Green Infrastructure Design Based on Spatial Conservation Prioritization and Modeling of Biodiversity Features and Ecosystem Services

Environmental Management

Volumn 57, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 251-256

  Snäll, Tord ^a   Lehtomäki, Joona ^b   Arponen, Anni ^b   Elith, Jane ^c   Moilanen, Atte ^b  

^a SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Citizen science data; Corridor; Ecosystem services; Green infrastructure; Spatial conservation prioritization; Systematic conservation planning; Zonation software

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; CONSERVATION; COST EFFECTIVENESS; DESIGN; ECOLOGY;

CITIZEN SCIENCE; CONSERVATION PRIORITIZATION; CORRIDOR; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE; SYSTEMATIC CONSERVATION PLANNING;

ECOSYSTEMS;

BIODIVERSITY; CITIZENSHIP; CONSERVATION PLANNING; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DESIGN; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; EUROPEAN UNION; GREENSPACE; INFRASTRUCTURE PLANNING; PRIORITIZATION; SOFTWARE; SPATIAL PLANNING; WORLD WIDE WEB;

ARTICLE; BIODIVERSITY; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CLINICAL FEATURE; CONSERVATION BIOLOGY; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; ECOSYSTEM; ECOSYSTEM MONITORING; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; GREEN CHEMISTRY; GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE; HABITAT; POPULATION; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; SPECIES DISTRIBUTION; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; EUROPE; PROCEDURES; THEORETICAL MODEL;

BIODIVERSITY; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ECOSYSTEM; EUROPE; MODELS, THEORETICAL;

EID: 84954396902     PISSN: 0364152X     EISSN: 14321009     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00267-015-0613-y     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Andersson K, Angelstam P, Elbakidze M, Axelsson R, Degerman E (2013) Green infrastructures and intensive forestry: need and opportunity for spatial planning in a Swedish rural–urban gradient. Scand J For Res 28:143–165
2. Arponen A, Moilanen A, Ferrier S (2008) A successful community-level strategy for conservation prioritization. J Appl Ecol 45:1436–1445
3. Ball IR, Possingham HP (2000) MARXAN (V1.8.2): marine reserve design using spatially explicit annealing, a Manual
4. Beier P, Spencer W, Baldwin RF, McRae BH (2011) Toward best practices for developing regional connectivity maps. Conserv Biol 25:879–892
5. Bennett EM, Peterson GD, Gordon LJ (2009) Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. Ecol Lett 12:1394–1404
6. Bernazzani P, Bradley BA, Opperman JJ (2012) Integrating climate change into habitat conservation plans under the U.S. endangered species act. Environ Man 49:1103–1114
7. Carroll C, McRae BH, Brookes A (2012) Use of linkage mapping and centrality analysis across habitat gradients to conserve connectivity of gray wolf populations in western North America. Conserv Biol 26:78–87
8. Chan KMA, Shaw MR, Cameron DR, Underwood EC, Daily GC (2006) Conservation planning for ecosystem services. PLoS Biol 4:2138–2152
9. Chan KMA, Hoshizaki L, Klinkenberg B (2011) Ecosystem services in conservation planning: targeted benefits vs. co-benefits or costs? PLoS One 6:e24378
10. Cimon-Morin J, Darveau M, Poulin M (2013) Fostering synergies between ecosystem services and biodiversity in conservation planning: a review. Biol Conserv 166:144–154
11. Dorazio RM (2014) Accounting for imperfect detection and survey bias in statistical analysis of presence-only data. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 23:1472–1484
12. Egoh BN, Reyers B, Carwardine J, Bode M, O’Farrell PJ, Wilson KA, Possingham HP, Rouget M, De Lange W, Richardson DM, Cowling RM (2010) Safeguarding Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services in the Little Karoo, South Africa. Conserv Biol 24:1021–1030
13. Elith J, Franklin J (2013) Species distribution modeling. In: Levin SA (ed) Encyclopedia of biodiversity, 2nd edn. Academic Press, Waltham, pp 692–705
14. European Commission (2009) Directive 2009/28/EC of the European parliament and of the council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources
15. European Commission (2012a) Our life insurance, our natural capital: an EU biodiversity strategy to 2020
16. European Commission (2012b) The multifunctionality of green infrastructure. In-depth Reports
17. European Environment Agency (2014) Spatial analysis of green infrastructure in Europe. Technical report 2
18. Ferrier S, Guisan A (2006) Spatial modelling of biodiversity at the community level. J Appl Ecol 43:393–404
19. Fithian W, Elith J, Hastie T, Keith D (2014) Bias correction in species distribution models: pooling survey and collection data for multiple species. Methods Ecol Evol. doi:10.1111/2041-210X.12242
20. Gärdenfors U (2010) Rödlistade arter i Sverige 2010—the red list of Swedish species. ArtDatabanken, Uppsala (in Swedish, English summary)
21. Gilbert-Norton L, Wilson R, Stevens JR, Beard KH (2010) A meta-analytic review of corridor effectiveness. Conserv Biol 24:660–668
22. Graham CH, Ferrier S, Huettman F, Moritz C, Townsend Peterson A (2004) New developments in museum-based informatics and applications in biodiversity analysis. TREE 19:497–503
23. Hanski I (2011) Habitat loss, the dynamics of biodiversity, and a perspective on conservation. Ambio 40:248–255
24. Kery M, Gardner B, Monnerat C (2010) Predicting species distributions from checklist data using site-occupancy models. J Biogeogr 37:1851–1862
25. Killeen TJ, Solorzano LA (2008) Conservation strategies to mitigate impacts from climate change in Amazonia. Philos Trans R Soc B 363:1881–1888
26. Koen EL, Bowman J, Walpole AA (2012) The effect of cost surface parameterization on landscape resistance estimates. Mol Ecol Res 12:686–696
27. Kopperoinen L, Itkonen P, Niemelä J (2014) Using expert knowledge in combining green infrastructure and ecosystem services in land use planning: an insight into a new place-based methodology. Landsc Ecol 29:1361–1375
28. Kukkala A, Moilanen A (2013) The core concepts of spatial prioritization in systematic conservation planning. Biol Rev 88:443–464
29. Kullberg P, Moilanen A (2014) Spatial biodiversity analyses and information needs of the convention on biological diversity. Nat Conserv 12:3–10
30. Lehtomäki J, Moilanen A (2013) Methods and workflow for spatial conservation prioritization using zonation. Environ Model Softw 47:128–137
31. Maes J, Teller A, Erhard M, Murphy P, Paracchini ML, Barredo JI, Grizzetti B, Cardoso A, Somma F, Petersen J-E, Meiner A, Royo Gelabert E, Zal N, Kristensen P, Bastrup-Birk A, Biala K, Romao C, Piroddi C, Egoh B, Fiorina C, Santos F, Naruševičius V, Verboven J, Pereira H, Bengtsson J, Kremena G, Marta-Pedroso C, Snäll T, Estreguil C, San Miguel J, Braat L, Grêt-Regamey A, Perez-Soba M, Degeorges P, Beaufaron G, Lillebø A, Abdul Malak D, Liquete C, Condé S, Moen J, Östergård H, Czúcz B, Drakou EG, Zulian G, Lavalle C (2014) Mapping and assessment of ecosystems and their services—indicators for ecosystem assessments under Action 5 of the EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020. European Commission. ISBN: 978-92-79-36161-6
32. Maes J, Barbosa A, Baranzelli C, Zulian G, Batista e Silva F, Vandecasteele I, Hiederer R, Liquete C, Paracchini ML, Mubareka S, Jacobs-Crisioni C, Perpiña Castillo C, Lavalle C (2015) More green infrastructure is required to maintain ecosystem services under current trends in land-use change in Europe. Landsc Ecol 30:517–534
33. Margules C, Sarkar S (2007) Systematic conservation planning. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
34. Millennium Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: general synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC
35. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2001) Ecosystems and human well-being: current state and trends, vol 1. Island Press, Washington DC
36. Moilanen A, Wilson KA, Possingham HP (2009) Spatial conservation prioritization: quantitative methods and computational tools. Oxford University Press, Oxford
37. Moilanen A, Anderson BJ, Eigenbrod F, Heinemeyer A, Roy DB, Gillings S, Armsworth PR, Gaston KJ, Thomas CD (2011) Balancing alternative land uses in conservation prioritization. Ecol Appl 21:1419–1426
38. Mulligan M (2014) Costing nature. http://www.policysupport.org/costingnature
39. Noss RF (1992) The wildlands project: land conservation strategy. Wild earth (special issue), 10–25
40. Ovaskainen O, Luoto M, Ikonen I, Rekola H, Meyke E, Kuussaari M (2008) An empirical test of a diffusion model: predicting clouded apollo movements in a novel environment. Am Nat 171:610–619
41. Pauleit SL, Liu L, Ahern J, Kazmierczak A (2011) Multifunctional green infrastructure planning to promote ecological services in the city. In: Niemelä J (ed) Urban ecology. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 272–285
42. Pinto N, Keitt T, Wainright M (2012) LORACS: JAVA software for modeling landscape connectivity and matrix permeability. Ecography 35:388–392
43. Possingham HP, Wilson KA, Andelman SJ, Vynne CH (2006) Protected areas: goals, limitations and design. In: Groom MJ, Meffe GK, Carroll CR (eds) Principles of conservation biology. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, pp 509–533
44. Pouzols FM, Moilanen A (2014) A method for building corridors within spatial priority ranking. Landsc Ecol 29:789–801
45. Pressey RL, Bottrill MC (2008) Opportunism, threats, and the evolution of systematic conservation planning. Conserv Biol 22:1340–1345
46. Rathore CS, Dubey Y, Shrivastava A, Pathak P, Patil V (2012) Opportunities of habitat connectivity for tiger (Panthera tigris) between Kanha and Pench National Parks in Madhya Pradesh, India. PLoS One 7:7
47. Raudsepp-Hearne C, Peterson GD, Bennett EM (2010) Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes. PNAS 107:5242–5247
48. Reyers B, Patrick J, O’Farrell JL, Wilson NK (2012) Expanding the conservation toolbox: conservation planning of multifunctional landscapes. Landsc Ecol 27:1121–1134
49. Rodrigues ASL, Brooks TM (2007) Shortcuts for biodiversity conservation planning: the effectiveness of surrogates. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst 38:713–737
50. Rouget M, Cowling RM, Lombard AT, Knight AT, Graham IHK (2006) Designing large-scale conservation corridors for pattern and process. Conserv Biol 20:549–561
51. Schmeller DS, Henry P-Y, Julliard R, Gruber B, Clobert J, Dziock F, Lengyel S, Nowicki P et al (2009) Advantages of volunteer-based biodiversity monitoring in Europe. Conserv Biol 23:307–316
52. Silvertown J (2009) A new dawn for citizen science. TREE 24:467–471
53. Snäll T, Ribeiro PJ Jr, Rydin H (2003) Spatial occurrence and colonisations in patch-tracking metapopulations of epiphytic bryophytes: local conditions versus dispersal. Oikos 103:566–578
54. Snäll T, Kindvall O, Nilsson J, Pärt T (2011) Evaluating citizen-based presence data for bird monitoring. Biol Conserv 144:804–810
55. Snäll T, Moen J, Berglund H, Bengtsson J (2014) Mapping and assessment of ecosystems and their services—the Swedish Forest Pilot. Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, Report 6626. Stockholm
56. Teacher AGF, Griffiths DJ, Hodgson DJ, Inger R (2013) Smartphones in ecology and evolution: a guide for the app-rehensive. Ecol Evol 3:5268–5278
57. Weber T, Sloan A, Wolf J (2006) Maryland’s green infrastructure assessment: development of a comprehensive approach to land conservation. Landsc Urb Plan 77:94–110
58. Williams P, Hannah L, Andelman S, Midgley G, Araújo M, Hughes G, Manne L, Martinez-Meyer E, Pearson R (2005) Planning for climate change: identifying minimum-dispersal corridors for the Cape proteaceae. Conserv Biol 19:1063–1074
59. Yoccoz NG, Nichols JD, Boulinier T (2001) Monitoring of biological diversity in space and time. TREE 16:446–453