Current State of Radial Artery Catheterization in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases

Volumn 58, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 241-246

  Hinohara, Tomoya T ^a   Rao, Sunil V ^a,b  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b DUKE CLINICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Learning curve; PCI; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Radial access; STEMI

Indexed keywords

ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTERY CATHETERIZATION; ARTERY SPASM; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; FEMORAL ARTERY; HEART INFARCTION; HUMAN; LEARNING CURVE; MORTALITY; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; RADIAL ARTERY; ST SEGMENT ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; STABLE ANGINA PECTORIS; STENT THROMBOSIS; VASCULAR ACCESS; ADVERSE EFFECTS; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; HEART CATHETERIZATION; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; PROCEDURES; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; PUNCTURE; RISK FACTOR; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

CARDIAC CATHETERIZATION; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; HUMANS; LEARNING CURVE; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; PUNCTURES; RADIAL ARTERY; RISK FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84952863938     PISSN: 00330620     EISSN: 18731740     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pcad.2015.07.007     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Caputo R.P., Tremmel JA, Rao S, et al. Transradial arterial access for coronary and peripheral procedures: executive summary by the Transradial Committee of the SCAI. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2011, 78(6):823-839.
2. Eikelboom J.W., Mehta SR, Anand SS, Xie C, Fox KA, Yusuf S Adverse impact of bleeding on prognosis in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Circulation 2006, 114(8):774-782.
3. Jolly S.S., Amlani S, Hamon M, Yusuf S, Mehta SR Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography or intervention and the impact on major bleeding and ischemic events: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Am Heart J 2009, 157(1):132-140.
4. Stone G.W., Witzenbichler B, Guagliumi G, et al. Bivalirudin during primary PCI in acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2008, 358(21):2218-2230.
5. Ndrepepa G., Berger PB, Mehilli J, et al. Periprocedural bleeding and 1-year outcome after percutaneous coronary interventions: appropriateness of including bleeding as a component of a quadruple end point. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008, 51(7):690-697.
6. Pristipino C., Trani C, Nazzaro MS, et al. Major improvement of percutaneous cardiovascular procedure outcomes with radial artery catheterisation: results from the PREVAIL study. Heart 2009, 95(6):476-482.
7. Rao S.V., Jollis JG, Harrington RA, et al. Relationship of blood transfusion and clinical outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes. JAMA 2004, 292(13):1555-1562.
8. Rao S.V., Ou FS, Wang TY, et al. Trends in the prevalence and outcomes of radial and femoral approaches to percutaneous coronary intervention: a report from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2008, 1(4):379-386.
9. Rao S.V., Cohen MG, Kandzari DE, Bertrand OF, Gilchrist IC The transradial approach to percutaneous coronary intervention: historical perspective, current concepts, and future directions. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010, 55(20):2187-2195.
10. Bertrand O.F., Belisle P, Joyal D, et al. Comparison of transradial and femoral approaches for percutaneous coronary interventions: a systematic review and hierarchical Bayesian meta-analysis. Am Heart J 2012, 163(4):632-648.
11. Karrowni W., Vyas A, Giacomino B, et al. Radial versus femoral access for primary percutaneous interventions in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2013, 6(8):814-823.
12. Romagnoli E., Biondi-Zoccai G, Sciahbasi A, et al. Radial versus femoral randomized investigation in ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: the RIFLE-STEACS (Radial Versus Femoral Randomized Investigation in ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012, 60(24):2481-2489.
13. Valgimigli M., Gagnor A., Calabro P., et al. Radial versus femoral access in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing invasive management: a randomised multicentre trial. Lancet 2015, 385:2465-2476.
14. Jolly S.S., Yusuf S, Cairns J, et al. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (RIVAL): a randomised, parallel group, multicentre trial. Lancet 2011, 377(9775):1409-1420.
15. Baklanov D.V., Kaltenbach LA, Marso SP, et al. The prevalence and outcomes of transradial percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: analysis from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (2007 to 2011). J Am Coll Cardiol 2013, 61(4):420-426.
16. Joyal D., Bertrand OF, Rinfret S, Shimony A, Eisenberg MJ Meta-analysis of ten trials on the effectiveness of the radial versus the femoral approach in primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol 2012, 109(6):813-818.
17. Bernat I., Horak D, Stasek J, et al. ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated by radial or femoral approach in a multicenter randomized clinical trial: the STEMI-RADIAL trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014, 63(10):964-972.
18. Wimmer N.J., Cohen DJ, Wasfy JH, Rathore SS, Mauri L, Yeh RW Delay in reperfusion with transradial percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: Might some delays be acceptable?. Am Heart J 2014, 168(1):103-109.
19. Azzalini L., Khan R, Al-Hawwas M, et al. Effect of radial-to-femoral access crossover on adverse outcomes in primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol 2014, 114(8):1165-1173.
20. Ball W.T., Sharieff W, Jolly SS, et al. Characterization of operator learning curve for transradial coronary interventions. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2011, 4(4):336-341.
21. Pancholy S.B., Rao S.V. Improving outcomes in primary percutaneous coronary intervention: transradial is worth the time. Am Heart J 2014, 168(1):1-3.
22. Hess C.N., Peterson ED, Neely ML, et al. The learning curve for transradial percutaneous coronary intervention among operators in the United States: a study from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. Circulation 2014, 129(22):2277-2286.
23. Jolly S.S., Cairns J, Niemela K, et al. Effect of radial versus femoral access on radiation dose and the importance of procedural volume: a substudy of the multicenter randomized RIVAL trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2013, 6(3):258-266.
24. Jolly S.S., Cairns J, Yusuf S, et al. Procedural volume and outcomes with radial or femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014, 63(10):954-963.
25. Rao S.V., Tremmel JA, Gilchrist IC, et al. Best practices for transradial angiography and intervention: a consensus statement from the society for cardiovascular angiography and intervention's transradial working group. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2014, 83(2):228-236.
26. Saito S., Tanaka S, Hiroe Y, et al. Comparative study on transradial approach vs. transfemoral approach in primary stent implantation for patients with acute myocardial infarction: results of the test for myocardial infarction by prospective unicenter randomization for access sites (TEMPURA) trial. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2003, 59(1):26-33.
27. Cantor W.J., Puley G, Natarajan MK, et al. Radial versus femoral access for emergent percutaneous coronary intervention with adjunct glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition in acute myocardial infarction-the RADIAL-AMI pilot randomized trial. Am Heart J 2005, 150(3):543-549.
28. Brasselet C., Tassan S, Nazeyrollas P, Hamon M, Metz D Randomised comparison of femoral versus radial approach for percutaneous coronary intervention using abciximab in acute myocardial infarction: results of the FARMI trial. Heart 2007, 93(12):1556-1561.
29. Li W.M., Li Y, Zhao JY, et al. Safety and feasibility of emergent percutaneous coronary intervention with the transradial access in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Chin Med J (Engl) 2007, 120(7):598-600.
30. Yan Z.X., Zhou YJ, Zhao YX, et al. Safety and feasibility of transradial approach for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction. Chin Med J (Engl) 2008, 121(9):782-786.
31. Chodor P., Krupa H, Kurek T, et al. RADIal versus femoral approach for percutaneous coronary interventions in patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction (RADIAMI): a prospective, randomized, single-center clinical trial. Cardiol J 2009, 16(4):332-340.
32. Gan L., Lib Q, Liuc R, Zhaoc Y, Qiuc J, Liao Y Effectiveness and feasibility of transradial approaches for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction. J Nanjing Med Univ 2009, 23(4):270-274.
33. Hou L., Wei YD, Li WM, Xu YW Comparative study on transradial versus transfemoral approach for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in Chinese patients with acute myocardial infarction. Saudi Med J 2010, 31(2):158-162.
34. Chodor P., Kurek T, Kowalczuk A, et al. Radial vs femoral approach with StarClose clip placement for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. RADIAMI II: a prospective, randomised, single centre trial. Kardiol Pol 2011, 69(8):763-771.