Open data in global environmental research: The Belmont Forum's open data survey

PLoS ONE

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2016, Pages

  Schmidt, Birgit ^a   Gemeinholzer, Birgit ^b   Treloar, Andrew ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

^b JUSTUS LIEBIG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^c Australian National Data Service (ANDS)   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EXPECTATION; HUMAN; PERCEPTION; COOPERATION; ENVIRONMENT; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; RESEARCH;

COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; ENVIRONMENT; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; RESEARCH;

EID: 84955513018     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146695     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Bryer J. Likert, an R package analyzing and visualizing Likert items. GitHub. 2013. Available: http://jason.bryer.org/likert/.
2. Schmidt B, Gemeinholzer B, Treloar A, Hodge J, Santanchè A, Oakley K. Belmont Forum Open Data Survey 2014. March 2015.
3. Tenopir C, Allard S, Douglass K, Aydinoglu AU, Wu L et al. Data sharing by scientists: practices and perceptions. PLoS ONE. 2011; 6: e21101.doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021101 PMID: 21738610
4. Peters DPC. Accessible ecology: synthesis of the long, deep, and broad. Trends Ecol Evol. 2010; 25(10): 592-601. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2010.07.005 PMID: 20728958
5. Marx V. Biology: the big challenges of big data. Nature. 2013; 498(7453): 255-260. doi: 10.1038/498255a PMID: 23765498
6. Specht A, Guru S, Houghton L, Keniger L, Driver P, Ritchie EG et al. Data management challenges in analysis and synthesis in the ecosystem sciences. Science of the Total Environment. 2015; 534:144-158. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.03.092 PMID: 25891686
7. Hsu L, Martin RL, McElroy B, Litwin-Miller K, Kim W. Data management, sharing, and reuse in experimental geomorphology: Challenges, strategies, and scientific opportunities. Geomorphology. 2015; 244:180-189. doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.03.039
8. Tenopir C, Dalton ED, Allard S, Frame M, Pjesivac I, Birch B, et al (2015) Changes in Data Sharing and Data Reuse Practices and Perceptions among Scientists Worldwide. PLoS ONE 10(8): e0134826. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134826 PMID: 26308551
9. Michener W, Vieglais D, Vision T, Kunze J, Cruse P, Janée G. DataONE: Data Observation Network for Earth-Preserving Data and Enabling Innovation in the Biological and Environmental Sciences. Trends Ecol Evol. 2011; 17.
10. Kratz JE, Strasser C. Researcher perspectives on publication and peer review of data. PLoS One. 2015; 10(2): e0117619. eCollection 2015. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117619 PMID: 25706992
11. The Expert Advisory Group on Data Access (EAGDA). Establishing incentives and changing cultures to support data access. Report, May 2014. Available: http://www.wellcome.ac.uk/About-us/Policy/Spotlight-issues/Data-sharing/EAGDA/WTP056496.htm.
12. Swan A, Brown S. To share or not to share: Publication and quality assurance of research data outputs. A report commissioned by the Research Information Network (RIN). 2008. Available: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/266742.
13. Akers K, Doty J. Disciplinary differences in faculty research data management practices and perspectives. International Journal of Digital Curation. 2013; 8(2): 5-26. doi: 10.2218/ijdc.v8i2.263
14. Nelson B. Empty Archives. Nature. 2009; 461:160-163. doi: 10.1038/461160a PMID: 19741679
15. Enke N, Thessen A, Bach K, Bendix J, Seeger B, Gemeinholzer B. The User's view on Biodiversity Data Sharing. Ecological Informatics. 2012; 11: 25-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2012.03.004
16. Hampton S, Strasser S, Tewksbury J, Gram W, Budden A, Batcheller A et al. Big data and the future of ecology. Frontiers in Ecololgy and the Environment. 2013; 11(3): 156-162. doi: 10.1890/120103
17. Molloy JC. Theopen knowledge foundation: open data means better science. PLoS Biol. 2011; 9: e1001195. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001195 PMID: 22162946
18. Parr CS, Cummings MP. Data sharing in ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol Evol. 2005; 20: 362-363. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2005.04.023 PMID: 16701396
19. Huang X, Qiao G. Biodiversity databases should gain support from journals. Trends Ecol Evol. 2011; 26: 377-378. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2011.05.006 PMID: 21665319
20. Whitlock MC. Data archiving in ecology and evolution: best practices. Trends Ecol Evol. 2011; 26: 61-65. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2010.11.006 PMID: 21159406
21. Piwowar HA, Vision TJ, Whitlock MC. Data archiving is a good investment. Nature. 2011; 473: 285. doi: 10.1038/473285a PMID: 21593852
22. Van Noorden R. Data-sharing: Everything on display. Nature. 2013; 500: 243-245. doi: 10.1038/nj7461-243a PMID: 23930278
23. Haff T, Roche D, Lanfear R, Binning S, Schwanz L, Cain K et al. Survey results for Roche et al. PLoS Biology Troubleshooting public data archiving: suggestions to increase participation. figshare. 2014.
24. Kratz J, Strasser C. Data publication consensus and controversies. Version 3. F1000Res. 23 April 2014 [revised 2014 Oct 16]; 3:94.
25. Global Earth Observation System of Systems (GEOSS). GEOSS Data Sharing Action Plan. 2010. Available: https://www.earthobservations.org/documents/geo-vii/07-GEOSS%20Data%20Sharing%20Action%20Plan%20Rev2.pdf.
26. Tennison J. Data Sharing is Not Open Data. 2014 March 17. Open Data Institute Blog Post. Available: https://theodi.org/blog/data-sharing-is-not-open-data.
27. Auer SR, Bizer C, Kobilarov G, Lehmann J, Cyganiak R, Ives Z. DBpedia: A Nucleus for a Web of Open Data. The Semantic Web. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. 2007; 4825: 722. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-76298-0-52
28. Wood, J. (ed.). Riding the wave: How Europe can gain from the rising tide of scientific data. Final report of the High Level Expert Group on Scientific Data. October 2010. Available: http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/ict/e-infrastructure/docs/hlg-sdi-report.pdf.
29. OECD. Principles and guidelines for access to research data from public funding. 2007. Available: http://www.oecd.org/sti/sci-tech/38500813.pdf.
30. Lee D, Cyganiak R, Decker S. Open Data Ireland: Open Data Publication Handbook. 2014. Available: http://per.gov.ie/wp-content/uploads/Open-Data-Publication-Handbook.pdf.
31. Lee D, Cyganiak R. Open Data Ireland: Best Practice Handbook. 2014. Available: http://per.gov.ie/wp-content/uploads/Best-Practice-Handbook.pdf.
32. Lee D, Cyganiak R, Decker S. Open Data Ireland: Open DataRoadmap. 2014. Available: http://per.gov.ie/wp-content/uploads/Roadmap.pdf.
33. Costello MJ. Motivating Online Publication of Data BioScience, 2009; 59(5): 418-427.
34. Kuipers T, van der Hoeven, J. Insight into digital preservation of research output in Europe. PARSE. Insight Survey Report. 2009. Available: http://www.parse-insight.eu/downloads/PARSE-Insight-D3-4-SurveyReport-final-hq.pdf.
35. Piwowar HA, Vision TJ (2013) Data reuse and the open data citation advantage. Peer J. 2013; 1: e175. doi: 10.7717/peerj.175 PMID: 24109559
36. Bolukbasi B, Berente N, Cutcher-Gershenfeld J, Dechurch L, Flint C, Haberman M et al. Open Data: Crediting a Culture of Cooperation. Science. 2013; 342(6162): 1041-4042. doi: 10.1126/science.342.6162.1041-b PMID: 24288316
37. Feijen M, Horstmann W, Manghi P, Robinson M, Russell R. DRIVER: Building the Network for Accessing Digital Repositories across Europe. Ariadne. 2007;(53:).
38. Cragin MH, Palmer CL, Carlson JR, Witt M. Data sharing, small science and institutional repositories. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A-Mathematical Physical and engineering Sciences. 2010; 368 (1926). doi: 10.1098/rsta.2010.0165
39. Fecher B, Friesike S, Hebing M. What Drives Academic Data Sharing? PLoS ONE. 2015: e0118053. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118053 PMID: 25714752
40. European Commission. Scientific data: open access to research results will boost Europe's innovation capacity. Press release. 2012. Available: http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release-IP-12-790-en.htm.
41. Research Information Network and the British Library. Patterns of information use and exchange: case studies of researchers in the life sciences. A report by the Research Information Network and the British Library. November 2009. Available: http://www.rin.ac.uk/system/files/attachments/Patterns-information-use-REPORT-Nov09.pdf.
42. Duke CS, Porter JH. The Ethics of Data Sharing and Reusein Biology. BioScience. 2013; 63: 483-489. doi: 10.1525/bio.2013.63.6.10
43. Crane D. Social structure in a group of scientists: a test of the "invisible college" hypothesis, American Sociological Review. 1969; 34(3): 335-352. doi: 10.2307/2092499
44. Stern S. Do scientists pay to be scientists? Management Science. 2004; 50(6): 835-853. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1040.0241
45. Hertzfeld HR, Link AN, Vonortas NS. Intellectual property protection mechanisms in research partnerships. Research Policy. 2006; 35(6): 825-838. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2006.04.006
46. Luna-Reyes LF, Black LJ, Cresswell AM, Pardo TA. Knowledge sharing and trust in collaborative requirements analysis. System Dynamics Review. 2008; 24(3): 265-297. doi: 10.1002/sdr.404
47. Lam A. What motivates academic scientists to engage in research commercialization: 'gold', 'ribbon' or 'puzzle'? Research Policy. 2011; 40(10): 1354-1368. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2011.09.002
48. Perkmann M, Tartari V, McKelvey M, Autio E, Broström A, D'Este P et al. Academic engagement and commercialisation: a review of the literature on university-industry relations. Research Policy. 2013; 42(2): 423-442. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2012.09.007
49. Borgman CL. The Conundrum of Sharing Research data. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2011; 63(6): 1059-1078. doi: 10.1002/asi.22634
50. Candela L, Castelli D, Coro G, Lelii L, Mangiacrapa F, Marioli V et al. An infrastructure-oriented approach for supporting biodiversity research. Ecological Informatics. 2015; 26(2): 162-172. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2014.07.006
51. Diekema A, Wesolek A, Walters CD. The NSF/NIH Effect: Surveying the Effect of Data Management Requirements on Faculty, Sponsored Programs, and Institutional Repositories, Journal of Academic Librarianship. 2014; 40(3-4): 322-331. doi: 10.1016/j.acalib.2014.04.010
52. Henty M, Weaver B, Bradbury S, Porter S. Investigating Data Management Practices in Australian Universities. Australian Partnership for Sustainable Repositories (APSR). Report. July 2008. Available: http://apsr.anu.edu.au/orca/investigating-data-management.pdf.
53. Lyon E. 2007. Dealing with relationships with data: roles, rights and responsibilities. Report UKOLN, University of Bath. 2007. Available: http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/programmes/digitalrepositories/dealing-with-data-report.final.pdf.
54. Canhos VP, de Souza S, De Giovanni R, Lange Canhos DA. Global Biodiversity Informatics: setting the scene for a "new world" of ecological forecasting. Biodiversity Informatics. 2004; 1:1-13. doi: 10.17161/bi.v1i0.3
55. Klump J. Criteria for the evaluation and certification of long-term digital archives in the earth sciences, EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts. 2010: 4923.
56. Bendix J, Nieschulze J, Michener WK. Data platforms in integrative biodiversity research. Ecological Informatics. 2012; 11:1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2012.04.001
57. Bach K, Schäfer D, Enke N, Seeger B, Gemeinholzer B, Bendix J. A comparative evaluation on technical solutions of long-term data repositories in integrative biodiversity research. Ecological Informatics. 2012; 11:16-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2011.11.008