A parietal memory network revealed by multiple MRI methods

Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Volumn 19, Issue 9, 2015, Pages 534-543

  Gilmore, Adrian W ^a   Nelson, Steven M ^c,d   McDermott, Kathleen B ^a,b  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c VISN 17 Center of Excellence for Research on Returning War Veterans   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS   (United States)

Author keywords

Encoding; Familiarity; Functional networks; Memory; Parietal cortex; Retrieval

Indexed keywords

DATA STORAGE EQUIPMENT; ENCODING (SYMBOLS);

FAMILIARITY; FUNCTIONAL MRI; FUNCTIONAL NETWORK; FUNCTIONAL PROPERTIES; LEARNING AND MEMORY; PARIETAL CORTICES; RESTING STATE FUNCTIONAL CONNECTIVITIES; RETRIEVAL;

NETWORK CODING;

ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EPISODIC MEMORY; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; FUNCTIONAL NEUROIMAGING; HUMAN; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; LEARNING; MEMORY; PARIETAL CORTEX; RECOGNITION; RESTING STATE NETWORK; REVIEW; STIMULUS RESPONSE; ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; IMAGE PROCESSING; NERVE CELL NETWORK; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PARIETAL LOBE; PHYSIOLOGY;

HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MEMORY; NERVE NET; PARIETAL LOBE;

EID: 84952637254     PISSN: 13646613     EISSN: 1879307X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2015.07.004     Document Type: Review

References (86)

1. Brewer J.B., et al. Making memories: brain activity that predicts how well visual experience will be remembered. Science 1998, 281:1185-1187.
2. Wagner A.D., et al. Building memories: remembering and forgetting of verbal experiences as predicted by brain activity. Science 1998, 281:1188-1191.
3. Buckner R.L., et al. Functional-anatomic study of episodic retrieval. II. Selective averaging of event-related fMRI trials to test the retrieval success hypothesis. Neuroimage 1998, 7:163-175.
4. Otten L.J., Rugg M.D. Task-dependency of the neural correlates of episodic encoding as measured by fMRI. Cereb. Cortex 2001, 11:1150-1160.
5. Otten L.J. Fragments of a larger whole: retrieval cues constrain observed neural correlates of memory encoding. Cereb. Cortex 2007, 17:2030-2038.
6. Yonelinas A.P., et al. Separating the brain regions involved in recollection and familiarity in recognition memory. J. Neurosci. 2005, 25:3002-3008.
7. Frithsen A., Miller M.B. The posterior parietal cortex: comparing remember/know and source memory tests of recollection and familiarity. Neuropsychologia 2014, 61:31-44.
8. Kim H. Differential neural activity in the recognition of old versus new events: an activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2013, 34:814-836.
9. McDermott K.B., et al. Laboratory-based and autobiographical retrieval tasks differ substantially in their neural substrates. Neuropsychologia 2009, 47:2290-2298.
10. Wagner A.D., et al. Parietal lobe contributions to episodic memory retrieval. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2005, 9:445-453.
11. Cabeza R., et al. Cognitive contributions of the ventral parietal cortex: an integrative theoretical account. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2012, 16:338-352.
12. McDermott K.B., et al. Retrieval success is accompanied by enhanced activation in anterior prefrontal cortex during recognition memory: an event-related fMRI study. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2000, 12:965-976.
13. Konishi S., et al. Neural correlates of episodic retrieval success. Neuroimage 2000, 12:276-286.
14. Wheeler M.E., Buckner R.L. Functional-anatomic correlates of remembering and knowing. Neuroimage 2004, 21:1337-1349.
15. Spaniol J., et al. Event-related fMRI studies of episodic encoding and retrieval: meta-analyses using activation likelihood estimation. Neuropsychologia 2009, 47:1765-1779.
16. Kim H. Neural activity that predicts subsequent memory and forgetting: a meta-analysis of 74 fMRI studies. Neuroimage 2011, 54:2446-2461.
17. Elman J.A., et al. Dynamic changes in parietal activation during encoding: implications for human learning and memory. Neuroimage 2013, 82:44-52.
18. McDermott K.B., et al. Direct comparison of episodic encoding and retrieval of words: an event-related fMRI study. Memory 1999, 7:661-680.
19. Jessen F., et al. Encoding and retrieval related cerebral activation in continuous verbal recognition. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 2001, 12:199-206.
20. Nelson S.M., et al. Neural signatures of test-potentiated learning in parietal cortex. J. Neurosci. 2013, 33:11754-11762.
21. Wheeler M.E., Buckner R.L. Functional dissociation among components of remembering: control, perceived oldness, and content. J. Neurosci. 2003, 23:3869-3880.
22. Raposo A., et al. Ventrolateral prefrontal cortex and self-initiated semantic elaboration during memory retrieval. Neuropsychologia 2009, 47:2261-2271.
23. Uncapher M.R., Wagner A.D. Posterior parietal cortex and episodic encoding: insights from fMRI subsequent memory effects and dual-attention theory. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 2009, 91:139-154.
24. Tulving E., et al. Neuroanatomical correlates of retrieval in episodic memory: auditory sentence recognition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1994, 91:2012-2015.
25. Buckner R.L., et al. Functional anatomic studies of memory retrieval for auditory words and visual picture. J. Neurosci. 1996, 16:6219-6235.
26. Nelson S.M., et al. A parcellation scheme for human left lateral parietal cortex. Neuron 2010, 67:156-170.
27. Nelson S.M., et al. In favor of a 'fractionation' view of ventral parietal cortex: comment on Cabeza et al. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2012, 16:399-400.
28. Seghier M.L. The angular gyrus: multiple functions and multiple subdivisions. Neuroscientist 2013, 19:43-61.
29. Bzdok D., et al. Subspecialization in the human posterior medial cortex. Neuroimage 2015, 106:55-71.
30. Cabeza R., et al. Response to Nelson et al.: ventral parietal subdivisions are not incompatible with an overarching function. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2012, 16:400-401.
31. Fox M.D., et al. The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2005, 102:9673-9678.
32. Andrews-Hanna J.R., et al. Functional-anatomic fractionation of the brain's default network. Neuron 2010, 65:550-562.
33. Otten L.J., Rugg M.D. When more means less: neural activity related to unsuccessful memory encoding. Curr. Biol. 2001, 11:1528-1530.
34. Wagner A.D., Davachi L. Cognitive neuroscience: forgetting of things past. Curr. Biol. 2001, 11:R964-R967.
35. Biswal B.B., et al. Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo-planar MRI. Magn. Reson. Med. 1995, 34:537-541.
36. Doucet G., et al. Brain activity at rest: a multiscale heirarchical functional organization. J. Neurophysiol. 2011, 105:2753-2763.
37. Power J.D., et al. Functional network organization of the human brain. Neuron 2011, 72:665-678.
38. Yeo B.T.T., et al. The organization of the human cerebral cortex estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity. J. Neurophysiol. 2011, 106:1125-1165.
39. Smith S.M., et al. Resting-state fMRI in the Human Connectome Project. Neuroimage 2013, 80:144-168.
40. Power J.D., et al. Studying brain organization via spontaneous fMRI signal. Neuron 2014, 84:681-696.
41. Yang Z., et al. Connectivity trajectory across lifespan differentiates the precuneus from the default network. Neuroimage 2014, 89:45-56.
42. Daselaar S.M., et al. When less means more: deactivations during encoding that predict subsequent memory. Neuroimage 2004, 23:921-927.
43. Daselaar S.M., et al. Posterior midline and ventral parietal activity is associated with retrieval success and encoding failure. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2009, 3:1-10.
44. de Chastelaine M., Rugg M.D. The relationship between task-related and subsequent memory effects. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2014, 35:3687-3700.
45. Lustig C., et al. Functional deactivations: change with age and dementia of the Alzheimer type. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2003, 100:14504-14509.
46. Buckner R.L., et al. The brain's default network: anatomy, function, and relevance to disease. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2008, 1124:1-38.
47. Segaert K., et al. The suppression of repetition enhancement: a review of fMRI studies. Neuropsychologia 2013, 51:59-66.
48. Desimone R., et al. Multiple memory systems in the visual cortex. The Cognitive Neurosciences 1995, 475-486. MIT Press. M.S. Gazzaniga (Ed.).
49. Schacter D.L., Buckner R.L. Priming and the brain. Neuron 1998, 20:185-195.
50. Grill-Spector K., et al. Repetition and the brain: neural models of stimulus-specific events. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2006, 10:14-23.
51. Henson R., et al. Neuroimaging evidence for dissociable forms of repetition priming. Science 2000, 287:1269-1272.
52. Huijbers W., et al. Explaining the encoding/retrieval flip: memory-related deactivations and activations in the posteromedial cortex. Neuropsychologia 2012, 50:3764-3774.
53. Huijbers W., et al. The encoding/retrieval flip: interactions between memory performance and memory stage and relationship to intrinsic functional networks. J Cogn. Neurosci. 2013, 25:1163-1179.
54. Vannini P., et al. What goes down must come up: role of the postermedial cortices in encoding and retrieval. Cereb. Cortex 2011, 21:22-34.
55. Vannini P., et al. The ups and downs of the posteromedial cortex: age- and amyloid-related functional alterations of the encoding/retrieval flip in cognitively normal older adults. Cereb. Cortex 2013, 23:1317-1328.
56. Herron J.E., et al. Probability effects on the neural correlates of retrieval success: an fMRI study. Neuroimage 2004, 21:302-310.
57. Aminoff E.M., et al. Maintaining a cautious state of mind during a recognition test: a large-scale fMRI study. Neuropsychologia 2015, 67:132-147.
58. Hutchinson J.B., et al. Increased functional connectivity between dorsal posterior parietal and ventral occipitotemporal cortex during uncertain memory decisions. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 2015, 117:71-83.
59. Habib R., et al. Memory encoding and hippocampally-based novelty/familiarity discrimination networks. Neuropsychologia 2003, 41:271-279.
60. Daselaar S.M., et al. Triple dissociation in the medial temporal lobes: recollection, familiarity, and novelty. J. Neurophysiol. 2006, 96:1902-1911.
61. Kafkas A., Montaldi D. Two separate, but interacting, neural systems for familiarity and novelty detection: a dual-route mechanism. Hippocampus 2014, 24:516-527.
62. Vilberg K.L., Rugg M.D. Memory retrieval and the parietal cortex: a review of evidence from a dual-process perspective. Neuropsychologia 2008, 46:1787-1799.
63. Gardiner J.M. Retrieval: on its essence and related concepts. Science of Memory: Concepts 2007, 221-224. Oxford University Press. H.L. Roediger (Ed.).
64. Jaeger A., et al. Unexpected novelty and familiarity orienting responses in lateral parietal cortex during recognition judgment. Neuropsychologia 2013, 51:1061-1076.
65. Craik F.I.M., Lockhart R.S. Levels of processing: a framework for memory research. J. Verb. Learn. Verb. Behav. 1972, 11:671-684.
66. Craik F.I., Tulving E. Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 1975, 104:268-294.
67. Shannon B.J., Buckner R.L. Functional-anatomic correlates of memory retrieval that suggest nontraditional processing roles for multiple distinct regions within posterior parietal cortex. J. Neurosci. 2004, 24:10084-10092.
68. Roediger H.L., McDermott K.B. Creating false memories: remembering words not presented in lists. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 1995, 21:803-814.
69. Roediger H.L., DeSoto K.A. Confidence and memory: assessing positive and negative correlations. Memory 2014, 22:76-91.
70. DeSoto K.A., Roediger H.L. Positive and negative correlations between confidence and accuracy for the same events in recognition of categorized lists. Psychol. Sci. 2014, 25:781-788.
71. Shirer W.R., et al. Decoding subject-driven cognitive states with whole-brain connectivity patterns. Cereb. Cortex 2012, 22:158-165.
72. Kelley W.M., et al. Hemispheric specialization in human dorsal frontal cortex and medial temporal lobe for verbal and nonverbal memory encoding. Neuron 1998, 20:927-936.
73. McDermott K.B., et al. Set- and code-specific activation in the frontal cortex: an fMRI study of encoding and retrieval of faces and words. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 1999, 11:631-640.
74. Marcus D.S., et al. Informatics and data mining: tools and strategies for the Human Connectome Project. Front. Neuroinform. 2011, 5:4.
75. Raichle M.E. The brain's dark energy. Science 2006, 314:1249.
76. Raichle M.E. Two views of brain function. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2010, 14:180-190.
77. Shulman G.L., et al. Common blood flow changes across visual tasks. II. Decreases in cerebral cortex. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 1997, 9:648-663.
78. Greicius M.D., et al. Functional connectivity in the resting brain: a network analysis of the default mode hypothesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2003, 100:253-258.
79. Gusnard D.A., Raichle M.E. Searching for a baseline: functional imaging and the resting human brain. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2001, 2:685-694.
80. Stark C.E.L., Squire L.R. When zero is not zero: the problem of ambiguous baseline conditions in fMRI. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2001, 98:12760.
81. Raichle M.E.M., Mintun M.A.M. Brain work and brain imaging. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2006, 29:449-476.
82. Morcom A.M., Fletcher P.C. Does the brain have a baseline? Why we should be resisting a rest. Neuroimage 2007, 37:1073-1082.
83. Raichle M.E.M., Snyder A.Z.A. A default mode of brain function: a brief history of an evolving idea. Neuroimage 2007, 37:1083-1089.
84. Nelson S.M., et al. The critical roles of localization and physiology for understanding parietal contributions to memory retrieval. Neuroscientist 2013, 19:578-591.
85. Cabeza R., et al. The parietal cortex and episodic memory: an attentional account. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2008, 9:613-625.
86. Grefkes C., Fink G.R. Review: the functional organization of the intraparietal sulcus in humans and monkeys. J. Anat. 2005, 207:3-17.