Changes in data sharing and data reuse practices and perceptions among scientists worldwide

PLoS ONE

Volumn 10, Issue 8, 2015, Pages

  Tenopir, Carol ^a   Dalton, Elizabeth D ^a   Allard, Suzie ^a   Frame, Mike ^b   Pjesivac, Ivanka ^c   Birch, Ben ^a   Pollock, Danielle ^a   Dorsett, Kristina ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

^b U S GEOLOGICAL SURVEY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; CLINICAL DATA REPOSITORY; CULTURAL FACTOR; DATA PROCESSING; DATA REUSE; DATA SHARING; FUNDING; GEOGRAPHIC ORIGIN; GROUPS BY AGE; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; INFORMATION SEEKING; INFORMATION STORAGE; INFORMATION SYSTEM; MIDDLE AGED; PUBLISHING; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; SCIENTIST; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; PERCEPTION; QUESTIONNAIRE; RESEARCH;

INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INTERNATIONALITY; PERCEPTION; RESEARCH; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 84943339182     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134826     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Mauthner NS, Parry O. Open access digital data sharing: Principles, policies and practices. Social Epistemology. 2013 Jan; 27(1):47-67. doi: 10.1080/02691728.2012.760663
2. Campbell P. Editorial on special issue on big data: community cleverness required. Nature. 2008; 455: 1. doi: 10.1038/455001a PMID: 18769385
3. Campbell P. Data's shameful neglect. Nature. 2009; 461: 145. doi: 10.1038/461145a
4. Kum H, Ahalt S, Carsey TM. Dealing with data: government records. Science. 2011; 332: 1263. doi: 10.1126/science.332.6035.1263-a PMID: 21659589
5. Cukier K. Data, Data Everywhere. The Economist. 25 February 2010. Available: http://www.economist.com/node/15557443
6. Borgman CL. The conundrum of sharing research data. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology. 2012 Jun; 63(6):1059-78. doi: 10.1002/asi.22634
7. Puniewska M. Scientists Have a Sharing Problem. The Atlantic. 15 December 2014. Available: http://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2014/12/scientists-have-a-sharing-problem/383061/. Accessed 2015 Feb 3.
8. Hey T, Tansley S, Tolle K. The fourth paradigm: Data-intensive scientific discovery. Microsoft Research; 2009.
9. DataONE. What is DataONE? Available: https://www.dataone.org/what-dataone
10. DataONE. Usability & Assessment Working Group Charter. 2011. Available: https://www.dataone.org/sites/all/documents/U&A-Charter.pdf
11. Tenopir C, Allard S, Douglass K, Aydinoglu A, Wu L, Read E, et al. Data sharing by scientists: Practices and perceptions. PLOS ONE. 2011; 6: e21101. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021101 PMID: 21738610
12. Grant Proposal Guide. National Science Foundation. 2011. Available: http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/policydocs/pappguide/nsf11001/gpg-2.jsp
13. Holdren J. Increasing access to the results of federally funded scientific research. Office of Science and Technology Policy. 22 February 2013. Available: http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/ostp-public-access-memo-2013.pdf
14. Faniel IM, Zimmerman A. Beyond the data deluge: a research agenda for large-scale data sharing and reuse. International Journal of Digital Curation. 2011; 6: 58-69. doi: 10.2218/ijdc.v6i1.172
15. Kim Y, Stanton JM. Institutional and individual influences on scientists' data sharing practices. Journal of Computational Science Education. 2013; 3: 47-56.
16. Dallmeier-Tiessen S, Darby R, Gitmans K, Lambert S, Matthews B, Mele S, et al. Enabling sharing and reuse of scientific data. New Review of Information Networking. 2014 Jan 2; 19(1):16-43. doi: 10.1080/13614576.2014.883936
17. Wallis JC, Rolando E, Borgman CL. If we share data, will anyone use them? Data sharing and reuse in the long tail of science and technology. PLOS ONE. 2013 Jul; 8(7):1-17. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067332
18. Carlson J, Stowell-Bracke M. Data management and sharing from the perspective of graduate students: An examination of culture and practice at the Water Quality Field Station. Libraries and the Academy. 2013; 13: 343-361. doi: 10.1353/pla.2013.0034
19. Rodriguez V. Access to data and material for research: putting empirical evidence into perspective. New Genetics and Society. 2009 Feb 19; 28(1):67-86. doi: 10.1080/14636770802670274
20. Pjesivac I, Dalton ED, Tenopir C. The effects of attitude toward access to data, perceived risk, and funding sources on data sharing practices. Poster presented at the 65th Annual International Communication Association Conference; San Juan, Puerto Rico; 2015 May 21-25.
21. Sayogo DS, Pardo TA. Exploring the determinants of scientific data sharing: Understanding the motivation to publish research data. Government Information Quarterly. 2013 Jan 2; 30(1):S19-31. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2012.06.011
22. Gorgolewski KJ, Margulies DS, Milham MP. Making data sharing count: A publication-based solution. Frontiers in Neuroscience. 2013; 7(9):1-7. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2013.00009
23. Haendel MA, Wasilevsky NA, Wirz JA. Dealing with data: A case study on information and data management literacy. PLOS Biology. 2012; 10. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001339
24. Volk C, Lucero Y, Barnas K. Why is data sharing in collaborative natural resource efforts so hard and what can we do to improve it? Environmental Management. 2014 May 1; 53(5):883-93. doi: 10.1007/s00267-014-0258-2 PMID: 24604667
25. Parsons MA, Godoy O, LeDrew E, de Bruin TF, Danis B, Tomlinson S, et al. A conceptual framework for managing very diverse data for complex, interdisciplinary science. Journal of Information Science. 2011; 37: 555-569. doi: 10.1177/0165551511412705
26. Pampel H, Vierkant P, Scholze F, Bertelmann R, Kindling M, Klump J, et al. Making research data repositories visible: The re3data.org registry. PLOS ONE. 2013; 8. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078080
27. re3data.org. Over 1,000 research data repositories indexed in re3data.org. 20 November 2014. Available: http://www.re3data.org/2014/11/over-1000-research-data-repositories-indexed-in-re3data-org/
28. Reichman OJ, Jones MB, Schildhauer MP. Challenges and opportunities of open data in ecology. Science. 2011; 331. doi: 10.1126/science.1197962
29. RCUK policy on open access and supporting guidance. Research Councils U.K. 8 April 2013. Available:: //www.rcuk.ac.uk/RCUK-prod/assets/documents/documents/RCUKOpenAccessPolicy.pdf
30. ARC open access policy, version 2013.1. Australian Research Council. 1 January 2013. Available: http://www.arc.gov.au/pdf/Open-Access/ARC%20Open%20Access%20Policy-Version%202013.1.pdf
31. Commission Recommendation of 17.7.2012 on access to and preservation of scientific information (C (2012) 4890 final). European Commission. Brussels. 17 July 2012. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document-library/pdf-06/recommendation-access-and-preservationscientific-information-en.pdf
32. Parsons MA. Data policy. Data Science Journal. 2013; 12: GRDI43-GRDI50. doi: 10.2481/dsj.GRDI-008
33. Science as an open enterprise: final report. The Royal Society. 2012. Available: https://royalsociety.org/~/media/policy/projects/sape/2012-06-20-saoe.pdf
34. Destro Bisol G, Anagnostou P, Capocasa M, Bencivelli S, Cerroni A, Contreras J, et al. Perspectives on open science and scientific data sharing: an interdisciplinary workshop. Journal of Anthropological Sciences. 2014; 92: 179-200. doi: 10.4436/jass.92006 PMID: 25020017
35. Eschenfelder KR, Johnson A. Managing the data commons: controlled sharing of scholarly data. J Assn Inf Sci Tec. 2014 Sep 1; 65(9):1757-74. doi: 10.1002/asi.23086
36. Kooij DT, De Lange AH, Jansen PG, Kanfer R, Dikkers JS. Age and work-related motives: results of a meta-analysis. Journal of Organizational Behaviour. 2011; 32: 197-225. doi: 10.1002/job.665
37. Waterman AS. The psychology of individualism [Internet]. New York: Praeger; 1984 [cited 2015 Jan 24]. Available from: http://scholar.google.com.proxy.lib.utk.edu:90/scholar?cites=10823364152872701234&as-sdt=5,43&sciodt=0,43&hl=en
38. Hofstede G. Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values [Internet]. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage; 1980 [cited 2015 Jan 24]. Available from: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract-id=1496209
39. Hui CH. Measurement of individualism-collectivism. Journal of Research in Personality. 1988 Mar; 22 (1):17-36. doi: 10.1016/0092-6566(88)90022-0
40. Millar MM, Dillman DA. Improving response to web and mixed-mode surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly. 2011; nfr003: 1-21. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfr003