Developing professionalism via multisource feedback in team-based learning

Teaching and Learning in Medicine

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 362-365

  Emke, Amanda R ^a   Cheng, Steven ^a   Dufault, Carolyn ^a   Cianciolo, Anna T ^b   Musick, David ^c   Richards, Boyd ^d   Violato, Claudio ^e  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c VIRGINIA TECH CARILION SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d New York Presbyterian Columbia University Medical Center   (United States)

^e WAKE FOREST SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HUMAN; INTERDISCIPLINARY COMMUNICATION; LEARNING; MEDICAL EDUCATION; PEER GROUP; PROCEDURES; PROFESSIONALISM; STATISTICAL MODEL; TEACHING;

EDUCATION, MEDICAL, UNDERGRADUATE; FEEDBACK; HUMANS; INTERDISCIPLINARY COMMUNICATION; LEARNING; LINEAR MODELS; PEER GROUP; PROFESSIONALISM; TEACHING;

EID: 84954551876     PISSN: 10401334     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10401334.2015.1077135     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Eva KW, Regehr G. Self-assessment in the health professions: A reformulation and research agenda. Academic Medicine 2005;80:S46-54.
2. Weber DE, Mavin TJ, Roth WM, Henriqson E, Dekker SWA. Exploring the use of categories in the assessment of airline pilots’ performance as a potential source of examiners’ disagreement. Journal of Cognitive Engi- neering and Decision Making 2014;8:248-64.
3. Gingerich A, Regehr G, Eva KW. Rater-based assessments as social judgments: Rethinking the etiology of rater errors. Academic Medicine 2011;86:S1-7.
4. Regehr G, Ginsburg, S, Herold J, Hatala R, Eva K, Oulanova O. Using “standardized narratives” to explore new ways to represent faculty opinions of resident performance. Academic Medicine 2012;87:419-27.
5. Ginsburg SR, Regehr G, Hatala R, McNaughton N, Frohna A, Hodges B, et al. Context, conflict, and resolution: A new conceptual framework for evaluating professionalism. Academic Medicine 2000;75:S6-11.
6. Dannefer EF, Henson LC, Bierer SB, Grady-Weliky TA, Meldrum S, Nofziger AC, et al. Peer assessment of professional competence. Medical Education 2005;39:713-22.
7. Violato C, Lockyer J. Self and peer assessments of pediatricians, psychia- trists and medicine specialists: Implications for self-directed learning. Advances in Health Science Education 2006;11:235-44.
8. Lockyer J, Violato C, Fidler H. Likelihood of change: A study assessing surgeon use of multi-source feedback data. Teaching and Learning in Medicine 2003;15:168-74.
9. Overeem K, Lombarts MJMH, Arah OA, Klazinga NS, Grol RPTM, Wol- lersheim HC. Three methods of multi-source feedback compared: A plea for narrative comments and coworkers’ perspectives. Medical Teacher 2010;32:141-7.
10. Eva KW, Armson H, Holmboe E, Lockyer J, Loney E, Mann K, et al. Factors influencing responsiveness to feedback: On the interplay between fear, confidence, and reasoning processes. Advances in Health Science Education 2012;17:15-26.
11. Smither JW, London M, Reilly RR. Does performance improve following multisource feedback? A theoretical model, meta-analysis and review of empirical findings. Personnel Psychology 2005;58: 33-66.