Visualizing the intellectual structure of information science (2006-2015): Introducing author keyword coupling analysis

Journal of Informetrics

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 132-150

  Yang, Siluo ^a,c   Han, Ruizhen ^a   Wolfram, Dietmar ^b   Zhao, Yuehua ^b  

^a WUHAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE   (United States)

^c XIANGTAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Author bibliographic coupling analysis; Author keyword coupling analysis; Bibliometric mapping; Information science

Indexed keywords

BIBLIOGRAPHIES; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS; MAPPING; WORLD WIDE WEB;

BIBLIOGRAPHIC COUPLINGS; BIBLIOMETRIC; COUPLING ANALYSIS; INTELLECTUAL STRUCTURES; KNOWLEDGE DOMAINS; MAPPING OF SCIENCE; MULTIPLE LEVELS; PATENT ANALYSIS;

INFORMATION SCIENCE;

EID: 84953332795     PISSN: 17511577     EISSN: 18755879     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2015.12.003     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Ahlgren P., Jarneving B., Rousseau R. Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2003, 54(6):550-560.
2. Borgatti S.P., Everett M.G., Freeman L.C. Ucinet for Windows: Software for social network analysis 2002, http://pages.uoregon.edu/vburris/hc431/Ucinet_Guide.pdf.
3. Boyack K.W., Klavans R. Co-citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, and direct citation: Which citation approach represents the research front most accurately?. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2010, 61(12):2389-2404.
4. Chen C., Ibekwe-SanJuan F., Hou J. The structure and dynamics of cocitation clusters: A multiple-perspective cocitation analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2010, 61(7):1386-1409.
5. Dehdarirad T., Villarroya A., Barrios M. Research trends in gender differences in higher education and science: A co-word analysis. Scientometrics 2014, 101(1):273-290.
6. Eck N.J.V., Waltman L. How to normalize cooccurrence data? An analysis of some well-known similarity measures. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2009, 60(8):1635-1651.
7. He Q. Knowledge discovery through co-word analysis. Library Trends 1999, 48(1):133-159.
8. Huang M.H., Chang C.P. A comparative study on detecting research fronts in the organic light-emitting diode (OLED) field using bibliographic coupling and co-citation. Scientometrics 2014, 1-17.
9. Jarneving B. A comparison of two bibliometric methods for mapping of the research front. Scientometrics 2005, 65(2):245-263.
10. Jarneving B. Bibliographic coupling and its application to research-front and other core documents. Journal of Informetrics 2007, 1(4):287-307.
11. Jeong Y.K., Song M., Ding Y. Content-based author co-citation analysis. Journal of Informetrics 2014, 8(1):197-211.
12. Scott J., Carrington P.J. The SAGE handbook of social network analysis 2011, SAGE Publications.
13. Kessler M.M. Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American Documentation 1963, 14:10-25.
14. Klavans R., Boyack K.W. Using global mapping to create more accurate document-level maps of research fields. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2011, 62(1):1-18.
15. Leydesdorff L. On the normalization and visualization of author co-citation data: Salton's Cosine versus the Jaccard index. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2008, 59(1):77-85.
16. Lu K., Wolfram D. Measuring author research relatedness: A comparison of word-based, topic-based, and author cocitation approaches. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2012, 63(10):1973-1986.
17. Ma R. Author bibliographic coupling analysis: A test based on a Chinese academic database. Journal of Informetrics 2012, 6(4):532-542.
18. MacRoberts M.H., MacRoberts B.R. Problems of citation analysis: A study of uncited and seldom-cited influences. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2010, 61(1):1-12.
19. Milojević S., Sugimoto C.R., Yan E., Ding Y. The cognitive structure of library and information science: Analysis of article title words. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2011, 62(10):1933-1953.
20. Morris S.A., Yen G.G. Crossmaps: Visualization of overlapping relationships in collections of journal papers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2004, 101(Suppl. 1):5291-5296.
21. Nicolaisen J. Citation analysis. Annual review of information science and technology 2007, 41(1):609-641.
22. Persson O. The intellectual base and research fronts of JASIS 1986-1990. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 1994, 45(1):31-38.
23. Qiu J.P., Dong K., Yu H.Q. Comparative study on structure and correlation among author co-occurrence networks in bibliometrics. Scientometrics 2014, 101(2):1345-1360.
24. Ravikumar S., Agrahari A., Singh S.N. Mapping the intellectual structure of scientometrics: A co-word analysis of the journal Scientometrics (2005-2010). Scientometrics 2015, 102(1):929-955.
25. Shibata N., Kajikawa Y., Takeda Y., Matsushima K. Comparative study on methods of detecting research fronts using different types of citation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2009, 60(3):571-580.
26. Shiffrin R.M., Börner K. Mapping knowledge domains. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2004, 101(Suppl. 1):5183-5185.
27. Van Den Besselaar P., Heimeriks G. Mapping research topics using word-reference co-occurrences: A method and an exploratory case study. Scientometrics 2006, 68(3):377-393.
28. Wang F., Qiu J., Yu H. Research on the cross-citation relationship of core authors in scientometrics. Scientometrics 2012, 91(3):1011-1033.
29. Wang Z.Y., Li G., Li C.Y., Li A. Research on the semantic-based co-word analysis. Scientometrics 2012, 90(3):855-875.
30. White H.D. Author cocitation analysis and Pearson's r. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2003, 54(13):1250-1259.
31. White H.D., Griffith B.C. Author co-citation: A literature measure of intellectual structure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 1981, 32(3):163-171.
32. White H.D., McCain K.W. Visualizing a discipline: An author co-citation analysis of information science 1972-1995. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 1998, 49(4):327-355.
33. Yan E., Ding Y. Scholarly network similarities: How bibliographic coupling networks, citation networks, cocitation networks, topical networks, coauthorship networks, and coword networks relate to each other. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2012, 63:1313-1326.
34. Yang S., Wang F. Visualizing information science: Author direct citation analysis in China and around the world. Journal of Informetrics 2015, 9(1):208-225.
35. Yang S., Qiu J., Xiong Z. An empirical study on the utilization of web academic resources in humanities and social sciences based on web citations. Scientometrics 2010, 84(1):1-19.
36. Yang Y., Wu M., Cui L. Integration of three visualization methods based on co-word analysis. Scientometrics 2012, 90(2):659-673.
37. Zhang L., Janssens F., Liang L., Glänzel W. Journal cross-citation analysis for validation and improvement of journal-based subject classification in bibliometric research. Scientometrics 2010, 82(3):687-706.
38. Zhao D., Strotmann A. Information science during the first decade of the web: An enriched author co-citation analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2008, 59:916-937.
39. Zhao D., Strotmann A. Evolution of research activities and intellectual influences in information science 1996-2005: Introducing author bibliographic-coupling analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2008, 59(13):2070-2086.
40. Zhao D., Strotmann A. Comparing all-author and first-author co-citation analyses of Information Science. Journal of Informetrics 2008, 2:229-239.
41. Zhao D., Strotmann A. Counting first, last, or all authors in citation analysis: A comprehensive comparison in the highly collaborative stem cell research field. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2011, 62(4):654-676.
42. Zhao D., Strotmann A. The knowledge base and research front of information science 2006-2010: An author cocitation and bibliographic coupling analysis. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 2014, 65(5):995-1006.
43. Zitt M. Meso-level retrieval: IR-bibliometrics interplay and hybrid citation-words methods in scientific fields delineation. Scientometrics 2015, 102(3):2223-2245.