Using expert knowledge in combining green infrastructure and ecosystem services in land use planning: An insight into a new place-based methodology

Landscape Ecology

Volumn 29, Issue 8, 2014, Pages 1361-1375

  Kopperoinen, Leena ^a   Itkonen, Pekka ^a   Niemelä, Jari ^b  

^a FINNISH ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

Expert assessment; Expert knowledge; GIS; Mapping; Method development; Participatory assessment

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; GIS; INFRASTRUCTURAL DEVELOPMENT; LAND USE PLANNING; MAPPING METHOD; PARTICIPATORY APPROACH; SATELLITE DATA; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 84920875050     PISSN: 09212973     EISSN: 15729761     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10980-014-0014-2     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Ahern J, Cilliers S, Niemelä J (2014) The concept of ecosystem services in adaptive urban planning and design: encouraging transdisciplinarity. Landscape and Urban Planning. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.07.014
2. Brown G, Montag JM, Lyon K (2011) Public participation GIS: a method for identifying ecosystem services. Soc Nat Resour :1-19
3. Burkhard B, Kroll F, Müller F, WindhorstW(2009) Landscapes capacities to provide ecosystem services: a concept for land-cover based assessments. Landsc Online 15:1-22
4. Burkhard B, Kroll F, Nedkov S, Müller F (2012) Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets. Ecol Ind 21:17-29
5. Calabrese JM, Fagan WF (2004) A comparison-shopper's guide to connectivity metrics. Front Ecol Environ 2(10):529-536
6. Egoh B, Reyers B, Rouget M, Richardson DM, Le Maitre DC, van Jaarsveld AS (2008) Mapping ecosystem services for planning and management. Agric Ecosyst Environ 127: 135-140
7. Egoh B, Drakou EG, Dunbar MB, Maes J, Willemen L (2012) Indicators for mapping ecosystem services: a review. JRC Scientific and Policy Reports. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg
8. Frank S, Fürst C, Koschke L, Makeschin F (2012) A contribution towards a transfer of the ecosystem service concept to landscape planning using landscape metrics. Ecol Ind 21:30-38
9. Frank S, Fürst C, Koschke L, Witt A, Makeschin F (2013) Assessment of landscape aesthetics: validation of a landscape metrics-based assessment by visual estimation of the scenic beauty. Ecol Ind 32:222-231
10. Girvetz EH, Thorne JH, Berry AM, Jaeger JAG (2008) Integration of landscape fragmentation analysis into regional planning: a statewide multi-scale case study from California, USA. Landsc Urban Plan 86(3-4):205-218
11. Haines-Young R (2011) Exploring ecosystem service issues across diverse knowledge domains using Bayesian Belief Networks. Prog Phys Geogr 35(5):681-699
12. Haines-Young R, Potschin M (2013) Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES): Consultation on Version 4, August-December 2012. EEA Framework Contract No EEA/IEA/09/003
13. Jaeger JAG, Bertiller R, Schwick C (2008) Implementing landscape fragmentation as an indicator in the Swiss Monitoring System of Sustainable Development (MONET). J Environ Manag 88(4):737-751
14. Kuttner M, Hainz-Renetzeder C, Hermann A, Wrbka T (2012) Borders without barriers: structural functionality and green infrastructure in the Austrian-Hungarian transboundary region of Lake Neusiedl. Ecol Ind 31:59-72
15. Kyttä M, Kahila M (2011) SoftGIS methodology: building bridges in urban planning. GIM Int 25(3):37-41
16. Kyttä M, Broberg A, Tzoulas T, Snabb K (2013) Towards contextually sensitive urban densification: location-based softGIS knowledge revealing perceived residential environmental quality. Landsc Urban Plan 113:30-46
17. LaFortezza R, Davies C, Sanesi G, Konijnendijk C (2012) Green infrastructure as a tool to support spatial planning in European urban regions. iForest 6:102-108
18. Lankia T, Kopperoinen L, Pouta E, Neuvonen M (2012) Mapping outdoor recreation benefits in Finland using national inventory data. In: Fredman P, Stenseke M, Liljendahl H, Mossing A, Laven D (eds) Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Monitoring and Management of Visitors in Recreational and Protected Areas. Outdoor Recreation in Change: Current Knowledge and Future Challenges, Stockholm, Sweden, August 21-24, 2012
19. Larondelle N, Haase D (2013) Urban ecosystem services assessment along a rural-urban gradient: a cross-analysis of European cities. Ecol Ind 29:179-190
20. Maes J, Hauck J, ParacchiniMet al. (2012) A spatial assessment of ecosystem services in Europe: methods, case studies and policy analysis-phase 2. Full report. Partnership for European Environmental Research, Ispra
21. Minor ES, Urban DL (2008) A graph-theory framework for evaluating landscape connectivity and conservation planning. Conserv Biol 22(2):297-307
22. Naidoo R, Balmford A, Costanza R et al (2008) Global mapping of ecosystem services and conservation priorities. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105(28):9495-9500
23. Naumann S, McKenna D, Kaphengst T (2011) Design, implementation and cost elements of Green Infrastructure projects. Final report to the European Commission, DG Environment, Contract no. 070307/2010/577182/ETU/F.1. Ecologic institute and GHK Consulting
24. Pauleit S, Breuste JH (2011) Land-use and surface-cover as urban ecological indicators. In: Niemelä J (ed) Urban ecology: patterns, processes, and applications. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 19-30
25. Raymond CM, Bryan BA, Hatton MacDonald D et al (2009) Mapping community values for natural capital and ecosystem services. Ecol Econ 68:1301-1315
26. Söderman T, Kopperoinen L, Yli-Pelkonen V, Shemeikka P (2012) Ecosystem services criteria for sustainable development in urban regions. J Environ Assess Policy Manag 14(2):1250008-1-1250008-48
27. Vihervaara P, Kumpula T, Ruokolainen A, Tanskanen A, Burkhard B (2012) The use of detailed biotope data for linking biodiversity with ecosystem services in Finland. Int J Biodivers Sci Ecosyst Serv Manag 8(1-2):169-185
28. Vogt P, Ferrari JR, Lookingbill TR, Gardner RH, Riitters KH, Ostapowicz K (2009) Mapping functional connectivity. Ecol Ind 9(1):64-71