Increasing concentrations of phenol progressively affect anaerobic digestion of cellulose and associated microbial communities

Biodegradation

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 15-27

  Chapleur, Olivier ^a   Madigou, Céline ^a   Civade, Raphaël ^a   Rodolphe, Yohan ^a   Mazéas, Laurent ^a   Bouchez, Théodore ^a  

^a Procédés biotechnologiques au service de l'environnement   (France)

Author keywords

ARISA; EC50; Inhibition; Micropollutants; Phenol degradation

Indexed keywords

BIODEGRADATION; CELLULOSE; ENZYME INHIBITION; MICROORGANISMS; PHENOLS; VOLATILE FATTY ACIDS;

ARISA; EC50; MICROPOLLUTANTS; PERFORMANCE STABILITY; PHENOL DEGRADATION; RIBOSOMAL INTERGENIC SPACER ANALYSIS; SPECIFIC METHANOGENIC ACTIVITY; STRUCTURAL ADAPTATION;

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION;

BIODEGRADATION; CELLULOSE; DIGESTIBILITY; FERMENTATION; INHIBITION; METHANOGENIC BACTERIUM; MICROBIAL COMMUNITY; OXIC CONDITIONS; PHENOL; POLLUTANT REMOVAL; TOXICITY TEST;

BACTERIAL DNA; CELLULOSE; METHANE; PHENOL DERIVATIVE; POLLUTANT; SEWAGE; VOLATILE FATTY ACID;

ANAEROBIC GROWTH; ARCHAEON; BIOREACTOR; BIOREMEDIATION; CHEMISTRY; FERMENTATION; GENETICS; METABOLISM; MICROBIOLOGY; POLLUTANT; RIBOSOME; SEWAGE;

ANAEROBIOSIS; ARCHAEA; BIODEGRADATION, ENVIRONMENTAL; BIOREACTORS; CELLULOSE; DNA, BACTERIAL; ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTANTS; FATTY ACIDS, VOLATILE; FERMENTATION; METHANE; PHENOLS; RIBOSOMES; SEWAGE; WATER MICROBIOLOGY;

EID: 84955177665     PISSN: 09239820     EISSN: 15729729     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10532-015-9751-4     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Angelidaki I, Mogensen AS, Ahring BK (2000) Degradation of organic contaminants found in organic waste. Biodegradation 11:377–383
2. Barnes SP, Keller J (2003) Cellulosic waste degradation by rumen-enhanced anaerobic digestion. Water Sci Technol 48:155–162
3. Bayer EA, Lamed R, Himmel ME (2007) The potential of cellulases and cellulosomes for cellulosic waste management. Curr Opin Biotechnol 18:237–245
4. Blum DJW, Hergenroeder R, Parkin GF, Speece RE (1986) Anaerobic treatment of coal conversion wastewater constituents: Biodegradability and toxicity. J Water Pollut Control Fed 58:122–131
5. Cardinale M et al (2004) Comparison of different primer sets for use in automated ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis of complex bacterial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:6147–6156
6. Chapleur O, Bize A, Serain T, Mazeas L, Bouchez T (2014) Co-inoculating ruminal content neither provides active hydrolytic microbes nor improves methanization of (1)(3)C-cellulose in batch digesters. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 87:616–629. doi:10.1111/1574-6941.12249
7. Chapleur O, Mazeas L, Godon JJ, Bouchez T (2015) Asymmetrical response of anaerobic digestion microbiota to temperature changes. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. doi:10.1007/s00253-015-7046-7
8. Chen Y, Cheng JJ, Creamer KS (2008) Inhibition of anaerobic digestion process: a review. Bioresour Technol 99:4044–4064
9. Fang HHP, Chan O-C (1997) Toxicity of phenol towards anaerobic biogranules. Water Res 31:2229–2242
10. Fang HHP, Chen T, Chan OC (1995) Toxic effects of phenolic pollutants on anaerobic benzoate-degrading granules. Biotechnol Lett 17:117–120. doi:10.1007/BF00134207
11. Fechner LC, Gourlay-Francé C, Uher E, Tusseau-Vuillemin MH (2010a) Adapting an enzymatic toxicity test to allow comparative evaluation of natural freshwater biofilms’ tolerance to metals. Ecotoxicology 19:1302–1311. doi:10.1007/s10646-010-0517-9
12. Fechner LC, Vincent-Hubert F, Gaubert P, Bouchez T, Gourlay-Francé C, Tusseau-Vuillemin MH (2010b) Combined eukaryotic and bacterial community fingerprinting of natural freshwater biofilms using automated ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 74:542–553
13. Fedorak PM, Hrudey SE (1984) The effects of phenol and some alkyl phenolics on batch anaerobic methanogenesis. Water Res 18:361–367
14. Fisher MM, Triplett EW (1999) Automated approach for ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis of microbial diversity and its application to freshwater bacterial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 65:4630–4636
15. García-Martínez J, Rodríguez-Valera F (2000) Microdiversity of uncultured marine prokaryotes: the SAR11 cluster and the marine Archaea of group I. Mol Ecol 9:935–948. doi:10.1046/j.1365-294X.2000.00953.x
16. Hernandez JE, Edyvean RGJ (2008) Inhibition of biogas production and biodegradability by substituted phenolic compounds in anaerobic sludge. J Hazard Mater 160:20–28. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.02.075
17. Hoyos-Hernandez C, Hoffmann M, Guenne A, Mazeas L (2014) Elucidation of the thermophilic phenol biodegradation pathway via benzoate during the anaerobic digestion of municipal solid waste. Chemosphere 97:115–119
18. Khardenavis AA, Kapley A, Purohit HJ (2008) Phenol-mediated improved performance of active biomass for treatment of distillery wastewater. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 62:38–45
19. Klinke HB, Thomsen AB, Ahring BK (2004) Inhibition of ethanol-producing yeast and bacteria by degradation products produced during pre-treatment of biomass. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 66:10–26
20. Levén L, Nyberg K, Korkea-aho L, Schnürer A (2006) Phenols in anaerobic digestion processes and inhibition of ammonia oxidising bacteria (AOB) in soil. Sci Total Environ 364:229–238
21. Loy A et al (2002) Oligonucleotide microarray for 16S rRNA gene-based detection of all recognized lineages of sulfate-reducing prokaryotes in the environment. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:5064–5081. doi:10.1128/aem.68.10.5064-5081.2002
22. Lynd LR, Weimer PJ, Van Zyl WH, Pretorius IS (2002) Microbial cellulose utilization: fundamentals and biotechnology. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 66:506–577
23. Michelland RJ, Dejean S, Combes S, Fortun-Lamothe L, Cauquil L (2009) StatFingerprints: a friendly graphical interface program for processing and analysis of microbial fingerprint profiles. Mol Ecol Resour 9:1359–1363
24. Monlau F, Sambusiti C, Barakat A, Quéméneur M, Trably E, Steyer JP, Carrère H (2014) Do furanic and phenolic compounds of lignocellulosic and algae biomass hydrolyzate inhibit anaerobic mixed cultures? Compr Rev Biotechnol Adv 32:934–951. doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2014.04.007
25. Olguin-Lora P, Puig-Grajales L, Razo-Flores E (2003) Inhibition of the acetoclastic methanogenic activity by phenol and alkyl phenols. Environ Technol 24:999–1006. doi:10.1080/09593330309385638
26. Prosser JI (2010) Replicate or lie. Environ Microbiol 12:1806–1810. doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2010.02201.x
27. Rosenkranz F et al (2013) Relationship between phenol degradation efficiency and microbial community structure in an anaerobic SBR. Water Res 47:6739–6749. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2013.09.004
28. Sierra-Alvarez R, Lettinga G (1991) The effect of aromatic structure on the inhibition of acetoclastic methanogenesis in granular sludge. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 34:544–550
29. Thioulouse J, Chessel D, Dole´dec S, Olivier J-M (1997) ADE-4: a multivariate analysis and graphical display software. Stat Comput 7:75–83. doi:10.1023/A:1018513530268
30. van Dorst J et al (2014) Community fingerprinting in a sequencing world. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 89:316–330. doi:10.1111/1574-6941.12308
31. Veeresh GS, Kumar P, Mehrotra I (2005) Treatment of phenol and cresols in upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) process: a review. Water Res 39:154–170
32. Wang YT, Suidan MT, Pfeffer TJ, Najam I (1989) The effect of concentration of phenols on their batch methanogenesis. Biotechnol Bioeng 33:1353–1357
33. Wang YT, Gabbard HD, Pai PC (1991) Inhibition of acetate methanogenesis by phenols. J Environ Eng 117:487–500
34. Weiland P (2010) Biogas production: current state and perspectives. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 85:849–860. doi:10.1007/s00253-009-2246-7
35. Wu JJ, Masten SJ (2002) Oxidation kinetics of phenolic and indolic compounds by ozone: applications to synthetic and real swine manure slurry. Water Res 36:1513–1526. doi:10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00352-9