The right supramarginal gyrus is important for proprioception in healthy and stroke-affected participants: A functional MRI study

Frontiers in Neurology

Volumn 6, Issue DEC, 2015, Pages

  Ben Shabat, Ettie ^a,b   Matyas, Thomas A ^a,b   Pell, Gaby S ^a   Brodtmann, Amy ^a   Carey, Leeanne M ^a,b  

^a FLOREY INSTITUTE OF NEUROSCIENCE AND MENTAL HEALTH   (Australia)

^b LA TROBE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Cerebral cortex; Functional laterality; Kinesthesis; Magnetic resonance imaging; Proprioception; Stroke; Upper extremity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR CONTROL; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; PASSIVE MOVEMENT; PREMOTOR CORTEX; PROPRIOCEPTION; SENSORIMOTOR CORTEX; SENSORY EVALUATION; SPATIAL BEHAVIOR; STIMULUS RESPONSE; SUPRAMARGINAL GYRUS; WRIST; WRIST POSITION SENSE TEST;

EID: 84954186693     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16642295     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2015.00248     Document Type: Article

References (85)

1. Dukelow SP, Herter TM, Bagg SD, Scott SH. The independence of deficits in position sense and visually guided reaching following stroke. J Neuroeng Rehabil (2012) 9:72. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-9-72.
2. Paschalis V, Nikolaidis MG, Giakas G, Jamurtas AZ, Koutedakis Y. Differences between arms and legs on position sense and joint reaction angle. J Strength Cond Res (2009) 23:1652-5. doi:10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181b4382d.
3. Gandevia S, Burke D. Does the nervous system depend on kinesthetic information to control natural limb movements? Behav Brain Sci (1992) 15:614-32.
4. Weiller C, Juptner M, Fellows S, Rijntjes M, Leonhardt G, Kiebel S, et al. Brain representation of active and passive movements. Neuroimage (1996) 4:105-10. doi:10.1006/nimg.1996.0034.
5. Radovanovic S, Korotkov A, Ljubisavljevic M, Lyskov E, Thunberg J, Kataeva G, et al. Comparison of brain activity during different types of proprioceptive inputs: a positron emission tomography study. Exp Brain Res (2002) 143:276-85. doi:10.1007/s00221-001-0994-4.
6. Alary F, Doyon B, Loubinoux I, Carel C, Boulanouar K, Ranjeva JP, et al. Event-related potentials elicited by passive movements in humans: characterization, source analysis, and comparison to fMRI. Neuroimage (1998) 8:377-90. doi:10.1006/nimg.1998.0377.
7. Ward NS, Newton JM, Swayne OB, Lee L, Thompson AJ, Greenwood RJ, et al. Motor system activation after subcortical stroke depends on corticospinal system integrity. Brain (2006) 129:809-19. doi:10.1093/brain/awl002.
8. Guzzetta A, Staudt M, Petacchi E, Ehlers J, Erb M, Wilke M, et al. Brain representation of active and passive hand movements in children. Pediatr Res (2007) 61:485-90. doi:10.1203/pdr.0b013e3180332c2e.
9. Mima T, Sadato N, Yazawa S, Hanakawa T, Fukuyama H, Yonekura Y, et al. Brain structures related to active and passive finger movements in man. Brain (1999) 122:1989-97. doi:10.1093/brain/122.10.1989.
10. Chang MC, Ahn SH, Cho YW, Son SM, Kwon YH, Lee MY, et al. The comparison of cortical activation patterns by active exercise, proprioceptive input, and touch stimulation in the human brain: a functional MRI study. NeuroRehabilitation (2009) 25:87-92. doi:10.3233/NRE-2009-0502.
11. Georgopoulos AP, Caminiti R, Kalaska JF. Static spatial effects in motor cortex and area 5: quantitative relations in a two-dimensional space. Exp Brain Res (1984) 54:446-54. doi:10.1007/BF00235470.
12. Mountcastle VB, Lynch JC, Georgopoulos A, Sakata H, Acuna C. Posterior parietal association cortex of the monkey: command functions for operations within extrapersonal space. J Neurophysiol (1975) 38:871-908.
13. Goodwin GM, Mccloskey DI, Matthews PB. The contribution of muscle afferents to kinaesthesia shown by vibration induced illusions of movement and by the effects of paralysing joint afferents. Brain (1972) 95:705-48. doi:10.1093/brain/95.4.705.
14. Naito E, Ehrsson H, Geyer S, Zilles K, Roland PE. Illusory arm movements activate cortical motor areas: a positron emission tomography study. J Neurosci (1999) 19:6134-44.
15. Naito E, Roland PE, Grefkes C, Choi HJ, Eickhoff S, Geyer S, et al. Dominance of the right hemisphere and role of area 2 in human kinesthesia. J Neurophysiol (2005) 93:1020-34. doi:10.1152/jn.00637.2004.
16. Romaiguere P, Anton JL, Roth M, Casini L, Roll JP. Motor and parietal cortical areas both underlie kinaesthesia. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res (2003) 16:74-82. doi:10.1016/S0926-6410(02)00221-5.
17. Naito E, Nakashima T, Kito T, Aramaki Y, Okada T, Sadato N. Human limb-specific and non-limb-specific brain representations during kinesthetic illusory movements of the upper and lower extremities. Eur J Neurosci (2007) 25:3476-87. doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05587.x.
18. Goble DJ, Coxon JP, Van Impe A, Geurts M, Van Hecke W, Sunaert S, et al. The neural basis of central proprioceptive processing in older versus younger adults: an important sensory role for right putamen. Hum Brain Mapp (2012) 33:895-908. doi:10.1002/hbm.21257.
19. Jones LA. Motor illusions: what do they reveal about proprioception? Psychol Bull (1988) 103:72-86. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.1.72.
20. Roll JP, Vedel JP, Ribot E. Alteration of proprioceptive messages induced by tendon vibration in man: a microneurographic study. Exp Brain Res (1989) 76:213-22. doi:10.1007/BF00253639.
21. Matthews PBC. Mammalian Muscle Receptors and Their Central Actions. London: Edward Arnold (Publishers) Ltd (1972).
22. Clark FJ, Burgess PR. Slowly adapting receptors in cat knee joint: can they signal joint angle? J Neurophysiol (1975) 38:1448-63.
23. Grigg P, Greenspan BJ. Response of primate joint afferent neurons to mechanical stimulation of knee joint. J Neurophysiol (1977) 40:1-8.
24. Rao SM, Bandettini PA, Binder JR, Bobholz JA, Hammeke TA, Stein EA, et al. Relationship between finger movement rate and functional magnetic resonance signal change in human primary motor cortex. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab (1996) 16:1250-4. doi:10.1097/00004647-199611000-00020.
25. Fox MD, Snyder AZ, Vincent JL, Corbetta M, Van Essen DC, Raichle ME. The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2005) 102:9673-8. doi:10.1073/pnas.0504136102.
26. Roy EA, MacKenzie C. Handedness effects in kinesthetic spatial location judgements. Cortex (1978) 14:250-8. doi:10.1016/S0010-9452(78)80051-3.
27. Goble DJ, Lewis CA, Brown SH. Upper limb asymmetries in the utilization of proprioceptive feedback. Exp Brain Res (2006) 168:307-11. doi:10.1007/s00221-005-0280-y.
28. Adamo DE, Martin BJ. Position sense asymmetry. Exp Brain Res (2009) 192:87-95. doi:10.1007/s00221-008-1560-0.
29. Carey LM, Matyas TA. Frequency of discriminative sensory loss in the hand after stroke in a rehabilitation setting. J Rehabil Med (2011) 43:257-63. doi:10.2340/16501977-0662.
30. Carey LM, Matyas TA, Oke LE. Sensory loss in stroke patients: effective training of tactile and proprioceptive discrimination. Arch Phys Med Rehabil (1993) 74:602-11. doi:10.1016/0003-9993(93)90158-7.
31. Smania N, Montagnana B, Faccioli S, Fiaschi A, Aglioti SM. Rehabilitation of somatic sensation and related deficit of motor control in patients with pure sensory stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil (2003) 84:1692-702. doi:10.1053/S0003-9993(03)00277-6.
32. Carey LM, Matyas TA. Training of somatosensory discrimination after stroke: facilitation of stimulus generalization. Am J Phys Med Rehabil (2005) 84:428-42. doi:10.1097/01.PHM.0000159971.12096.7F.
33. Dechaumont-Palacin S, Marque P, De Boissezon X, Castel-Lacanal E, Carel C, Berry I, et al. Neural correlates of proprioceptive integration in the contralesional hemisphere of very impaired patients shortly after a subcortical stroke: an fMRI study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair (2008) 22:154-65. doi:10.1177/1545968307307118.
34. Carey JR, Kimberley TJ, Lewis SM, Auerbach EJ, Dorsey L, Rundquist P, et al. Analysis of fMRI and finger tracking training in subjects with chronic stroke. Brain (2002) 125:773-88. doi:10.1093/brain/awf091.
35. Oldfield RC. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia (1971) 9:97-113. doi:10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4.
36. Adamo DE, Martin BJ, Brown SH. Age-related differences in upper limb proprioceptive acuity. Percept Mot Skills (2007) 104:1297-309. doi:10.2466/PMS.104.3.1297-1309.
37. Huettel SA, Singerman JD, Mccarthy G. The effects of aging upon the hemodynamic response measured by functional MRI. Neuroimage (2001) 13:161-75. doi:10.1006/nimg.2000.0675.
38. Carey LM, Oke LE, Matyas TA. Impaired limb position sense after stroke: a quantitative test for clinical use. Arch Phys Med Rehabil (1996) 77:1271-8. doi:10.1016/S0003-9993(96)90192-6.
39. Miezin FM, Maccotta L, Ollinger JM, Petersen SE, Buckner RL. Characterizing the hemodynamic response: effects of presentation rate, sampling procedure, and the possibility of ordering brain activity based on relative timing. Neuroimage (2000) 11:735-59. doi:10.1006/nimg.2000.0568.
40. Hall LA, McCloskey DI. Detections of movements imposed on finger, elbow and shoulder joints. J Physiol (1983) 335:519-33. doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1983.sp014548.
41. Binkofski F, Seitz RJ, Arnold S, Classen J, Benecke R, Freund HJ. Thalamic metbolism and corticospinal tract integrity determine motor recovery in stroke. Ann Neurol (1996) 39:460-70. doi:10.1002/ana.410390408.
42. Talairach J. Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain: 3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging. New York, NY: G. Thieme; Thieme Medical Publishers (1988).
43. Crinion J, Ashburner J, Leff A, Brett M, Price C, Friston K. Spatial normalization of lesioned brains: performance evaluation and impact on fMRI analyses. Neuroimage (2007) 37:866-75. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.04.065.
44. Hutchinson S, Kobayashi M, Horkan CM, Pascual-Leone A, Alexander MP, Schlaug G. Age-related differences in movement representation. Neuroimage (2002) 17:1720-8. doi:10.1006/nimg.2002.1309.
45. Naccarato M, Calautti C, Jones PS, Day DJ, Carpenter TA, Baron JC. Does healthy aging affect the hemispheric activation balance during paced index-to-thumb opposition task? An fMRI study. Neuroimage (2006) 32:1250-6. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.05.003.
46. Eickhoff SB, Amunts K, Mohlberg H, Zilles K. The human parietal operculum. II. Stereotaxic maps and correlation with functional imaging results. Cereb Cortex (2006) 16:268-79. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhi106.
47. Mayka MA, Corcos DM, Leurgans SE, Vaillancourt DE. Three-dimensional locations and boundaries of motor and premotor cortices as defined by functional brain imaging: a meta-analysis. Neuroimage (2006) 31:1453-74. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.02.004.
48. Fernandez G, De Greiff A, Von Oertzen J, Reuber M, Lun S, Klaver P, et al. Language mapping in less than 15 minutes: real-time functional MRI during routine clinical investigation. Neuroimage (2001) 14:585-94. doi:10.1006/nimg.2001.0854.
49. Deblaere K, Boon PA, Vandemaele P, Tieleman A, Vonck K, Vingerhoets G, et al. MRI language dominance assessment in epilepsy patients at 1.0 T: region of interest analysis and comparison with intracarotid amytal testing. Neuroradiology (2004) 46:413-20. doi:10.1007/s00234-004-1196-0.
50. Loubinoux I, Carel C, Pariente J, Dechaumont S, Albucher JF, Marque P, et al. Correlation between cerebral reorganization and motor recovery after subcortical infarcts. Neuroimage (2003) 20:2166-80. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.08.017.
51. Ward NS, Brown MM, Thompson AJ, Frackowiak RS. Longitudinal changes in cerebral response to proprioceptive input in individual patients after stroke: an FMRI study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair (2006) 20:398-405. doi:10.1177/1545968306286322.
52. Van de Winckel A, Wenderoth N, De Weerdt W, Sunaert S, Peeters R, Van Hecke W, et al. Frontoparietal involvement in passively guided shape and length discrimination: a comparison between subcortical stroke patients and healthy controls. Exp Brain Res (2012) 220:179-89. doi:10.1007/s00221-012-3128-2.
53. Reddy H, Floyer A, Donaghy M, Matthews PM. Altered cortical activation with finger movement after peripheral denervation: comparison of active and passive tasks. Exp Brain Res (2001) 138:484-91. doi:10.1007/s002210100732.
54. Sahyoun C, Floyer-Lea A, Johansen-Berg H, Matthews PM. Towards an understanding of gait control: brain activation during the anticipation, preparation and execution of foot movements. Neuroimage (2004) 21:568-75. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.09.065.
55. Ciccarelli O, Toosy AT, Marsden JF, Wheeler-Kingshott CM, Sahyoun C, Matthews PM, et al. Identifying brain regions for integrative sensorimotor processing with ankle movements. Exp Brain Res (2005) 166:31-42. doi:10.1007/s00221-005-2335-5.
56. Carel C, Loubinoux I, Boulanouar K, Manelfe C, Rascol O, Celsis P, et al. Neural substrate for the effects of passive training on sensorimotor cortical representation: a study with functional magnetic resonance imaging in healthy subjects. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab (2000) 20:478-84. doi:10.1097/00004647-200003000-00006.
57. Loubinoux I, Carel C, Alary F, Boulanouar K, Viallard G, Manelfe C, et al. Within-session and between-session reproducibility of cerebral sensorimotor activation: a test-retest effect evidenced with functional magnetic resonance imaging. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab (2001) 21:592-607. doi:10.1097/00004647-200105000-00014.
58. Caspers S, Eickhoff SB, Geyer S, Scheperjans F, Mohlberg H, Zilles K, et al. The human inferior parietal lobule in stereotaxic space. Brain Struct Funct (2008) 212(6):481-95. doi:10.1007/s00429-008-0195-z.
59. Rowe MJ, Turman AB, Murray GM, Zhang HQ. Parallel organization of somatosensory cortical areas I and II for tactile processing. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol (1996) 23:931-8. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1681.1996.tb01145.x.
60. Brozzoli C, Gentile G, Ehrsson HH. That's near my hand! Parietal and premotor coding of hand-centered space contributes to localization and self-attribution of the hand. J Neurosci (2012) 32(42):14573-82. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2660-12.2012.
61. Cattaneo L, Rizzolatti G. The mirror neuron system. Arch Neurol (2009) 66(5):557-60. doi:10.1001/archneurol.2009.41.
62. Bernard RA, Goran DA, Sakai ST, Carr TH, Mcfarlane D, Nordell B, et al. Cortical activation during rhythmic hand movements performed under three types of control: an fMRI study. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci (2002) 2:271-81. doi:10.3758/CABN.2.3.271.
63. Thickbroom GW, Byrnes ML, Mastaglia FL. Dual representation of the hand in the cerebellum: activation with voluntary and passive finger movement. Neuroimage (2003) 18:670-4. doi:10.1016/S1053-8119(02)00055-1.
64. Schubotz RI, von Cramon DY. Functional-anatomical concepts of human premotor cortex: evidence from fMRI and PET studies. Neuroimage (2003) 20(Suppl 1):S120-31. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.09.014.
65. Ehrsson HH, Fagergren A, Jonsson T, Westling G, Johansson RS, Forssberg H. Cortical activity in precision-versus power-grip tasks: an fMRI study. J Neurophysiol (2000) 83:528-36.
66. Wise SP, Boussaoud D, Johnson PB, Caminiti R. Premotor and parietal cortex: corticocortical connectivity and combinatorial computations. Annu Rev Neurosci (1997) 20:25-42. doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.20.1.25.
67. Galati G, Committeri G, Sanes JN, Pizzamiglio L. Spatial coding of visual and somatic sensory information in body-centred coordinates. Eur J Neurosci (2001) 14:737-46. doi:10.1046/j.0953-816x.2001.01674.x.
68. Corbetta M, Kincade MJ, Lewis C, Snyder AZ, Sapir A. Neural basis and recovery of spatial attention deficits in spatial neglect. Nat Neurosci (2005) 8:1603-10. doi:10.1038/nn1574.
69. Alary F, Simoes C, Jousmaki V, Forss N, Hari R. Cortical activation associated with passive movements of the human index finger: an MEG study. Neuroimage (2002) 15:691-6. doi:10.1006/nimg.2001.1010.
70. Stephan KE, Marshall JC, Friston KJ, Rowe JB, Ritzl A, Zilles K, et al. Lateralized cognitive processes and lateralized task control in the human brain. Science (2003) 301:384-6. doi:10.1126/science.1086025.
71. Doricchi F, Tomaiuolo F. The anatomy of neglect without hemianopia: a key role for parietal-frontal disconnection? Neuroreport (2003) 14:2239-43. doi:10.1097/00001756-200312020-00021.
72. Halligan PW, Marshall JC, Wade DT. Visuospatial neglect: underlying factors and test sensitivity. Lancet (1989) 2:908-11. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(89)91561-4.
73. Committeri G, Pitzalis S, Galati G, Patria F, Pelle G, Sabatini U, et al. Neural bases of personal and extrapersonal neglect in humans. Brain (2007) 130:431-41. doi:10.1093/brain/awl265.
74. Sacco RL, Bello JA, Traub R, Brust JC. Selective proprioceptive loss from a thalamic lacunar stroke. Stroke (1987) 18:1160-3. doi:10.1161/01.STR.18.6.1160.
75. Gutrecht JA, Zamani AA, Pandya DN. Lacunar thalamic stroke with pure cerebellar and proprioceptive deficits. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry (1992) 55:854-6. doi:10.1136/jnnp.55.9.854.
76. Shintani S, Tsuruoka S, Shiigai T. Pure sensory stroke caused by a cerebral hemorrhage: clinical-radiologic correlations in seven patients. Am J Neuroradiol (2000) 21:515-20.
77. Thiel A, Aleksic B, Klein J, Rudolf J, Heiss WD. Changes in proprioceptive systems activity during recovery from post-stroke hemiparesis. J Rehabil Med (2007) 39:520-5. doi:10.2340/16501977-0089.
78. Lee MY, Kim SH, Choi BY, Chang CH, Ahn SH, Jang SH. Functional MRI finding by proprioceptive input in patients with thalamic hemorrhage. NeuroRehabilitation (2012) 30:131-6. doi:10.3233/NRE-2012-0736.
79. Kenzie JM, Semrau JA, Findlater SE, Herter TM, Hill MD, Scott SH, et al. Anatomical correlates of proprioceptive impairments following acute stroke: a case series. J Neurol Sci (2014) 342:52-61. doi:10.1016/j.jns.2014.04.025.
80. Tombari D, Loubinoux I, Pariente J, Gerdelat A, Albucher JF, Tardy J, et al. A longitudinal fMRI study: in recovering and then in clinically stable sub-cortical stroke patients. Neuroimage (2004) 23:827-39. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.058.
81. Lindberg PG, Schmitz C, Engardt M, Forssberg H, Borg J. Use-dependent up-and down-regulation of sensorimotor brain circuits in stroke patients, proprioception intact. Neurorehabil Neural Repair (2007) 21:315-26. doi:10.1177/1545968306296965.
82. Feydy A, Carlier R, Roby-Brami A, Bussel B, Cazalis F, Pierot L, et al. Longitudinal study of motor recovery after stroke: recruitment and focusing of brain activation. Stroke (2002) 33:1610-7. doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000017100.68294.52.
83. Calautti C, Baron JC. Functional neuroimaging studies of motor recovery after stroke in adults: a review. Stroke (2003) 34:1553-66. doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000071761.36075.A6.
84. Carey LM, Abbott DF, Puce A, Jackson GD, Syngeniotis A, Donnan GA. Reemergence of activation with poststroke somatosensory recovery: a serial fMRI case study. Neurology (2002) 59:749-52. doi:10.1212/WNL.59.5.749.
85. Carey LM, Abbott DF, Harvey MR, Puce A, Seitz RJ, Donnan GA. Relationship between touch impairment and brain activation after lesions of subcortical and cortical somatosensory regions. Neurorehabil Neural Repair (2011) 25:443-57. doi:10.1177/1545968310395777.