Rehabilitation of Somatic Sensation and Related Deficit of Motor Control in Patients with Pure Sensory Stroke

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Volumn 84, Issue 11, 2003, Pages 1692-1702

  Smania, Nicola ^a,d   Montagnana, Barbara ^b   Faccioli, Silvia ^a   Fiaschi, Antonio ^a   Aglioti, Salvatore M ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VERONA   (Italy)

^b 'Sacro Cuore Don Calabria' Hospital   (Italy)

^c SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

^d Policlinico G B Rossi   (Italy)

Author keywords

Cerebrovascular disorders; Hand; Rehabilitation; Sensation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; CASE REPORT; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GRIP STRENGTH; HUMAN; MALE; MOTOR CONTROL; PARIETAL LOBE; PURE SENSORY STROKE; SENSORY DYSFUNCTION; SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX; STROKE; TASK PERFORMANCE; TRAINING; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

EID: 0242467673     PISSN: 00039993     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1053/S0003-9993(03)00277-6     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Feigenson JS, McCarthy ML, Greenberg SD, Feigenson WD. Factors influencing outcome and length of stay in a stroke rehabilitation unit. Part 2. Stroke 1977;8:657-62.
2. Sterzi R. Hemianopia, hemianesthesia and hemiplegia after right and left hemisphere damage. A hemispheric difference. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1993;56:308-10.
3. Mauguière F, Desmedt JE, Courjon J. Astereognosis and dissociated loss of frontal or parietal components of somatosensory evoked potentials in hemispheric lesions. Brain 1983;106:271-311.
4. McClatchie G. Survey of the rehabilitation outcome of strokes. Med J Aust 1980;6:649-51.
5. Twitchell TE. Sensory factors in purposive movement. J Neurophysiol 1954;17:239-52.
6. Aglioti S, Beltramello A, Bonazzi A, Corbetta M. Thumb-pointing in humans after damage to somatic sensory cortex. Exp Brain Res 1996;109:92-100.
7. Jeannerod M, Michel F, Prablanc C. The control of hand movements in a case of hemianesthesia following a parietal lesion. Brain 1984;107:899-920.
8. Van Buskirk C, Webster D. Prognostic value of sensory defect in rehabilitation of hemiplegics. Neurology 1955;5:407-11.
9. Anderson EK. Sensory impairments in hemiplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1971;52:293-7.
10. Stern PH, McDowell F, Miller JM, Robinson M. Factors influencing stroke rehabilitation. Stroke 1971;2:213-8.
11. Held JP. The natural history of stroke. In: Licht S, editor. Stroke and its rehabilitation. Baltimore: Waterly; 1975. p 53-69.
12. Kusoffsky A, Wadell I, Nilsson BY. The relationship between sensory impairment and motor recovery in patients with hemiplegia. Scand J Rehabil Med 1982;14:27-32.
13. Smith DL, Akhtar AJ, Garraway WM. Proprioception and spatial neglect after stroke. Age Ageing 1983;12:63-9.
14. Zeman BD, Yiannikas C. Functional prognosis in stroke: use of somatosensory evoked potentials. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1989;52:242-7.
15. Taub E, Berman AJ. Avoidance conditioning in the absence of relevant proprioceptive and exteroceptive feedback. J Comp Physiol Psychol 1963;56:1012-6.
16. Taub E, Berman AJ. Movement and learning in the absence of sensory feedback. In: Freedman SJ, editor. The neurophysiology of spatially oriented behavior. Homewood (IL): Dorsey Pr; 1968, p 173-92.
17. Dannenbaum RM, Dykes RW. Sensory loss in the hand after sensory stroke: therapeutic rationale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1988;69:833-9.
18. Bobath B. Adult hemiplegia: evaluation and treatment. 2nd ed. London: William Heinemann Medical; 1978.
19. Brunnstrom S. Movement therapy in hemiplegia. New York: Harper & Row; 1970.
20. Jenkins WM, Merzenich MM. Functional reorganization of primary somatosensory cortex in adult owl monkeys after behaviorally controlled tactile stimulation. J Neurophysiol 1990;63:82-103.
21. Xerri C, Merzenich MM, Peterson BE, Jenkins W. Plasticity of primary somatosensory cortex paralleling sensorimotor skill recovery from stroke in adult monkeys. J Neurophysiol 1998;79:2119-48.
22. Aglioti S, Beltramello A, Peru A, Smania N, Tinazzi M. Anomalous double sensations after damage to the cortical somatosensory representation of the hand in humans. Neurocase 1999;5:285-92.
23. Taub E. Somatosensory deafferentation research with monkeys: implications for rehabilitation medicine, In: Ince LP, editor. Behavioral psychology in rehabilitation medicine: clinical applications. Baltimore: William & Wilkins; 1980. p 371-401.
24. Carey LM, Matyas TA, Oke LE. Sensory loss in stroke patients: effective training of tactile and proprioceptive discrimination. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993;74:602-11.
25. Yekutiel M, Guttman E. A controlled trial of the retraining of the sensory function of the hand in stroke patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1993;56:241-4.
26. Ruch TC, Fulton JF, German W. Sensory discrimination in monkey, chimpanzee and man after lesions of the parietal lobe. Arch Neurol Psychiatry 1938;39:919-38.
27. Forster FM, Shields CD. Cortical sensory defects causing disability. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1959;40:56-61.
28. Vinograd A, Taylor E, Grossman S, Sensory retraining of the hemiplegic hand. Am J Occup Ther 1962;16:246-50.
29. Van Deusen Fox J. Cutaneous stimulation: effects on selected test of perceptions. Am J Occup Ther 1964;18:53-5.
30. De Jersey MC. Report on a sensory programme for patients with sensory deficits. Aust J Physiother 1979;25:165-70.
31. Wilson BA. Research and evaluation in rehabilitation. In: Wilson BA, McLellan D, editors. Rehabilitation studies handbook. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ Pr; 1997. p 161-87.
32. Ghez C, Gordon J, Ghilardi MF, Christakos CN, Cooper SE. Roles of proprioceptive input in the programming of arm trajectories. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 1990;55:837-47.
33. Roland PE, Larsen B, Lassen NA, Skinhof E. Supplementary motor area and other cortical areas in organization of voluntary movements in man. J Neurophysiol 1980;43:118-36.
34. Derouesne C, Yelnik A, Castaigne P. Isolated sensory deficiency caused by infarction in the region of the anterior choroidal artery. Rev Neurol 1985;141:311-4.
35. Groothuis DR, Duncan GW, Fisher CM. The human thalamocortical sensory path in the internal capsule: evidence from a small capsular hemorrhage causing a pure sensory stroke. Ann Neurol 1977;2:328-31.
36. Bassetti C, Bogousslavky J, Regli F. Sensory syndromes in parietal stroke. Neurology 1993;43:1942-9.
37. Knecht S, Kunesch E, Schnitzler A. Parallel and serial processing of haptic information in man: effects of parietal lesions in sensorimotor hand function. Neuropsychologia 1996;34:669-87.
38. Folstein MP, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975;12:189-92.
39. Bisiach E, Vallar G, Perani D, Papagno C, Berti A. Unawareness of disease following lesions of the right hemisphere: anosognosia for hemiplegia and anosognosia for hemianopia. Neuropsychologia 1986;24:471-82.
40. De Renzi E, Pieczuro A, Vignolo LA. Ideational apraxia: a quantitative study. Neuropsychologia 1968;6:41-52.
41. De Renzi E, Motti F, Nichelli P. Imitating gestures: a quantitative approach to ideomotor apraxia. Arch Neurol 1980;37:6-10.
42. De Renzi E, Lucchelli F. Ideational apraxia. Brain 1988;111:1173-85.
43. Briggs GG, Nebes RD. Patterns of hand preference in a student population. Cortex 1975;11:230-8.
44. Wehrli FW. The basis of MR contrast. In: Atlas SW, editor. Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain and spine. New York: Raven Pr; 1991. p 23-38.
45. Kuhn MJ, Mikulis DJ, Ajoub DM, et al. Wallerian degeneration after cerebral infarction: evaluatioh with sequential MR imaging. Radiology 1989;172:179-82.
46. Damasio H, Damasio AR. Lesion analysis in neuropsychology. New York: Oxford Univ Pr; 1989.
47. Glanz SA. Primer of biostatistics. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1987.
48. Robertson IH, Halligan PW, Marshall JC. Prospects for the rehabilitation of unilateral neglect. In: Robertson IH, Marshall JC, editors. Unilateral neglect: clinical and experimental studies. Hove (UK): Lawrence Erlbaum; 1993. p 279-92.
49. Lugoboni L, Montagnana B, Aglioti S, Smania N. Standardizzazione di una batteria di test per la valutazione della sensibilità somatica. Riabil Oggi 1999;8:25-41.
50. Dannenbaum RM, Dykes RW. Evaluating sustained touch-pressure in severe sensory deficit: meeting an unanswered need. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1990;71:455-9.
51. Johansson RS. How is grasping modified by somatosensory input? In: Humphrey DR, Freund HJ, editors. Motor control: concepts and issues. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1991. p 331-55.
52. Taub E, Miller NE, Novack TA, et al. Technique to improve chronic motor deficits after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993;74:347-54.
53. Liepert J, Miltner W, Bauder H, et al. Motor cortex plasticity during constraint-induced movement therapy in stroke patients. Neurosci Lett 1998;250:5-8.
54. Miltner WH, Bauder H, Sommer M, Dettmers C, Taub E. Effects of constraint-induced movement therapy on patients with chronic motor deficits after stroke. A replication study. Stroke 1999;30:586-92.
55. Lautenbacher S, Rollman GB. Sex differences in responsiveness to painful and non-painful stimuli are dependent upon the stimulation method. Pain 1993;53:255-64.
56. Dam H, Tonin P, Casson S, et al. The effects of long term rehabilitation therapy on post stroke hemiplegic patients. Stroke 1993;24:1186-91.
57. Kelly-Hayes M. Time intervals, survival, and destination. Three crucial variables in stroke outcome research. Stroke 1990;21 (Suppl 9):1124-6.
58. Jorgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS. Intracerebral hemorrhage versus infarction: stroke severity, risk factors, and prognosis. Ann Neurol 1995;38:45-50.
59. Carey LM, Abbot DF, Puce A, Jackson GD, Syngeniotis A, Donnan GA. Reemergence of activation with poststroke somatosensory recovery: a serial fMRI case study. Neurology 2002;59:749-52.
60. Shelton FN, Reding MJ. Effect of lesion location on upper limb motor recovery after stroke. Stroke 2001;32:107-12.