The knowledge base and research front of information science 2006-2010: An author cocitation and bibliographic coupling analysis

Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 65, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 995-1006

  Zhao, Dangzhi ^a   Strotmann, Andreas ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^b GESIS LEIBNIZ INSTITUTE FOR THE SOCIAL SCIENCES   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIBLIOGRAPHIES; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS;

AUTHOR COCITATION ANALYSIS; BIBLIOGRAPHIC COUPLINGS; DRIVE DEVELOPMENT; FULL TEXT ANALYSIS; INTELLECTUAL STRUCTURES; MAPPING OF SCIENCE; TRADITIONAL COMPUTERS; WEB TECHNOLOGIES;

SEARCH ENGINES;

EID: 84901487475     PISSN: 23301635     EISSN: 23301643     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.23027     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Bates, M.J., & Maack, M.N. (Eds.). (2010). Encyclopedia of Library and Information Sciences (3rd ed.). New York, NY: CRC Press.
2. Chen, C., Ibekwe-SanJuan, F., & Hou, J. (2010). The structure and dynamics of cocitation clusters: A multiple-perspective cocitation analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61, 1386-1409.
3. Cornelius, B., Landström, H., & Persson, O. (2006). Entrepreneurial studies: The dynamic research front of a developing social science. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30, 375-398.
4. Finlay, C.S., Sugimoto, C.R., Li, D., & Russell, T.G. (2012). LIS dissertation titles and abstracts (1930-2009): Where have all the librar gone? Library Quarterly, 82, 29-46.
5. Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L., & Black, W.C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
6. Hirsch, J.E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 102, 16569-16572.
7. Klavans, R., & Boyack, K.W. (2011). Using global mapping to create more accurate document-level maps of research fields. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62, 1-18.
8. Larivière, V., Sugimoto, C.R., & Cronin, B. (2012). A bibliometric chronicling of library and information science's first hundred years. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63, 997-1016.
9. Lu, K., & Wolfram, D. (2012). Measuring author research relatedness: A comparison of word-based, topic-based, and author cocitation approaches. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63, 1973-1986.
10. McCain, K.W. (1990). Mapping authors in intellectual space: A technical overview. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(6), 433-443.
11. Milojević, S., Sugimoto, C.R., Yan, E., & Ding, Y. (2011). The cognitive structure of library and information science: Analysis of article title words. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62, 1933-1953.
12. Persson, O. (1994). The intellectual base and research fronts of JASIS 1986-1990. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45, 31-38.
13. Rousseau, R., Garcia-Zorita, C., & Sanz-Casado, E. (2013). The h-bubble. Journal of Informetrics, 7, 294-300.
14. Saracevic, T. (2010). Information science. In M.J. Bates & M.N. Maack (Eds.), Encyclopedia of library and information sciences (3rd ed., pp. 2570-2582). New York, NY: CRC Press.
15. Strotmann, A., & Zhao, D. (2012). Author name disambiguation: What difference does it make in author-based citation analysis? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63, 1820-1833.
16. Sugimoto, C.R., Li, D., Russell, T.G., Finlay, S.C., & Ding, Y. (2011). The shifting sands of disciplinary development: Analyzing North American library and information science dissertations using latent Dirichlet allocation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62, 185-204.
17. White, H.D. (1990). Author co-citation analysis: Overview and defense. In C.L. Borgman (Ed.), Scholarly communication and bibliometrics (pp. 84-106). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
18. White, H.D., & McCain, K.W. (1998). Visualizing a discipline: An author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972-1995. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49, 327-355.
19. Yan, E., & Ding, Y. (2012). Scholarly network similarities: How bibliographic coupling networks, citation networks, cocitation networks, topical networks, coauthorship networks, and coword networks relate to each other. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63, 1313-1326.
20. Zhao, D., & Strotmann, A. (2008a). Information science during the first decade of the web:An enriched author co-citation analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59, 916-937.
21. Zhao, D., & Strotmann, A. (2008b). Evolution of research activities and intellectual influences in information science 1996-2005: Introducing author bibliographic coupling analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59, 2070-2086.
22. Zhao, D., & Strotmann, A. (2008c). Comparing all-author and first-author co-citation analyses of Information Science. Journal of Informetrics, 2, 229-239.
23. Zhao, D., & Strotmann, A. (2011a). Counting first, last, or all authors in citation analysis: A comprehensive comparison in the highly collaborative stem cell research field. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62, 654-676.
24. Zhao, D., & Strotmann, A. (2011b). Intellectual structure of stem cell research: A comprehensive author co-citation analysis of a highly collaborative and multidisciplinary field. Scientometrics, 87, 115-131.