Evaluation of the knowledge base of French intensivists and anaesthesiologists as concerns the interpretation of respiratory arterial pulse pressure variation

Anaesthesia Critical Care and Pain Medicine

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 29-34

  Fischer, Marc Olivier ^a,b   Dechanet, Fabien ^a   du Cheyron, Damien ^a   Gérard, Jean Louis ^a   Hanouz, Jean Luc ^a,b   Fellahi, Jean Luc ^a,b  

^a CAEN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^b France   (France)

Author keywords

Case vignettes; Clinical vignettes; Critical care; Monitoring; Predicting fluid responsiveness; Pulse pressure variation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANESTHESIST; ARTERIAL PRESSURE; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; BLOOD PRESSURE; BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING; BREATHING RATE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FLUID THERAPY; FRANCE; HEART RATE; HEART RIGHT VENTRICLE; HEMODYNAMIC PARAMETERS; HUMAN; INTENSIVIST; INTRAABDOMINAL HYPERTENSION; LUNG COMPLIANCE; MALE; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; OLIGURIA; PHYSICIAN; PROFESSIONAL KNOWLEDGE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RESIDENT; RESPIRATORY ARTERIAL PULSE PRESSURE VARIATION; SINUS RHYTHM; TIDAL VOLUME; VIGNETTE; ANESTHESIOLOGY; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; BIOASSAY; BLOOD FLOW; BREATHING MECHANICS; ELECTROLYTE BALANCE; INTENSIVE CARE; LEG; MEDICAL EDUCATION; PHYSIOLOGY; STANDARDS; VASCULARIZATION;

ADULT; ANESTHESIOLOGY; ARTERIAL PRESSURE; CRITICAL CARE; ENDPOINT DETERMINATION; FEMALE; FRANCE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HEART RATE; HUMANS; INTERNSHIP AND RESIDENCY; LEG; MALE; PHYSICIANS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REGIONAL BLOOD FLOW; RESPIRATION, ARTIFICIAL; RESPIRATORY MECHANICS; WATER-ELECTROLYTE BALANCE;

EID: 84953343219     PISSN: None     EISSN: 23525568     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.accpm.2014.06.001     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Rivers E., Nguyen B., Havstad S., Ressler J., Muzzin A., et al. Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med 2001, 345:1368-1377.
2. Hamilton M., Cecconi M., Rhodes A. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the use of preemptive hemodynamic intervention to improve postoperative outcomes in moderate and high-risk surgical patients. Anesth Analg 2011, 112:1392-1402.
3. Michard F., Boussat S., Chemla D., Anguel N., Mercat A., Lecarpentier Y., et al. Relation between respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure and fluid responsiveness in septic patients with acute circulatory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000, 162:134-138.
4. Lopes M.R., Oliveira M.A., Pereira V.O., Lemos I.P., Auler J.O., Michard F. Goal-directed fluid management based on pulse pressure variation monitoring during high-risk surgery: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Crit Care 2007, 11:R100.
5. Lansdorp B., Ouweneel D., de Keijzer A., van der Hoeven J.G., Lemson J., Pickkers P. Non-invasive measurement of pulse pressure variation and systolic pressure variation using a finger cuff corresponds with intra-arterial measurement. Br J Anaesth 2011, 107:540-545.
6. De Backer D., Heenen S., Piagnerelli M., Koch M., Vincent J.L. Pulse pressure variations to predict fluid responsiveness: influence of tidal volume. Intensive Care Med 2005, 31:517-523.
7. Monnet X., Bleibtreu A., Ferre A., Dres M., Gharbi R., Richard C., et al. Passive leg-raising and end-expiratory occlusion tests perform better than pulse pressure variation in patients with low respiratory system compliance. Crit Care Med 2012, 40:152-157.
8. De Backer D., Taccone F.S., Holsten R., Ibrahimi F., Vincent J.L. Influence of respiratory rate on stroke volume variation in mechanically ventilated patients. Anesthesiology 2009, 110:1092-1097.
9. Mahjoub Y., Pila C., Friggeri A., Zogheib E., Lobjoie E., Tinturier F., et al. Assessing fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients: false-positive pulse pressure variation is detected by Doppler echocardiographic evaluation of the right ventricle. Crit Care Med 2009, 37:2570-2575.
10. Renner J., Gruenewald M., Quaden R., Hanss R., Meybohm P., Steinfath M., et al. Influence of increased intra-abdominal pressure on fluid responsiveness predicted by pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation in a porcine model. Crit Care Med 2009, 37:650-658.
11. Mesquida J., Kim H.K., Pinsky M.R. Effect of tidal volume, intrathoracic pressure, and cardiac contractility on variations in pulse pressure, stroke volume, and intrathoracic blood volume. Intensive Care Med 2011, 37:1672-1679.
12. Fischer M.O., Pelissier A., Bohadana D., Gérard J.L., Hanouz J.L., Fellahi J.L. Prediction of responsiveness to an intravenous fluid challenge in patients after cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass: a comparison between arterial pulse pressure variation and digital plethysmographic variability index. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2013, 27:1087-1093.
13. Cannesson M., Le Manach Y., Hofer C.K., Goarin J.P., Lehot J.J., Vallet B., et al. Assessing the diagnostic accuracy of pulse pressure variations for the prediction of fluid responsiveness: a "gray zone" approach. Anesthesiology 2011, 115:231-241.
14. Peabody J.W., Luck J., Glassman P., Dresselhaus T.R., Lee M. Comparison of vignettes, standardized patients, and chart abstraction. A prospective validation study of 3 methods for measuring quality. JAMA 2000, 283:1715-1722.
15. Mohan D., Fischhoff B., Farris C., Switzer G.E., Rosengart M.R., Yealy D.M., et al. Validating a vignette-based instrument to study physician decision making in trauma triage. Med Decis Making 2014, 34:242-252.
16. Patel S., Landers T., Larson E., Zaoutis T., Delamora P., Paul D.A., et al. Clinical vignettes provide an understanding of antibiotic prescribing practices in neonatal intensive care units. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2011, 32:597-602.
17. McLain N.E., Biddle C., Cotter J.J. Anesthesia clinical performance outcomes: does teaching method make a difference?. AANA J 2012, 80:S11-S16.
18. Sites B.D., Antonakakis J.G. Ultrasound guidance in regional anesthesia: state of the art review through challenging clinical scenarios. Reg Loc Anesth 2009, 2:1-14.
19. Ruppe M.D., Feudtner C., Hexem K.R., Morrisson W.E. Family factors affect clinician attitudes in pediatric end-of-life decision making: a randomized vignette study. J Pain Sympt Manage 2013, 45:832-840.
20. Iberti T., Daily E., Leibowitz A., Schecter C., Fischer E., Silverstein J., The Pulmonary Artery Catheter Study Group Assessment of critical care nurses' knowledge of the pulmonary artery catheter. Crit Care Med 1994, 22:1674-1678.
21. Gnaegi A., Feihl F., Perret C. Intensive care physicians' insufficient knowledge of right-heart catheterization at the bedside: time to act?. Crit Care Med 1997, 25:213-220.
22. Fischer J.A., Muller-Weeks S. Physician perceptions of the role and value of basic science knowledge in daily clinical practice. Med Teach 2012, 34:744-747.
23. Cannesson M., Pestel G., Ricks C., Hoeft A., Perel A. Hemodynamic monitoring and management in patients undergoing high-risk surgery: a survey among North American and European anesthesiologists. Crit Care 2011, 15:R197.
24. Salzwedel C., Puig J., Carstens A., Bein B., Molnar Z., Kiss K., et al. Perioperative goal-directed hemodynamic therapy based on radial arterial pulse pressure variation and continuous cardiac index trending reduces postoperative complications after major abdominal surgery: a multi-center, prospective, randomized study. Crit Care 2013, 17:R191.
25. Sondergaard S. Pavane for a pulse pressure variation defunct. Crit Care 2013, 17:327.
26. Fischer M.-O., et al. Arterial pulse pressure variation suitability in critical care: a French national survey. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med 2015, 10.1016/j.accpm.2014.08.001.
27. Mahjoub Y., Lejeune V., Muller L., Perbet S., Zieleskewicz L., Bart F., et al. Evaluation of pulse pressure variation validity criteria in critically ill patients: a prospective observational multicentre point-prevalence study. Br J Anaesth 2014, 112:681-685.
28. Henriques T., Antunes L., Bernardes J., Matias M., Sato D., Costa-Santos C. Information-based measure of disagreement for more than two observers: a useful tool to compare the degree of observer disagreement. BMC Med Res Methodol 2013, 13:47.