Interactivity3 design and assessment framework for educational games to promote motivation and complex problem-solving skills

Assessment in Game-Based Learning: Foundations, Innovations, and Perspectives

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 257-285

  Eseryel, Deniz ^a   Guo, Yu ^b   Law, Victor ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

^b OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84955332610     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-3546-4_14     Document Type: Chapter

References (61)

1. Amory, A. (2007). Game object model version II: A theoretical framework for educational game development. Educational Technology Research and Development,55(1), 51-77.
2. Azevedo, R., Winters, F. I., & Moos, D. C. (2004). Can students collaboratively use hypermedia to learn about science? The dynamics of self- and other-regulatory processes in an ecology classroom. Journal of Educational Computing Research,31(3), 215-245.
3. Barab, S., Squire, K., & Dueber, W. (2000). A co-evolutionary model for supporting the emergence of authenticity. Educational Technology Research and Development,48(2), 37-62.
4. Blumberg, F. C., Rosenthal, S. F., & Randall, J. D. (2008). Impasse-driven learning in the context of video games. Computers in Human Behavior,24(4), 1530-1541.
5. Brown, J., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher,18(1), 32-42.
6. Chen, H., Dun, H. B. L., Phuah, P. S. K., & Lam, D. Z. Y. (2006). Enjoyment or engagement? Role of social interaction in playing massively multiplayer online role-playing games (MMORPGS). In R. Harper, M. Rauterberg, M. Combetto (Eds.), Entertainment computing—ICEC 2006: 5th international conference (pp. 262-267). Cambridge, UK.
7. Cordova, D. I., & Lepper, M. R. (1996). Intrinsic motivation and the process of learning: Beneficial effects of contextualization, personalization, and choice. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(4), 715-730.
8. Crawford, C. (1984). The art ofcomputergame design.Berkley, CA: McGraw-Hill.
9. Crawford, C. (2010). Interactivity, process, and algorithm. In R. van Eck (Ed.), Interdisciplinary models and tools for serious games: Emerging concepts and future directions (pp. 333-346). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
10. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1991). Flow: Thepsychology ofoptimal experience.New York, NY: Harper Perennial.
11. Dansky, R. (2007). Introduction to game narrative. In C. Bateman (Ed.), Game writing: Narrative sills for videogames. Boston, MA: Charles River Media.
12. Dempsey, J. V., Haynes, L. L., Lucassen, B. A., & Casey, M. S. (2002). Forty simple computer games and what they could mean to educators.Simulation & Gaming, 33(2), 157-168.
13. Dickey, M. (2007). Game design and learning: A conjectural analysis of how massively multiple online role-playing games (MMORPGs) foster intrinsic motivation. Educational Technology Research and Development,55(3), 253-273.
14. Dochy, F., Segers, M., Van den Bossche, P., & Gijbels, D. (2003). Effects of problem-based learning: A meta-analysis. Learning and Instruction,13(5), 533-568.
15. Dondlinger, M. J., & Lunce, L. M. (2009). Wayfinding affordances are essential for effective use of virtual environment for instructional applications. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching,5(3), Retrieved February 19, 2011, from http://jolt.merlot.org/vol5no3/lunce_0909.htm
16. Dorner, D. (1987). On the difficulties people have in dealing with complexity. In K. Duncan, J. Rasmussen, & L. Leplat (Eds.), New technology and human error (pp. 97-109). Chichester, NY: Wiley.
17. Ducheneaut, N., & Moore, R. J. (2004). The social side of gaming: A study of interaction patterns in a massively multiplayer online game. In J. Herbsleb & G. Olson (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2004 ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work (pp. 360-369). New York: The Association for Computer Machinery.
18. Eifferman, R. R. (1974). It’s child’s play. In L. M. Shears & E. M. Bower (Eds.), Games in education and development (pp. 75-102). Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
19. Eseryel, D., & Ge, X. (2010). Designing effective game-based learning environments: Implications for design research. Paper presented at “Educational Design Research: Local Change, Global Impact”: A Special Conference to Honor Professor Thomas C. Reeves Upon his Retirement from the University of Georgia, March 26-27, 2010.
20. Eseryel, D., Ge, X., Ifenthaler, D., & Law, V. (2011). Dynamic modeling as a cognitive regulation scaffold for complex problem solving skill acquisition in an educational massively multiplayer online game environment. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 45(3), 265-287.
21. Eseryel, D., Ifenthaler, D., & Ge, X. (2010). Alternative assessment strategies for game-based learning environments. In D. Ifenthaler, K. PIsaias, D. G. Sampson, & J. M. Spector (Eds.), Multiple perspectives on problem solving and learning in the digital age (pp. 159-178). New York, NY: Springer.
22. Eseryel, D., Miller, R. B., Ge, X., Ifenthaler, D., Law, V., & Guo, Y. (2010). A longitudinal study on the impact of digital game-based learning on complex problem solving skill acquisition and student motivation. Paper presented at the 2010 Annual Convention of Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Anaheim, CA, October 26-30, 2010.
23. Feltovich, P. J., Spiro, R. J., Coulson, R. L., & Feltovich, J. (1996). Collaboration within and among minds: Mastering complexity, individually and in groups. In T. D. Koschmann (Ed.), CSCL: Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm (pp. 25-44). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.
24. Fullerton, T., Swain, C., & Hoffman, S. (2004). Game design workshop: Designing, prototyping, and playtesting games.San Francisco, CA: CMP Books.
25. Ge, X., Thomas, M., & Greene, B. (2006). Technology-rich ethnography for examining the transition to authentic problem-solving in a high school computer programming class. Journal of Educational Computing Research,34(4), 319-352.
26. Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.
27. Gee, J. P. (2007). Games and learning: Issues, perils, and potentials. In J. P. Gee (Ed.), Good video games and good learning: Collected essays on video games, learning, and literacy (pp. 129-174). New York: Palgrave/MacMillan.
28. Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. The American Journal of Sociology,91(3), 481.
29. Gredler, M. E. (2004). Games and simulations and their relationship to learning. In D. Jonassen (Ed.), The handbook of research on educational communications and technology (2nd ed., pp. 571-581). Bloomington, IN: AECT.
30. Greenfield, P. M. (2010). Video games. In R. van Eck (Ed.), Gaming and cognition: Theories and practice from the learning sciences (pp. 1-21). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
31. Gunter, G. A., Kenny, R. F., & Vick, E. H. (2008). Taking educational games seriously: Using the retain model to design endogenous fantasy into standalone educational games. Educational Technology Research and Development,56(5), 619-641.
32. Ifenthaler, D. (2010). Relational, structural, and semantic analysis of graphical representations and concept maps. Educational Technology Research and Development,55(1), 81-97.
33. Jonassen, D. H. (1997). Instructional design models for well-structured and III-structured problem-solving learning outcomes. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(1), 65-94.
34. Kagan, J. (1978). The growth of the child. New York, NY: Norton.
35. Komerska, R., & Ware, C. (2003). Haptic-geozui3D: Exploring the use of haptics in auv path planning. Proceedings 13th international symposium on unmanned Untethered Submersible Technology UUST’03, Durham, NH.
36. Konzack, L. (2002). Computer game criticism: A method for computer game analysis. In F. Mayra (Ed.), CGDC conference proceedings (pp. 89-100). Tampere, Finland: Tampere University Press.
37. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
38. Liarokapis, F. (2006). An exploration from virtual to augmented reality gaming. Simulation & Gaming,37(4), 507-533.
39. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Malone, T. W. (1980). What makes thingsfun to learn? A study ofintrinsically motivating computer games (Cognitive and Instructional Sciences Series CIS-7 (SSL-80-11)). Palo Alto, CA: XEROX Palo Alto Research Center.
40. Miller, R. B., Eseryel, D., & Ge, X. (2009) Surviving in Space: The effects of a massively multiplayer online game (MMOG) on students’ motivation.Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, April 13-17, 2009.
41. Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review,23(2), 242-266.
42. Parker, L., & Lepper, M. (1992). Effects of fantasy contexts on children’s learning and motivation: Making learning more fun. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(4), 625-633.
43. Pirnay-Dummer, P., & Ifenthaler, D. (2010). Automated knowledge visualization and assessment. In D. Ifenthaler, P. Pirnay-Dummer, & N. M. Seel (Eds.), Computer-based diagnostics and systematic analysis of knowledge (pp. 77-115). New York: Springer.
44. Prensky, M. (2006). Don’t botherme mom-I’m learning.St. Paul, MN: Paragon House.
45. Prensky, M. (2007). Digital game-based learning.St. Paul, MN: Paragon House.
46. Rieber, L. (1996). Seriously considering play: Designing interactive learning environments based on the blending of microworlds, simulations, and games. Educational Technology Research and Development,44(2), 43-58.
47. Ryan, R., & Deci, E. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist,55(1), 68-78.
48. Salen, K., & Zimmerman, E. (2004). Rules of play.Cambridge, MA: MIT.
49. Salen, K., & Zimmerman, E. (2005). Game design and meaningful play. In J. Raessens & J. H. Goldstein (Eds.), Handbook of computer game studies.Cambridge, MA: MIT.
50. Schank, R. C., Berman, T. R., & Macpherson, K. A. (1999). Learning by doing. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. II, pp. 161-181). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
51. Shaffer, D. W. (2006). How computer games help children learn? New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
52. Steinkuehler, C. A. (2004). Learning in massively multiplayer online games. In Y. B. Kafai, W. A. Sandoval, & N. Enyedy (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th international conference on learning sciences (pp. 521-528).
53. Sweetser, P., & Wyeth, P. (2005). GameFlow: A model for evaluating player enjoyment in games. ACM Computers in Entertainment,3(3), 1-24.
54. Uribe, D., Klein, J., & Sullivan, H. (2003). The effect of computer-mediated collaborative learning on solving III-defined problems. Educational Technology Research and Development,51(1), 5-19.
55. van Eck, R. (2006). Building intelligent learning games. In D. Gibson, C. Aldrich, & M. Prensky (Eds.), Games and simulations in online learning: Research and development frameworks. Hershey, PA: Idea Group.
56. van Eck, R. (2007). Six ideas in search of a discipline. In B. Shelton & D. Wiley (Eds.), The educational design and use of computer simulation games. Boston, MA: Sense.
57. Wideman, H., Owston, R., Brown, C., Kushniruk, A., Ho, F., & Pitts, K. (2007). Unpacking the potential of educational gaming: A new tool for gaming research. Simulation & Gaming, 38(1), 10.
58. Wilson, K., Bedwell, W., Lazzara, E., Salas, E., Burke, C., Estock, J., & Conkey, C. (2009). Relationships between game attributes and learning outcomes. Simulation & Gaming, 40(2),217-266.
59. Wilson, S., & Williams, L. (2010). Serious games for the classroom: A case study of designing and developing a massive multiplayer online game. In R. van Eck (Ed.), Interdisciplinary models and tools for serious games: Emerging concepts and future directions (pp. 264-287). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
60. Yanuzzi, T. J., & Behrenshausen, B. G. (2010). Serious games for transformative learning: A communication perspective on the radical binarisation of everyday life. In R. van Eck (Ed.), Interdisciplinary models and tools for serious games: Emerging concepts and future directions(pp. 74-102). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
61. Yee, N. (2006). Motivations for play in online games. Cyberpsychology & Behavior,9(6), 772-775.