Applying latency to half of a self-avatar's body to change real walking patterns

2015 IEEE Virtual Reality Conference, VR 2015 - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 89-96

  Samaraweera, Gayani ^a   Perdomo, Alex ^a   Quarles, John ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

Author keywords

H.5.1 Multimedia Information Systems : Artificial, augmented, and virtual realities Evaluation methodology

Indexed keywords

TIME DELAY;

EVALUATION/METHODOLOGY; GAIT REHABILITATION; NOVEL TECHNIQUES; PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES; SIMULATOR SICKNESS; USER PERFORMANCE; VIRTUAL REHABILITATION; WALKING PATTERN;

VIRTUAL REALITY;

EID: 84954512348     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/VR.2015.7223329     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (33)

1. J. A. Jones, J. E. Swan, II, G. Singh, S. Reddy, K. Moser, C. Hua, and S. R. Ellis. Improvements in visually directed walking in virtual environments cannot be explained by changes in gait alone. In Pro-ceedings of the ACM Symposium on Applied Perception, Los Angeles, California, Aug. 2012.
2. B. Mohler, J. Campos, M. Weyel, and H. H. Bülthoff. Gait parameters while walking in a head-mounted display virtual environment and the real world. pages 1-4, Weimar, Germany, July 2007.
3. L. Phillips, B. Ries, M. Kaeding, and V. Interrante. Gait parameters in stressful virtual environments. In 2nd IEEE VR 2010 Workshop on Perceptual Illusions in Virtual Environments, Waltham, MA, USA, March 2010.
4. G. Samaraweera, R. Guo, and J. Quarles. Latency and avatars in virtual environments and the effects on gait for persons with mobility impairments. In 3D User Interfaces (3DUI), 2013 IEEE Symposium on, pages 23-30, 2013.
5. T. B. Sheridan and W. R. Ferrell. Remote manipulative control with transmission delay. Human Factors in Electronics, IEEE Transactions on, HFE-4 (1): 25-29, Sept. 1963.
6. I. S. MacKenzie and C. Ware. Lag as a determinant of human performance in interactive systems. In Proceedings of the INTERACT '93 and CHI '93 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, pages 488-493, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1993.
7. M. Meehan, S. Razzaque, M. C. Whitton, and F. P. Brooks, Jr. Effect of latency on presence in stressful virtual environments. In Proceed-ings of the IEEE Virtual Reality 2003, VR '03, pages 141-, Washington, DC, USA, 2003. IEEE Computer Society.
8. C. J. Rich and C. C. Braun. Assessing the impact of control and sensory compatibility on sickness in virtual environments. Proceed-ings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 40 (22): 1122-1125, 1996.
9. K. K. Patterson, I. Parafianowicz, C. J. Danells, V. Closson, M. C. Verrier, W. R. Staines, S. E. Black, and W. E. McIlroy. Gait asymmetry in community-ambulating stroke survivors. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 89 (2), 2008.
10. S. Hesse, M. Konrad, and D. Uhlenbrock. Treadmill walking with partial body weight support versus floor walking in hemiparetic subjects. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 80 (4): 421-427, 1999.
11. T. Prokop, M. Schubert, and W. Berger. Visual influence on human locomotion modulation to changes in optic flow. Experimental Brain Research, 114 (1): 63-70, 1997.
12. J. Feasel, M. C. Whitton, L. Kassler, F. P. Brooks, and M. D. Lewek. The integrated virtual environment rehabilitation treadmill system. Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, IEEE Transactions on, 19 (3): 290-297, June 2011.
13. G. J. Barton, A. R. De Asha, E. CP van Loon, T. Geijtenbeek, and M. A. Robinson. Manipulation of visual biofeedback during gait with a time delayed adaptive virtual mirror box. Journal of NeuroEngineer-ing and Rehabilitation, 11 (1): 101, 2014.
14. B. J. Mohler, W. B. Thompson, S. H. Creem-Regehr, Jr Pick, H. L., and Jr Warren, W. H. Visual flow influences gait transition speed and preferred walking speed. Experimental Brain Research, 181 (2): 221-228, 2007.
15. J. L. Souman, P. R. Giordano, M. Schwaiger, I. Frissen, T. Thümmel, H. Ulbrich, A. De Luca, H. H. Bülthoff, and M. O. Ernst. Cyberwalk: Enabling unconstrained omnidirectional walking through virtual environments. ACM Trans. Appl. Percept., 8 (4): 25: 1-25: 22, December 2008.
16. T. Banton, J. Stefanucci, F. Durgin, A. Fass, and D. Proffitt. The perception of walking speed in a virtual environment. Presence: Teleoper. Virtual Environ., 14 (4): 394-406, August 2005.
17. J. J. Rieser, H. L. Jr Pick, D. H. Ashmead, and A. E. Garing. Calibration of human locomotion and models of perceptual-motor organization. Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 21 (3): 480-497, 1995.
18. E. A. McManus, B. Bodenheimer, S. Streuber, S. de la Rosa, H. H. Bülthoff, and B. J. Mohler. The influence of avatar (self and character) animations on distance estimation, object interaction and locomotion in immersive virtual environments. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visu-alization, APGV '11, pages 37-44, New York, NY, USA, 2011. ACM.
19. V. I. Petkova, M. Khoshnevis, and H. H. Ehrsson. The perspective matters! multisensory integration in ego-centric reference frames determines full body ownership. Frontiers in Psychology, 2 (35), 2011.
20. K. Kilteni, R. Groten, and M. Slater. The sense of embodiment in virtual reality. Presence, 21 (4): 373-387, Nov 2012.
21. E. L. Altschuler, S. B. Wisdom, L. Stone, C. Foster, D. Galasko, M. E. Llewellyn, and Ramachandran V. S. Rehabilitation of hemiparesis after stroke with a mirror. The Lancet, 353 (9169): 2035-2036, 1999.
22. Y. Kang, H. Park, H. Kim, T. Lim, J. Ku, S. Cho, S. Kim, and E. Park. Upper extremity rehabilitation of stroke: Facilitation of corticospinal excitability using virtual mirror paradigm. Journal of NeuroEngineer-ing and Rehabilitation, 9 (1), 2012.
23. P. Debevec. Rendering synthetic objects into real scenes: Bridging traditional and image-based graphics with global illumination and high dynamic range photography. In Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, SIGGRAPH '98, pages 189-198, New York, NY, USA, 1998. ACM.
24. B. Walter, S. R. Marschner, H. Li, and K. E. Torrance. Microfacet models for refraction through rough surfaces. In Proceedings of the 18th Eurographics Conference on Rendering Techniques, EGSR'07, pages 195-206, Aire-la-Ville, Switzerland, Switzerland, 2007. Eurographics Association.
25. GAITRite. Gaitrite electronic walkway technical reference, Dec 2013.
26. A. Steed. A simple method for estimating the latency of interactive, real-time graphics simulations. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM Sym-posium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology, VRST '08, pages 123-129, New York, NY, USA, 2008. ACM.
27. Unity Indie VRPN Adapter. http://web. cs. wpi. edu/gogo/hive/UIVA/.
28. D. S. Reisman, R. Wityk, K. Silver, and A. J. Bastian. Locomotor adaptation on a split-belt treadmill can improve walking symmetry post-stroke. Brain, 130 (7): 1861-1872, 2007.
29. R. S. Kennedy, N. E. Lane, K. S. Berbaum, and M. G. Lilienthal. Simulator sickness questionnaire: An enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 3 (3): 203-220, 1993.
30. Ralf Bender and Stefan Lange. Adjusting for multiple testingwhen and how? Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 54 (4): 343-349, 2001.
31. K. Mania, B. D. Adelstein, S. R. Ellis, and M. I. Hill. Perceptual sensitivity to head tracking latency in virtual environments with varying degrees of scene complexity. In Proceedings of the 1st Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization, APGV '04, pages 39-47, New York, NY, USA, 2004. ACM.
32. S. R. Ellis, K. Mania, B. D. Adelstein, and M. I. Hill. Generalizeability of latency detection in a variety of virtual environments. Proceed-ings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 48 (23): 2632-2636, 2004.
33. G. Samaraweera, R. Guo, and J. Quarles. Head tracking latency in virtual environments revisited: Do users with multiple sclerosis notice latency less? (In submission), 2014.