Magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound-fusion biopsy significantly upgrades prostate cancer versus systematic 12-core transrectal ultrasound biopsy

European Urology

Volumn 64, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 713-719

  Siddiqui, M Minhaj ^a   Rais Bahrami, Soroush ^a   Truong, Hong ^a   Stamatakis, Lambros ^a   Vourganti, Srinivas ^a   Nix, Jeffrey ^a   Hoang, Anthony N ^a   Walton Diaz, Annerleim ^a   Shuch, Brian ^a   Weintraub, Michael ^a   Kruecker, Jochen ^b   Amalou, Hayet ^a   Turkbey, Baris ^a   Merino, Maria J ^a   Choyke, Peter L ^a   Wood, Bradford J ^a   Pinto, Peter A ^a  

^a NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b PHILIPS RESEARCH LABORATORIES   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Image guided biopsy; Magnetic resonance imaging; Prostate cancer; Prostatic neoplasms diagnosis; Prostatic neoplasms pathology; Prostatic neoplasms ultrasonography; Targeted biopsy

Indexed keywords

PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIGITAL RECTAL EXAMINATION; GLEASON SCORE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE GUIDED BIOPSY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE BIOPSY; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATE SIZE; PROSTATE VOLUME; PROSTATECTOMY; TRANSRECTAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

IMAGE-GUIDED BIOPSY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS/DIAGNOSIS; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS/PATHOLOGY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS/ULTRASONOGRAPHY; TARGETED BIOPSY;

AGED; BIOPSY, LARGE-CORE NEEDLE; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGE-GUIDED BIOPSY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, INTERVENTIONAL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIMODAL IMAGING; NEOPLASM GRADING; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROGNOSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL;

EID: 84885427550     PISSN: 03022838     EISSN: 18737560     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.05.059     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. E.T. Fernandes, C.P. Sundaram, R. Long, M. Soltani, and C.J. Ercole Biopsy Gleason score: how does it correlate with the final pathological diagnosis in prostate cancer? Br J Urol 79 1997 615 617
2. G.D. Carlson, C.B. Calvanese, H. Kahane, and J.I. Epstein Accuracy of biopsy Gleason scores from a large uropathology laboratory: use of a diagnostic protocol to minimize observer variability Urology 51 1998 525 529
3. F.K.-H. Chun, T. Steuber, and A. Erbersdobler Development and internal validation of a nomogram predicting the probability of prostate cancer Gleason sum upgrading between biopsy and radical prostatectomy pathology Eur Urol 49 2006 820 826
4. M.S. Cookson, N.E. Fleshner, S.M. Soloway, and W.R. Fair Correlation between Gleason score of needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimen: accuracy and clinical implications J Urol 157 1997 559 562
5. B. Turkbey, H. Mani, and V. Shah Multiparametric 3T prostate magnetic resonance imaging to detect cancer: histopathological correlation using prostatectomy specimens processed in customized magnetic resonance imaging based molds J Urol 186 2011 1818 1824
6. A.R. Rastinehad, A.A. Baccala, and P.H. Chung D'Amico risk stratification correlates with degree of suspicion of prostate cancer on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging J Urol 185 2011 815 820
7. C.M. Moore, N.L. Robertson, and N. Arsanious Image-guided prostate biopsy using magnetic resonance imaging-derived targets: a systematic review Eur Urol 63 2013 125 140
8. L. Marks, S. Young, and S. Natarajan MRI-ultrasound fusion for guidance of targeted prostate biopsy Curr Opin Urol 23 2013 43 50
9. B. Turkbey, H. Mani, and O. Aras Prostate cancer: can multi-parametric MRI identify prostate cancer patients who are candidates for active surveillance? Radiology 268 2013 144 152
10. S. Vourganti, A. Rastinehad, and N.K. Yerram Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound fusion biopsy detect prostate cancer in patients with prior negative transrectal ultrasound biopsies J Urol 188 2012 2152 2157
11. B. Turkbey, P.A. Pinto, and H. Mani Prostate cancer: value of multiparametric MR imaging at 3 T for detection - histopathologic correlation Radiology 255 2010 89 99
12. P.A. Pinto, P.H. Chung, A.R. Rastinehad, and Baccala Magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion guided prostate biopsy improves cancer detection following transrectal ultrasound biopsy and correlates with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging J Urol 186 2011 1281 1285
13. C.M. Moore, V. Kasivisvanathan, and S. Eggener Standards of reporting for MRI-targeted biopsy studies (START) of the prostate: recommendations from an International Working Group Eur Urol 64 2013 544 552
14. O.O. Ukimura, J.A.J. Coleman, and A.A. de la Taille Contemporary role of systematic prostate biopsies: indications, techniques, and implications for patient care Eur Urol 63 2013 214 230
15. T.T. Hambrock, C.C. Hoeks, and C.C.H.-V. de Kaa Prospective assessment of prostate cancer aggressiveness using 3-T diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging-guided biopsies versus a systematic 10-core transrectal ultrasound prostate biopsy cohort Eur Urol 61 2012 177 184
16. Sonn GA, Chang E, Natarajan S, et al. Value of targeted prostate biopsy using magnetic resonance-ultrasound fusion in men with prior negative biopsy and elevated prostate-specific antigen. Eur Urol. In press. http://dx.doi.org/10. 1016/j.eururo.2013.03.025