Patient and public involvement: How much do we spend and what are the benefits?

Health Expectations

Volumn 18, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 1918-1926

  Pizzo, Elena ^a   Doyle, Cathal ^b   Matthews, Rachel ^b   Barlow, James ^a  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b CHELSEA AND WESTMINSTER HOSPITAL NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Benefits; Costs; Engagement; Involvement; Patient and public involvement; Public

Indexed keywords

COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ECONOMICS; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HUMAN; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT PARTICIPATION;

COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; HEALTH POLICY; HUMANS; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT-CENTERED CARE;

EID: 84954508365     PISSN: 13696513     EISSN: 13697625     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/hex.12204     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Staniszewska S, Herron-Marx S, Mockford C. Measuring the impact of patient and public involvement: the need for an evidence base. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 2008; 20: 373-374.
2. Burton P. Conceptual, theoretical and practical issues in measuring the benefits of public participation. Evaluation, 2009; 15: 263-284.
3. Hughes D, Mullen C, Vincent-Jones P. Choice vs. voice? PPI policies and the re-positioning of the state in England and Wales. Health Expectations, 2009; 12: 237-250.
4. Ocloo JE, Fulop NJ. Developing a 'critical' approach to patient and public involvement in patient safety in the NHS: learning lessons from other parts of the public sector? Health Expectations, 2011; 15: 424-432.
5. Tritter JQ. Revolution or evolution: the challenges of conceptualizing patient and public involvement in a consumerist world. Health Expectations, 2009; 12: 275-287.
6. Department of Health. Equity and Excellence: Liberating the NHS. London, 2010. www.dh.gov.uk (search for gateway reference: 14835).
7. Dorfman P. Patient and Public Involvement Policy in the UK. NHS Centre for Involvement, University of Warwick, 2007.
8. Epstein RM, Fiscella K, Lesser CS, Stange KC. Why the nation needs a policy push on patient-centered health care. Health Affairs (Millwood), 2010; 29: 1489-1495.
9. Boote J, Telford R, Cooper C. Consumer involvement in health research: a review and research agenda. Health Policy, 2002; 61: 213-236.
10. Telford R, Beverley CA, Cooper CL, Boote JD. Consumer involvement in health research: fact or fiction? British Journal of Clinical Governance, 2002; 7: 92-103.
11. Tritter JQ. Public and patient participation in health care and health policy in the United Kingdom. Health Expectations, 2011; 14: 220-223.
12. Burton P, Goodlad R, Croft J. How would we know what works? Context and complexity in the evaluation of community involvement. Evaluation, 2006; 12: 294-312.
13. Coulter A, Ellins J. Patient-Focused Interventions. A Review of the Evidence. London: The Health Foundation, 2006.
14. Carlsson C, Nilbert M, Nilsson K. Patients' involvement in improving cancer care: experiences in three years of collaboration between members of patient associations and health care professionals. Patient Education and Counselling, 2006; 61: 65-71.
15. Thornton S. Patient power needs a turbo boost. Health Service Journal, 2011; 121: 16-17.
16. Forbat L, Hubbard G, Kearney N. Patient and public involvement: models and muddles. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 2009; 18: 2547-2554.
17. Coulter A. Engaging Patients in Healthcare. Maidenhead: Open University Press, 2011.
18. Involve. People and Participation: How to put Citizens at the Heart of Decision-Making. London: Involve, 2005.
19. Imison C, Naylor C, Goodwin N et al. Transforming our Healthcare System. Ten Priorities for Commissioners. London: The King's Fund, 2011.
20. Imison C. Reconfiguring Hospital Services: Briefing. London: The King's Fund, 2011.
21. Corrigan PW, Larson JE. Shared decision making: whose decision? Psychiatric Services, 2009; 60: 1555; author reply 1555-6.
22. Boyle D, Harris M. The Challenge of Co-production: How Equal Partnerships Between Professionals and the Public are Crucial to Improving Public Services. London: NESTA, 2009.
23. Crawford MJ, Rutter D, Manley C et al. Systematic review of involving patients in the planning and development of health care. British Medical Journal, 2002; 325: 1263.
24. Elwyn G, Edwards A, Mowle S et al. Measuring the involvement of patients in share decision-making: a systematic review of instruments. Patient Education and Counselling, 2001; 43: 5-22.
25. Ali K, Roffe C, Crome P. What patients want: consumer involvement in the design of a randomized controlled trial of routine oxygen supplementation after acute stroke. Stroke, 2006; 37: 865-871.
26. Coglianese C. Does consensus work? Pragmatism and democracy in the regulatory process. In: Morales A (ed.) Renascent Pragmatism: Studies in Law and Social Science 80-09. Burlington: Ashgate, 2003.
27. Drummond MF, Sculpher MJ, Torrance GW, O'Brien BJ, Stoddart GL. Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes, 3rd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.
28. Briggs AH, O'Brien BJ. The death of cost-minimisation analysis? Health Economics, 2001; 10: 179-184.
29. Birch S, Gafni A. Cost-effectiveness and cost utility analysis: methods for the non-economic evaluation of health care programmes and how we can do better. In: Geilser E, Heller O (eds) Managing Technology in Health Care. Norwell, MA: Kluwer, 1996: 51-68.
30. Gold MR, Siegel JE, Russel LB, Weinstein MC. Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.
31. Thompson AGH. The meaning of patient involvement and participation in health care consultations: a taxonomy. Social Science & Medicine, 2007; 64: 1297-1310.
32. Birch S, Donaldson C. Applications of cost-benefit analysis to health care: departures from welfare economic theory. Journal of Health Economics, 1987; 6: 211-225.
33. Dolan P. Output measures and valuation in health. In: Drummond MF, McGuire A (eds) Economic Evaluation in Health Care - Merging Theory With Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001: 46-67.
34. Torrance GW. Measurement of health state utilities for economic appraisal - a review. Journal of Health Economics, 1986; 5: 1-30.
35. Diener A, O'Brien B, Gafni A. Health care contingent valuation studies: a review and classification of the literature. Health Economics, 1998; 7: 313-326.
36. Koopmanschap M, Rutten F. Indirect costs: the consequence of production loss or increased costs of production. Medical Care, 1996; 34 (Suppl.): DS59-DS68.
37. Daykin N, Evans D, Petsoulas C, Sayers A. Evaluating the impact of patient and public involvement initiatives on UK health services: a systematic review. Evidence and Policy, 2007; 3: 47-65.
38. NAO. Getting Citizens Involved: Community Participation in Neighbourhood Renewal. London: Comptroller and Auditor General, National Audit Office, 2004.
39. OPDM. Public Participation in Local Government. A Survey of Local Authorities. London: Minister OotDP, 2002.
40. OPDM. Citizen Engagement and Public Services: Why Neighbourhoods Matter. London: Minister OotDP, 2005.
41. Angell K, Kreshka M, McCoy R et al. Psychosocial intervention for rural women with breast cancer. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2003; 18: 499-507.
42. Barnard A, Carter M, Britten N, Purtell R, Wyatt K, Ellis A. The PC11 Report: An Evaluation of Consumer Involvement in the London Primary Care Studies Programme. Exeter: Peninsula Medical School, 2005.
43. Andejeski Y, Bisceglio I, Dickersin K et al. Quantitative impact of including consumers in the scientific review of breast cancer research proposals. Journal of Women's Health and Gender-Based Medicine, 2002; 11: 379-388.
44. Caron-Flinterman J, Broerse J, Bunders J. The experimental knowledge of patients: a new resource for biomedical research? Social Science & Medicine, 2005; 60: 2575-2584.
45. Beresford P. The role of service user research in generating knowledge-based health and social care: from conflict to contribution. Evidence and Policy, 2005; 3: 329-341.
46. Clark M, Glasby J, Lester H. Cases for change: user involvement in mental health services and research. Research Policy and Planning, 2004; 22: 31-38.
47. Davies S, Nolan M. Editorial: nurturing research partnerships with older people and their carers: learning from experience. Quality in Ageing - Policy, Practice and Research, 2003; 4: 2-5.
48. Dewar B. Beyond tokenistic involvement of older people in research - a framework for future development and understanding. International Journal of Older People Nursing in association with Journal of Clinical Nursing, 2005; 14: 48-53.
49. Parris M. Don't ask my opinion; don't consult, engage or include; just lead' in. The Times, 2005 26-2-2005.
50. Taverne D. The March of Unreason: Science, Democracy and the New Fundamentalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.
51. Taylor M. Unleashing the Potential: Bringing Residents to the Centre of Regeneration. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation, 1995.
52. Jones IR, Berney L, Kelly M et al. Is patient involvement possible when decisions involve scarce resources? A qualitative study of decision-making in primary care. Social Science & Medicine, 2004; 59: 93-102.
53. Involve. The True Costs of Participation. London: Involve, 2005.
54. McLaughlin H. Involving young service users as co-researchers: possibilities, benefits and costs. British Journal of Social Work, 2006; 36: 1395-1410.