Simultaneous multi-slice readout-segmented echo planar imaging for accelerated diffusion-weighted imaging of the breast

European Journal of Radiology

Volumn 85, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 274-278

  Filli, Lukas ^a   Ghafoor, Soleen ^a   Kenkel, David ^a   Liu, Wei ^b   Weiland, Elisabeth ^c   Andreisek, Gustav ^a   Frauenfelder, Thomas ^a   Runge, Val M ^d   Boss, Andreas ^a  

^a University Hospital Zurich Institut fur Diagnostische Radiologie   (Switzerland)

^b Siemens Mindit Magnetic Resonance Ltd Shenzhen   (China)

^c SIEMENS AG   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Blipped CAIPIRINHA; Breast; Diffusion weighted imaging; Readout segmented echo planar imaging; Simultaneous multi slice

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT REDUCTION; BREAST EXAMINATION; CALCULATION; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; ECHO PLANAR IMAGING; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FRIEDMAN TEST; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; READOUT SEGMENTED ECHO PLANAR IMAGING; ARTIFACT; BREAST; BREAST TUMOR; FEMALE; IMAGE SUBTRACTION; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO;

ADULT; ARTIFACTS; BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; DIFFUSION MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; ECHO-PLANAR IMAGING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO; SUBTRACTION TECHNIQUE;

EID: 84955464071     PISSN: 0720048X     EISSN: 18727727     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.10.009     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. W. Bogner, S. Gruber, K. Pinker, G. Grabner, A. Stadlbauer, M. Weber, and et al. Diffusion-weighted MR for differentiation of breast lesions at 3.0 T: how does selection of diffusion protocols affect diagnosis? Radiology 253 2009 341 351
2. H. Bickel, K. Pinker-Domenig, W. Bogner, C. Spick, Z. Bago-Horvath, M. Weber, and et al. Quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient as a noninvasive imaging biomarker for the differentiation of invasive breast cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ Invest. Radiol. 50 2015 95 100
3. M. Iima, K. Yano, M. Kataoka, M. Umehana, K. Murata, S. Kanao, and et al. Quantitative non-gaussian diffusion and intravoxel incoherent motion magnetic resonance imaging: differentiation of malignant and benign breast lesions Invest. Radiol. 50 2015 205 211
4. S.H. Park, H.Y. Choi, and S.Y. Hahn Correlations between apparent diffusion coefficient values of invasive ductal carcinoma and pathologic factors on diffusion-weighted MRI at 3.0 Tesla J. Magn. Reson. Imaging: JMRI 41 2015 175 182
5. K. Pinker, W. Bogner, P. Baltzer, S. Gruber, H. Bickel, B. Brueck, and et al. Improved diagnostic accuracy with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the breast using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging, and 3-dimensional proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging Invest. Radiol. 49 2014 421 430
6. C. Iacconi, M. Giannelli, C. Marini, A. Cilotti, M. Moretti, P. Viacava, and et al. The role of mean diffusivity (MD) as a predictive index of the response to chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer: a preliminary study Eur. Radiol. 20 2010 303 308
7. M.D. Pickles, P. Gibbs, M. Lowry, and L.W. Turnbull Diffusion changes precede size reduction in neoadjuvant treatment of breast cancer Magn. Reson. Imaging 24 2006 843 847
8. S. Liu, R. Ren, Z. Chen, Y. Wang, T. Fan, C. Li, and et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging in assessing pathological response of tumor in breast cancer subtype to neoadjuvant chemotherapy J. Magn. Reson. Imaging: JMRI 42 3 2015 779 787
9. M. Costantini, P. Belli, P. Rinaldi, E. Bufi, G. Giardina, G. Franceschini, and et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging in breast cancer: relationship between apparent diffusion coefficient and tumour aggressiveness Clin. Radiol. 65 2010 1005 1012
10. X. Chen, W.L. Li, Y.L. Zhang, Q. Wu, Y.M. Guo, and Z.L. Bai Meta-analysis of quantitative diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the differential diagnosis of breast lesions BMC Cancer 10 2010 693
11. Y. Guo, Y.Q. Cai, Z.L. Cai, Y.G. Gao, N.Y. An, L. Ma, and et al. Differentiation of clinically benign and malignant breast lesions using diffusion-weighted imaging J. Magn. Reson. Imaging: JMRI 16 2002 172 178
12. W. Bogner, K. Pinker-Domenig, H. Bickel, M. Chmelik, M. Weber, T.H. Helbich, and et al. Readout-segmented echo-planar imaging improves the diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted MR breast examinations at 3.0 T Radiology 263 2012 64 76
13. D.A. Porter, and R.M. Heidemann High resolution diffusion-weighted imaging using readout-segmented echo-planar imaging, parallel imaging and a two-dimensional navigator-based reacquisition Magn. Reson. Med. 62 2009 468 475
14. Y. Kuroki, K. Nasu, S. Kuroki, K. Murakami, T. Hayashi, R. Sekiguchi, and et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging of breast cancer with the sensitivity encoding technique: analysis of the apparent diffusion coefficient value Magn. Reson. Med. Sci. 3 2004 79 85
15. K. Setsompop, B.A. Gagoski, J.R. Polimeni, T. Witzel, V.J. Wedeen, and L.L. Wald Blipped-controlled aliasing in parallel imaging for simultaneous multislice echo planar imaging with reduced g-factor penalty Magn. Reson. Med. 67 2012 1210 1224
16. R. Frost, P. Jezzard, G. Douaud, S. Clare, D.A. Porter, and K.L. Miller Scan time reduction for readout-segmented EPI using simultaneous multislice acceleration: diffusion-weighted imaging at 3 and 7 Tesla Magn. Reson. Med. 74 2014 136 149
17. F. Sardanelli, C. Boetes, B. Borisch, T. Decker, M. Federico, F.J. Gilbert, and et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: recommendations from the EUSOMA working group Eur. J. Cancer 46 2010 1296 1316
18. D. Le Bihan, E. Breton, D. Lallemand, M.L. Aubin, J. Vignaud, and M. Laval-Jeantet Separation of diffusion and perfusion in intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging Radiology 168 1988 497 505
19. J. Morelli, D. Porter, F. Ai, C. Gerdes, M. Saettele, T. Feiweier, and et al. Clinical evaluation of single-shot and readout-segmented diffusion-weighted imaging in stroke patients at 3 T Acta Radiol. 54 2013 299 306
20. S.B. Reeder, B.J. Wintersperger, O. Dietrich, T. Lanz, A. Greiser, M.F. Reiser, and et al. Practical approaches to the evaluation of signal-to-noise ratio performance with parallel imaging: application with cardiac imaging and a 32-channel cardiac coil Magn. Reson. Med. 54 2005 748 754
21. W. Bogner, K. Pinker, O. Zaric, P. Baltzer, L. Minarikova, D. Porter, and et al. Bilateral diffusion-weighted MR imaging of breast tumors with submillimeter resolution using readout-segmented echo-planar imaging at 7 T Radiology 274 2015 74 84
22. J.R. Landis, and G.G. Koch The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data Biometrics 33 1977 159 174
23. H.L. Kundel, and M. Polansky Measurement of observer agreement Radiology 228 2003 303 308
24. J.M. Bland, and D.G. Altman Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement Lancet 1 1986 307 310
25. R. Rakow-Penner, B. Daniel, H. Yu, A. Sawyer-Glover, and G.H. Glover Relaxation times of breast tissue at 1.5 T and 3 T measured using IDEAL J. Magn. Reson. Imaging: JMRI 23 2006 87 91
26. D. Atkinson, S. Counsell, J.V. Hajnal, P.G. Batchelor, D.L. Hill, and D.J. Larkman Nonlinear phase correction of navigated multi-coil diffusion images Magn. Reson. Med. 56 2006 1135 1139
27. H. Dong, Y. Li, K. Yu, and H. Li Comparison of image quality and application values on different field-of-view diffusion-weighted imaging of breast cancer Acta Radiol. 2015
28. H. Rahbar, S.C. Partridge, W.B. DeMartini, B. Thursten, and C.D. Lehman Clinical and technical considerations for high quality breast MRI at 3 Tesla J. Magn. Reson. Imaging: JMRI 37 2013 778 790