Safety and feasibility of transradial approach for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction

Chinese Medical Journal

Volumn 121, Issue 9, 2008, Pages 782-786

  Yan, Zhen Xian ^a   Zhou, Yu Jie ^a   Zhao, Ying Xin ^a   Liu, Yu Yang ^a   Shi, Dong Mei ^a   Guo, Yong He ^a   Cheng, Wan Jun ^a  

^a CAPITAL MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Acute myocardial infarction; Elderly; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Transfemoral; Transradial

Indexed keywords

ACUTE HEART INFARCTION; AGED; AORTA BALLOON; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL HEART PACEMAKER; BLEEDING; CANNULATION; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FALSE ANEURYSM; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; HEMOSTASIS; HUMAN; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PUNCTURE; REPERFUSION; SAFETY; VASCULAR ACCESS; HEART INFARCTION; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; RADIAL ARTERY; TRANSLUMINAL CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY;

AGED; ANGIOPLASTY, TRANSLUMINAL, PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; RADIAL ARTERY;

EID: 51149100319     PISSN: 03666999     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00029330-200805010-00004     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Cheng CI, Wu CJ, Fang CY, Youssef AA, Chen CJ, Chen SM, et al. Feasibility and safety of transradial stenting for unprotected left main coronary artery stenoses. Circ J 2007; 71: 855-861.
2. Small A, Klinke P, Della Siega A, Fretz E, Kinloch D, Mildenberger R, et al. Day procedure intervention is safe and complication free in higher risk patients undergoing transradial angioplasty and stenting. The discharge study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2007; 70: 907-912.
3. Yang YJ, Xu B, Chen JL, Kang S, Qiao SB, Qin XW, et al. Comparison of immediate and followup results between transradial and transfemoral approach for percutaneous coronary intervention in true bifurcational lesions. Chin Med J 2007; 120: 539-544.
4. Sanmartin M, Cuevas D, Moxica J, Valdes M, Esparza J, Baz JA, et al. Transradial cardiac catheterization in patients with coronary bypass grafts: feasibility analysis and comparison with transfemoral approach. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2006; 67: 580-584.
5. Gilchrist IC, Moyer CD, Gascho JA. Transradial right and left heart catheterizations: a comparison to traditional femoral approach. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2006; 67: 585-588.
6. Cantor WJ, Puley G, Natarajan MK, Dzavik V, Madan M, Fry A, et al. Radial versus femoral access for emergent percutaneous coronary intervention with adjunct glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition in acute myocardial infarction - the RADIAL-AMI pilot randomized trial. Am Heart J 2005; 150: 543-549.
7. Kim JY, Yoon J, Jung HS, Ko JY, Yoo BS, Hwang SO, et al. Feasibility of the radial artery as a vascular access route in performing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Yonsei Med J 2005; 46: 503-510.
8. Cheng TO. Influence of learning curve on the success of transradial coronary angioplasty. Catheter Cardiovasc Diagn 1998; 45: 215-216.
9. Salgado Fernandez J, Calviño Santos R, Vázquez Rodríguez JM, Vázquez González N, Vázquez Rey E, Pérez Fernández R, et al. Transradial approach to coronary angiography and angioplasty: initial experience and learning curve. Rev Esp Cardiol 2003; 56: 152-159.
10. Louvard Y, Ludwig J, Lefevre T, Schmeisser A, Brück M, Scheinert D, et al. Transradial approach for coronary angioplasty in the setting of acute myocardial infarction: a dual-center registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2002; 55: 206-211.
11. Valsecchi O, Musumeci G, Vassileva A, Tespili M, Guagliumi G, Gavazzi A, et al. Safety, feasibility and efficacy of transradial primary angioplasty in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Ital Heart J 2003; 4: 329-334.
12. Kim MH, Cha KS, Kim HJ, Kim SG, Kim JS. Primary stenting for acute myocardial infarction via the transradial approach: a safe and useful alternative to the transfemoral approach. J Invasive Cardiol 2000; 12: 292-296.
13. Cantor WJ, Puley G, Natarajan MK, Dzavik V, Madan M, Fry A, et al. Radial versus femoral access for emergent percutaneous coronary intervention with adjunct glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition in acute myocardial infarction - the RADIAL-AMI pilot randomized trial. Am Heart J 2005; 150: 543-549.
14. Philippe F, Larrazet F, Meziane T, Dibie A. Comparison of transradial vs transfemoral approach in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction with primary angioplasty and abciximab. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2004; 61: 67-73.
15. Brasselet C, Tassan S, Nazeyrollas P, Hamon M, Metz D. Randomized comparison of femoral versus radial approach for percutaneous coronary intervention using abxicimab in acute myocardial infarction: results of the FARMI Trial. Heart 2007; 93: 1556-1561.
16. Floyd KC, Jayne JE, Kaplan AV, Friedman BJ, Niles NW, Hettleman BD, et al. Age-based differences of percutaneous coronary intervention in the drug-eluting stent era. J Interv Cardiol 2006; 19: 381-387.
17. Assali AR, Moustapha A, Sdringola S, Salloum J, Awadalla H, Saikia S, et al. The dilemma of success: percutaneous coronary interventions in patients > or = 75 years of age-successful but associated with higher vascular complications and cardiac mortality. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2003; 59: 195-199.
18. Feldman DN, Gade CL, Slotwiner AJ, Parikh M, Bergman G, Wong SC, et al. Comparison of outcomes of percutaneous coronary interventions in patients of three age groups (from the New York State Angioplasty Registry). Am J Cardiol 2006; 98: 1334-1339.
19. Blankenship JC, Hellkamp AS, Aguirre FV, Demko SL, Topol EJ, Califf RM, et al. Vascular access site complications after percutaneous coronary intervention with abciximab in the evaluation of c7E3 for the prevention of ischemic complications (EPIC) trial. Am J Cardiol 1998; 81: 36-40.
20. Goyen M, Manz S, Kroger K, Massalha K, Haude M, Rudofsky G. Interventional therapy of vascular complications caused by the hemostatic puncture closure device angio-seal. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2000; 49:142-147.
21. Stiebellehner L, Nikfardjan M, Diem K, Atteneder M, Stulnig T, Priglinger U, et al. Manual compression versus mechanical compression device (FemoStop) after diagnostic coronary angiography with/without intervention. Wien Klin Wochenschr 2002; 114: 847-852.
22. Tron C, Koning R, Eltchaninoff H, Douillet R, Chassaing S, Sanchez-Giron C, et al. A randomized comparison of a percutaneous suture device versus manual compression for femoral artery hemostasis after PTCA. J Interv Cardiol 2003; 16: 217-221.