Faculty Assessment of an Innovative Approach to Medical Education

Medical Science Educator

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 108-116

  Schwartz, Frederic N ^a   Hover, Mara L ^a   Kinney, Marjorie ^a   McCoy, Lise ^a  

^a A T STILL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Clinical Presentation Curriculum; Community Medicine; Contextual Learning; Distance Learning; Inductive Reasoning; Medically Underserved Population

Indexed keywords

EID: 84955121804     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21568650     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF03341770     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. National Association of Community Health Centers (NACHC). Workforce — Future of Medical Education. Retrieved May 12, 2011 from http://www.nachc.com/clinicalworkforcefuturemeded.cfm
2. Mandin, H et al. Developing a “Clinical Presentation” Curriculum at the University of Calgary. Academic Medicine, Vol 70, No. 3 March 1995.
3. Zwet J van der, Zwietering PJ, Teunissen PW, Vleuten CPM van der, Scherpbier a JJ a. Workplace learning from a socio-cultural perspective: creating developmental space during the general practice clerkship. Advances in health sciences education: theory and practice. 2011;16(3):359–73.
4. Cooke M, Irby DM, O’Brien B. Educating Physicians: a Call for Reform of Medical School and Residency. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass; 2010.
5. Eva, K. W. (2005). What every teacher needs to know about clinical reasoning. Medical education. 2005;39(1):98–106.
6. Bowen JL. Educational strategies to promote clinical diagnostic reasoning. The New England journal of medicine. 2006; 355(21):2217–25.
7. Woloschuk W, Harasym P, Mandin H, Jones A. Use of scheme-based problem solving: an evaluation of the implementation and utilization of schemes in a clinical presentation curriuculum. Medical Education. 2000; 34(437–442).
8. Mclaughlin K, Coderre S, Mortis G, Mandin H. Teaching and learning in medicine expert-type knowledge structure in medical students is associated with increased odds of diagnostic success. Teaching and Learning in Medicine. 2007;(October 2011):37-41.
9. Srinivasan M, Wilkes M, Stevenson F, Nguyen T, Slavin S. Comparing problem-based learning with case-based learning: effects of a major curricular shift at two institutions. Academic Medicine. 2007;82(1):74–82.
10. Anderson, M. B., & Kanter, S. L. Medical education in the United States and Canada, Academic medicine. 2010;85(9 Suppl):S2–18.
11. Sunal DW, Hodges J, Sunal CS, et al. Teaching Science in Higher Education: Faculty Professional Development and Barriers to Change. School Science and Mathematics. 2001;101(5):246–257.
12. Merriënboer JJG, Sweller J. Cognitive Load Theory and Complex Learning: Recent Developments and Future Directions. Educational Psychology Review. 2005;17(2):147–177.
13. Patel VL, Arocha JF, Zhang J. Thinking and Reasoning in Medicine. In: Cambridge Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2004:1–34.
14. Coderre S, Mandin H, Harasym PH, Fick GH. Diagnostic reasoning strategies and diagnostic success. Medical education. 2003;37(8):695–703.
15. Shahabeddin, S.P., Shirazi-Beheshtiha, S. H., Aslani, F., Taghdiri, M. R., Abadiyeh, R., & Tsai, T.-C. Developing a clinical presentation curriculum in veterinary education: a cognitive perspective. Comparative Clinical Pathology. 2011.
16. Schwartz FN, Hover M, Kinney M, McCoy L. Student assessment of an innovative approach to medical education. Med Sci Educ 2012; 22(3): 102–108.