An algorithm to detect and communicate the differences in computational models describing biological systems

Bioinformatics

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 563-570

  Scharm, Martin ^a   Wolkenhauer, Olaf ^a,b   Waltemath, Dagmar ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROSTOCK   (Germany)

^b STELLENBOSCH UNIVERSITY   (South Africa)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FACTUAL DATABASE; HUMAN; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY; WORKFLOW;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATABASES, FACTUAL; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY; WORKFLOW;

EID: 84955474528     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv484     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Casadevall, A. and Fang, F. C. (2010) Reproducible science. Infect. Immun., 78, 4972-4975.
2. Cobena, G. et al. (2002) Detecting changes in xml documents. In: Agrawal, R. et al. (eds), Proceedings 18th International Conference on Data Engineering, IEEE, San Jose, CA, pp. 41-52.
3. Cooper, J. et al. (2011) High-throughput functional curation of cellular electrophysiology models. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol., 107, 11-20.
4. Cuellar, A. A. et al. (2003) An overview of CellML 1. 1, a biological model description language. Simulation, 79, 740-747.
5. Davidson, S. B. and Freire, J. (2008) Provenance and scientific workflows: challenges and opportunities. In: Proceedings of the 2008 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, SIGMOD '08, ACM, New York, pp. 1345-1350, http://doi. acm. org/10. 1145/1376616. 1376772.
6. Gennari, J. H. et al. (2008) Integration of multi-scale biosimulation models via light-weight semantics. Pac. Symp. Biocomput., 13, 414-425.
7. Gentleman, R. (2005) Reproducible research: a bioinformatics case study. Stat. Appl. Genet. Mol. Biol., 4, Article 2.
8. Gleeson, P. et al. (2010) Neuroml: a language for describing data driven models of neurons and networks with a high degree of biological detail. PLoS Comput. Biol., 6, e1000815.
9. Goble, C. (2002) Position statement: musings on provenance, workflow and (semantic web) annotations for bioinformatics. In: Workshop on Data Derivation and Provenance, Chicago, IL.
10. Hucka, M. et al. (2003) The systems biology markup language (SBML): a medium for representation and exchange of biochemical network models. Bioinformatics, 19, 524-531.
11. King, R. D. et al. (2011) On the formalization and reuse of scientific research. J. R. Soc. Interface, 8, 1440-1448.
12. Krause, F. et al. (2010) Annotation and merging of SBML models with semanticSBML. Bioinformatics, 26, 421-422.
13. Laine, C. et al. (2007) Reproducible research: moving toward research the public can really trust. Ann. Intern. Med., 146, 450-453.
14. Li, C. et al. (2010) Biomodels database: an enhanced, curated and annotated resource for published quantitative kinetic models. BMC Syst. Biol., 4, 92.
15. Lopes, C. T. et al. (2010) Cytoscape web: an interactive web-based network browser. Bioinformatics, 26, 2347-2348.
16. Marian, A. et al. (2001) Change-centric management of versions in an xml warehouse. In: Apers, P. M. G. et al. (eds), Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, VLDB '01, September 11-14, 2001, Roma, Italy, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., pp. 581-590.
17. Mesirov, J. P. (2010) Computer science. Accessible reproducible research. Science, 327, 415-416.
18. Miller, A. et al. (2011) Revision history aware repositories of computational models of biological systems. BMC Bioinformatics, 12, 22.
19. Moreau, L. et al. (2008) The provenance of electronic data. In: Communications of the ACM-The psychology of security: why do good users make bad decisions?, ACM, New York, NY, USA, vol. 51, pp. 52-58.
20. Myers, E. W. (1986) An o(nd) difference algorithm and its variations. Algorithmica, 1, 251-266.
21. Novak, B. and Tyson, J. J. (1993) Numerical analysis of a comprehensive model of M-phase control in Xenopus oocyte extracts and intact embryos. J. Cell. Sci., 106, 1153-68.
22. Peng, R. D. (2011) Reproducible research in computational science. Science, 334, 1226-1227.
23. Ram, S. and Liu, J. (2010) Provenance management in biosciences. In: Trujillo, J. et al (eds.) Advances in Conceptual Modeling Applications and Challenges, volume 6413 of LNCS. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 54-64.
24. Saffrey, P. and Orton, R. (2009) Version control of pathway models using XML patches. BMC Syst. Biol., 3, 34.
25. Sandve, G. K. et al. (2013) Ten simple rules for reproducible computational research. PLoS Comp. Biol., 9, e1003285.
26. Smallbone, K. et al. (2010) Towards a genome-scale kinetic model of cellular metabolism. BMC Syst. Biol., 4, 6.
27. Swat, M. et al. (2015) Pharmacometrics markup language (pharmml): opening new perspectives for model exchange in drug development. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst. Pharmacol., 4, 316-319.
28. Waltemath, D. et al. (2011) Reproducible computational biology experiments with SED-ML-the simulation experiment description markup language. BMC Syst. Biol., 5, 198.
29. Waltemath, D. et al. (2013a) Improving the reuse of computational models through version control. Bioinformatics, 29, 742-748.
30. Waltemath, D. et al. (2013b) Reproducibility of model-based results in systems biology. In: Prokop, A. and Csuks, B. (eds.), Systems Biology. Springer, The Netherlands, pp. 301-320.
31. Wolstencroft, K. et al. (2015) SEEK: a systems biology data and model management platform. BMC Syst. Biol., 9, 33.
32. Yu, T. et al. (2011) The physiome model repository 2. Bioinformatics, 27, 743-744.