The dynamics of co-management and social capital in protected area management-The cardoso island state park in Brazil

World Development

Volumn 67, Issue , 2015, Pages 475-489

  Sessin Dilascio, Karla ^a   Prager, Katrin ^b   Irvine, Katherine N ^b   De Almeida Sinisgalli, Paulo Antonio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b SCOTTISH CROP RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Brazil; Co management; Community involvement; Conservation units; Social capital

Indexed keywords

COMANAGEMENT; COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION; CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; PROTECTED AREA; SOCIAL CAPITAL;

BRAZIL; CARDOSO ISLAND; CARDOSO ISLAND STATE PARK; SAO PAULO [BRAZIL];

EID: 84912016677     PISSN: 0305750X     EISSN: 18735991     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.11.004     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Adams C. Caiçaras na mata atlântica: pesquisa científica versus planejamento e gestão ambiental 2000, Annablume; FAPESP, São Paulo, 337.
2. Adhikari K.P., Goldey P. Social capital and its "downside": the impact on sustainability of induced community-based organizations in Nepal. World Development 2010, 38(2):184-194.
3. Ahn, T.K. & Ostrom, E. (2002). Social capital and the second-generation theories of collective action: an analytical approach to the forms of social capital. In: Workshop in political theory and political analysis, Indiana University. Indiana, 36p. Retrieved from: Accessed: 11 Oct. 2014. http://localgov.fsu.edu/readings_papers/regional%20governance/AhnOstrom2002SocialCapital.pdf.
4. Basurto X. Linking multi-level governance to local common-pool resource theory using fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis: Insights from twenty years of biodiversity conservation in Costa Rica. Global Environmental Change 2013, 2:573-587.
5. Bensusan N. Conservação da Biodiversidade em áreas protegidas 2006, FGV, Rio de Janeiro, 176.
6. Berkes F. Adaptive co-management and complexity: Exploring the many faces of co-management. Adaptive co-management: collaboration, learning, and multi-level governance 2007, 19-37. UBC Press, Vancouver. D. Armitage, F. Berkes, N. Doubleday (Eds.).
7. Berkes F. Evolution of co-management: Role of knowledge generation, bridging organization and social learning. Journal of Environmental Management 2009, 90:1692-1702.
8. Brito M.C.W. Unidades de conservação: intenções e resultados 2003, Annablume; FAPESP, São Paulo, 230.
9. Brandon K., Wells M. Planning for people and parks: Design dilemmas. World Development 1992, 20(4):557-570.
10. Brandon K., Gorenflo L.J., Rodrigues A.S.L., Waller R.W. Reconciling biodiversity conservation, people, protected areas, and agricultural suitability in Mexico. World Development 2005, 33(9):1403-1418.
11. Bodin Ö., Crona B.I. Management of natural resources at the community level: Exploring the role of social capital and leadership in a rural fishing community. World Development 2008, 36(12):2763-2779.
12. Campolim M.B., Parada I.S., Yamaoka J.G. Gestão participativa da visitação pública na comunidade do Marujá - Parque Estadual da Ilha do Cardoso 2008, Instituto Florestal, Série Deregistro, São Paulo, 33, 39-49.
13. Carlsson L., Berkes F. Co-management: concepts and methodological implication. Journal of Environmental Management 2005, 75:65-76.
14. Coleman J.S. Foundations of social theory 1990, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts and London, 241-299.
15. Creswell J.W. Research design. Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches 2009, Sage, Los Angeles. 3rd ed.
16. Dekker P., Uslaner E.M. Introduction. Social capital and participation in everyday life 2001, 1-8. Routledge, London. E.M. Uslaner (Ed.).
17. Conflito entre Populações Humanas e Unidades de Conservacao e Mata Atlantica. Relatorio de Pesquisa 1995, NUPAUB, São Paulo. A.C.S. Diegues, L.P. Vianna (Eds.).
18. Diegues, A. C. S. (1998). Diversidade biológica e culturas tradicionais litorâneas: o caso das comunidades caiçaras. São Paulo: NUPAUB-USP, Série Documentos e Relatórios de Pesquisa, n°5, 37. Retrieved from: Accessed: 13 Oct. 2014. http://nupaub.fflch.usp.br/sites/nupaub.fflch.usp.br/files/DiversidadeBio%20%26%20CultTrad015.pdf.
19. Diegues, A. C. S. (2007). O Vale do Ribeira e Litoral de São Paulo: meio-ambiente, história e população. CENPEC, 41. Retrieved from: Access: 13 Oct. 2014. http://nupaub.fflch.usp.br/sites/nupaub.fflch.usp.br/files/color/cenpec.pdf.
20. Evans, P. (1997). State-society synergy: Government and social capital. In: Development location: Global, area, and international archive, 217. Retrieved from: . http://escholarship.org/uc/item/8mp05335.
21. Field A., Miles J., Field Z. Discovering statistics Using R 2012, Sage Publications, London.
22. Folke C., Carpenter S., Elmqvist T., Gunderson L., Holling C.S., Walker B. Resilience for sustainable development: Building adaptive capacity in a world of transformations. AMBIO: A journal of the human environment 2002, 31(5):437-440.
23. Fischer A., Wakjira D.T., Weldesemaet Y.T., Ashenafi Z.T. On the interplay of actors in the co-management of natural resources - A dynamic perspective. World Development 2014, 64:158-168.
24. Gibson C., Williams J., Ostrom E. Rules and resource management. World Development 2005, 31(2):273-284.
25. Hayes T.M. Parks, people, and forest protection: An institutional assessment of the effectiveness of protected areas. World Development 2006, 34(12):2064-2075.
26. IBAMA, WWF-BRASIL Efetividade de gestão das unidades de conservação federais do Brasil 2007, IBAMA, Brasília, Retrieved from:
27. Kendrick A. Caribou co-management in northern Canada: Fostering multiple ways of knowing. Navigating social-ecological systems: Building resilience for complexity and change 2003, 241-268. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK. F. Berkes, J. Colding, C. Folke (Eds.).
28. Klooster D. Institutional choice, community, and struggle: A case study of forest co-management in Mexico. World Development 2000, 28(1):1-20.
29. Lopes P.F.M., Silvano R.A.M., Begossi A. Extractive and sustainable development reserves in Brazil: Resilient alternatives to fisheries?. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 2011, 54:421-443.
30. Macedo, H. S. (2007). Processos participativos na gestão de Unidades de Conservação. In Anais do II Seminário Nacional Movimentos Sociais, Participação e Democracia 25 a 27 de abril de 2007, UFSC, Florianópolis, Brasil Núcleo de Pesquisa em Movimentos Sociais - NPMS, 289-304.
31. MMA. (2004). Gestão participativa do SNUC/Ministério do Meio Ambiente. Secretaria de Biodiversidade e Florestas. Diretoria do Programa Nacional de Áreas Protegidas. Programa Áreas Protegidas da AmazÔnia. - Brasília: Ministério do Meio Ambiente.
32. Oliveira J.A.P. Implementing environmental policies in developing countries through decentralization: The case of protected areas in Bahia, Brazil. World Development 2002, 30(10):1713-1736.
33. Olsson P., Folke C., Berkes F. Adaptive comanagement for building resilience in social-ecological systems. Environmental Management 2004, 34:75-90.
34. Ostrom E., Ahn T.K. The meaning of social capital and its link to collective action. Handbook of social capital: The troika of sociology, political science and economics 2009, 17-35. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, Cheltenham, UK. G.T. Svendsen, G.L.H. Svendsen (Eds.).
35. Paavola J. Institutions and environmental governance: A reconceptualization. Ecological Economics 2007, 63:93-103.
36. Patton M.Q. Qualitative research and evaluation methods 2002, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, 247-253.
37. Pinkerton E. Towards specificity in complexity: Understanding co-management from a social science perspective. The fisheries co-management experience: Accomplishments, challenges, and prospects 2003, 61-78. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands. D.C. Wilson, J.R. Nielsen, P. Degnbol (Eds.).
38. Plummer R., Fitzgibbon J. People matter: The importance of social capital in the co-management of natural resources. Nature Resource Forum 2006, 30:51-62.
39. Plummer, R., & Fitzgibbon, J. (2007). Connecting adaptive co-management, social learning, and social capital through theory and practice. In: D. Armitage, F. Berkes, & N. Doubleday, Adaptive co-management: collaboration, learning, and multi-level governance. Canada, 38-59.
40. Putman R. Tuning in, tuning out: The strange disappearance of social capital in America. PS: Political Science and Politics, Cambridge 1995, 27:664-683.
41. Pretty J. Social capital and the collective management of resources. Science 2003, 302:1912-1914.
42. Rodrigues, C. L. (2001). Limites do Consenso: Territórios Polissêmicos da Mata Atlântica e a Gestão Ambiental Participativa. Maio de 2001. f. 279. Tese (Doutorado em Geografia Humana) - Curso de Pós-graduação em Geografia Humana - Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ciências Humanas, Universidade de São Paulo. São Paulo.
43. Rodrigues C.L. A cultura caiçara e turismo no bairro do Marujá, Ilha do Cardoso (entrevista). Enciclopédia Caiçara: o olhar do pesquisador 2004, Vol. 1:327-341. NUPAUB-CEC/HUCITEC, São Paulo.
44. Santilli J. Socioambientalismo e novos direitos: proteção jurídica à diversidade biológica e cultural 2005, Peirópolis, São Paulo, 343.
45. Schultz L., Duit A., Folke C. Participation, adaptive co-management, and management performance in the world network of biosphere reserves. World Development 2011, 39(4):662-671.
46. Schröter B., Sessin-Dilascio K., Meyer C., Matzdorf B., Sattler C., Meyer M., et al. Multi-level governance through adaptive co-management: Conflict resolution in an inhabited Brazilian State Park. Ecological Process 2014, 6. 2192-1709.
47. Svendsen G.T., Svendsen G.L.H. The troika of sociology, political science and economics. Handbook of social capital: The troika of sociology, political science and economics 2009, 1-13. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, Cheltenham, UK. G.T. Svendsen, G.L.H. Svendsen (Eds.).
48. Ungar P., Strand R. Inclusive protected area management in the Amazon: The importance of social networks over ecological knowledge. Sustainability 2012, 4:3260-3278.
49. WWF-Brasil; Fundação Florestal, Instituto Florestal. (2006). Rappam: implementação da avaliação rápida e priorização do manejo das unidades de conservação do Instituto Florestal e da Fundação Florestal de São Paulo. WWF, Programa de Preservação da Mata Atlântica, Instituto Florestal de São Paulo, Fundação Florestal, Secretaria do Meio Ambiente do Estado de São Paulo. São Paulo. Retrieved from: Access: 11 Oct. 2014. http://www.wwf.org.br/natureza_brasileira/especiais/gestao_de_unidades_de_conservacao/efetividade_de_gestao_de_unidades_de_conservacao2/.