Inquiry-based learning and the flipped classroom model

PRIMUS

Volumn 25, Issue 8, 2015, Pages 745-762

  Love, Betty ^a   Hodge, Angie ^a   Corritore, Cynthia ^a,b   Ernst, Dana C ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA AT OMAHA   (United States)

^b CREIGHTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Active learning; Computer programming; Flipped classroom; Flipped learning; IBL; Inquiry based learning; Linear algebra

Indexed keywords

EID: 84955490756     PISSN: 10511970     EISSN: 19354053     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10511970.2015.1046005     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Bloom, B. S., M. D. Engelhard, E. J. Furst, W. H. Hill, and D. R. Krathwohl. 1956. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. New York: Longmans, Green & Co.
2. Chalice, D. 1995. How to teach a class by the modified Moore method, American Mathematics Monthly. 104(4): 317-321.
3. Crouch, C. H., J. Watkins, A. P. Fagen, and E. Mazur. 2007. Peer Instruction Engaging Students one-on-one, all at once. Physics. 9(9): 1-55.
4. Eckerdal, A. 2009. Novice Programming Students' Learning of Concepts and Practise. Ph. D. thesis, Upsalla, Sweden, Upsalla University.
5. Flipped Learning Network. Definition of Flipped Learning. http: // flippedlearning. org/domain/46. Accessed 3 August 2015.
6. Foertsch, J., G. Moses, J. Strikwerda, and M. Litzkow. 2002. Reversing the Lecture homework paradigm using eTEACH web-based streaming video software. Journal of Engineering Education. 91(3): 267-274.
7. Gannod, G. C., J. E. Burge, and M. T. Helmick. 2008. Using the Inverted classroom to teach software engineering. In Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE 30th International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 777-786.
8. Goodell, J. 2000. Learning to teach mathematics for understanding: The role of reflection. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development. 2.
9. Goos, M. 2005. A sociocultural analysis of the development of pre-service and beginning teachers' pedagogical identities as users of technology. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education. 8(1): 35-59.
10. Hadjerrouit, S. 2008. Towards a blended learning model for teaching and learning computer programming: A case study. Informatics in Education. 7(2): 181-210.
11. Hanks, B., S. Fitzgerald, R. McCauley, L. Murphy, and C. Zander. 2011. Pair programming in education: a literature review. Computer Science Education. 21(2): 135-173.
12. Hodge, A., B. Love, N. Grandgenett, and A. W. Swifts. 2014. A flipped classroom approach: Benefits and challenges of flipping the learning of procedural knowledge. In P. R. Lowenthal, C. S. Yorkhand, and L. C. Richardson, (eds), Online Learning: Common Misconceotions, Benefits and Challenges. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers, pp. 49-60.
13. Johnson, L., and J. Renner. 2012. Effect of the flipped classroom model on secondary computer applications course: Student and teacher perceptions, questions and student achievement. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Louisville, KY, University of Louisville.
14. Lage, M., G. Piatt, and M. Treglia. 2000. Inverting the classroom: A gateway of creating an inclusive leafhing environment. The Journal of Economic Education 31(1): 30-43.
15. Laursen, S. L., M. Hassi, M. Kogan, A. Hunter, and T. Weston. 2011. Evaluation of the IBL mathematics project: Student and instructor outcomes of inquiry-based learning in college mathematics, Assessment & Evaluation Center for Inquiry-Based Learning in Mathematics, University of Colorado, Ethnography & Evaluation Research.
16. Love, B., A. Hodge, N. Grandgenett, and A. W. Swift. 2014. Student learning and perceptions in a flipped linear algebra course. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. 45(3): 317-324.
17. Mahavier, W. 1999. What is the Moore method?. PRIMUS. 9: 339-254.
18. Marshall, H. W., and A. DeCapu. 2013. Making the Transition to Classroom Success: Culturally Responsive Teaching for Struggling Language Learner. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
19. Novak, G. M., A. Gavrin, W. Christian, and E. Patterson. 1999. Just-in-Time Teaching: Blending Active Learning with Web Technology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
20. Pacheco, A., A. Gomes, J. Henriques, A. de Almeida, and A. Mendes. 2008. Mathematics and Programming: Some Studies. In Proceedings of the Internation Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies.
21. Papadopoulos, C., A. S. Roman. 2010. Implementing and inverted class room model in engineering statics: Initial results. In Proceedings of the 40th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference.
22. Poll Anywhere, http: //pollanywhere. com. Accessed 3 August 2015.
23. Porter, A. CMSC 436: Programming handheld systems. Accessed 24 December 2014.
24. Reichheld, F. 2003. The one number you need to grow. Harvard Business Review. 8(12): 46-55.
25. Robins, A., J. Rountree, and N. Rountree. 2003. Learning and teaching programming: A review and discussion. Computer Science Education. 13(2): 137-172.
26. Sams, A., and J. Bergmann. 2012. Flip Your Classroom: Reach Every Student in Every Class Every Day. Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education.
27. Schneiderman, B. 1998. Relate-create-donate: A teaching learning philosophy for the Cyber-Generation, Computers & Education. 31(1): 25-39.
28. Warter-Perez, N., and J. Dong. 2102. Flipping the classroom: How to embed inquiry and design projects into a digital engineering lecture. In Proceedings of the 2012 ASEE PSW Section Conference.
29. Xu, S., and V. Rajlich. 2004. Cognitive processes during debugging. In Proceedings of the Third IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Informatics.