Environmental conflict communication

The SAGE Handbook of Conflict Communication: Integrating Theory, Research, and Practice

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 513-536

  Peterson, Tarla Rai ^a,b,c   Feldpausch Parker, Andrea Marie ^d  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

^c UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

^d STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84952670454     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4135/9781452281988.n22     Document Type: Chapter

References (80)

1. Administrative Procedures Act, 5 U.S.C. § 551et seq. (1946).
2. Ahteensuu, M., & Sippi, H. (2009). A critical assessment of public consultations on GMOs in the European Union. Environmental Values, 18, 129-152. doi:10.3197/096327109X438035 http://dx.doi.org/10.3197/096327109X438035
3. Amnesty International & The Sierra Club. (2000). Environmentalists under fire: 10 urgent cases of human rights abuses. Retrieved from http://www.sierraclub.org/human-rights/amnesty/report.pdf
4. Appelstrand, M. (2002). Participation and societal values: The challenge for lawmakers and policy practitioners. Forest Policy and Economics, 4, 281-290. doi:10.1016/S1389-9341(02)00070-9 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1389-9341%2802%2900070-9
5. Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 25, 216-224. doi:10.1080/01944366908977225 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225
6. Brogden, M. J., & Greenberg, J. B. (2003). The fight for the west: A political ecology of land use conflicts in Arizona. Human Organization, 62, 289-298.
7. Brummans, B. H. J. M., Putnam, L. L., Gray, B., Hanke, R., Lewicki, R. J., & Wiethoff, C. (2008). Making sense of intractable multiparty conflict: A study of framing in four environmental disputes. Communication Monographs, 75, 25-51. doi:10.1080/03637750801952735 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03637750801952735
8. Carolan, M. S. (2006). Ecological representation in deliberation: The contribution of tactile spaces. Environmental Politics, 15, 345-361. doi:10.1080/09644010600627535 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09644010600627535
9. Carolan, M. S. (2009). "I do therefore there is": Enlivening socio-environmental theory. Environmental Politics, 18 (1), 1-17. doi:10.1080/09644010802622748 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09644010802622748
10. Costanza, R., & Jorgenson, S. E. (2002). Understanding and solving environmental problems in the 21st century: Toward a new, integrated hard problem science. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
11. Cox, J. R. (2012). Environmental communication and the public sphere (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12. Daniels, S. E., & Walker, G. B. (2001). Working through environmental conflict: The collaborative learning approach. Westport, CT: Praeger.
13. Dewulf, A., Francois, G., Paul-Wostl, C., & Taillieu, T. (2007). A framing approach to cross-disciplinary research collaboration: Experiences from a large-scale research project on adaptive water management. Ecology and Society, 12 (2), 14. Retrieved from http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss2/art14/
14. Dustin, D. L., Schneider, I. E., McAvoy, L. H., & Frakt, A. N. (2002). Cross-cultural claims on Devils Tower National Monument: A case study. Leisure Sciences, 24, 79-88. doi:10.1080/01490400252772845 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01490400252772845
15. Enck-Wanzer, D. (2006). Trashing the system: Social movement, intersectional rhetoric, and collective agency in the Young Lord’s Organization’s Garbage Offensive. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 92, 174-201. doi:10.1080/00335630600816920 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00335630600816920
16. Fabricius, C., Koch, E., & Magome, H. (2001). Towards strengthening collaborative ecosystem management: Lessons from environmental conflict and political change in southern Africa. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand, 31, 831-844. doi:10.1080/03014223.2001.9517679 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03014223.2001.9517679
17. Fernandez-Gimenez, M. E., Ballard, H. L., & Sturtevant, V. E. (2008). Adaptive management and social learning in collaborative and community-based monitoring: A study of five community-based forestry organizations in the western USA. Ecology and Society, 13 (2), 4. Retrieved from http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss2/art4/
18. Fischer, A., & Marshall, K. (2010). Framing the landscape: Discourses of woodland restoration and moorland management in Scotland. Journal of Rural Studies, 26, 185-193. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2009.09.004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2009.09.004
19. Fletcher, A. L. (2009). Clearing the air: The contribution of frame analysis to understanding climate policy in the United States. Environmental Politics, 18, 800-816. doi:10.1080/09644010903157123 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09644010903157123
20. Fontaine, G. (2010). The effects of energy co-governance in Peru. Energy Policy, 38, 2234-2244. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2009.12.011 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.12.011
21. Giri, K., & Darnhofer, I. (2010). Nepali women using community forestry as a platform for social change. Society & Natural Resources, 23, 1216-1229. doi:10.1080/08941921003620533 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08941921003620533
22. Gray, B. (2003). Framing of environmental disputes. In R. Lewicki, B. Gray, & M. Elliot (Eds.), Making sense of intractable environmental conflicts: Concepts and cases (pp. 11-34). Washington, DC: Island Press.
23. Gray, J. (2010a). Reflection. Text & Performance Quarterly, 30, 220-221. doi:10.1080/10462930903245072 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10462930903245072
24. Gray, J. (2010b). Trail mix: A sojourn on the muddy divide between nature and culture. Text & Performance Quarterly, 30, 201-219. doi:10.1080/10462930903245064 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10462930903245064
25. Gregory, R., McDaniels, T., & Fields, D. (2001). Decision aiding, not dispute resolution: Creating insights through structured environmental decisions. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 20, 415-432. doi:10.1002/pam.1001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pam.1001
26. Gwartney, P. A., Fessenden, L., & Landt, G. (2002). Measuring the long-term impact of a community conflict resolution process: A case study using content analysis of public documents. Negotiation Journal-On the Process of Dispute Settlement, 18, 51-74. doi:10.1111/j.1571-9979.2002.tb00250.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1571-9979.2002.tb00250.x
27. Habron, G. (2003). Role of adaptive management for watershed councils. Environmental Management, 31, 29-41. doi:10.1007/s00267-002-2763-y http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00267-002-2763-y
28. Hamilton, J. D. (2003). Exploring technical and cultural appeals in strategic risk communication: The Fernald radium case. Risk Analysis, 23, 291-302. doi:10.1111/1539-6924.00309 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1539-6924.00309
29. Hobson, K. (2006). Enacting environmental justice in Singapore: Performative justice and the green volunteer network. Geoforum, 37, 671-681. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2005.08.004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2005.08.004
30. Ivie, R. L. (2002). Rhetorical deliberation and democratic politics in the here and now. Rhetoric and Public Affairs, 5, 277-285. doi:10.1353/rap.2002.0033 http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/rap.2002.0033
31. Ivie, R. L. (2004). Prologue to democratic dissent in America. Javnost-The Public: Journal of the European Institute for Communication and Culture, 11, 19-35.
32. Kallis, G., Kiparsky, M., & Norgaars, R. (2009). Collaborative governance and adaptive management: Lessons from California’s CALFED water program. Environmental Science & Policy, 12, 631-643. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2009.07.002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2009.07.002
33. Laessoe, J. (2007). Participation and sustainable development: The post-ecologist transformation of citizen involvement in Denmark. Environmental Politics, 16, 231-250. doi:10.1080/09644010701211726 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09644010701211726
34. Lewicki, R., Gray, B., & Elliot, M. (Eds.). (2003). Making sense of intractable environmental conflicts: Concepts and cases. Washington, DC: Island Press.
35. Littlejohn, S. W., & Domenici, K. (2001). Engaging communication in conflict: Systemic practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781452225654 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452225654
36. Low, D. (2008). Dissent and environmental communication: A semiotic approach. Semiotica, 172, 47-64.
37. Maguire, L. A. (2003). Interplay of science and stakeholder values in Neuse River total maximum daily load process. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management-A, 129 (4), 261-270. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2003)129:4(261) http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/%28ASCE%290733-9496%282003%29129:4%28261%29
38. Mander, S. L., Bows, A., Anderson, K. L., Shackley, S., Agnolucci, P., & Ekins, P. (2008). The Tyndall decarbonisation scenarios: Part I. Development of a backcasting methodology with stakeholder participation. Energy Policy, 36, 3754-3763. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2008.06.003 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.06.003
39. Martin, R., & Piper, J.-E. (Eds.). (2001). Native voices: An informal collection of papers presented at the AAA Meeting, November 2000. American Indian Quarterly, 25 (1), 1-40. doi:10.1353/aiq.2001.0007 http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/aiq.2001.0007
40. Mascarenhas, M., & Scarce, R. (2004). "The intention was good": Legitimacy, consensus-based decision making, and the case of forest planning in British Columbia, Canada. Society & Natural Resources, 17, 17-38.
41. Mason, M. (2008). Information disclosure and environmental rights: The Aarhus Convention. Global Environmental Politics, 10, 10-31. doi:10.1162/GLEP_a_00012 http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/GLEP_a_00012
42. McComas, K. A., Trumbo, C. W., & Besley, J. C. (2007). Public meetings about suspected cancer clusters: The impact of voice, interactional justice, and risk perception on attendees’ attitudes in six communities. Journal of Health Communication, 12, 527-549. doi:10.1080/10810730701508245 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10810730701508245
43. McGill, K. (2006). Reading the valley: Performance as a rhetoric of dimension. Text & Performance Quarterly, 26, 389-404. doi:10.1080/10462930600836421 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10462930600836421
44. Moore, M. (2004). Colliding ironies and Clinton’s salvage rider rhetoric in the Northwest timber controversy. In T. R. Peterson (Ed.), Green talk in the White House: The rhetorical presidency encounters ecology (pp. 181-206). College Station: Texas A&M University Press.
45. National Environmental Policy Act, 42 U.S.C. § 4321et seq. (1969).
46. Neff, M. (2007). Scenario planning for wildlife management: A case study of the National Elk Refuge, Jackson, Wyoming. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 12, 219-226. doi:10.1080/10871200701442783 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10871200701442783
47. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511807763 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807763
48. Perreault, T., & Valdivia, G. (2010). Hydrocarbons, popular protest and national imaginaries: Ecuador and Bolivia in comparative context. Geoforum, 41, 689-699. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2010.04.004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2010.04.004
49. Peters, J. D. (1999). Speaking into the air: A history of the idea of communication. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
50. Peterson, M. N., Allison, S. A., Peterson, M. J., Peterson, T. R., & Lopez, R. R. (2004). A tale of two species: Habitat conservation plans as bounded conflict. Journal of Wildlife Management, 68, 743-761. doi:10.2193/0022-541X(2004)068[0743:ATOTSH]2.0.CO;2 http://dx.doi.org/10.2193/0022-541X%282004%29068%5B0743:ATOTSH%5D2.0.CO;2
51. Peterson, M. N., Birckhead, J., Leong, K., Peterson, M. J., & Peterson, T. R. (2010). Rearticulating the myth of human-wildlife conflict. Conservation Letters, 3, 74-82. doi:10.1111/j.1755-263X.2010.00099.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-263X.2010.00099.x
52. Peterson, M. N., Peterson, M. J., & Peterson, T. R. (2005). Conservation and the myth of consensus. Conservation Biology, 19, 762-767. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00518.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00518.x
53. Peterson, M. N., Peterson, M. J., & Peterson, T. R. (2006). Why conservation needs dissent. Conservation Biology, 20, 576-578. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00409.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00409.x
54. Peterson, M. N., Peterson, M. J., & Peterson, T. R. (2007). Environmental communication: Why this crisis discipline should facilitate environmental democracy. Environmental Communication: A Journal of Nature and Culture, 1, 74-86. doi:10.1080/17524030701334292 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17524030701334292
55. Peterson, M. N., Peterson, T. R., Peterson, M. J., Lopez, R. R., & Silvy, N. J. (2002). Cultural conflict and the endangered Florida Key deer. Journal of Wildlife Management, 66, 947-968. doi:10.2307/3802928 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3802928
56. Peterson, T. R. (2003). Social control frames: Opportunities or constraints. Environmental Practice, 5, 232-238. doi:10.1017/S1466046603035622 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1466046603035622
57. Peterson, T. R., & Franks, R. R. (2006). Environmental conflict communication. In J. Oetzel & S. Ting-Toomey (Eds.), Handbook of conflict communication (pp. 419-445). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
58. Peterson, T. R., Peterson, M. J., & Grant, W. E. (2004). Social practice and biophysical process. In S. L. Senecah (Ed.), Environmental communication yearbook (Vol. 1, pp. 15-32). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
59. Peterson, T. R., Peterson, M. N., Peterson, M. J., Allison, S. A., & Gore, D. C. (2006). To play the fool: Can environmental conservation and democracy survive social capital? Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 3, 116-140. doi:10.1080/14791420600633048 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14791420600633048
60. Pezzullo, P. C. (2007). Toxic tourism: Rhetorics of pollution, travel, and environmental justice. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
61. Poncelet, E. C. (2001). "A kiss here and a kiss there": Conflict and collaboration in environmental partnerships. Environmental Management, 27, 13-25. doi:10.1007/s002670010130 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s002670010130
62. Prelli, L. (2004). Sustainable forestry in New Hampshire. In T. R. Peterson (Ed.), Green talk in the White House: The rhetorical presidency encounters ecology (pp. 233-257). College Station: Texas A&M University Press.
63. Putnam, L. L., Burgess, G., & Royer, R. (2003). We can’t go on like this: Frame changes in intractable conflicts. Environmental Practice, 5, 247-255. doi:10.1017/S1466046603035646 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1466046603035646
64. Riemer, J. W. (2004). Chippewa spearfishing, lake property owners/anglers, and tourism: A case study of environmental social conflict. Sociological Spectrum, 24, 43-70. doi:10.1080/02732170370229751 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02732170370229751
65. Robbins, S. M. (2010). Play nice or pick a fight? Cooperation as an interest group strategy at implementation. Policy Studies Journal, 38, 515-535. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00372.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00372.x
66. Salzman, J., & Thompson, B. H. (2010). Environmental law and policy (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Foundation Press.
67. Schwarze, S. (2006). Environmental melodrama. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 92, 239-261. doi:10.1080/00335630600938609 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00335630600938609
68. Senecah, S. L. (2004). The process trinity of access, standing, and influence: The role of practical theory in planning and evaluating the effectiveness of environmental participatory processes In S. P. Depoe, J. W. Delicath, & M. A. Elsenbeer (Eds.), Communication and public participation in environmental decision making (pp. 13-33). Albany: SUNY Press.
69. Singleton, S. (2002). Collaborative environmental planning in the American West: The good, the bad and the ugly. Environmental Politics, 11, 54-75. doi:10.1080/714000626 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/714000626
70. Thompson, J., Forster, C. B., Werner, C., & Peterson, T. R. (2010). Mediated modeling: Using collaborative processes to integrate scientist and stakeholder knowledge about greenhouse gas emissions in an urban ecosystem. Society & Natural Resources, 23, 742-757. doi:10.1080/08941920802102032 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08941920802102032
71. Toker, C. W. (2004). Public participation or stakeholder frustration: An analysis of consensus-based participation in the Georgia Port Authority’s stakeholder evaluation group In S. P. Depoe, J. W. Delicath, & M. A. Elsenbeer (Eds.), Communication and public participation in environmental decision making (pp. 175-199). Albany: SUNY Press.
72. Turnhout, E., Van Bommel, S., & Aarts, N. (2010). How participation creates citizens: Participatory governance as performative practice. Ecology and Society, 15 (4), 26. Retrieved from http://www.ecologyandsociety.org./vol.15/iss4/art26/
73. Van den Belt, M. J. (2004). Mediated modeling: A system dynamics approach to environmental consensus building. Washington, DC: Island Press.
74. Walker, G. B., & Daniels, S. E. (2004). Dialogue and deliberation in environmental conflict: Enacting civic science. In S. L. Senecah (Ed.), Environmental communication yearbook (Vol. 1, pp. 135-152). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
75. Walker, G. B., Senecah, S. L., & Daniels, S. E. (2006). From the forest to the river: Citizens’ views of stakeholder engagement. Human Ecology Review, 13, 193-202.
76. Walker, P. A., & Hurley, P. T. (2004). Collaboration derailed: The politics of community-based resource management in Nevada County. Society & Natural Resources, 17, 735-751. doi:10.1080/08941920490480723 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08941920490480723
77. Webler, T., Tuler, S., & Krueger, R. (2001). What is a good public participation process? Five perspectives from the public. Environmental Management, 27, 435-450. doi:10.1007/s002670010160 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s002670010160
78. World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our common future. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
79. Yearley, S., Cinderby, S., Forrester, J., Bailey, P., & Rosen, P. (2003). Participatory modeling and the local governance of the politics of UK air pollution: A three-city case study. Environmental Values, 12, 247-262. doi:10.3197/096327103129341315 http://dx.doi.org/10.3197/096327103129341315
80. Zhong, L. J., & Mol, A. P. J. (2008). Participatory environmental governance in China: Public hearings on urban water tariff setting. Journal of Environmental Management, 88, 899-913. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.04.018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.04.018