Bibliometric analysis of output and impact based on CRIS data: a case study on the registered output of a Dutch university

Scientometrics

Volumn 106, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 1-16

  van Leeuwen, Thed N ^a   van Wijk, Erik ^a   Wouters, Paul F ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Bibliometric analysis; CRIS system; Non WoS citation impact analysis; Research impact assessment

Indexed keywords

EID: 84954365459     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: 15882861     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-015-1788-y     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Aksnes, D. W., & Revheim, J.-B. (2000). The application of CRIS for analyzing research output—Problems and prospects. In Proceedings of the 5th international conference on research information systems 2000. Kassel, Germany. ftp://ftp.cordis.europa.eu/pub/cris2000/docs/aksnes_fulltext.pdf.
2. Butler, L., & Visser, M. S. (2006). Extending citation analysis to non-source items. Scientometrics,66, 327–343.
3. Debackere, K., & Glanzel, W. (2004). Using a bibliometric approach to support research policy making: The case of the Flemish BOF-key. Scientometrics,59, 253–276.
4. Engels, T. C. E., Ossenblok, T. L. B., & Spruyt, E. H. J. (2012). Changing publication patterns in the social sciences and humanities, 2000–2009. Scientometrics,93, 373–390.
5. Garfield, E. (1979). Citation indexing—Its theory and applications in science, technology and humanities. New York: Wiley.
6. Hicks, D. (1999). The difficulty of achieving full coverage of international social science literature and the bibliometric consequences. Scientometrics,44, 193–215.
7. Luwel, M., Moed, H. F., Nederhof, A. J., Samblanx, V. D., Verbrugghem, K., & van der Wurff, L. J. (1999). Towards indicators of research performance in the social sciences and humanities. Brussel: Vlaamse Interuniversitaire Raad.
8. Martin, B. R., & Irvine, J. (1983). Assessing basic research. Some partial indicators of scientific progress in radio astronomy. Research Policy,12, 61–90.
9. Moed, H. F. (2004). Citation analysis in research evaluation. Berlin: Springer.
10. Moed, H. F., Burger, W. J. M., Frankfurt, J. G., & van Raan, A. F. J. (1985). The use of bibliometric data for the measurement of university research performance. Research Policy,14, 131–149.
11. Moed, H. F., de Bruin, R. E., & van Leeuwen, T. N. (1995). New bibliometric tools for the assessment of national research performance: Database description overview of indicators and first applications. Scientometrics,33, 381–425.
12. Moed, H. F., Luwel, M., & Nederhof, A. J. (2002). Towards research performance in the humanities. Library Trends,50, 498–520.
13. Narin, F., & Withlow, E. S. (1990). Measurement of scientific co-operation and co-authorship in CEC-related areas of Science, Report EUR 12900. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
14. Nederhof, A. J., van Leeuwen, T. N., & van Raan, A. F. J. (2010). Highly cited non-journal publications in political science, economics and psychology: A first exploration. Scientometrics,83, 363–374.
15. Nederhof, A. J., & Visser, M. S. (2004). Quantitative deconstruction of citation impact indicators: Waxing field impact but waning journal impact. Journal of Documentation,60, 658–672.
16. Ossenblok, T. L. B., Engels, T. C. E., & Sivertsen, G. (2012). The representation of the social sciences and humanities in the Web of Science—A comparison of publication patterns and incentive structures in Flanders and Norway (2005–9). Research Evaluation,21, 280–290.
17. Ossenblok, T. L. B., Verleysen, F. T., & Engels, T. C. E. (2014). Co-authorship of journal articles and book chapters in the social sciences and humanities (2000–2010). JASIST,65, 882–897.
18. Schneider, J. W. (2009). An outline of the bibliometric indicator used for performance-based funding of research institutions in Norway. European Political Science Review,8, 364–378.
19. Schöpflin, U. (1992). Problems of representativity in the Social Sciences Citation Index. Representation of Science and Technology. In Proceedings of the international conference on science and technology indicators, Bielefeld, Germany, 10–12 June 1990, DSWO Press.
20. Sivertsen, G. (2010). A performance indicator based on complete data for the scientific publication output at research institutions. ISSI Newsletter,6, 22–28.
21. Sivertsen, G., & Larsen, B. (2012). Comprehensive bibliographic coverage of the social sciences and humanities in a citation index: An empirical analysis of the potential. Scientometrics,91, 567–575.
22. Van Leeuwen, T. N. (2007). Modelling of bibliometric approaches and importance of output verification in research performance assessment. Research Evaluation,16, 93–105.
23. Van Leeuwen, T. N. (2013). Bibliometric research evaluations, Web of Science and the social sciences and humanities: A problematic relationship? Bibliometrie—Praxis & Forschung, Online published in Volume 2. http://www.bibliometrie-pf.de/article/viewFile/173/218.
24. Van Raan, A. F. J. (1997). Advanced bibliometric methods as quantitative core of peer review based evaluation and foresight exercises. Scientometrics,36, 397–420.
25. Verleysen, F. T., & Engels, T. C. E. (2012). Historical publications at Flemish universities. Journal of Belgian History-Revue Belge d’Histoire Contemporaine-Belgisch Tijdschrift voor Nieuwste Geschiedenis,42, 110.
26. Waltman, L., van Eck, N. J., van Leeuwen, T. N., Visser, M. S., & van Raan, A. F. J. (2011a). Towards a new crown indicator: Some theoretical considerations. Journal of Informetrics,5, 37–47.
27. Waltman, L., van Eck, N. J., van Leeuwen, T. N., Visser, M. S., & van Raan, A. F. J. (2011b). Towards a new crown indicator: An empirical analysis. Scientometrics,87, 467–481.