Towards research performance in the humanities

Library Trends

Volumn 50, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 498-520

  Moed, Henk F ^a   Luwel, Marc ^b   Nederhof, A J ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b Ministry of the Flemish Community   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 23044534741     PISSN: 00242594     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (24)

1. Cole, S. (1983). The hierarchy of the sciences? American Journal of Sociology, 89, 111-139.
2. Cole, S.; Cole, J. R.; & Dietrich, L. (1978). Measuring the cognitive state of scientific disciplines. In Y. Elkana, J. Lederberg, & K. Merton (Eds.), Toward a metric of science: The advent of scientific indicators (pp. 209-251). New York: Wiley.
3. Ellman, I. A. (1983). Comparison of law faculty production in leading law reviews. Journal of Legal Education, 33(4), 681.
4. Finkenstaedt, T. (1990). Measuring research performance in the humanities. Scientometrics, 19(5-6), 409-117.
5. Garfield, E. (1979). Most-cited authors in the arts and humanities, 1977-1978. Current Contents, 32. In E. Garfield, Essays of an information scientist, volume 4 (pp. 238-244). Philadelphia: Institute for Scientific Information.
6. Garfield, E. (1986). The 250 most-cited authors in the Arts and Humanities Citation Index, 1976-1983. Current Contents, 48, 3-10.
7. Hemlin, S. (1996). Social studies of the humanities: A case study of research conditions and performance in ancient history and classical archaeology, and English. Research Evaluation, 6(1), 53-61.
8. Hemlin, S., & Gustafsson, M. (1996). Research production in the arts and humanities. A questionnaire study of factors influencing research performance. Scientometrics, 37(3), 417-432.
9. Inter-University Committee of the Flemish Faculties of Law (1996). The assessment of performance in juridical research. Final Report (in Dutch).
10. Justiss, L. K. (1993). A bibliometric study of Texas law reviews. Law Library Journal, 85, 407-408.
11. Kyvik, S. (1989). Productivity differences, fields of learning, and Lotka's Law. Scientometrics, 15(3-4), 205-214.
12. Luwel, M.; Moed, H. F.; Nederhof, A. J.; De Samblanx V.; Verbrugghen, K.; & van der Wurff, L.J. (1999). Towards indicators of research performance in the social sciences and humanities: An exploratory study in the fields of law and linguistics at Flemish Universities. Brussels: Vlaamse Universitaire Raad, Depot nr. d/1999/2939/9.
13. McGrath, W. E (1996). The unit of analysis (objects of study) in bibliometrics and scientometrics. Scientometrics, 35(2), 257-264.
14. Nederhof, A.J.; Luwel M.; & Moed, H. F. (2001) Assessing the quality of scholarly journals in linguistics: An alternative to citation-based journal impact factors. Scientometrics, 51(1), 241-265.
15. Nederhof, A.J., &: Noyons, E. C. M. (1992). International comparison of departments' research performance in the humanities. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 43(3), 249-256.
16. Nederhof, A.J., & Zwaan, R. A. (1991). Quality judgements of journals as indicators of research performance in the humanities and the social and behavioral sciences. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42(5), 332-340.
17. Nederhof, A. J.; Zwaan, R. A.; de Bruin, R. E; & Dekker, P.J. (1989). Assessing the usefulness of bibliometric indicators for the humanities and the social behavioral sciences. Scientometrics, 15(5-6), 423-435.
18. Review Committee on Juridical Research, Association of Universities in the Netherlands (1996). Quality assessment of research - Rechtsgeleerdheid (in Dutch). Utrecht: Vereniging van Samenwerkende Nederlandse Universiteiten (VSNU).
19. Shapiro, F. R. (1992). Origins of bibliometrics, citation indexing, and citation analysis: The neglected legal literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 43(5), 337-339.
20. Sorensen, J. R. (1994). Scholarly productivity in criminal justice: Institutional affiliation of authors in the top ten criminal justice journals. Journal of Criminal Justice, 22 (6), 535-547.
21. Swygert, M. I., & Gozansky, N. E. (1985). Senior law faculty publication study: Comparisons of law school productivity. Journal of Legal Education, 35(3), 373-394.
22. Van Den Berghe, H.; de Bruin, R. E.; Houben, J. A.; Kint, A.; Luwel, M.; Spruyt, E.; & Moed, H. F. (1998). Bibliometric indicators of research performance in Flanders. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(1), 59-67.
23. van Raan, A. F.J. (1996). Advanced bibliometric methods as quantitative core of peer review based evaluation and foresight exercises. Scientometrics, 36(3), 397-420.
24. Wood, J. B. (1988). The growth of scholarship: An online bibliometric comparison of dissertations in the sciences and the humanities. Scientometrics, 13(1-2), 53-62.