Rasch analysis in the human sciences

Rasch Analysis in the Human Sciences

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 1-482

  Boone, William J ^a   Yale, Melissa S ^b   Staver, John R ^c  

^a MIAMI UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Purdue University ^*  (United States)

^c PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84954587596     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-6857-4     Document Type: Book

References (111)

1. Andrich, D. (1982). An index of person separation in latent trait theory, the traditional KR-20 index, and the Guttman scale response pattern. Educational Research and Perspectives, 9,95-104.
2. Bell, A. (1997). The mind and heart in human sexual behavior: Owning and sharing ourpersonal truths. Lanham, MD: Arnoson.
3. Bond, T. G. (2003). Validity and assessment: A Rasch measurement perspective. Metodología de las Ciencias del Comportamiento, 5(2), 179-194.
4. Forkmann, T., Boecker, M., Wirtz, M., Glaesmer, H., Brahler, E., Norra, C., & Gauggel, S. (2010). Validation of the Rasch-based depression screening in a large scale German general population sample. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 8, 105.
5. Linacre, J. M. (1994). Sample size and item calibration stability. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 7(4), 328.
6. Linacre, J. M. (2012a) Winsteps (Version 3.74) [Software]. Available from http://www.winsteps.com/index.html
7. Linacre, J. M. (2012b) Ministeps [Software]. Available from http://www.winsteps.com/ministep.html
8. Looney, M. A. (2004). Evaluating judge performance in sport. Journal of Applied Measurement, 5(1), 31-47
9. Boone, W., Townsend, S., & Staver, J. (2011). Using Rasch theory to guide the practice of survey development and survey data analysis in science education and to inform science reform efforts: An exemplar utilizing STEBI self-efficacy data. Science Education, 95(2), 258-280.
10. Bradley, K., Cunningham, J., Akers, K., Knutson, N. (2011, April). Middle category or survey pitfall: Using Rasch modeling to illustrate the middle category measurement flaw. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association.
11. Enochs, L. G., & Riggs, I. M. (1990). Further development of an elementary science teaching efficacy belief instrument: A pre-service elementary scale. School Science and Mathematics, 90(8), 694-706. doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.1990.tb12048.x.
12. Glass, G. V., & Stanley, J. C. (1970). Statistical methods in education and psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
13. Linacre, J. M. (2012) Winsteps (Version 3.74) [Software]. Available from http://www.winsteps.com/index.html
14. Stevens, S. S. (1959). Chap. 2: Measurement, psychophysics and utility. In C. W. Churchman & P. Ratoosh (Eds.), Measurement: Definitions and theories. New York: Wiley.
15. Wright, B. D., & Masters, G. N. (1982). Rating scale analysis. Chicago: MESA Press.
16. Enochs, L. G., & Riggs, I. M. (1990). Further development of an elementary science teaching efficacy belief instrument: A pre-service elementary scale. School Science and Mathematics, 90(8), 694-706. doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.1990.tb12048.x.
17. Linacre, J. M. (2012). Winsteps (Version 3.74) [Software]. Available from http://www.winsteps.com/index.html
18. Enochs, L. G., & Riggs, I. M. (1990). Further development of an elementary science teaching efficacy belief instrument: A pre-service elementary scale. School Science and Mathematics, 90(8), 694-706. doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.1990.tb12048.x.
19. Linacre, J. M., & Wright, B. D. (1989). The “length” of a logit. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 3(2), 54-55.
20. Enochs, L. G., & Riggs, I. M. (1990). Further development of an elementary science teaching efficacy belief instrument: A pre-service elementary scale. School Science and Mathematics, 90(8), 694-706.
21. Boone, W. J., Townsend, J. S., & Staver, J. R. (2011). Using Rasch theory to guide the practice of survey development and survey data analysis in science education and to inform science reform efforts: An exemplar utilizing STEBI self-efficacy data. Science Education, 95(2), 258-280.
22. DeMars, C., & Linacre, J. (2004). Mapping multidimensionality. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 18(3), 9990-9991.
23. Fraser, B. J. (1981). Test of Science Related Attitudes Handbook (TOSRA). Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.
24. Lai, J. S., & Eton, D. T. (2002). Clinically meaningful gaps. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 15(4), 850.
25. Linacre, J. M. (2000). Computer adaptive testing: A methodology whose time has come. In S. Chae, U. Kang, E. Jeon, & J. M. Linacre (Eds.), Development of computerized middle school achievement test. Seoul, South Korea: Komesa Press. [in in Korean].
26. Liu, X. (2010). Using and developing measurement instruments in science education: A Rasch modeling approach. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
27. Wilson, M., & Draney, K. (2000, May). Standard mapping: A technique for setting standards and maintaining them over time. Paper presented at the international conference on measurement and multivariate analysis, Banff, Canada.
28. Wright, B. D. (2012). Benjamin D. Wright’s annotated KeyMath Diagnostic. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 25(4), 1350.
29. Linacre, J. M. (2002). What do infit and outfit, mean-square and standardized mean? Rasch Measurement Transactions, 16(2), 878.
30. Linacre, J. M. (2012). A user’s guide to Winsteps Ministeps Rasch-model computer programs [version 3.74.0]. Retrieved from http://www.winsteps.com/winsteps.htm
31. Wright, B. D., & Linacre, J. M. (1994). Reasonable mean-square fit values. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 8(3), 370.
32. Wright, B. D., & Masters, G. (1982). Rating scale analysis. Chicago: Mesa Press.
33. Campbell, T., Abd-Hamid, H., & Chapman, H. (2010). Development of instrument to assess teacher and student perceptions of inquiry experiences in science classrooms. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21, 13-30.
34. Hayes, J. R. (1981). The completeproblem solver. Hillsdale: Lawrence Earlbaum.
35. Linacre, J. M. (2002). Optimizing rating scale category effectiveness. Journal of Applied Measurement, 3(1), 85-106.
36. Linacre, J. M. (2012). Winsteps (Version 3.74) [Software]. Available from http://www.winsteps.com/index.html
37. AERA, APA, & NCME. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: Author.
38. Boone, W., Townsend, S., & Staver, J. R. (2011). Using Rasch theory to guide the practice of survey development and survey data analysis in science education and to inform science reform efforts: An exemplar utilizing STEBI self efficiency data. Science Education, 95(2), 258-280.
39. Duncan, P. W., Bode, R., Lai, S. M., & Perera, S. (2003). Rasch analysis of a new stroke-specific outcome scale: The stroke impact scale. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 84(7), 953.
40. Fisher, W. P. (1992). Reliability statistics. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 6(3), 238.
41. Linacre, J. M. (1997). KR-20 or Rasch reliability: Which tells the “truth”? Rasch Measurement Transactions, 11(3), 580-581.
42. Linacre, J. M. (2012). A user’s guide to Winsteps Ministeps Rasch-model computer programs [version 3.74.0]. Retrieved from http://www.winsteps.com/index.htm
43. Meyer, J. P. (2010). Reliability. New York: Oxford University Press.
44. Nunnally, J. (1967). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
45. Tennant, A., & Conghan, P. (2007). The Rasch measurement model in rheumatology: What is it and why use it? When should it be applied, and what should one look for in a Rasch paper? Arthritis Care and Research, 5(8), 1358-1362.
46. Wright, B. D., & Masters, O. N. (1982). Rating scale analysis (Rasch measurement). Chicago: MESA Press.
47. Linacre, J. M. (2006). Bernoulli trials, Fisher information, Shannon information and Rasch. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 20(3), 1062-1063.
48. Rasch, G. (1960). Probabilistic modelsfor some intelligence and attainment tests. Copenhagen: Danish Institute for Educational Research.
49. Wright, B. D. (1997). Measurement for social science and education. A history of social science measurement. University of Chicago MESA (Measurement, Evaluation and Statistical Analysis) Research Memo 62.
50. Wright, B. D., & Stone, M. H. (1979). Best test design. Chicago: MESA Press.
51. Linacre, J. M. (2012). Winsteps (Version 3.74) [Software]. Available from http://www.winsteps.com/index.html
52. Fraser, B. J. (1981). Test of science related attitudes handbook (TOSRA). Melbourne, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.
53. Wolfe, E. W. (2000). Equating and item banking with the Rasch model. Journal of Applied Measurement, 1(4), 409-434.
54. Wright, B. D., & Stone, M. H. (1979). Best test design. Chicago: MESA Press.
55. Hestenes, D., Wells, M., & Swackhamer, G. (1992). Force concept inventory. The Physics Teacher, 30, 141-158.
56. Wright, B. D. (1999). Common sense for measurement. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 13(3), 704.
57. Bybee, R. W. (2002). Scientific literacy - Mythos oder realität? In W. Gräber, P. Nentwig, T. Koballa, & R. Evans (Eds.), Scientific literacy. Der beitrag der naturwissenschaften zur allgemeinen bildung. Opladen, Germany: Leske+Budrich.
58. Hammann, M. (2004). Kompetenzentwicklungsmodelle: Merkmale und ihre Bedeutung - dargestellt anhand von Kompetenzen beim Experimentieren. Merkmahle und ihre Bedeutung, 57(4), 196-203.
59. Mayer, J. (2007). Erkenntnisgewinnung als wissenschaftliches problemlösen. In H. Vogt & D. Krüger (Eds.), Handbuch der theorien in der biologiedidaktischen forschung. Berlin, Germany/Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
60. Möller, A., Grube, C., Hartmann, S., & Mayer, J. (2009, April). Increase of inquiry competence: A longitudinal large-scale assessment of students’ performance from grade 5 to 10. Paper presented at the international conference of the National Association of Research in Science Teaching (NARST), Garden Grove, CA.
61. Möller, A., Grube, C., & Mayer, J. (2008, March-April). Skills and levels of students’ inquiry competence in lower secondary biology education (grade 5-10). Paper presented at the international conference of the National Association of Research in Science Teaching (NARST), Baltimore, MD.
62. Schauble, L., Glaser, R., Duschl, R. A., Schulze, S., & John, J. (1995). Students’ understanding of the objectives and procedures of experimentation in the science classroom. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4, 131-166.
63. Bjorkdahl, A., Nilsson, A. L., Grimby, G., & Stibrant Sunnerhagen, K. S. (2006). Does a short period of rehabilitation in the home setting facilitate functioning after stroke? A randomized controlled trial. Clinical Rehabilitation,20, 1038-1049.
64. Gothwal, V. K., Wright, T. A., Lamoureux, E. L., & Pesudovs, K. (2010). Measuring outcomes of cataract surgery using the visual function index-14. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 36(7), 1181-1188.
65. Linacre, J. M. (1994). Sample size and item calibration stability. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 7(4), 328.
66. Linacre, J. M. (1999). Investigating rating scale category utility. Journal of Outcome Measurement, 3(2), 103-122.
67. Linacre, J. M. (2002). Understanding Rasch measurement: Optimizing rating scale category effectiveness. Journal of Applied Measurement, 3(1), 85-106.
68. Linacre, J. M. (2012). Winsteps (Version 3.74) [Software]. Available from http://www.winsteps.com/index.html
69. Wright, B. D., & Tennant, A. (1996). Sample size again. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 9(4), 468.
70. Baghaei, P. (2007). Applying the Rasch rating-scale model to set multiple cut-offs. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 20(4), 1075-1076.
71. Roorda, L. D., Jones, C. A., Waltz, M., Lankhorst, G. J., Bouter, L. M., van der Eijken, J. W., et al. (2004). Satisfactory cross cultural equivalence of the Dutch WOMAC in patients with hip osteoarthritis waiting for arthroplasty. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 63(1), 36-42.
72. Wright, B. D., & Masters, G. (1982). Rating scale analysis. Chicago: Mesa Press.
73. Linacre, J. M. (2012) Winsteps (Version 3.74) [Software]. Available from http://www.winsteps.com/index.html
74. Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2007). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
75. Boone, W., Townsend, S., & Staver, J. (2011). Using Rasch Theory to Guide the Practice of Survey Development and Survey Data Analysis in Science Education and to Inform Science Reform Efforts: An Exemplar Utilizing STEBI Self-efficacy Data. Science Education, 95(2), 258-280.
76. Gallagher, J., & Lindsey, S. (1997). Elementary science teaching analysis matrix. Unpublished document.
77. Linacre, J. M. (2012). Facets computerprogramformany-facetRasch measurement. Beaverton, OR: Winsteps.com.
78. Looney, M. A. (1996). Figure skating fairness. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 10(2), 500.
79. Looney, M. A. (2004). Evaluating judge performance in sport. Journal of Applied Measurement, 5(1), 31-47.
80. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principals and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
81. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
82. National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
83. Thurstone, L. L. (1928). Attitudes can be measured. American Journal of Sociology, 33, 529-554.
84. Wright, B. D. (1989). Rasch model for Thurstone’s scaling requirements. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 2(1), 13-14.
85. Wright, B. D. (1992). IRT in the 1990s: Which models work best? Rasch Measurement Transactions, 6(1), 196-200.
86. Bond, T., & Fox, C. M. (2007). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
87. Smith E. V., Jr., & Smith, R. M. (Eds.). (2004). Introduction to Rasch measurement: Theory, models, and applications. Maple Grove, MN: JAM Press.
88. Wright, B. D., & Stone, M. H. (1979). Best test design. Chicago: MESA Press.
89. Linacre, J. M. (2012). A user’s guide to Winsteps [User’s manual and software]. http://www.winsteps.com/winsteps.htm
90. Rasch Measurement Transactions [RMT]. http://www.rasch.org/rmt/
91. Journal of Applied Measurement (JAM). http://www.jampress.org/
92. Boone, W., Abell, S., Volkmann, M., Arbaugh, F., & Lannin, J. (2011). Evaluating selected perceptions of science and mathematics teachers in an alternative certification program. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(3), 551-569. doi:10.1007/s10763-010-9205-8.
93. Boone, W. J., & Scantlebury, K. (2006). The role of Rasch analysis when conducting science education research utilizing multiple-choice tests. Science Education, 90(2), 253-269.
94. Boone, W. J., Townsend, J. S., & Staver, J. R. (2011). Using Rasch theory to guide the practice of survey development and survey data analysis in science education and to inform science reform efforts: An exemplar utilizing STEBI self-efficacy data. Science Education, 95(2), 258-280.
95. Donnelly, L. A., & Boone, W. J. (2007). Biology teachers’ attitudes toward and use of Indiana’s evolution standards. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(2), 236-257.
96. Eggert, S., & Bogeholz, S. (2010). Students’ use of decision making strategies with regard to socioscientific issues - An application of the Rasch partial credit model. Science Education, 94, 230-258.
97. Liu, X., & Boone, W. J. (2006). An introduction to Rasch measurement. In X. Liu & W. J. Boone (Eds.), Rasch measurement in science education (pp. 1-22). Maple Grove, MN: JAM Press.
98. Liu, X., & Lesniak, K. (2005). Students’ progression of understanding the matter concept from elementary to high school. Science Education, 89(3), 433-450.
99. Neumann, K., Fischer, H. E., & Kauertz, A. (2010). From PISA to educational standards: The impact of large scale assessments on science education in Germany. In Fou-Lai Lin (Ed.), International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(3), 545-563.
100. Neumann, I., Neumann, K., & Nehm, R. (2011). Evaluating instrument quality in science education: Rasch-based analyses of a nature of science test. International Journal of Science Education, 33(10), 1373-1405.
101. Baylor, C. R., Yorkston, K. M., Eadie, T. L., Miller, R. M., & Amtmann, D. (2009). Developing the communicative participation item bank: Rasch analysis results from a spasmodic dyspho- nia sample. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 52, 1302-1320. doi:1092-4388/09/5205-1302.
102. Cole, J. C., Rabin, A. S., Smith, T. L., & Kaufman, A. S. (2004). Development and validation of a Rasch-derived CES-D short form. Psychological Assessment, 16(4),360-372. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.16.4.360
103. Comins, J., Brodersen, J., Krogsgaard, M., & Beyer, N. (2008). Rasch analysis of the knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS): A statistical re-evaluation. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 18, 336-345.
104. Covic, T., Pallant, J. F., Conaghan, P. G., & Tennant, A. (2007). A longitudinal evaluation of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression scale (CES-D) in a rheumatoid arthritis population using Rasch analysis. Health and Quality of Life Research, 5, 41. doi:10.1186/1477-7525-5-41.
105. De Morton, N. A., Keating, J. L., & Davidson, M. (2008). Rasch analysis of the Barthel index in the assessment of hospitalized older patients after admission for an acute medical condition. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 89, 641-647. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2007.10.021.
106. Duncan, P. W., Bode, R. K., Lai, S. M., & Perera, S. (2003). Rasch analysis of a new stroke-specific outcome scale: The stroke impact scale. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 84, 950-963. doi:10.1016/S0003-9993(03)00035-2.
107. Hagquist, C. (2001). Evaluating composite health measures using Rasch modeling: An illustrative example. Social and Preventive Medicine, 46(6), 369-378. doi:10.1007BF01321663.
108. Itzkovich, M., Tripolski, M., Zeilig, G., Ring, H., Rosentul, N., Ronen, J., et al. (2002). Rasch analysis of the Catz-Itzkovich spinal cord independence measure. Spinal Cord, 40, 396-407. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101315.
109. Latimer, S., Covic, T., Cumming, S. R., & Tennant, A. (2009). Psychometric analysis of the Self-Harm Inventory using Rasch modeling. BMC Psychiatry, 9, 53.
110. Stelmack, J., Szlyk, J. P., Stelmack, T., Babcock-Parziale, J., Bemers-Turco, P., Williams, R. T., et al. (2004). Use of Rasch person-item map in exploratory data analysis: A clinical perspective. Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development, 41(2), 233-242.
111. Teslo, L. (2003). Measuring behaviors and perceptions: Rasch analysis as a tool for rehabilitation research. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 35, 105–115.