Synthetic long-read sequencing reveals intraspecies diversity in the human microbiome

Nature Biotechnology

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 64-69

  Kuleshov, Volodymyr ^a,b   Jiang, Chao ^b   Zhou, Wenyu ^b   Jahanbani, Fereshteh ^b   Batzoglou, Serafim ^a   Snyder, Michael ^b  

^a Stanford University   (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BACTERIAL SPECIES; BACTERIAL STRAINS; COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS; COMPUTATIONAL ANALYSIS; COMPUTATIONAL TOOLS; HUMAN MICROBIOME; INTRASPECIES VARIATION; MICROBIAL STRAIN;

BIOTECHNOLOGY;

CONTIG;

ARTICLE; BACTERIAL CHROMOSOME; BACTERIAL GENOME; BACTERIAL STRAIN; CHROMOSOME ANALYSIS; GENE SEQUENCE; HAPLOTYPE; HUMAN; INTESTINE FLORA; METAGENOME; METAGENOMICS; MICROBIAL DIVERSITY; NONHUMAN; OPERON; PHYLOGENETIC TREE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPECIES DIVERSITY; SPECIES IDENTIFICATION; SYNTHETIC LONG READ SEQUENCING; HIGH THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; MICROFLORA; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

HIGH-THROUGHPUT NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCING; HUMANS; MICROBIOTA; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84953791854     PISSN: 10870156     EISSN: 15461696     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nbt.3416     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Rinke, C. et al. Insights into the phylogeny and coding potential of microbial dark matter. Nature 499, 431-437 (2013).
2. Thomas, T., Gilbert, J. & Meyer, F. Metagenomics - a guide from sampling to data analysis. Microb. Inform. Exp. 2, 3 (2012).
3. Daniel, R. The metagenomics of soil. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 3, 470-478 (2005).
4. Venter, J.C. et al. Environmental genome shotgun sequencing of the Sargasso Sea. Science 304, 66-74 (2004).
5. Human Microbiome Project Consortium. Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome. Nature 486, 207-214 (2012).
6. Iverson, V. et al. Untangling genomes from metagenomes: revealing an uncultured class of marine Euryarchaeota. Science 335, 587-590 (2012).
7. Albertsen, M. et al. Genome sequences of rare, uncultured bacteria obtained by differential coverage binning of multiple metagenomes. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 533-538 (2013).
8. Nielsen, H.B. et al. MetaHIT Consortium; MetaHIT Consortium. Identification and assembly of genomes and genetic elements in complex metagenomic samples without using reference genomes. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 822-828 (2014).
9. Burton, J.N., Liachko, I., Dunham, M.J. & Shendure, J. Species-level deconvolution of metagenome assemblies with Hi-C-based contact probability maps. G3 (Bethesda) 4, 1339-1346 (2014).
10. Eid, J. et al. Real-time DNA sequencing from single polymerase molecules. Science 323, 133-138 (2009).
11. Fichot, E.B. & Norman, R.S. Microbial phylogenetic profiling with the Pacific Biosciences sequencing platform. Microbiome 1, 10 (2013).
12. Kuleshov, V. et al. Whole-genome haplotyping using long reads and statistical methods. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 261-266 (2014).
13. Di Rienzi, S.C. et al. The human gut and groundwater harbor non-photosynthetic bacteria belonging to a new candidate phylum sibling to Cyanobacteria. eLife 2, e01102 (2013).
14. Sharon, I. et al. Accurate, multi-kb reads resolve complex populations and detect rare microorganisms. Genome Res. 25, 534-543 (2015).
15. McCoy, R.C. et al. Illumina TruSeq synthetic long-reads empower de novo assembly and resolve complex, highly-repetitive transposable elements. PLoS One 9, e106689 (2014).
16. Li, R. et al. De novo assembly of human genomes with massively parallel short read sequencing. Genome Res. 20, 265-272 (2010).
17. Myers, E.W. et al. A whole-genome assembly of Drosophila. Science 287, 2196-2204 (2000).
18. Sommer, D.D., Delcher, A.L., Salzberg, S.L. & Pop, M. Minimus: a fast, lightweight genome assembler. BMC Bioinformatics 8, 64 (2007).
19. Zhu, W., Lomsadze, A. & Borodovsky, M. Ab initio gene identification in metagenomic sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, e132 (2010).
20. Magoc, T. et al. GAGE-B: an evaluation of genome assemblers for bacterial organisms. Bioinformatics 29, 1718-1725 (2013).
21. Mao, F., Dam, P., Chou, J., Olman, V. & Xu, Y. DOOR: a database for prokaryotic operons. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, D459-D463 (2009).
22. Chen, W.H., Minguez, P., Lercher, M.J. & Bork, P. OGEE: an online gene essentiality database. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, D901-D906 (2012).
23. Cingolani, P. et al. A program for annotating and predicting the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms, SnpEff: SNPs in the genome of Drosophila melanogaster strain w1118; iso-2; iso-3. Fly (Austin) 6, 80-92 (2012).
24. Gusfield, D. Efficient algorithms for inferring evolutionary trees. Networks 21, 19-28 (1991).
25. Parks, D.H., MacDonald, N.J. & Beiko, R.G. Classifying short genomic fragments from novel lineages using composition and homology. BMC Bioinformatics 12, 328 (2011).
26. Alneberg, J. et al. Binning metagenomic contigs by coverage and composition. Nat. Methods 11, 1144-1146 (2014).
27. Burton, J.N. et al. Chromosome-scale scaffolding of de novo genome assemblies based on chromatin interactions. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 1119-1125 (2013).
28. Berlin, K. et al. Assembling large genomes with single-molecule sequencing and locality-sensitive hashing. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 623-630 (2015).
29. Lieberman, T.D. et al. Parallel bacterial evolution within multiple patients identifies candidate pathogenicity genes. Nat. Genet. 43, 1275-1280 (2011).
30. Walker, B.J. et al. Pilon: an integrated tool for comprehensive microbial variant detection and genome assembly improvement. PLoS One 9, e112963 (2014).
31. Nijkamp, J.F., Pop, M., Reinders, M.J.T. & de Ridder, D. Exploring variation-aware contig graphs for (comparative) metagenomics using MaryGold. Bioinformatics 29, 2826-2834 (2013).
32. Gurevich, A., Saveliev, V., Vyahhi, N. & Tesler, G. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 29, 1072-1075 (2013).
33. Treangen, T.J. et al. MetAMOS: a modular and open source metagenomic assembly and analysis pipeline. Genome Biol. 14, R2 (2013).
34. Schloss, P.D. et al. Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75, 7537-7541 (2009).
35. Duitama, J. et al. Fosmid-based whole genome haplotyping of a HapMap trio child: evaluation of Single Individual Haplotyping techniques. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, 2041-2053 (2012).
36. Berger, E., Yorukoglu, D., Peng, J. & Berger, B. HapTree: a novel Bayesian framework for single individual polyplotyping using NGS data. PLoS Comput. Biol. 10, e1003502 (2014).
37. Aguiar, D. & Istrail, S. Haplotype assembly in polyploid genomes and identical by descent shared tracts. Bioinformatics 29, i352-i360 (2013).
38. Niklas, N. et al. cFinder: definition and quantification of multiple haplotypes in a mixed sample. BMC Res. Notes 8, 422 (2015).
39. Pulido-Tamayo, S. et al. Frequency-based haplotype reconstruction from deep sequencing data of bacterial populations. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, e105 (2015).
40. Gusfield, D. Inference of haplotypes from samples of diploid populations: complexity and algorithms. J. Comput. Biol. 8, 305-323 (2001).