The NSF/NIH Effect: Surveying the Effect of Data Management Requirements on Faculty, Sponsored Programs, and Institutional Repositories

Journal of Academic Librarianship

Volumn 40, Issue 3-4, 2014, Pages 322-331

  Diekema, Anne R ^a   Wesolek, Andrew ^a   Walters, Cheryl D ^a  

^a UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Data management; Data sets; Institutional repositories; Scholarly communication

Indexed keywords

EID: 84905108854     PISSN: 00991333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2014.04.010     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Alvaro E., Brooks H., Ham M., Poegel S., Rosencrans S. E-science librarianship: Field undefined. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship 2011, 66:28-43. (Available online: http://www.istl.org/11-summer/article1.html).
2. Association of American Universities, Association of Public Land-grant Universities, Association of Research Libraries SHared Access Research Ecosystem (SHARE) 2013, (Draft, June 7, 2013), (Available online: http://www.arl.org/storage/documents/publications/share-proposal-07june13.pdf).
3. Babbie E.R. Survey research methods 1973, Wadsworth Pub. Co., Belmont, Calif.
4. Campbell E.G., Weissman J.S., Causino N., Blumenthal D. Data withholding in academic medicine: Characteristics of faculty denied access to research results and biomaterials. Research Policy 2000, 29(2):303-312. (Available online: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733399000682).
5. Carlson J., Ramsey A.E., Kotterman J.D. Using an institutional repository to address local-scale needs: A case study at Purdue university. Library Hi Tech 2010, 28(1):152-173. (Available online: http://www.emeraldinsight.com/journals.htm?articleid=1846230&show=abstract).
6. Connell T.H. The use of institutional repositories: The Ohio State University experience. College & Research Libraries 2011, 72:253-274. (Case Study).
7. Delserone L.M. At the watershed: Preparing for research data management and stewardship at the university of Minnesota libraries. Library Trends 2008, 57(2):202-210. (Available online: https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/bitstream/handle/2142/10670/delserone.pdf?sequence=2).
8. Dietrich D., Adamus T., Miner A., Steinhart G. De-mystifying the data management requirements of research funders. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship 2012, 70. (Available online: http://www.istl.org/12-summer/refereed1.html).
9. Evans J.A. Industry collaboration, scientific sharing, and the dissemination of knowledge. Social Studies of Science 2010, 40(5):757-791. (Available online: http://sss.sagepub.com/content/40/5/757.full.pdf+html).
10. Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act of 2013 Fair access to Science and Technology Research Act of 2013. H.R. 708 and S. 350, 113th Cong. 2013, (Available online: http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c113:H.R.708:.).
11. Fischer E.A. Public access to data from federally funded research: Provisions in OMB circular a-110. Congressional Research Service 2013, Library of Congress, Washington, DC, (Available online: https://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/secrecy/R42983.pdf).
12. Gold, A. (2007a). Cyberinfrastructure, data, and libraries, Part 1: A cyberinfrastructure primer for librarians. D-Lib Magazine, 13(9/10). Available online:. http://www.dlib.org/dlib/september07/gold/09gold-pt1.html.
13. Gold, A. (2007b). Cyberinfrastructure, data, and libraries, Part 2: Libraries and the data challenge: Roles and actions for libraries. D-Lib Magazine, 13(9/10). Available online:. http://www.dlib.org/dlib/september07/gold/09gold-pt2.html.
14. Gore S.A. E-science and data management resources on the web. Medical Reference Services Quarterly 2011, 30(2):167-177. (Available online: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21534116).
15. Hajjem C., Harnad S., Gingras Y. Ten year cross-disciplinary comparison of the growth of open access and how it increases research citation impact. IEEE Data Engineering Bulletin 2005, 28(4):39-47.
16. Hey T., Hey J. E-science and its implications for the library community. Library Hi Tech 2006, 24(4):515-528. (Available online: http://www.emeraldinsight.com/journals.htm?articleid=1583887).
17. Hswe P., Holt A. Joining in the enterprise of response in the wake of the NSF data management planning requirement. Research Library Issues 2011, 274:12-17. (Available online: http://publications.arl.org/rli274/12).
18. Jones E. E-science talking points for ARL deans and directors 2008, Association of Research Libraries, Washington, DC, (Available online: http://www.arl.org/storage/documents/publications/e-science-talking-points.pdf).
19. Kurtz M.J., Eichhorn G., Accomazzi A., Grant C., Demleitner M., Henneken E., et al. The effect of use and access on citations. Information Processing & Management 2005, 41(6):1395-1402.
20. Liotta L.A., Lowenthal M., Mehta A., Conrads T.P., Veenstra T.D., Fishman D.A., et al. Importance of communication between producers and consumers of publicly available experimental data. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2005, 97(4):310-314. (Available online: http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/content/97/4/310.abstract).
21. Luce R.E. Grand challenges and new roles for the twenty-first-century research library in an era of e-science. The data deluge: Can libraries cope with e-science? 2012, 3-15. Libraries Unlimited, Santa Barbara, Calif. D.B. Marcum, G. George (Eds.).
22. Macdonald S., Martinez-Uribe L. User engagement in research data curation. Research and advanced technology for digital libraries 2009, 309-314. Springer, New York, (Available online: http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-642-04346-8_30). M. Agosti, J. Borbinha, S. Kapidakis, C. Papatheodorou, G. Tsakonas (Eds.).
23. Macdonald S., Martinez-Uribe L. Collaboration to data curation: Harnessing institutional expertise. New Review of Academic Librarianship 2010, 16(S1). (Available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13614533.2010.505823#.Ugqv6mRFxJE).
24. The data deluge: Can libraries cope with e-science? 2012, Santa Barbara, Calif, Libraries Unlimited. D.B. Marcum, G. George (Eds.).
25. Mullins J.L. Bringing librarianship to e-science. College & Research Libraries 2009, 70(3):212-213. (Available online: http://crl.acrl.org/content/70/3/212.full.pdf+html).
26. National Science Foundation Changing the conduct of science in the information age: Summary report of workshop held on November 12, 2010 National Science Foundation 2011, National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA, (Available online: http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2011/oise11003/oise11003.pdf).
27. Newton M.P., Miller C.C., Bracke M.S. Librarian roles in institutional repository data set collecting: Outcomes of a research library task force. Collection Management 2010, 36(1):53-67. (Available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01462679.2011.530546#.Ugq2R2RFxJE).
28. Pritchard P.A. The embedded science librarian: Partner in curriculum design and delivery. Journal of Library Administration 2010, 50(4):373-396. 10.1080/01930821003667054.
29. Qin J., D'Ignazio J. The central role of metadata in a science data literacy course. Journal of Library Metadata 2010, 10(2/3):188-204. (Available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/19386389.2010.506379#.Ugq3e2RFxJE).
30. Ramírez M.L. Whose role is it anyway?: A library practitioner's appraisal of the digital data deluge. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science 2011, 37(5):21-23. (Available online: http://works.bepress.com/marisa_ramirez/20/).
31. Ratner H. Understanding CHORUS 2013, (Available online : http://chorusaccess.org/understanding-chorus-fact-sheet/).
32. Soehner C., Steeves C., Ward J. E-science and data support services: A study of ARL member institutions 2010, Association of Research Libraries, Washington, D.C., (Retrieved from http://www.arl.org/storage/documents/publications/escience-report-2010.pdf).
33. Steinhart G. DataStaR: A data staging repository to support sharing and publication of research data. Paper presented at the International Association of Scientific and Technological University Libraries, 31st annual conference 2010, (Available online: http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1012&context=iatul2010).
34. United States.Executive Office of the President.Office of Science and Technology Policy Memorandum for the heads of executive departments and agencies: Increasing access to the results of federally funded scientific research 2013, (Available online: http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/ostp_public_access_memo_2013.pdf).
35. Witt M. Co-designing, co-developing, and co-implementing an institutional data repository service. Journal of Library Administration 2012, 52(2):172-188. (Available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01930826.2012.655607#.UgrGDBaRP8s).