Using Political Efficacy Messages to Increase Climate Activism: The Mediating Role of Emotions

Science Communication

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 99-127

  Feldman, Lauren ^a   Hart, P Sol ^b  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

climate change; efficacy; emotions; political ideology; political participation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84954520225     PISSN: 10755470     EISSN: 15528545     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1075547015617941     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. T.BolsenJ.N.DruckmanF.L.Cook (2015). Citizens’, scientists’, and policy advisors’ beliefs about global warming. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 658, 271-295. doi:10.1177/0002716214558393
2. T.Brader (2005). Striking a responsive chord: How political ads motivate and persuade voters by appealing to emotions. American Journal of Political Science, 49, 388-405. doi:10.1111/j.0092-5853.2005.00130.x
3. J.G.BullockD.P.GreenS.E.Ha (2010). Yes, but what’s the mechanism? (don’t expect an easy answer). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 550-558.
4. T.H.CampbellA.C.Kay (2014). Solution aversion: On the relation between ideology and motivated disbelief. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 809-824. doi:10.1037/a0037963
5. A.E.Chadwick (2015). Toward a theory of persuasive hope: Effects of cognitive appraisals, hope appeals, and hope in the context of climate change. Health Communication, 30, 598-611. doi:10.1080/10410236.2014.916777
6. S.C.CraigR.G.NiemiG.E.Silver (1990). Political efficacy and trust: A report on the NES pilot study items. Political Behavior, 12, 289-314. doi:10.1007/BF00992337
7. M.F.DahlstromA.DudoD.Brossard (2012). Precision of information, sensational information, and self-efficacy information as message-level variables affecting risk perceptions. Risk Analysis, 32, 155-166. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01641.x
8. R.E.DunlapK.D.Van Liere (1978). The new environmental paradigm: A proposed measuring instrument and preliminary results. Journal of Environmental Education, 9, 10-19.
9. E.W.GroenendykA.J.Banks (2014). Emotional rescue: How affect helps partisans overcome collective action problems. Political Psychology, 35, 359-378. doi:10.1111/pops.12045
10. P.S.HartL.Feldman (2014). Threat without efficacy? Climate change on U.S. network news. Science Communication, 36, 325-351. doi:10.1177/1075547013520239
11. P.S.HartE.C.Nisbet (2012). Boomerang effects in science communication: How motivated reasoning and identity cues amplify opinion polarization about climate mitigation policies. Communication Research, 39, 701-723.
12. P.S.HartE.C.NisbetT.Myers (2015). Public attention to science and political news and support for climate change mitigation. Nature Climate Change, 5, 541-545. doi:10.1177/0093650211416646
13. A.F.Hayes (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
14. A.F.Hayes (2014, May). Hacking PROCESS: Some advanced and undocumented applications in mediation and moderation analysis. PowerPoint slides presented at the Midwest Psychological Association Conference, Chicago, IL.
15. L.HuddyS.FeldmanC.TaberG.Lahav (2005). Threat, anxiety, and support of antiterrorism policies. American Journal of Political Science, 49, 593-608. doi:10.2307/3647734
16. R.S.Lazarus (1991). Emotion and adaptation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
17. R.S.Lazarus (2006). Emotions and interpersonal relationships: Toward a person-centered conceptualization of emotions and coping. Journal of Personality, 74(1), 9-46. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00368.x
18. T.J.LeeperK.J.Mullinix (2015). What if you had done things differently? Testing the generalizability of framing effects with parallel experiments. Unpublished manuscript. Retrieved from https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/414906/ParallelExperimentsOnFraming.pdf
19. A.LeiserowitzE.MaibachC.Roser-RenoufG.FeinbergS.Rosenthal (2014) Americans’ actions to limit global warming, November 2013. New Haven, CT: Yale Project on Climate Change Communication. Retrieved from http://environment.yale.edu/climate-communication/files/Behavior-November-2013.pdf
20. J.S.LernerD.Keltner (2001). Fear, anger, and risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(1), 146. doi:10.1037//O022-3514.81.1.146
21. E.MaibachC.Roser-RenoufA.Leiserowitz (2008). Communication and marketing as climate change-intervention assets: A public health perspective. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 35, 488-500. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2008.08.016
22. E.MaibachC.Roser-RenoufA.Leiserowitz (2009). Global warming’s six Americas 2009: An audience segmentation analysis. New Haven, CT: Yale Project on Climate Change Communication. Retrieved from http://environment.yale.edu/climate-communication/files/SixAmericas2009.pdf
23. G.E.MarcusW.R.NeumanM.MacKuen (2000). Affective intelligence and political judgment. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
24. A.M.McCrightR.E.Dunlap (2011). The politicization of climate change and polarization in the American public’s views of global warming, 2001–2010. Sociological Quarterly, 52, 155-194. doi:10.1111/j.1533-8525.2011.01198.x
25. J.M.MillerJ.A.Krosnick (2004). Threat as a motivator of political activism: A field experiment. Political Psychology, 25, 507-523.
26. T.A.MyersM.C.NisbetE.W.MaibachA.A.Leiserowitz (2012). A public health frame arouses hopeful emotions about climate change. Climatic Change, 113, 1105-1112. doi:10.1007/s10584-012-0513-6
27. R.L.Nabi (2002). Discrete emotions and persuasion. In (Eds.), The persuasion handbook: Developments in theory and practice (pp. 289-308). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28. R.L.Nabi (2003). Exploring the framing effects of emotion do discrete emotions differentially influence information accessibility, information seeking, and policy preference?Communication Research, 30, 224-247. doi:10.1177/0093650202250881
29. M.C.Nisbet (2009). Communicating climate change: Why frames matter for public engagement. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 51(2), 12-23. doi:10.3200/ENVT.51.2.12-23
30. D.OckwellL.WhitmarshS.O’Neill (2009). Reorienting climate change communication for effective mitigation. Science Communication, 30, 305-327. doi:10.1177/1075547008328969
31. S.O’NeillS.Nicholson-Cole (2009). “Fear won’t do it”: Promoting positive engagement with climate change through visual and iconic representations. Science Communication, 30, 355-379. doi:10.1177/1075547008329201
32. D.J.O’Keefe. (2003). Message properties, mediating states, and manipulation checks: Claims, evidence, and data analysis in experimental persuasive message effects research. Communication Theory, 13(3), 251-274. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2003.tb00292.x
33. P.Romero-LankaoJ.B.SmithD.J.DavidsonN.S.DiffenbaughP.L.KinneyP.KirshenL.Villers Ruiz (2014). North America. In (Eds.), Climate change 2014: Impacts, adaptation, & vulnerability. Part B: Regional aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (pp. 1439-1458). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/wg2/WGIIAR5-Chap26_FINAL.pdf
34. S.J.RosenstoneJ.M.Hansen (2003). Mobilization, participation, and democracy in America (1st ed.). New York, NY: Pearson.
35. C.Roser-RenoufE.W.MaibachA.LeiserowitzX.Zhao (2014). The genesis of climate change activism: From key beliefs to political action. Climatic Change, 125, 163-178. doi:10.1007/s10584-014-1173-5
36. C.A.SmithP.C.Ellsworth (1985). Patterns of cognitive appraisal in emotion. Journal of Personality and Social psychology, 48, 813-838. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.48.4.813
37. N.SmithA.Leiserowitz (2014). The role of emotion in global warming policy support and opposition. Risk Analysis, 34, 937-948. doi:10.1111/risa.12140
38. R.C.Stedman (2004). Risk and climate change: Perceptions of key policy actors in Canada. Risk Analysis, 24, 1395-1406. doi:10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00534.x
39. C.S.TaberM.Lodge (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50, 755-769. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00214.x
40. N.TauschJ.C.BeckerR.SpearsO.ChristR.SaabP.SinghR.N.Siddiqui (2011). Explaining radical group behavior: Developing emotion and efficacy routes to normative and nonnormative collective action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 129-148. doi:10.1037/a0022728
41. N.A.ValentinoT.BraderE.W.GroenendykK.GregorowiczV.L.Hutchings (2011). Election night’s alright for fighting: The role of emotions in political participation. Journal of Politics, 73, 156-170. doi:10.1017/S0022381610000939
42. N.A.ValentinoK.GregorowiczE.W.Groenendyk (2009). Efficacy, emotions and the habit of participation. Political Behavior, 31, 307-330. doi:10.1007/s11109-008-9076-7
43. K.Witte (1992). Putting the fear back into fear appeals: The extended parallel process model. Communication Monographs, 59, 329-349. doi:10.1080/03637759209376276