Manipulation of visual biofeedback during gait with a time delayed adaptive Virtual Mirror Box

Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Barton, Gabor J ^a   De Asha, Alan R ^b   Van Loon, Edwin C P ^c   Geijtenbeek, Thomas ^c   Robinson, Mark A ^a  

^a LIVERPOOL JOHN MOORES UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRADFORD   (United Kingdom)

^c Motek Medical bv   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Amputees; Cerebral palsy; Complex regional pain syndrome; Gait; Mirror box; Phantom limb pain; Rehabilitation; Stroke; Virtual reality

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANKLE PROSTHESIS; ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; COGNITIVE REHABILITATION; COMPUTER ASSISTED THERAPY; DISABLED PERSON; ELBOW; GAIT; GAIT DISORDER; HUMAN; JOINT FUNCTION; KNEE FUNCTION; LIMB MOVEMENT; LOCOMOTION; MIDDLE AGED; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TREADMILL TEST; VIRTUAL MIRROR BOX; VIRTUAL REALITY EXPOSURE THERAPY; VISUAL FEEDBACK; WALKING; COMPUTER INTERFACE; EQUIPMENT; MALE; METHODOLOGY; NEUROLOGIC GAIT DISORDER; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY; SENSORY FEEDBACK;

AMPUTEES; BIOFEEDBACK, PSYCHOLOGY; FEEDBACK, SENSORY; GAIT; GAIT DISORDERS, NEUROLOGIC; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 84903882014     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17430003     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1743-0003-11-101     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Synaesthesia in phantom limbs induced with mirrors. Ramachandran VS, Rogers-Ramachandran D, Proc Biol Sci 1996 263 1369 377 386 10.1098/rspb.1996. 0058 8637922
2. Increased motor control of a phantom leg in humans results from the visual feedback of a virtual leg. Brodie EE, Whyte A, Waller B, Neurosci Lett 2003 341 2 167 169 10.1016/S0304-3940(03)00160-5 12686392
3. Plasticity and functional recovery in neurology. Ramachandran VS, Clin Med 2005 5 368 373 10.7861/clinmedicine.5-4-368 16138492
4. Mirror therapy for phantom limb pain. Chan BL, Witt R, Charrow AP, Magee A, Howard R, Pasquina PF, Heilman KM, Tsao JW, N Engl J Med 2007 357 2206 2007 10.1056/NEJMc071927 18032777
5. Analgesia through the looking-glass? A randomized controlled trial investigating the effect of viewing a 'virtual' limb upon phantom limb pain, sensation and movement. Brodie EE, Whyte A, Niven CA, Eur J Pain 2007 11 4 428 436 10.1016/j.ejpain.2006.06.002 16857400
6. Rehabilitation of hemiparesis after stroke with a mirror. Altschuler EL, Wisdom SB, Stone L, Foster C, Galasko D, Llewellyn DM, Ramachandran VS, Lancet 1999 353 2035 2036 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)00920-4 10376620
7. Mirror therapy improves hand function in subacute stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Yavuzer G, Selles R, Sezer N, Sütbeyaz S, Bussmann JB, Köseoǧlu F, Atay MB, Stam HJ, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008 89 3 393 398 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.08.162 18295613
8. Systematic review of the effectiveness of mirror therapy in upper extremity function. Ezendam D, Bongers RM, Jannink MJ, Disabil Rehabil 2009 31 26 2135 49 10.3109/09638280902887768 19903124
9. The mirror box illusion: effect of visual information on bimanual coordination in children with spastic hemiparetic cerebral palsy. Feltham MG, Ledebt A, Bennett SJ, Deconinck FJ, Verheul MH, Savelsbergh GJ, Motor Control 2010 14 1 68 82 20237404
10. Using visual illusion to reduce at-level neuropathic pain in paraplegia. Moseley GL, Pain 2007 130 294 298 10.1016/j.pain.2007.01.007 17335974
11. Training with virtual visual feedback to alleviate phantom limb pain. Mercier C, Sirigu A, Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009 23 6 587 594 10.1177/1545968308328717 19171946
12. Immersive virtual reality as a rehabilitative technology for phantom limb experience: a protocol. Murray CD, Patchick E, Pettifer S, Caillette F, Howard T, Cyberpsychol Behav 2006 9 2 167 170 10.1089/cpb.2006.9.167 16640472
13. An Investigation into the Performance of a Virtual Mirror Box for the Treatment of Phantom Limb Pain in Amputees using Augmented Reality Technology. O'Neill K, de Paor A, MacLachlan M, McDarby G, Human-Computer-Interaction International Conference Proceedings. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc 2003
14. Variation in phantom limb pain: results of a diary study. Whyte AS, Niven CA, J Pain Symptom Manage 2001 22 5 947 953 10.1016/S0885-3924(01)00356-6 11728798
15. A real-time system for biomechanical analysis of human movement and muscle function. van den Bogert AJ, Geijtenbeek T, Even-Zohar O, Steenbrink F, Hardin EC, Med Biol Eng Comput in press
16. D-Flow: Immersive Virtual Reality and Real-Time Feedback for Rehabilitation. Geijtenbeek T, Steenbrink F, Otten E, Even-Zohar O, Proceedings of the 10th ACM International Conference on Virtual Reality Continuum and Its Applications in Industry, 11-12 December 2011 New York: ACM 2011 201 208
17. Algorithms to determine event timing during normal walking using kinematic data. Hreljac A, Marshall RN, J Biomech 2000 33 783 786 10.1016/S0021-9290(00)00014-2 10808002
18. Automatic detection of gait events using kinematic data. O'Connor CM, Thorpe SK, O'Malley MJ, Vaughan CL, Gait Posture 2007 25 469 474 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.05.016 16876414
19. Gait event detection using a multilayer neural network. Miller A, Gait Posture 2009 29 542 545 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2008.12.003 19135372
20. A marker based kinematic method of identifying initial contact during gait. De Asha AR, Robinson MA, Barton GJ, Gait Posture 2012 36 3 650 652 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.04.016 22704579
21. Two simple methods for determining gait events during treadmill and overground walking using kinematic data. Zeni JA Jr, Richards JG, Higginson JS, Gait Posture 2008 27 710 714 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.07.007 17723303
22. Levine D, Richards J, Whittle MW, Whittle's Gait Analysis Churchill Livingstone: Elsevier 2012
23. Development of a Virtual Mirror Box for spatial and temporal manipulation of visual feedback on body movement during gait: A technical evaluation [abstract]. Barton GJ, De Asha AR, Geijtenbeek T, Robinson MA, Gait Posture 2011 36 S1 76
24. Effect of viewing angle on arm reaching while standing in a virtual environment: Potential for virtual rehabilitation. Ustinova KI, Perkins J, Szostakowski L, Tamkei LS, Leonard WA, Acta Psychologica 2010 133 180 190 10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.11.006 20021998