ERP evidence for hemispheric asymmetries in abstract but not exemplar-specific repetition priming

Psychophysiology

Volumn 52, Issue 12, 2015, Pages 1610-1619

  Küper, Kristina ^a,b   Liesefeld, Anna M ^b,c   Zimmer, Hubert D ^b  

^a LEIBNIZ RESEARCH CENTRE FOR WORKING ENVIRONMENT AND HUMAN FACTORS   (Germany)

^b SAARLAND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cognition; EEG; Learning

Indexed keywords

BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; DECISION MAKING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED RESPONSE; FEMALE; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; MALE; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; REPETITION PRIMING; VISUAL FIELD; YOUNG ADULT;

BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; DECISION MAKING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; REPETITION PRIMING; VISUAL FIELDS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84955190206     PISSN: 00485772     EISSN: 14698986     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/psyp.12542     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Beeri, M. S., Vakil, E., Adonsky, A., & Levenkron, S. (2004). The role of the cerebral hemispheres in specific versus abstract priming. Laterality: Asymmetries Body, Brain and Cognition, 9, 313-323. doi: 10.1080/13576500342000176
2. Berti, S., Geissler, H., Lachmann, T., & Mecklinger, A. (2000). Event-related potentials dissociate visual working memory processes under categorical and identical comparison conditions. Brain Research, Cognitive Brain Research, 9, 147-155. doi: 10.1016/S0926-6410(99)00051-8
3. Biederman, I., & Cooper, E. E. (1992). Size invariance in visual object priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 121-133. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.18.1.121
4. Bradshaw, J. L., & Nettleton, N. C. (1981). The nature of hemispheric specialization in man. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 4, 51-91. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X00007548
5. Burgund, E. D., & Marsolek, C. J. (2000). Viewpoint-invariant and viewpoint-dependent object recognition in dissociable neural subsystems. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 480-489. doi: 10.3758/BF03214360
6. Cave, C. B., Bost, P. R., & Cobb, R. E. (1996). Effects of color and pattern on implicit and explicit picture memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 639-653. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.22.3.639
7. Dien, J. (2009). A tale of two recognition systems: Implications of the fusiform face area and the visual word form area for lateralized object recognition models. Neuropsychologia, 47, 1-16. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.08.024
8. Ecker, U. K. H., & Zimmer, H. D. (2009). ERP evidence for flexible adjustment of retrieval orientation and its influence on familiarity. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21, 1907-1919. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21135
9. Eddy, M. D., & Holcomb, P. J. (2011). Invariance to rotation in depth measured by masked repetition priming is dependent on prime duration. Brain Research, 1424, 38-52. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2011.09.036
10. Evans, K. M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2009). Left and right memory revisited: Electrophysiological investigations of hemispheric asymmetries at retrieval. Neuropsychologia, 47, 303-313. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.08.027
11. Ganis, G., Kutas, M., & Sereno, M. I. (1996). The search for "common sense": an electrophysiological study of the comprehension of words and pictures in reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8, 89-106. doi: 10.1162/jocn.1996.8.2.89
12. Gratton, G., Coles, M. G. H., & Donchin, E. (1983). A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 55, 468-484. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(83)90135-9
13. Griffin, M., DeWolf, M., Keinath, A., Liu, X., & Reder, L. (2013). Identical versus conceptual repetition FN400 and parietal old/new ERP components occur during encoding and predict subsequent memory. Brain Research, 1512, 68-77. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2013.03.014
14. Groh-Bordin, C., Zimmer, H. D., & Mecklinger, A. (2005). Feature binding in perceptual priming and in episodic object recognition: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Brain Research, Cognitive Brain Research, 24, 556-567. doi: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.03.006
15. Guillaume, C., Guillery-Girard, B., Chaby, L., Lebreton, K., Hugueville, L., Eustache, F., & Fiori, N. (2009). The time course of repetition effects for familiar faces and objects: An ERP study. Brain Research, 1248, 149-161. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.10.069
16. Guillem, F., N'Kaoua, B., Rougier, A., & Claverie, B. (1995). Intracranial topography of event-related potentials (N400/P600) elicited during a continuous recognition memory task. Psychophysiology, 32, 382-392. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1995.tb01221.x
17. Hommel, B. (2004). Event files: Feature binding in and across perception and action. Trends in Cognitive Science, 8, 494-500. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.08.007
18. Kiefer, M., & Pulvermüller, F. (2012). Conceptual representations in mind and brain: Theoretical developments, current evidence and future directions. Cortex, 48, 805-825. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2011.04.006
19. Koivisto, M. (1995). On functional brain asymmetries in perceptual priming. Brain and Cognition, 29, 36-53. doi: 10.1006/brcg.1995.1266
20. Kroll, N. E. A., Rocha, D. A., Yonelinas, A. P., & Baynes, K. (2001). Form-specific visual priming in the left and right hemispheres. Brain and Cognition, 47, 564-569. doi: 10.1006/brcg.2001.1330
21. Kroll, N. E. A., Yonelinas, A. P., Kishiyama, M. M., Baynes, K., Knight, R. T., & Gazzaniga, M. S. (2003). The neural substrates of visual implicit memory: Do the two hemispheres play different roles? Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 833-842. doi: 10.1162/089892903322370753
22. Küper, K., Groh-Bordin, C., Zimmer, H. D., & Ecker, U. K. H. (2012). Electrophysiological correlates of exemplar-specific processes in implicit and explicit memory. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 12, 52-64. doi: 10.3758/s13415-011-0065-7
23. Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2011). Thirty years and counting: Finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). Annual Reviews of Psychology, 62, 621-647. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.131123
24. Maillard, L., Barbeau, E. J., Baumann, C., Koessler, L., Bénar, C., Chauvel, P., & Liégeois-Chauvel, C. (2011). From perception to recognition memory: Time course and lateralization of neural substrates of word and abstract picture processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 782-800. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2010.21434
25. Marsolek, C. J. (1995). Abstract visual-form representations in the left cerebral hemisphere. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 375-386. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.21.2.375
26. Marsolek, C. J. (2004). Abstractionist versus exemplar-based theories of visual word priming: A subsystems resolution. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 57, 1233-1259. doi: 10.1080/02724980343000747
27. Marsolek, C. J., Kosslyn, S. M., & Squire, L. R. (1992). Form-specific visual priming in the right cerebral hemisphere. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 492-508. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.18.3.492
28. Marsolek, C. J., Squire, L.R., Kosslyn, S. M., & Lulenski, M. E. (1994). Form-specific explicit and implicit memory in the right cerebral hemisphere. Neuropsychology, 8, 588-597. doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.8.4.588
29. McPherson, W. B., & Holcomb, P. J. (1999). An electrophysiological investigation of semantic priming with pictures of real objects. Psychophysiology, 36, 53-65. doi: 10.1017/S0048577299971196
30. Mecklinger, A. (2000). Interfacing mind and brain: A neurocognitive model of recognition memory. Psychophysiology, 37, 1-18. doi: 10.1111/1469-8986.3750565
31. Milner, B. (1971). Interhemispheric differences in the localization of psychological processes in man. British Medical Bulletin, 27, 272-277.
32. Paller, K. A. (2001). Neurocognitive foundations of human memory. In D. L. Mendin (Ed.), The Psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 40, pp. 121-145). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. doi: 10.1016/S0079-7421(00)80019-5
33. Race, E. A., Badre, D., & Wagner, A. D. (2010). Multiple forms of learning yield temporally distinct electrophysiological repetition effects. Cerebral Cortex, 20, 1726-1738. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhp233
34. Rajaram, S., & Roediger, H. L. (1993). Direct comparison of four implicit memory tests. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 765-777. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.19.4.765
35. Rugg, M. D., & Curran, T. (2007). Event-related potentials and recognition memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 251-257. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2007.04.004
36. Rugg, M. D., Mark, R. E., Walla, P., Schloerscheidt, A. M., Birch, C. S., & Allan, K. (1998). Dissociation of the neural correlates of implicit and explicit memory. Nature, 392, 595-598. doi: 10.1038/33396
37. Rugg, M. D., & Yonelinas, A. P. (2003). Human recognition memory: A cognitive neuroscience perspective. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 313-319. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00131-1
38. Schacter, D. L. (1994). Priming and multiple memory systems: Perceptual mechanisms of implicit memory. In D. L. Schacter & E. Tulving (Eds.), Memory systems 1994 (pp. 233-268). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. doi: 10.1162/jocn.1992.4.3.244
39. Schacter, D. L., Bowers, J., & Booker, J. (1989). Intention, awareness, and implicit memory: The retrieval intentionality criterion. In S. Lewandowsky, J. M. Dunn, & K. Kirsner (Eds.), Implicit memory: Theoretical issues (pp. 47-69). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
40. Schacter, D. L., & Buckner, R. L. (1998). Priming and the brain. Neuron, 20, 185-195. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80448-1
41. Schacter, D. L., Dobbins, I. G., & Schnyer, D. M. (2004). Specificity of priming: A cognitive neuroscience perspective. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5, 853-862. doi: 10.1038/nrn1534
42. Schendan, H. E., & Kutas, M. (2002). Neurophysiological evidence for two processing times for visual object identification. Neuropsychologia, 40, 931-945. doi: 10.1016/S0028-3932(01)00176-2
43. Schendan, H. E., & Kutas, M. (2003). Time course of processes and representations supporting visual object identification and memory. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 111-135. doi: 10.1162/089892903321107864
44. Schendan, H. E., & Kutas, M. (2007). Neurophysiological evidence for the time course of activation of global shape, part, and local contour representations during visual object categorization and memory. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 743-749. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.5.734
45. Schendan, H. E., & Maher, S. M. (2009). Object knowledge during entry-level categorization is activated and modified by implicit memory after 200 ms. NeuroImage, 44, 1423-1438. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.09.061
46. Schweinberger, S. R., & Sommer, W. (1991). Contributions of stimulus encoding and memory search to right hemisphere superiority in face recognition: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Neuropsychologia, 29, 389-413. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(91)90027-6
47. Stenberg, G., Hellman, J., Johansson, M., & Rosén, I. (2009). Familiarity or conceptual priming: Event-related potentials in name recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21, 447-460. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21045
48. Studer, T., & Hübner, R. (2008). The direction of hemispheric asymmetries for object categorization at different levels of abstraction depends on the task. Brain and Cognition, 67, 197-211. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2008.01.003
49. Stuss, D. T., Picton, T. W., Cerry, A. M., Leech, E. E., & Stethem, L. L. (1992). Perceptual closure and object identification: Electrophysiological response to incomplete pictures. Brain and Cognition, 19, 253-266. doi: 10.1016/0278-2626(92)90047-P
50. Squire, L. R. (1994). Declarative and nondeclarative memory in humans and animals: Experimental analysis and historical origins. In D. L. Schacter & E. Tulving (Eds.), Memory systems 1994 (pp. 203-232). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
51. Tulving, E. (1983). Elements of episodic memory. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
52. Tulving, E., & Schacter, D. L. (1990). Priming and human memory systems. Science, 247, 301-306. doi: 10.1126/science.2296719
53. Vogel, E. K., Luck, S. J., & Shapiro, K. L. (1998). Electrophysiological evidence of a postperceptual locus of suppression during the attentional blink. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1656-1574. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.24.6.1656
54. Voss, J. L., & Federmeier, K. D. (2011). FN400 potentials are functionally identical to N400 potentials and reflect semantic processing during recognition testing. Psychophysiology, 48, 532-546. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01085.x
55. Voss, J. L., Lucas, H. D., & Paller, K. A. (2010). Conceptual priming and familiarity: Different expressions of memory during recognition testing with distinct neurophysiological correlates. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 2638-2651. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21341
56. Weldon, M. S., Roediger, H. L., Beitel, D. A., & Johnston, T. R. (1995). Perceptual and conceptual processes in implicit and explicit tests with picture fragment and word fragment cues. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 268-285. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1995.1012
57. Yonelinas, A. P., Kroll, N. E. A., Baynes, K., Dobbins, I. G., Frederick, C. M., Knight, R. T., & Gazzaniga, M. S. (2001). Visual implicit memory in the left hemisphere: Evidence from patients with callosotomies and right occipital lobe lesions. Psychological Science, 12, 293-298. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00354
58. Zimmer, H. D. (1995). Size and orientation of objects in explicit and implicit memory: A reversal of the dissociation between perceptual similarity and type of test. Psychological Research, 57, 260-273. doi: 10.1007/BF00431287
59. Zimmer, H. D., & Ecker, U. K. H. (2010). Remembering perceptual features unequally bound in object and episodic tokens: Neural mechanisms and their electrophysiological correlates. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 34, 1066-1079. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.01.014
60. Zimmer . H. D., & Steiner, A. (2003). Colour specificity in episodic and perceptual object recognition with enhanced colour impact. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 15, 349-470. doi: 10.1080/09541440303603