Best practices for transradial angiography and intervention: A consensus statement from the society for cardiovascular angiography and intervention's transradial working group

Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions

Volumn 83, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 228-236

  Rao, Sunil V ^a   Tremmel, Jennifer A ^b   Gilchrist, Ian C ^c   Shah, Pinak B ^d   Gulati, Rajiv ^e   Shroff, Adhir R ^f   Crisco, Van ^g   Woody, Walter ^h   Zoghbi, Gilbert ⁱ   Duffy, Peter L ^j   Sanghvi, Kintur ^k   Krucoff, Mitchell W ^a   Pyne, Christopher T ^l   Skelding, Kimberly A ^m   Patel, Tejas ⁿ   Pancholy, Samir B ^o  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c PENN STATE MILTON S HERSHEY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^e MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

^g First Coast Heart and Vascular Center   (United States)

^h VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

ⁱ Department of Cardiology   (United States)

^j FirstHealth of the Carolinas Inc   (United States)

^k Deborah Heart and Lung Institute   (United States)

^l LAHEY HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^m GEISINGER MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

ⁿ Seth NHL Municipal Medical College   (India)

^o Janet Weis Children s Hospital   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

brachial radial ulnar; CATB, catheterization; complex PCI; PCIC, percutaneous coronary intervention; PPCI; primary PCI

Indexed keywords

HEPARIN; HIRULOG;

ANGIOGRAPHY; ARTERY OCCLUSION; ARTICLE; BALLOON CATHETER; CONSENSUS; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CURRICULUM; HAND; HUMAN; INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOVASCULAR PROCEDURE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL SOCIETY; PATIENT MONITORING; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; RADIAL ARTERY; RADIATION EXPOSURE; RISK ASSESSMENT; VASCULAR ACCESS;

BRACHIAL/RADIAL/ULNAR; CATB, CATHETERIZATION; COMPLEX PCI; PCIC, PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PPCI; PRIMARY PCI;

BENCHMARKING; CARDIAC CATHETERIZATION; CONSENSUS; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HUMANS; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; RADIAL ARTERY; SOCIETIES, MEDICAL;

EID: 84892780062     PISSN: 15221946     EISSN: 1522726X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ccd.25209     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Hamon M, Pristipino C, Di Mario C, et al. Consensus document on the radial approach in percutaneous cardiovascular interventions: Position paper by the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions and Working Groups on Acute Cardiac Care and Thrombosis of the European Society of Cardiology. EuroIntervention 2013; 8: 1242-1251.
2. Jolly SS, Amlani S, Hamon M, Yusuf S, Mehta SR,. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography or intervention and the impact on major bleeding and ischemic events: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Am Heart J 2009; 157: 132-140.
3. Caputo RP, Tremmel JA, Rao S, et al. Transradial arterial access for coronary and peripheral procedures: Executive summary by the Transradial Committee of the SCAI. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2011; 78: 823-839.
4. Cooper CJ, El-Shiekh RA, Cohen DJ, et al. Effect of transradial access on quality of life and cost of cardiac catheterization: A randomized comparison. Am Heart J 1999; 138: 430-436.
5. Jolly SS, Yusuf S, Cairns J, et al. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (RIVAL): A randomised, parallel group, multicentre trial. Lancet 2011; 377: 1409-1420.
6. Joyal D, Bertrand OF, Rinfret S, Shimony A, Eisenberg MJ,. Meta-analysis of ten trials on the effectiveness of the radial versus the femoral approach in primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol 2012; 109: 813-818.
7. Feldman DN, Swaminathan RV, Kaltenbach LA, et al. Adoption of radial access and comparison of outcomes to femoral access in percutaneous coronary intervention: An updated report from the national cardiovascular data registry (2007-2012). Circulation 2013; 127: 2295-2306.
8. Bertrand OF, Rao SV, Pancholy S, et al. Transradial approach for coronary angiography and interventions: Results of the first international transradial practice survey. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2010; 3: 1022-1031.
9. Rhyne D, Mann T,. Hand ischemia resulting from a transradial intervention: Successful management with radial artery angioplasty. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2010; 76: 383-386.
10. Rao SV, Bernat I, Bertrand OF,. Remaining challenges and opportunities for improvement in percutaneous transradial coronary procedures. Eur Heart J 2012; 33: 2521-2526.
11. Mercuri M, Mehta S, Xie C, Valettas N, Velianou JL, Natarajan MK,. Radial artery access as a predictor of increased radiation exposure during a diagnostic cardiac catheterization procedure. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2011; 4: 347-352.
12. Chambers CE, Fetterly KA, Holzer R, et al. Radiation safety program for the cardiac catheterization laboratory. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2011; 77: 546-556.
13. Sciahbasi A, Romagnoli E, Trani C, et al. Operator radiation exposure during percutaneous coronary procedures through the left or right radial approach: The TALENT dosimetric substudy. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2011; 4: 226-31.
14. Marque N, Jegou A, Varenne O, et al. Impact of an extension tube on operator radiation exposure during coronary procedures performed through the radial approach. Arch Cardiovasc Dis 2009; 102: 749-754.
15. Behan M, Haworth P, Colley P, et al. Decreasing operators' radiation exposure during coronary procedures: The transradial radiation protection board. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2010; 76: 79-84.
16. Politi L, Biondi-Zoccai G, Nocetti L,. et al. Reduction of scatter radiation during transradial percutaneous coronary angiography: A randomized trial using a lead-free radiation shield. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2012; 79: 97-102.
17. Sciahbasi A, Romagnoli E, Burzotta F, et al. Transradial approach (left vs right) and procedural times during percutaneous coronary procedures: TALENT study. Am Heart J 2011; 161: 172-179.
18. Jolly SS, Cairns J, Niemela K, et al. Effect of radial versus femoral access on radiation dose and the importance of procedural volume: A substudy of the multicenter randomized RIVAL trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2013; 6: 258-266.
19. Lo TS, Ratib K, Chong AY, Bhatia G, Gunning M, Nolan J,. Impact of access site selection and operator expertise on radiation exposure; a controlled prospective study. Am Heart J 2012; 164: 455-461.
20. Romagnoli E, Biondi-Zoccai G, Sciahbasi A, et al. Radial versus femoral randomized investigation in st-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: The RIFLE-STEACS (Radial Versus Femoral Randomized Investigation in ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012; 60: 2481-2489.
21. Vorobcsuk A, Konyi A, Aradi D, et al. Transradial versus transfemoral percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction Systematic overview and meta-analysis. Am Heart J 2009; 158: 814-821.
22. Joyal D, Bertrand OF, Rinfret S, Shimony A, Eisenberg MJ,. Meta-analysis of ten trials on the effectiveness of the radial versus the femoral approach in primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol 2012 109: 813-818.
23. Louvard Y, Ludwig J, Lefevre T, et al. Transradial approach for coronary angioplasty in the setting of acute myocardial infarction: A dual-center registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2002; 55: 206-211.
24. Valsecchi O, Musumeci G, Vassileva A, et al. Safety, feasibility and efficacy of transradial primary angioplasty in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Ital Heart J 2003; 4: 329-334.
25. Kim JY, Yoon J, Jung HS, et al. Feasibility of the radial artery as a vascular access route in performing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Yonsei Med J 2005; 46: 503-510.
26. Ziakas A, Gomma A, McDonald J, Klinke P, Hilton D,. A comparison of the radial and the femoral approaches in primary or rescue percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction in the elderly. Acute Cardiac Care 2007; 9: 93-96.
27. Weaver AN, Henderson RA, Gilchrist IC, Ettinger SM,. Arterial access and door-to-balloon times for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients presenting with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2010; 75: 695-699.
28. Yip HK, Chung SY, Chai HT, et al. Safety and efficacy of transradial vs transfemoral arterial primary coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction: Single-center experience. Circ J 2009; 73: 2050-2055.
29. Hetherington SL, Adam Z, Morley R, et al. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: Changing patterns of vascular access, radial versus femoral artery. Heart 2009; 95: 1612-1618.
30. Arzamendi D, Ly HQ, Tanguay JF, et al. Effect on bleeding, time to revascularization, and one-year clinical outcomes of the radial approach during primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 2010; 106: 148-154.
31. Pancholy S, Patel T, Sanghvi K, Thomas M, Patel T,. Comparison of door-to-balloon times for primary PCI using transradial versus transfemoral approach. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2010; 75: 991-995.
32. Saito S, Tanaka S, Hiroe Y, et al. Comparative study on transradial approach vs. transfemoral approach in primary stent implantation for patients with acute myocardial infarction: Results of the test for myocardial infarction by prospective unicenter randomization for access sites (TEMPURA) trial. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2003; 59: 26-33.
33. Cantor WJ, Puley G, Natarajan MK, et al. Radial versus femoral access for emergent percutaneous coronary intervention with adjunct glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition in acute myocardial infarction-The RADIAL-AMI pilot randomized trial. Am Heart J 2005; 150: 543-549.
34. Li WM, Li Y, Zhao JY, et al. Safety and feasibility of emergent percutaneous coronary intervention with the transradial access in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Chin Med J 2007; 120: 598-600.
35. Brasselet C, Tassan S, Nazeyrollas P, Hamon M, Metz D,. Randomised comparison of femoral versus radial approach for percutaneous coronary intervention using abciximab in acute myocardial infarction: Results of the FARMI trial. Heart 2007; 93: 1556-1561.
36. Yan ZX, Zhou YJ, Zhao YX, et al. Safety and feasibility of transradial approach for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction. Chin Med J 2008; 121: 782-786.
37. Chodor P, Krupa H, Kurek T, et al. RADIal versus femoral approach for percutaneous coronary interventions in patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction (RADIAMI): A prospective, randomized, single-center clinical trial. Cardiol J 2009; 16: 332-340.
38. Hou L, Wei YD, Li WM, Xu YW,. Comparative study on transradial versus transfemoral approach for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in Chinese patients with acute myocardial infarction. Saudi Med J 2010; 31: 158-162.
39. Spaulding C, Lefevre T, Funck F, et al. Left radial approach for coronary angiography: Results of a prospective study. Catheteri Cardiovasc Diagn 1996; 39: 365-370.
40. Barbeau GR, Arsenault F, Dugas L, Simard S, Lariviere MM,. Evaluation of the ulnopalmar arterial arches with pulse oximetry and plethysmography: Comparison with the Allen's test in 1010 patients. Am Heart J 2004; 147: 489-493.
41. Wilkins RG,. Radial artery cannulation and ischaemic damage: A review. Anaesthesia 1985; 40: 896-899.
42. Slogoff S, Keats AS, Arlund C,. On the safety of radial artery cannulation. Anesthesiology 1983; 59: 42-47.
43. Hata M, Sezai A, Niino T, et al. Radial artery harvest using the sharp scissors method for patients with pathological findings on Allen's test. Surg Today 2006; 36: 790-792.
44. Bhananker SM, Liau DW, Kooner PK, Posner KL, Caplan RA, Domino KB,. Liability related to peripheral venous and arterial catheterization: A closed claims analysis. Anesth Analg 2009; 109: 124-129.
45. Doyle BJ, Rihal CS, Gastineau DA, Holmes DR Jr,. Bleeding, blood transfusion, and increased mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention: Implications for contemporary practice. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009; 53: 2019-2027.
46. Verheugt FW, Steinhubl SR, Hamon M, et al. Incidence, prognostic impact, and influence of antithrombotic therapy on access and nonaccess site bleeding in percutaneous coronary intervention. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2011; 4: 191-197.
47. Kirtane AJ, Piazza G, Murphy SA, et al. Correlates of bleeding events among moderate- to high-risk patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and treated with eptifibatide: observations from the PROTECT-TIMI-30 trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 47: 2374-2379.
48. Montalescot G, White HD, Gallo R, et al. Enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin in elective percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med 2006; 355: 1006-1017.
49. Bertrand OF, Jolly SS, Rao SV, et al. Meta-analysis comparing bivalirudin versus heparin monotherapy on ischemic and bleeding outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol 2012; 110: 599-606.
50. Ball WT, Sharieff W, Jolly SS, et al. Characterization of operator learning curve for transradial coronary interventions. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2011; 4: 336-341.
51. Jacobs AK, Babb JD, Hirshfeld JW Jr, Holmes DR Jr,. Task force 3: Training in diagnostic and interventional cardiac catheterization endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008; 51: 355-361.