Understanding governance structures in community management of ecosystems and natural resources: The Marujá case study in Brazil

Ecosystem Services

Volumn 16, Issue , 2015, Pages 182-191

  Sattler, Claudia ^a   Schröter, Barbara ^a   Jericó Daminello, Camila ^b   Sessin Dilascio, Karla ^b   Meyer, Claas ^a   Matzdorf, Bettina ^a   Wortmann, Lukas ^a   de Almeida Sinisgalli, Paulo Antonio ^b   Meyer, Angela ^c   Giersch, Gregor ^c  

^a LEIBNIZ CENTRE FOR AGRICULTURAL LANDSCAPE RESEARCH ZALF   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^c Organisation for International Dialogue and Conflict Management (IDC)   (Austria)

Author keywords

Co management; Common pool resources; Community based management; Ecosystem services; Environmental governance; Latin America

Indexed keywords

EID: 84953287865     PISSN: 22120416     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.10.015     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Adger W.N. Social capital, collective action, and adaptation to climate change. Econ. Geogr. 2003, 79:387-404.
2. Agrarwal, A., Narain, S., 2000. Water harvesting: community-led natural resource management ILEIA Newsl. March, pp. 11-13. Available at 〈. http://www.fao.org/prods/gap/database/gap/files/511_WATER_HARVESTING_IN_INDIA.PDF.
3. Agrawal A., Chhatre A. Explaining success in the commons: community forest governance in the Indian Himalaya. World Dev. 2006, 34:149-166.
4. Agrawal A., Gibson C.C. Enchantment and disenchantment: the role of community in natural resource management. World Dev. 1999, 27:629-649.
5. Armitage D. Governance and the commons in a multi-level world. Int. J. Commons 2008, 2(1):7-32.
6. Armitage D., Berkes F., Doubleday N. Adaptive Co-Management: Collaboration, Learning and Multi-level Governance 2007, UBC Press, Vancouver.
7. Bebbington A., Dharmawan L., Fahmi E., Guggenheim S. Local capacity, village governance and the political economy of rural development in Indonesia. World Dev. 2006, 34:1958-1976.
8. Beitl C.M. Adding environment to the collective action problem: individuals, civil society, and the mangrove-fishery commons in Ecuador. World Dev. 2014, 56:93-107.
9. Berkes F. From community-based resource management to complex systems. Ecol. Soc. 2006, 11(1):45. [online] URL:http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art45/.
10. Berkes, F., George, P., Preston, R., 1991. Co-management: the Evolution in Theory and Practice of Joint Administration of Living Resources. TASO research report, second series No. 1, Available at: . http://dlc.dlib.indiana.edu/dlc/bitstream/handle/10535/1506/Co-Management_The_Evolution_in_Theory_and_Practice:of_the_Joint_Administration_of_Living_Resources.pdf?sequence=1.
11. Blaikie P. Is small really beautiful? Community-based natural resource management in Malawi and Botswana. World Dev. 2006, 34:1942-1957.
12. Borrini-Feyerabend, A., Farvar, M.T., Nguinguiri, J.C., Ndangang, V., 2007. Co Management of Natural Resources: Organising, Negotiating, Learning by doing. Available at: https://portals.iucn.org/library/efiles/documents/2000-082.pdf.
13. Carlsson L., Berkes F. Co-management: concepts and methodological implications. J. Env. Manag. 2005, 75:65-76.
14. Cash D.W., Moser S.C. Linking global and local scales: designing dynamic assessment and managment processes. Glob. Env. Chang. 2000, 10:109-120.
15. Cinner J.E., McClanahan T.R. Socioeconomic factors that lead to overfishing in small-scale coral reef fisheries in Papua New Guinea. Environ. Conserv. 2006, 33:73-80.
16. Cox M., Arnold G., Villamayor Tomas S. A review of design principles for community-based natural resource managment. Ecol. Soc. 2010, 15(4):38. [online]. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss4/art38/.
17. Ernstson H., Barthel S., Andersson E., Borgström S.T. Scale-crossing brokers and network governance of urban ecosystem services: the case of Stockholm. Ecol. Soc. 2010, 15(4):28. [online]:. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss4/art28/.
18. Fabricius C., Folke C., Cundill G., Schultz L. Powerless spectators, coping actors, and adaptive co-managers: a synthesis of the role of communities in ecosystem management. Ecol. Soc. 2007, 12(1):29. [online] URL:. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss1/art29/.
19. Flick, U., 2004. Triangulation. Eine Einführung. VS, Wiesbaden.
20. Folke C., Hahn T., Olsson P., Norberg J. Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Ann. Rev. Env. Resour. 2005, 30:441-473.
21. Harkes, I.H.T., 2006. Fisheries Co-management, the Role of Local Institutions and Decentralisation in Southeast Asia: with Specific Reference to Marine Sasi in Central Maluku, Indonesia. Available at: https://openaccess.leidenuniv.nl/handle/1887/4385.
22. Krippendorff K. Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology 2004, SAGE publication, Thousand Oaks, Oaks.
23. Liu J., Qu H., Huang D., Chen G., Yue X., Zhao X., Liang Z. The role of social capital in encouraging residents' pro-environmental behaviors in community-based ecotourism. Tourim. Manag. 2014, 41:190-201.
24. Lovell C., Mandondo A., Mariarty P. The question of scale in intergated natural resource management. Conser. Ecol. 2002, 5(2):25. [online] URL: http://www.consecol.org/vol5/iss2/art25/.
25. Low, B., Ostrom, E., Simon, C., Wilson, J., 2000. Redundancy and Diversity in Governing and Managing Common Pool Resources. Available at: . http://csel.eng.ohio-state.edu/productions/intel/research/trust/ostrom%20low2000.pdf.
26. Markelova, H., Mwangi, E., 2015. Multilevel Governance and Cross-Scale Coordination for Natural Resource Managment: Lessons from Current Research. Available at: http://wealthofthecommons.org/essay/multilevel-governance-and-cross-scale-coordination-natural-resource-management-lessons-current.
27. Matzdorf, B., Biedermann, C., Meyer, C., Nicolaus, K., Sattler, C., Schomers, S., 2014. Paying for green? Payments for Ecosystem Services in Practice. Successful Examples of PES from Germany, the United Kingdom and the United States. Available at: http://www.civiland-zalf.org/download/PayingforGreen_PESinpractice.pdf.
28. Mayring P. Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Grundlagen und Techniken 2008, Weinheim und Basel, Beltz.
29. Mosimane A.W., Breen C., Nkhata B.A. Collective identity and resilience in the managment of common pool resources. Int. J. Commons 2012, 6:344-362.
30. Newig J., Fritsch O. Environmental governance: participatory, multi-level-and effective? Environ. Policy Gov. 2009, 19:197-214.
31. Olson M. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups 1965, Harvard University Press, Cambridge and London.
32. Ostrom E. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action 1990, Cambridge University Press, New York.
33. Ostrom E., Walker J. Communication in a commons: Cooperation without external enforcement. Labopratory Research in Political Economy 1991, 287-322. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor. T.R. Palfrey (Ed.).
34. Ostrom E., Walker J., Gardner R. Covenants with and without a sword: Self governance is possible. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 1992, 86:404-417.
35. Ostrom E. Collective action and the evolution of social norms. J. Econ. Perspect. 2000, 14:137-158.
36. Paavola J. Explaining multi-level environmental governance 2008, 10:1-20. Sustainability Research Institute (SRI), Leeds.
37. Poteete A.R., Janssen M., Ostrom E. Working tOgether: Collective Action, The Commons, and Multiple Methods in Practice 2010, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
38. Ruiz-Ballestros E., Gual M. The emergence of new commons. Hum. Ecol. 2012, 40:847-862.
39. Ruttan L.M. Economic heterogenity and the commons: effect on collective action and collective goods provisioning. World Dev. 2008, 36:969-985.
40. Sattler C., Trampnau S., Schomers S., Meyer C., Matzdorf B. Multi-classification of payments for ecosystem services: How do classification charcteristics relate to overall success?. Ecosyst. Serv. 2013, 6:31-45.
41. Sattler C., Schröter B. Living by strict rules: co-management as a way to prevent eviction from a conservation area-the case of the Marujá community in Brazil. Solutions 2015, 6:58-66.
42. Schomers S., Sattler C., Matzdorf B. An analytical framework for assessing the potential of intermediaries to improve the performance of payments for ecosystem services. Land Use Policy 2015, 42:58-70.
43. Schröter B., Sessin-Dilascio K., Meyer C., Matzdorf B., Sattler C., Meyer A., Giersch G., Jerico-Daminello C., Wortmann L. Multi-level governance through adaptive co-managment: conflict resolution in a Brazilian state park. Ecol. Process. 2014, 3:6. [online] URL:http://www.ecologicalprocesses.com/content/3/1/6.
44. Schultz L., Duit A., Folke C. Participation, adaptive co-management, and management performance in the world network of biosphere reserves. World Dev. 2011, 39:662-671.
45. Sessin-Dilascio K., Prager K., Irvine K.N., de Almeida Sinisgalli P. The dynamics of co-management and social capital in protected area management-the cardoso island state park in Brazil. World Dev. 2015, 67:475-489.
46. Singelton S. Constructing Cooperation: The Evolution of Institutions of Comanagement 1998, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.
47. Smith E.A. Communication and collective action: language and the evolution of human cooperation. Evol. Hum. Behav. 2010, 31:231-245.
48. Stern P. Deliberative methods for understanding environmental systems. BioScience 2005, 55:976-982.
49. Tucker C.M., Randolph J.C., Castellanos E.J. Institutions, biophisical factors and history: an integrative analysis of private and common property forests in Guatemala and Honduras. Hum. Ecol. 2007, 35:259-274.
50. Vatn A. An institutional analysis of payments for environmental services. Ecol. Econ. 2010, 69:1245-1252.
51. Young, O., 2002a. Institutional Interplay: the Environmental Consequences of Cross-Scale Interactions. Available at: . http://dlc.dlib.indiana.edu/dlc/bitstream/handle/10535/519/youngo041300.pdf?sequence=1.
52. Young O.R. The Institutional Dimensions of Environmental Change: Fit, Interplay, And Scale 2002, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.