Highly cited non-journal publications in political science, economics and psychology: A first exploration

Scientometrics

Volumn 83, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 363-374

  Nederhof, Anton J ^a   van Leeuwen, Thed N ^a   van Raan, Anthony F J ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Books; Citation analysis; Economics; Highly cited publications; Non journal publications; Political science; Psychology; Social and behavioral sciences

Indexed keywords

EID: 77952288251     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-009-0086-y     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Butler, L., & Visser, M. S. (2006). Extending citation analysis to non-source items. Scientometrics, 66, 327-343.
2. Cronin, B., Snyder, H., & Atkins, H. (1997). Comparative citation rankings of authors in monographic and journal literature: A study of sociology. Journal of Documentation, 53, 263-273.
3. Garfield, E. (1979). Citation indexing-its theory and applications in science, technology and humanities. New York: Wiley.
4. Glänzel, W., & Schoepflin, U. (1999). A bibliometric study of reference literature in the sciences and the social sciences. Information Processing and Management, 35, 31-44.
5. Hicks, D. (1999). The difficulty of achieving full coverage of international social science literature and the bibliometric consequences. Scientometrics, 44, 193-215.
6. Kyvik, S. (2003). Changing trends in publishing behaviour among university faculty, 1980-2000. Scientometrics, 58, 35-48.
7. Lewison, G. (2001). Evaluation of books as research outputs in history of medicine. Research Evaluation, 10, 89-95.
8. Lindholm-Romantschuk, Y., & Warner, J. (1996). The role of monographs in scholarly communication: An empirical study of philosophy, sociology and economics. Journal of Documentation, 54, 389-404.
9. Lisee, C., Lariviere, V., & Archambault, E. (2008). Conference proceedings as a source of scientific information: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59, 1776-1784.
10. Moed, H. F. (2005). Citation analysis in research evaluation. Dordrecht: Springer.
11. Nederhof, A. J. (1989). Books and chapters are not to be neglected in measuring research productivity. American Psychologist, 44, 734-735.
12. Nederhof, A. J. (2006). Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the social sciences and the humanities: A review. Scientometrics, 66, 81-100.
13. Nederhof, A. J. (2008). Policy impact of bibliometric rankings of research performance of departments and individuals in economics. Scientometrics, 74, 163-174.
14. Nederhof, A. J., Zwaan, R. A., de Bruin, R. E., & Dekker, P. J. (1989). Assessing the usefulness of bibliometric indicators for the humanities and the social sciences. Scientometrics, 15, 423-435.
15. Schubert, A., Glaenzel, W., & Thijs, B. (2006). The weight of author self-citations. A fractional approach to self-citation counting. Scientometrics, 67, 503-505.
16. Thompson, J. W. (2002). The death of the scholarly monograph in the humanities? Citation patterns in literary research. Libri, 52, 121-136.
17. Tijssen, R. J. W., Hollanders, H., van Leeuwen, Th. N., & Nederhof, A. J. (2008). Science and technology indicators 2008: Summary, Netherlands observatory of science and technology. The Hague: Ministry of Education, Culture and Sciences. Available via www. nowt. nl.
18. van Leeuwen, T. N. (2006). The application of bibliometric analyses in the evaluation of social science research: Who benefits from it, and why it is still feasible. Scientometrics, 66, 133-154.
19. van Raan, A. F. J. (2004). Measuring Science. Capita Selecta of current main issues. In H. F. Moed, W. Glänzel, & U. Schmoch (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative science and technology research (pp. 19-50). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
20. Visser, M. S., Moed, H. F., Spruyt, E., & Nederhof, A. J. (2004). Bibliometrische Studie van de Faculteit Toegepaste Economische Wetenschappen aan de Universiteit Antwerpen 1992-2001. Leiden: CWTS.