Major improvement of percutaneous cardiovascular procedure outcomes with radial artery catheterisation: Results from the PREVAIL study

Heart

Volumn 95, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 476-482

  Pristipino, Christian ^a,k   Trani, C ^b   Nazzaro, M S ^c   Berni, A ^d   Patti, G ^e   Patrizi, R ^f   Pironi, B ^g   Mazzarotto, P ^h   Gioffre G ⁱ   Biondi Zoccai, G G L ^j   Richichi, G ^a  

^a SAN FILIPPO NERI HOSPITAL   (Italy)

^b CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

^c SAN CAMILLO FORLANINI HOSPITAL   (Italy)

^d SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

^e UNIVERSITY CAMPUS BIO MEDICO   (Italy)

^f FONDAZIONE POLICLINICO UNIVERSITARIO A GEMELLI IRCCS   (Italy)

^g Ospedale Madre G Vannini   (Italy)

^h San Carlo Hospital   (Italy)

ⁱ S EUGENIO HOSPITAL   (Italy)

^j University Hospital   (Italy)

^k NONE   (Italy)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME; AGED; ARTERY CATHETERIZATION; ARTICLE; CARDIOGENIC SHOCK; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; FATALITY; FEMALE; FEMORAL ARTERY; HEART INFARCTION; HOSPITAL; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIAL ARTERY; STABLE ANGINA PECTORIS; STROKE; THERAPY EFFECT; TRANSLUMINAL CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY; VASCULAR ACCESS; VASCULAR DISEASE;

AGED; ANGIOPLASTY, TRANSLUMINAL, PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY; FEMALE; FEMORAL ARTERY; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HEMORRHAGE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; MYOCARDIAL ISCHEMIA; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RADIAL ARTERY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 61949286607     PISSN: 13556037     EISSN: 1468201X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/hrt.2008.150714     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Ndrepepa G, Berger PB, Mehilli J, et al. Periprocedural bleeding and 1-year outcome after percutaneous coronary interventions: appropriateness of including bleeding as a component of a quadruple end point. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;51:690-7.
2. Hamon M, Filippi-Codaccioni E, Riddell JW, et al. Prognostic impact of major bleeding in patients with acute coronary syndromes. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eurointervention 2007;3:400-8.
3. Agostoni P, Biondi-Zoccai GG, de Benedictis ML, et al. Radial versus femoral approach for percutaneous coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures; systematic overview and meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:349-56.
4. Pristipino C, Pelliccia F, Granatelli G, et al. Comparison of access-related bleeding complications in women versus men undergoing percutanous coronary catheterization using the radial artery versus femoral artery approach. Am J Cardiol 2007;99:1216-21.
5. Rao SV, Ou FS, Wang TY, et al. Trends in the prevalence and outcomes of radial and femoral approaches to percutaneous coronary intervention: a report from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2008;1;379-86.
6. Montalescot G, Ongen Z, Guindy R, et al, for the RIVIERA Investigators. Predictors of outcome in patients undergoing PCI. Results of the RIVIERA study. Int J Cardiol 2007. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2007.07.127.
7. Chase AJ, Fretz EB, Warburton WP, et al. The association of arterial access site at angioplasty with transfusion and mortality the MORTAL study: (Mortality benefit of Reduced Transfusion After PCI via the Arm or Leg). Heart 2008;94:1019-25.
8. Steinhubl SR, Kastrati A, Berger PB. Variation in the definitions of bleeding in clinical trias of patients with acute coronary syndromes and undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions and its impact on the apparent safety of antithrombotic drugs. Am Heart J 2007;154:3-11.
9. Ultimo resoconto attività 2005.xls. In Attività dei Laboratori Italiani di Emodinamica, I dati delle attività - 2005. Available at http://www.gise.it/ (accessed 20 January 2008).
10. Chew DP, Bhatt DL, Lincoff AM, et al. Clinical endpoint definitions following percutaneous coronary intervention and their relationship to late mortality: an assessment by attributable risk. Heart 2006;92:945-50.
11. Rao SV, O'Grady K, Pieper KS, et al. A comparison of the clinical impact of bleeding measured by two different classifications among patients with acute coronary syndromes. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47:809-16.
12. Cepeda MS, Boston R, Farrar JT, et al. Comparison of logistic regression versus propensity score when the number of events is low and there are multiple confounders. Am J Epidemiol 2003;158:280-7.
13. Cosgrave J, Melzi G, Corbett S, et al. Comparable clinical outcomes with paclitaxel- and sirolimus-eluting stents in unrestricted contemporary practice. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:2320-8.
14. Popma JJ, Berger P, Ohman EM, et al. Antithrombotic therapy during percutaneous coronary intervention: the seventh ACCP conference on antithrombotic and thrombolytic therapy. Chest 2004;126:576S-599S.
15. Louvard Y, Lefevre T, Allain A, et al. Coronary angiography through the radial or the femoral approach: the CARAFE study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2001;52:181-7.
16. Allen C, Glasziou P, Del Mar C. Bed rest: a potentially harmful treatment needing more careful evaluation. Lancet 1999;354:1229- 33.
17. Brasselet C, Tassan S, Nazeyrollas P, et al. Randomised comparison of femoral versus radial approach for percutaneous coronary intervention using abciximab in acute myocardial infarction: results of the FARMI Trial. Heart 2007;93:1556-61.