A flipped classroom approach: Benefits and challenges of flipping the learning of procedural knowledge

Online Learning: Common Misconceptions, Benefits and Challenges

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 49-59

  Hodge, Angie ^a   Love, Betty ^a   Grandgenett, Neal ^a   Swift, Andrew ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA AT OMAHA   (United States)

Author keywords

Flipped classroom; Inquiry based learning; Mathematics; Online learning

Indexed keywords

EID: 84954482006     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (13)

1. Andersen, M. (2006). Back to the board. Innovation Abstracts, 28(19). Retrieved from http://www.teachingcollegemath.com/files/pdf/back_to_the_board.pdf
2. Augustine, N. R., Barrett, C., Cassell, G., Grasmick, N., Holliday, C., Hackson, S., & Zare, R. (2010). Rising above the gathering storm, revisited: Rapidly approaching category 5. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine.
3. Bates, S., & Galloway, R. (2012). The inverted classroom in a large enrollment introductory physics course: A case study. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on the Aiming for Excellence in STEM Learning and Teaching. Retrieved from http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/assets/documents/stem-conference/PhysicalSciences/ Simon_Bates_Ross_Galloway.pdf
4. Deslauriers, L, Schelew, E., & Wieman, C. (2011). Improved learning in a large-enrollment physics class. Science, 332, 862-864. doi: 10.1126/science.1201783
5. Fairweather, J. (2010). Linking evidence and promising practices in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) undergraduate education: A status report for The National Academies National Research Council Board of Science Education. Retrieved from https://www.nsf.gov/attachments/117803/public/Xc--Linking_Evidence-- Fairweather.pdf
6. Gannod, G., Burge, J., & Helmick, M. (2008, May). Using the inverted classroom to teach software engineering. ICSE '08: Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Software Engineering, Leipzig, Germany.
7. Lage, M., Platt, G., & Treglia, M. (2000). Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment. The Journal of Economic Education, 31(1), 30-43.
8. Laursen, S., Hassi, M. M. L., Kogan, M., Hunter, A. B., & Weston, T. (2011). Evaluation of the IBL Mathematics Project: Student and instructor outcomes of inquiry-based learning in college mathematics. Retrieved from http://www.colorado.edu/eer/research/ documents/IBLmathReportALL_050211.pdf
9. Martin, D. B., Gholson, M. L., & Leonard, J. (2010). Mathematics as gatekeeper: Power and privilege in the production of knowledge. Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 3(2), 12-24.
10. Moravec, M., Williams, A., Aguilar-Roca, N., & O'Dowd, D. (2010). Learn before lecture: A strategy that improves learning outcomes in a large introductory biology class. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 9, 473-481.
11. Nelson Laird, T. F., Sullivan, D. F., Zimmerman, C., & McCormick, A. C. (2011). STEM/non-STEM differences in engagement at US institutions. Peer Review, 13(3), 23- 26.
12. Rundell-Singer, S. (2011). STEM education: Time for integration. (2011). Peer Review, 13(3), 4-7.
13. Sams, A., & Bergmann, J. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. Washington, D.C.: International Society for Technology in Education.