Co-inoculating ruminal content neither provides active hydrolytic microbes nor improves methanization of 13C-cellulose in batch digesters

FEMS Microbiology Ecology

Volumn 87, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 616-629

  Chapleur, Olivier ^a   Bize, Ariane ^a   Serain, Thibaut ^a   Mazéas, Laurent ^a   Bouchez, Théodore ^a  

^a Procédés biotechnologiques au service de l'environnement   (France)

Author keywords

Anaerobic digestion; Fingerprinting; Pyrosequencing; Stable isotope probing

Indexed keywords

BACTERIUM; BIODEGRADATION; CARBON ISOTOPE; CELLULOSE; HYDROLYSIS; INOCULATION; METHANE; MICROBIAL ACTIVITY; MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE; REPRODUCTION; RUMINANT;

ANIMALIA; ARCHAEA; BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS);

CARBON; CELLULOSE; METHANE; PROPIONIC ACID DERIVATIVE; RIBOSOMAL SPACER DNA; RNA 16S;

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION; ANIMAL; ARCHAEON; ARTICLE; BACTERIUM; BIOREACTOR; BIOREMEDIATION; CATTLE; CLASSIFICATION; FINGERPRINTING; GENETICS; HYDROLYSIS; METABOLISM; MICROBIOLOGY; PYROSEQUENCING; RUMINANT STOMACH; SEWAGE; STABLE ISOTOPE PROBING;

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION; FINGERPRINTING; PYROSEQUENCING; STABLE ISOTOPE PROBING;

ANIMALS; ARCHAEA; BACTERIA; BIODEGRADATION, ENVIRONMENTAL; BIOREACTORS; CARBON ISOTOPES; CATTLE; CELLULOSE; DNA, RIBOSOMAL SPACER; HYDROLYSIS; METHANE; PROPIONATES; RNA, RIBOSOMAL, 16S; RUMEN; SEWAGE;

EID: 84896725946     PISSN: 01686496     EISSN: 15746941     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1574-6941.12249     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Barnes SP & Keller J (2003) Cellulosic waste degradation by rumen-enhanced anaerobic digestion. Water Sci Technol 48: 155-162.
2. Bayané A & Guiot SR (2011) Animal digestive strategies versus anaerobic digestion bioprocesses for biogas production from lignocellulosic biomass. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 10: 43-62.
3. Bayer EA, Lamed R & Himmel ME (2007) The potential of cellulases and cellulosomes for cellulosic waste management. Curr Opin Biotechnol 18: 237-245.
4. Blasig JD, Holtzapple MT, Dale BE, Engler CR & Byers FM (1992) Volatile fatty acid fermentation of AFEX-treated bagasse and newspaper by rumen microorganisms. Resour. Conserv. Recy. 7: 95-114.
5. Caporaso JG, Bittinger K, Bushman FD, DeSantis TZ, Andersen GL & Knight R (2010a) pynast: a flexible tool for aligning sequences to a template alignment. Bioinformatics 26: 266-267.
6. Caporaso JG, Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J et al. (2010b) qiime allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat Methods 7: 335-336.
7. Cardinale M, Brusetti L, Quatrini P, Borin S, Puglia AM, Rizzi A, Zanardini E, Sorlini C, Corselli C & Daffonchio D (2004) Comparison of different primer sets for use in automated ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis of complex bacterial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 70: 6147-6156.
8. Cole JR, Wang Q, Cardenas E et al. (2009) The Ribosomal Database Project: improved alignments and new tools for rRNA analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 37(suppl 1): 141-145.
9. Czerkawski JW & Breckenridge G (1977) Design and development of a long-term rumen simulation technique (Rusitec). Br J Nutr 38: 371-384.
10. Eleazer WE, Odle Iii WS, Wang YS & Barlaz MA (1997) Biodegradability of municipal solid waste components in laboratory- scale landfills. Environ Sci Technol 31: 911-917.
11. Fechner LC, Vincent-Hubert F, Gaubert P, Bouchez T, Gourlay-Francé C & Tusseau-Vuillemin MH (2010) Combined eukaryotic and bacterial community fingerprinting of natural freshwater biofilms using automated ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 74: 542-553.
12. Firkins J & Yu Z (2006) Characterisation and quantification of the microbial populations of the rumen. Ruminant Physiology: Digestion, Metabolism and Impact of Nutrition on Gene Expression, Immunology and Stress (Sejrsen K, Hvelplund T & Nielsen MO, eds), pp. 19-54. Wageningen Academic Publisher, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
13. Fisher MM & Triplett EW (1999) Automated approach for ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis of microbial diversity and its application to freshwater bacterial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 65: 4630-4636.
14. Gagnaire DY & Taravel FR (1980) Biosynthesis of bacterial cellulose from D-glucose uniformly enriched in 13C. Eur J Biochem 103: 133-143.
15. García-Martínez J & Rodríguez-Valera F (2000) Microdiversity of uncultured marine prokaryotes: the SAR11 cluster and the marine Archaea of Group I. Mol Ecol 9: 935-948.
16. Gijzen HJ, Lubberding HJ, Verhagen FJ, Zwart KB & Vogels GD (1987) Application of rumen microorganisms for an enhanced anaerobic degradation of solid organic waste materials. Biol. Waste 22: 81-95.
17. Godon JJ, Arcemisbéhère L, Escudié R, Bize A, Guillot A, Li T, Miambi E, Robert A & Steyer JP (2010) How to get 500 million years of experience in anaerobic digestion: animal mimicking. Proceedings, 12th World Congress on Anaerobic Digestion, Guadalajara (MEX). IWA, London.
18. Gorris LGM, van Deursen JMA, van der Drift C & Vogels GD (1989) Inhibition of propionate degradation by acetate in methanogenic fluidized bed reactors. Biotechnol Lett 11: 61-66.
19. Guindon S & Gascuel O (2003) A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst Biol 52: 696-704.
20. Hess M, Sczyrba A, Egan R et al. (2011) Metagenomic discovery of biomass-degrading genes and genomes from cow rumen. Science 331: 463-467.
21. Hu ZH, Wang G & Yu HQ (2004) Anaerobic degradation of cellulose by rumen microorganisms at various pH values. Biochem Eng J 21: 59-62.
22. Huber H, Hohn MJ, Rachel R, Fuchs T, Wimmer VC & Stetter KO (2002) A new phylum of Archaea represented by a nanosized hyperthermophilic symbiont. Nature 417: 63-67.
23. Loy A, Lehner A, Lee N, Adamczyk J, Meier H, Ernst J, Schleifer KH & Wagner M (2002) Oligonucleotide microarray for 16S rRNA gene-based detection of all recognized lineages of sulfate-reducing prokaryotes in the environment. Appl Environ Microbiol 68: 5064-5081.
24. Ludwig W, Strunk O, Westram R et al. (2004) arb: a software environment for sequence data. Nucleic Acids Res 32: 1363-1371.
25. Lueders T, Manefield M & Friedrich MW (2004) Enhanced sensitivity of DNA- and rRNA-based stable isotope probing by fractionation and quantitative analysis of isopycnic centrifugation gradients. Environ Microbiol 6: 73-78.
26. Lynd LR, Weimer PJ, Van Zyl WH & Pretorius IS (2002) Microbial cellulose utilization: fundamentals and biotechnology. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 66: 506-577.
27. Miron J, Ben-Ghedalla D & Morrison M (2001) Invited review: adhesion mechanisms of rumen cellulolytic bacteria. J Dairy Sci 84: 1294-1309.
28. Muetzel S, Lawrence P, Hoffmann EM & Becker K (2009) Evaluation of a stratified continuous rumen incubation system. Anim Feed Sci Technol 151: 32-43.
29. O'Sullivan CA & Burrell PC (2007) The effect of media changes on the rate of cellulose solubilisation by rumen and digester derived microbial communities. Waste Manag 27: 1808-1814.
30. Owens FN & Goetsch LA (1988) Ruminal fermentation. The Ruminant Animal, Digestive Physiology and Nutrition (Church DC, Ed). Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
31. Qu X, Mazéas L, Vavilin VA, Epissard J, Lemunier M, Mouchel JM, He PJ & Bouchez T (2009) Combined monitoring of changes in δ13CH4 and archaeal community structure during mesophilic methanization of municipal solid waste. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 68: 236-245.
32. Radajewski S, Ineson P, Parekh NR & Murrell JC (2000) Stable-isotope probing as a tool in microbial ecology. Nature 403: 646-649.
33. Rivière D, Desvignes V, Pelletier E, Chaussonnerie S, Guermazi S, Weissenbach J, Li T, Camacho P & Sghir A (2009) Towards the definition of a core of microorganisms involved in anaerobic digestion of sludge. ISME J 3: 700-714.
34. Russell JB, Muck RE & Weimer PJ (2009) Quantitative analysis of cellulose degradation and growth of cellulolytic bacteria in the rumen. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 67: 183-197.
35. Smith DM, Snow DE, Rees E, Zischkau AM, Hanson JD, Wolcott RD, Sun Y, White J, Kumar S & Dowd SE (2010) Evaluation of the bacterial diversity of pressure ulcers using bTEFAP pyrosequencing. BMC Med Genomics 3: 1.
36. Stack RJ & Cotta MA (1986) Effect of 3-phenylpropanoic acid on growth of and cellulose utilization by cellulolytic ruminal bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 52: 209-210.
37. Stack RJ, Hungate RE & Opsahl WP (1983) Phenylacetic acid stimulation of cellulose digestion by Ruminococcus albus 8. Appl Environ Microbiol 46: 539-544.
38. Turner S, Pryer KM, Miao VP & Palmer JD (1999) Investigating deep phylogenetic relationships among cyanobacteria and plastids by small subunit rRNA sequence analysis. J Eukaryot Microbiol 46: 327-338.
39. Verstraete W, Debeer D, Pena M, Lettinga G & Lens P (1996) Anaerobic bioprocessing of organic wastes. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 12: 221-238.
40. Wang Q, Garrity GM, Tiedje JM & Cole JR (2007) Naïve Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Appl Environ Microbiol 73: 5261-5267.
41. Weimer PJ (1996) Why don't ruminal bacteria digest cellulose faster? J Dairy Sci 79: 1496-1502.
42. Weimer PJ, Russell JB & Muck RE (2009) Lessons from the cow: what the ruminant animal can teach us about consolidated bioprocessing of cellulosic biomass. Bioresour Technol 100: 5323-5331.
43. Yue ZB, Li WW & Yu HQ (2013) Application of rumen microorganisms for anaerobic bioconversion of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour Technol 128: 738-744.
44. Zheng D, Alm EW, Stahl DA & Raskin L (1996) Characterization of universal small-subunit rRNA hybridization probes for quantitative molecular microbial ecology studies. Appl Environ Microbiol 62: 4504-4513.