Schematic memory components converge within angular gyrus during retrieval

eLife

Volumn 4, Issue NOVEMBER2015, 2015, Pages

  Wagner, Isabella C ^a   van Buuren, Mariët ^a   Kroes, Marijn C W ^a,b   Gutteling, Tjerk P ^a   van der Linden, Marieke ^a   Morris, Richard G ^c   Fernández, Guillén ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANGULAR GYRUS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; MEMORY; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BRAIN; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FEMALE; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PARIETAL LOBE; PHYSIOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BRAIN; FEMALE; HEALTHY VOLUNTEERS; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MEMORY; PARIETAL LOBE; RADIOGRAPHY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84955321607     PISSN: None     EISSN: 2050084X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7554/elife.09668     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Ashburner J. 2007. A fast diffeomorphic image registration algorithm. NeuroImage 38:95-113. doi: 10.1016/j. neuroimage.2007.07.007
2. Bartlett FC. 1932. Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology. Cambridge, England: University Press . doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1933.tb02913.x
3. Bengtsson SL, Haynes J-D, Sakai K, Buckley MJ, Passingham RE. 2009. The representation of abstract task rules in the human prefrontal cortex. Cerebral Cortex 19:1929-1936. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhn222
4. Binder JR, Desai RH, Graves WW, Conant LL. 2009. Where is the semantic system? a critical review and meta- analysis of 120 functional neuroimaging studies. Cerebral Cortex 19:2767-2796. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhp055
5. Bonnici HM, Chadwick MJ, Lutti A, Hassabis D, Weiskopf N, Maguire EA. 2012. Detecting representations of recent and remote autobiographical memories in vmPFC and hippocampus. Journal of Neuroscience 32: 16982-16991. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2475-12.2012
6. Brainard DH. 1997. The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision 10:433-436. doi: 10.1163/156856897X00357
7. Collins AGE, Frank MJ. 2013. Cognitive control over learning: creating, clustering, and generalizing task-set structure. Psychological Review 120:190-229. doi: 10.1037/a0030852
8. Coutanche MN, Thompson-Schill SL. 2012. The advantage of brief fMRI acquisition runs for multi-voxel pattern detection across runs. NeuroImage 61:1113-1119. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.03.076
9. Dragoi G, Tonegawa S. 2013. Development of schemas revealed by prior experience and NMDA receptor knock- out. eLife 2:e01326 doi: 10.7554/eLife.01326
10. Frankland PW, Bontempi B. 2005. The organization of recent and remote memories. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 6:119-130. doi: 10.1038/nrn1607
11. Friedman-Hill , 1995. Parietal contributions to visual feature binding: evidence from a patient with bilateral lesions. Science 269:853-855.Robertson L, Treisman A. doi: 10.1126/science.7638604
12. Friston KJ, Buechel C, Fink GR, Morris J, Rolls E, Dolan RJ. 1997. Psychophysiological and modulatory interactions in neuroimaging. NeuroImage 6:218-229. doi: 10.1006/nimg.1997.0291
13. Ghosh VE, Gilboa A. 2014. What is a memory schema? A historical perspective on current neuroscience literature. Neuropsychologia 53:104-114. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.11.010
14. Ghosh VE, Moscovitch M, Melo Colella B, Gilboa A. 2014. Schema representation in patients with ventromedial PFC lesions. Journal of Neuroscience 34:12057-12070. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0740-14.2014
15. Gilmore AW, Nelson SM, McDermott KB. 2015. A parietal memory network revealed by multiple MRI methods. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 19:534-543. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2015.07.004
16. Guerin SA, Robbins CA, Gilmore AW, Schacter DL. 2012. Interactions between visual attention and episodic retrieval: dissociable contributions of parietal regions during gist-based false recognition. Neuron 75:1122-1134. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.08.020
17. Hassabis D, Chu C, Rees G, Weiskopf N, Molyneux PD, Maguire EA. 2009. Decoding neuronal ensembles in the human hippocampus. Current Biology 19:546-554. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2009.02.033
18. Kesner RP. 2012. Parietal lesions produce illusory conjunction errors in rats. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience 6:22 doi: 10.3389/fnint.2012.00022
19. King DR, de Chastelaine M, Elward RL, Wang TH, Rugg MD. 2015. Recollection-related increases in functional connectivity predict individual differences in memory accuracy. Journal of Neuroscience 35:1763-1772. doi: 10. 1523/JNEUROSCI.3219-14.2015
20. Knowlton BJ, Squire LR, Gluck MA. 1994. Probabilistic classification learning in amnesia. Learning & Memory 1: 106-120.
21. Kriegeskorte N, Goebel R, Bandettini P. 2006. Information-based functional brain mapping. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103:3863-3868. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0600244103
22. Kroes MCW, Fernández G. 2012. Dynamic neural systems enable adaptive, flexible memories. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 36:1646-1666. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.02.014
23. Kumaran D, Summerfield JJ, Hassabis D, Maguire EA. 2009. Tracking the emergence of conceptual knowledge during human decision making. Neuron 63:889-901. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.07.030
24. Lewis PA, Durrant SJ. 2011. Overlapping memory replay during sleep builds cognitive schemata. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 15:343-351. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2011.06.004
25. Maguire EA. 1999. The functional neuroanatomy of comprehension and memory: the importance of prior knowledge. Brain 122:1839-1850. doi: 10.1093/brain/122.10.1839
26. Marr D. 1970. A theory for cerebral neocortex. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 176:161-234. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1970.0040
27. McKenzie S, Frank AJ, Kinsky NR, Porter B, Rivière PD, Eichenbaum H. 2014. Hippocampal representation of related and opposing memories develop within distinct, hierarchically organized neural schemas. Neuron 83: 202-215. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.05.019
28. Mumford JA, Turner BO, Ashby FG, Poldrack RA. 2012. Deconvolving BOLD activation in event-related designs for multivoxel pattern classification analyses. NeuroImage 59:2636-2643. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.08. 076
29. Nieuwenhuis ILC, Takashima A. 2011. The role of the ventromedial prefrontal cortex in memory consolidation. Behavioural Brain Research 218:325-334. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2010.12.009
30. Poser BA, Versluis MJ, Hoogduin JM, Norris DG. 2006. BOLD contrast sensitivity enhancement and artifact reduction with multiecho EPI: parallel-acquired inhomogeneity-desensitized fMRI. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 55:1227-1235. doi: 10.1002/mrm.20900
31. Preston AR, Eichenbaum H. 2013. Interplay of hippocampus and prefrontal cortex in memory. Current Biology 23:R764-R773. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.05.041
32. Price AR, Bonner MF, Peelle JE, Grossman M. 2015. Converging evidence for the neuroanatomic basis of combinatorial semantics in the angular gyrus. 35:3276-3284. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3446-14.2015
33. Reinitz MT, Lammers WJ, Cochran aBarbara Pitt's. 1992. Memory-conjunction errors: miscombination of stored stimulus features can produce illusions of memory. Memory & Cognition 20:1-11. doi: 10.3758/BF03208247
34. Reverberi C, Gorgen K, Haynes J-D. 2012. Compositionality of rule representations in human prefrontal cortex. Cerebral Cortex 22:1237-1246. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhr200
35. Richards BA, Xia F, Santoro A, Husse J, Woodin MA, Josselyn SA, Frankland PW. 2014. Patterns across multiple memories are identified over time. Nature Neuroscience 17:981-986. doi: 10.1038/nn.3736
36. Rugg MD, Vilberg KL. 2013. Brain networks underlying episodic memory retrieval. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 23:255-260. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2012.11.005
37. Sakai K. 2006. Prefrontal set activity predicts rule-specific neural processing during subsequent cognitive performance. Journal of Neuroscience 26:1211-1218. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3887-05.2006
38. Schacter DL, Norman KA, Koutstaal W. 1998. THE COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE of CONSTRUCTIVE MEMORY. Annual Review of Psychology 49:289-318. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.289
39. Shimamura AP. 2011. Episodic retrieval and the cortical binding of relational activity. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience 11:277-291. doi: 10.3758/s13415-011-0031-4
40. Simons JS, Peers PV, Hwang DY, Ally BA, Fletcher PC, Budson AE. 2008. Is the parietal lobe necessary for recollection in humans? Neuropsychologia 46:1185-1191. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.07.024
41. Takashima A, Petersson KM, Rutters F, Tendolkar I, Jensen O, Zwarts MJ, McNaughton BL, Fernandez G. 2006. Declarative memory consolidation in humans: a prospective functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103:756-761. doi: 10.1073/ pnas.0507774103
42. Takashima A, Nieuwenhuis ILC, Jensen O, Talamini LM, Rijpkema M, Fernandez G. 2009. Shift from hippocampal to neocortical centered retrieval network with consolidation. Journal of Neuroscience 29:10087-10093. doi: 10. 1523/JNEUROSCI.0799-09.2009
43. Takehara-Nishiuchi K, McNaughton BL. 2008. Spontaneous changes of neocortical code for associative memory during consolidation. Science 322:960-963. doi: 10.1126/science.1161299
44. Tanaka KZ, Pevzner A, Hamidi AB, Nakazawa Y, Graham J, Wiltgen BJ. 2014. Cortical representations are reinstated by the hippocampus during memory retrieval. Neuron 84:347-354. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.09. 037
45. Treisman AM, Gelade G. 1980. A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology 12:97-136. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(80)90005-5
46. Tse D, Langston RF, Kakeyama M, Bethus I, Spooner PA, Wood ER, Witter MP, Morris RGM. 2007. Schemas and memory consolidation. Science 316:76-82. doi: 10.1126/science.1135935
47. Tse D, Takeuchi T, Kakeyama M, Kajii Y, Okuno H, Tohyama C, Bito H, Morris RGM. 2011. Schema-dependent gene activation and memory encoding in neocortex. Science 333:891-895. doi: 10.1126/science.1205274
48. van Buuren M, Kroes MCW, Wagner IC, Genzel L, Morris RGM, Fernandez G. 2014. Initial investigation of the effects of an experimentally learned schema on spatial associative memory in humans. Journal of Neuroscience 34:16662-16670. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2365-14.2014
49. van Kesteren MTR, Rijpkema M, Ruiter DJ, Fernandez G. 2010. Retrieval of associative information congruent with prior knowledge is related to increased medial prefrontal activity and connectivity. Journal of Neuroscience 30:15888-15894. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2674-10.2010
50. van Kesteren MTR, Fernandez G, Norris DG, Hermans EJ. 2010. Persistent schema-dependent hippocampal- neocortical connectivity during memory encoding and postencoding rest in humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107:7550-7555. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0914892107
51. van Kesteren MTR, Beul SF, Takashima A, Henson RN, Ruiter DJ, Fernández G. 2013. Differential roles for medial prefrontal and medial temporal cortices in schema-dependent encoding: from congruent to incongruent. Neuropsychologia 51:2352-2359. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.05.027
52. van Kesteren MTR, Rijpkema M, Ruiter DJ, Morris RGM, Fernández G. 2014. Building on prior knowledge: schema-dependent encoding processes relate to academic performance. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 26:2250-2261. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00630
53. Vann SD, Aggleton JP, Maguire EA. 2009. What does the retrosplenial cortex do? Nature Reviews Neuroscience 10:792-802. doi: 10.1038/nrn2733
54. Wagner AD, Shannon BJ, Kahn I, Buckner RL. 2005. Parietal lobe contributions to episodic memory retrieval. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9:445-453. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.07.001
55. Wang S-H, Morris RGM. 2010. Hippocampal-neocortical interactions in memory formation, consolidation, and reconsolidation. Annual Review of Psychology 61:49-79. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100523
56. Warren DE, Jones SH, Duff MC, Tranel D. 2014. False recall is reduced by damage to the ventromedial prefrontal cortex: implications for understanding the neural correlates of schematic memory. Journal of Neuroscience 34:7677-7682. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0119-14.2014
57. Watrous AJ, Tandon N, Conner CR, Pieters T, Ekstrom AD. 2013. Frequency-specific network connectivity increases underlie accurate spatiotemporal memory retrieval. Nature Neuroscience 16:349-356. doi: 10.1038/ nn.3315
58. Woolgar A, Hampshire A, Thompson R, Duncan J. 2011. Adaptive coding of task-relevant information in human frontoparietal cortex. Journal of Neuroscience 31:14592-14599. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2616-11.2011
59. Yazar Y, Bergström ZM, Simons JS, Balasubramaniam R. 2014. Continuous theta burst stimulation of angular gyrus reduces subjective recollection. PLoS ONE 9:e110414 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110414