The user's view on biodiversity data sharing - Investigating facts of acceptance and requirements to realize a sustainable use of research data -

Ecological Informatics

Volumn 11, Issue , 2012, Pages 25-33

  Enke, Neela ^a   Thessen, Anne ^b   Bach, Kerstin ^c   Bendix, Jörg ^c   Seeger, Bernhard ^c   Gemeinholzer, Birgit ^d  

^a FREIE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

^b MARINE BIOLOGICAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^c PHILIPPS UNIVERSITY MARBURG   (Germany)

^d JUSTUS LIEBIG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Biodiversity; Database; Long term data storage; Online survey; Primary data; User requirements

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; DATA MANAGEMENT; DATABASE; INTERNET; RESEARCH WORK; SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY; SUSTAINABILITY;

EID: 84865161700     PISSN: 15749541     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2012.03.004     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Arzberger P., Schroeder P., Beaulieu A., Bowker G., Casey K., Laaksonen L., Moorman D., Uhlir P., Wouters P. Promoting Access to Public Research Data for Scientific. Economic, and Social Development Data Science Journal 2004, 3:135-152.
2. Bach, K., Schäfer, D., Enke, N., Seeger, B., Gemeinholzer, B., Bendix, J., in press. A comparative evaluation on technical solutions of long-term data repositories for integrative biodiversity research. Ecological Informatics.
3. Bastow R., Leonelli S. Sustainable digital infrastructure. EMBO Reports 2010, 11:730-734.
4. Bertzky M., Stoll-Kleemann Multilevel discrepancies with sharing data on protected areas: what we have and what we need for the global village. Journal of Environmental Management 2009, 90:8-24.
5. Constable H., Guralnick R., Wieczorek J., Spencer C., Peterson A.T. VertNet: a new model for biodiversity data sharing. PLoS Biology 2010, 8(2):e1000309. 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000309.
6. Cook C., Heath F., Thompson R.L. A meta-analysis of response rates in web- or Internet based surveys. Educational and Psychological Measurement 2000, 60:821-836.
7. Costello M.J. Motivating online publication of data. BioScience 2009, 59:418-427.
8. Deutskens E., De Ruyter K., Wetzels M., Oosterveld P. Response rate and response quality of Internet based surveys: an experimental study. Marketing Letters 2004, 15:21-36.
9. Sharing Research Data 1985, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C. S.E. Fienberg, M.E. Martin, M.L. Straf (Eds.).
10. Frenzel M., Klotz S., Hardisty A., Banki O. LifeWatch - a European e-Science and observatory infrastructure supporting access and use of biodiversity and ecosystem data. Nature Preceedings 2011, 10.1038/npre.2011.5843.1.
11. Froese R., Lloris D., Opitz S. Scientific data in the public domain - the need to make scientific data publically available concerns and possible solutions. ACP-EU Fisheries Research Report 2004, 14:267-271.
12. Guralnick R.P., Hill A.W., Lane M. Towards a collaborative, global infrastructure for biodiversity assessment. Ecology Letters 2007, 10:663-672.
13. Janssen T., Schmidt M., Dressler S., Hahn K., Hien M., Lykke A.M., Mahamane A., Sambou B., Sinsin B., Thiombiano A., Wittig R., Zizka G. Addressing data property rights concerns and providing incentives for collaborative data pooling: the West African Vegetation Database approach. Journal of Vegetation Science 2011, 22(4):614-620.
14. Kottmann R., Gray T., Murphy S., Kagan L., Kravitz S., Lombardot T., Field D., Glöckner F.O., Consortium tGS A standard MIGS/MIMS compliant XML schema: toward the development of the Genomic Contextual Data Markup Language (GDML). Omics 2008, 12:115-121.
15. National Research Council A Question of Balance: Private Rights and the Public Interest in Scientific and Technical Databases 1999, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
16. Piwowar H., Day R.S., Fridsma D.B. Sharing detailed research data is associated with increases citation rate. PLoS One 2007, 2(3):e308. 10.1371/journal.pone.0000308.
17. Pullin A.S., Salafsky N. Save the whales? Save the rainforest? Save the data!. Conservation Biology 2010, 24:915-917.
18. Ruusalepp R. Infrastructure planning and data curation: a comparative study of international approaches to enabling the sharing of research data 2008, JISC.
19. Savage C.J., Vickers A.J. Empirical study of data-sharing by authors publishing in PLoS journals. PLoS One 2009, 4:e7078.
20. Schaminée J.H.J., Hennekens S.M., Ozinga W.A. Use of the ecological information system SynBioSys for the analysis of large datasets. Journal of Vegetation Science 2007, 18:463-470.
21. Scholes R.J., Mace G.M., Turner W., Geller G.N., Jürgens N., Lariauderie A., Muchoney D., Walther B.A., Mooney H.A. Toward a global biodiversity observing system. Science 2008, 321:1044-1045.
22. Stafford R., Hart A.G., Collins L., Kirkhope C.L., Williams R.L., Rees S.G., Lloyd J.R., Goodenough A.E. EU-Social Science: the role of internet social networks in the collection of bee biodiversity data. PLoS One 2010, 5:e14381. 10.1371/journal.pone.0014381.
23. Tenopir C., Allard S., Douglass K., Aydinoglu A.U., Wu L., Read E., Manoff M., Frame M. Data sharing by scientists: practices and perceptions. PLoS One 2011, 6:e211s01.
24. Van House N.A. Digital libraries and collaborative knowledge construction. Digital Library Use: Social Practice in Design and Evaluation 2002, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. A.P. Bishop, B. Buttenfield, N.A. Van House (Eds.).
25. Van House A.N. Biodiversity Data Perversity: understanding barriers to sharing data across epistemic communities. Presentation at the Annual Meeting of the Society for Social Studies of Science (4S), Atlanta, GA, Oct. 16, 2003 2003.