Differential roles for medial prefrontal and medial temporal cortices in schema-dependent encoding: From congruent to incongruent

Neuropsychologia

Volumn 51, Issue 12, 2013, Pages 2352-2359

  van Kesteren, Marlieke T R ^a,b   Beul, Sarah F ^a,c   Takashima, Atsuko ^d   Henson, Richard N ^e   Ruiter, Dirk J ^b   Fernández, Guillén ^a,b  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER HAMBURG EPPENDORF   (Germany)

^d RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^e MRC COGNITION AND BRAIN SCIENCES UNIT   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Congruency; Medial prefrontal cortex; Medial temporal lobe; Memory encoding; Schema

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATIVE MEMORY; BOLD SIGNAL; BRAIN FUNCTION; BRAIN MAPPING; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; FUSIFORM GYRUS; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MEDIAL PREFRONTAL CORTEX; MEDIAL TEMPORAL CORTEX; MEMORY CONSOLIDATION; MENTAL PERFORMANCE; NORMAL HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; REACTION TIME; TEMPORAL CORTEX; VISUAL MEMORY;

CONGRUENCY; MEDIAL PREFRONTAL CORTEX; MEDIAL TEMPORAL LOBE; MEMORY ENCODING; SCHEMA;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; BRAIN MAPPING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MEMORY; MENTAL RECALL; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); TEMPORAL LOBE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84886096106     PISSN: 00283932     EISSN: 18733514     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.05.027     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Anderson J.R. Effects of prior knowledge on memory for new information. Memory and Cognition 1981, 9(3):237-246.
2. Bartlett F.C. Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology 1932, University Press, Cambridge, [England].
3. Bransford J.D., Brown A.L., Cocking R.R. How people learn: brain, mind, experience and school 2000, National Academy Press, Washington D.C.
4. Bransford J.D., Johnson M.K. Contextual prerequisites for understanding-some investigations of comprehension and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 1972, 11(6):717-726.
5. Davis T., Love B.C., Preston A.R. Learning the exception to the rule: Model-based FMRI reveals specialized representations for surprising category members. Cerebral Cortex 2012, 22(2):260-273.
6. DeWitt M.R., Knight J.B., Hicks J.L., Ball B.H. The effects of prior knowledge on the encoding of episodic contextual details. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2012, 19(2):251-257.
7. Friston K.J., Buechel C., Fink G.R., Morris J., Rolls E., Dolan R.J. Psychophysiological and modulatory interactions in neuroimaging. Neuroimage 1997, 6(3):218-229.
8. Huijbers W., Pennartz C.M., Rubin D.C., Daselaar S.M. Imagery and retrieval of auditory and visual information: Neural correlates of successful and unsuccessful performance. Neuropsychologia 2011, 49(7):1730-1740.
9. Kormi-Nouri R., Nilsson L.G., Ohta N. The novelty effect: Support for the novelty-encoding hypothesis. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 2005, 46(2):133-143.
10. Marr D. A theory for cerebral neocortex. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Science 1970, 176(43):161-234.
11. Murre J.M. TraceLink: A model of amnesia and consolidation of memory. Hippocampus 1996, 6(6):675-684.
12. Paller K.A., Wagner A.D. Observing the transformation of experience into memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2002, 6(2):93-102.
13. Poser B.A., Versluis M.J., Hoogduin J.M., Norris D.G. BOLD contrast sensitivity enhancement and artifact reduction with multiecho EPI: Parallel-acquired inhomogeneity-desensitized fMRI. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2006, 55(6):1227-1235.
14. Scoville W.B., Milner B. Loss of recent memory after bilateral hippocampal lesions. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgury and Psychiatry 1957, 20(1):11-21.
15. Sharon T., Moscovitch M., Gilboa A. Rapid neocortical acquisition of long-term arbitrary associations independent of the hippocampus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 2011, 108(3):1146-1151.
16. Squire L.R., Alvarez P. Retrograde amnesia and memory consolidation: a neurobiological perspective. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 1995, 5(2):169-177.
17. Staresina B.P., Duncan K.D., Davachi L. Perirhinal and parahippocampal cortices differentially contribute to later recollection of object- and scene-related event details. Journal of Neuroscience 2011, 31(24):8739-8747.
18. Staresina B.P., Grey J.C., Davachi L. Event congruency enhances episodic memory encoding through semantic elaboration and relational binding. Cerebral Cortex 2009, 19(5):1198-1207.
19. Sugiura M., Shah N.J., Zilles K., Fink G.R. Cortical representations of personally familiar objects and places: Functional organization of the human posterior cingulate cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2005, 17(2):183-198.
20. Tendolkar I., Arnold J., Petersson K.M., Weis S., Anke B.-D., van Eijndhoven P., et al. Probing the neural correlates of associative memory formation: A parametrically analysed event-related functional MRI study. Brain Research 2007, 1142:159-168.
21. Tse D., Langston R.F., Kakeyama M., Bethus I., Spooner P.A., Wood E.R., et al. Schemas and memory consolidation. Science 2007, 316(5821):76-82.
22. Tse D., Takeuchi T., Kakeyama M., Kajii Y., Okuno H., Tohyama C., et al. Schema-dependent gene activation and memory encoding in neocortex. Science 2011, 333(6044):891-895.
23. Tulving E., Kroll N. Novelty assessment in the brain and long-term-memory encoding. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 1995, 2(3):387-390.
24. Tzourio-Mazoyer N., Landeau B., Papathanassiou D., Crivello F., Etard O., Delcroix N., et al. Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain. Neuroimage 2002, 15(1):273-289.
25. van Kesteren M.T., Fernandez G., Norris D.G., Hermans E.J. Persistent schema-dependent hippocampal-neocortical connectivity during memory encoding and postencoding rest in humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2010, 107(16):7550-7555.
26. van Kesteren M.T., Rijpkema M., Ruiter D.J., Fernandez G. Retrieval of associative information congruent with prior knowledge is related to increased medial prefrontal activity and connectivity. Journal of Neuroscience 2010, 30(47):15888-15894.
27. van Kesteren, M. T., Rijpkema, M., Ruiter, D. J., & Fernandez, G. (2011). How a prior schema affects mnemonic processing. Paper presented at the 5th International Conference on Memory, York, UK.
28. van Kesteren M.T., Ruiter D.J., Fernandez G., Henson R.N. How schema and novelty augment memory formation. Trends in Neurosciences 2012, 35(4):211-219.
29. Wagner A.D., Shannon B.J., Kahn I., Buckner R.L. Parietal lobe contributions to episodic memory retrieval. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2005, 9(9):445-453.
30. Wang S.H., Morris R.G. Hippocampal-neocortical interactions in memory formation, consolidation, and reconsolidation. Annual Review of Psychology 2010, 61(49-79):C41-44.
31. Watkins M.J., Gardiner J.M. Appreciation of generate-recognise theory of recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 1979, 18(6):687-704.