Environmental conflict communication

The SAGE Handbook of Conflict Communication: Integrating Theory, Research, and Practice

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 419-450

  Peterson, Tarla Rai ^a   Franks, Rebecca Royer ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84887089698     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4135/9781412976176.n15     Document Type: Chapter

References (169)

1. Administrative Procedures Act, 5 U.S.C. t 551 et seq. (1946).
2. Aguirre B. E."Sustainable development" as collective surge Social Science Quarterly 83 (2002) 101-118doi:10.1111/1540-6237.00073 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1540-6237.00073
3. Allen, T. F. H., & Hoekstra, T. W.(1993). Toward a definition of sustainability. In W. W.Covington & L. F.Debano (Eds.), Sustainable ecological systems: Implementing an ecological approach to land management (pp. 98-107). Fort Collins, CO: Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station.
4. Allison, S. A.(2002). Community-based conservation planning: The case of the endangered Houston toad in Bastrop County, Texas. Unpublished master’s thesis, Texas A&M University, College Station.
5. Amnesty International and Sierra Club. (2000). Environmentalists under fire: 10 urgent cases of human rights abuses. Retrieved May 28, 2004, from http://www.sierraclub.org/human-rights/amnesty/report.pdf.
6. Appelstrand M.Participation and societal values: The challenge for lawmakers and policy practitioners Forest Policy and Economics 4 (2002) 281-290doi:10.1016/S1389-9341(02)00070-9 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1389-9341%2802%2900070-9
7. Arnstein S. R.A ladder of citizen participation Journal of the American Institute of Planners 25 (1969) 216-224
8. Bingham G.A note of hope for resolving environmental conflict Environmental Science & Technology 19 (1985) 291doi:10.1021/es00134a600 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es00134a600
9. Bingham, G.(1987). Resolving environmental disputes: A decade of experience. In R. W.Lake (Ed.), Resolving locational conflict (pp. 314-323). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers, Center for Urban Policy Research.
10. Blackburn, J. W., & Bruce, W. M.(1995). Mediating environmental conflicts: Theory and practice. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
11. Blumberg L. Knuffke D.Count us out: Why the Wilderness Society opposed the Quincy Library Group legislation Chronicle of Community 2 (1998) 41-44
12. Blumenthal D. Jannink J. L.A classification of collaborative management methods Conservation Ecology 4 (2000) 13Retrieved November 9, 2004, from http://www.consecol.org/vol4/iss2/art13
13. Bourdieu, P.(1985). The forms of capital. In J. G.Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241-258). New York: Greenwood.
14. Brick, P., Snow, D., & Van de Wetering, S. (Eds.). (2001). Across the Great Divide: Explorations in collaborative conservation in the American West. Washington, DC: Island Press.
15. Brogden M. J. Greenberg J. B.The fight for the west: A political ecology of land use conflicts in Arizona Human Organization 62 (2003) 289-298
16. Brunner, R. D., Colburn, C. H., Cromley, C. M., Klein, C. M., & Olson, E. A.(2002). Finding common ground: Governance and natural resources in the American West. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
17. Buckle L. G. Thomas-Buckle S. R.Placing environmental mediation in context: Lessons from "failed" mediations Environmental Impact Assessment Review 6 (1986) 55-70doi:10.1016/0195-9255(86)90040-5 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0195-9255%2886%2990040-5
18. Callicott J. B. Mumford K.Ecological sustainability as a conservation concept Conservation Biology 11 (1997) 32-40doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1997.95468.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1997.95468.x
19. Chambers, R.(1997). Whose reality counts? Putting the first last. London: Intermediate Technology Publishers.
20. Chase L. C. Schusler T. M. Decker D. J.Innovations in stakeholder involvement: What’s the next step? Wildlife Society Bulletin 28 (2000) 208-217
21. Checkland, P., & Scholes, J.(1990). Soft systems methodology in action. New York: John Wiley.
22. Checkoway B.The politics of public hearings Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 17 (1981) 566-582doi:10.1177/002188638101700411 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002188638101700411
23. Chess C. Purcell K.Public participation and the environment: Do we know what works? Environmental Science & Technology 33 (1999) 2685-2692doi:10.1021/es980500g http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es980500g
24. Costanza, R., Cumberland, J., Daly, H., Goodland, R., & Norgaard, R.(1997). An introduction to ecological economics. Boca Raton, FL: St. Lucie Press. doi:10.1201/9781420048353 http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781420048353
25. Costanza J. Daly H.Natural capital and sustainable development Conservation Biology 6 (1992) 37-47doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1992.610037.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1992.610037.x
26. Costanza R. d’Arge R. de Groot R. Farber S. Grasso M. Hannon B., et al.The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital Nature 387 (1997) 253-260doi:10.1038/387253a0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/387253a0
27. Costanza, R., & Jorgenson, S. E.(2002). Understanding and solving environmental problems in the 21st century: Toward a new, integrated hard problem science. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
28. Costanza R. Ruth M.Using dynamic modeling to scope environmental problems and build consensus Environmental Management 22 (1998) 183-195doi:10.1007/s002679900095 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s002679900095
29. Cox, J. R.(2004). The re/making of the "environmental president": Clinton/Gore and the rhetoric of U.S. environmental politics, 1992-1996. In T. R.Peterson (Ed.), Green talk in the White House: The rhetorical presidency encounters ecology (pp. 157-180). College Station: Texas A&M University Press.
30. Creighton, J. L.(1981). The public involvement manual. Cambridge, MA: Abt Books.
31. Creighton J. L.Public participation in federal agencies’ decision making in the 1990’s National Civic Review 88 (1999) 249-258doi:10.1002/ncr.88308 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ncr.88308-->
32. Cvetkovich G. Earle T. C.The construction of justice: A case study of public participation in land management Journal of Social Issues 50 (1994) 161-178doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1994.tb02425.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1994.tb02425.x
33. Czeck B.Economic growth as the limiting factor for wildlife conservation Wildlife Society Bulletin 28 (2000) 4-15
34. Dahl R.Finding middle ground: Environmental conflict resolution Environmental Health Perspectives 111 (2003) 650-652doi:10.1289/ehp.111-a650 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.111-a650
35. Daly, H. E., & Cobb, J.(1989). For the common good: Redirecting the economy towards community, the environment, and a sustainable future. Boston: Beacon.
36. Daniels S. E. Walker G. B.Collaborative learning: Improving public deliberation in ecosystem-based management Environmental Impact Assessment Review 16 (1996) 71-102doi:10.1016/0195-9255(96)00003-0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0195-9255%2896%2900003-0
37. Daniels, S. E., & Walker, G. B.(2001). Working through environmental conflict: The collaborative learning approach. Westport, CT: Praeger.
38. Davis C. B. Lewicki R. J.Introduction to special issue: Environmental conflict resolution: Framing and intractability-An introduction Environmental Practice 5 (2003) 200-272
39. de la Court T.Critique of the dominant development paradigm Development 2 (1992) 42-46
40. Depoe, S. P., Delicath, J. W., & Elsenbeer, M. A. (Eds.). (2004). Communication and public participation in environmental decision making. Albany: State University of New York Press.
41. Dingwall R.What makes conflict resolution possible? Negotiation Journal-On the Process of Dispute Settlement 18 (2002) 321-326
42. Dionisopoulos G. N. Crable R. E.Definitional hegemony as a public relations strategy: The rhetoric of the nuclear power industry after Three Mile Island Central States Speech Journal 39 (1988) 134-145doi:10.1080/10510978809363244 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10510978809363244
43. Donovan, R.(1994). BOSCOSA: Forest conservation and management through local institutions (Costa Rica). In D.Western & M.Wright (Eds.), Natural connections: Perspectives in communitybased conservation (pp. 215-233). Washington, DC: Island Press.
44. Doremus H.Preserving citizen participation in the era of reinvention: The Endangered Species Act example Ecology Law Quarterly 25 (1999) 707-717
45. Drake L. Donohue W.Communicative framing theory in conflict resolution Communication Research 23 (1996) 297-322doi:10.1177/009365096023003003 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/009365096023003003
46. Driedger S. M. Eyles J.Drawing the battle lines: Tracing the "science war" in the construction of the chloroform and human health risks debate Environmental Management 31 (2003) 476-488doi:10.1007/s00267-002-2888-z http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00267-002-2888-z
47. Dukes, E., & Firehock, K.(2001). Collaboration: A guide for environmental advocates. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.
48. Dustin D. L. Schneider I. E. McAvoy L. H. Frakt A. N.Cross-cultural claims on Devils Tower National Monument: A case study Leisure Sciences 24 (2002) 79-88doi:10.1080/01490400252772845 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01490400252772845
49. Ehrlich, P. R.(2000). Human natures: Genes, cultures, and the human prospect. Washington, DC: Island Press.
50. Ehrlich P. R.Get off the train and walk Conservation Biology 17 (2003) 352-353doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.01723.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.01723.x
51. Endangered Species Act, 16 U.S.C. t 1531 et seq. (1973).
52. Fabricius C. Koch E. Magome H.Towards strengthening collaborative ecosystem management: Lessons from environmental conflict and political change in southern Africa Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand 31 (2001) 831-844doi:10.1080/03014223.2001.9517679 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03014223.2001.9517679
53. Farley J. Costanza R.Envisioning shared goals for humanity: A detailed, shared vision of a sustainable and desirable USA in 2100 Ecological Economics 43 (2002) 245-259doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00218-5 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009%2802%2900218-5
54. Few R.Conservation, participation, and power: Protected-area planning in the coastal zone of Belize Journal of Planning Education and Research 19 (2000) 401-408doi:10.1177/0739456X0001900409 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0739456X0001900409
55. Fiorino D. J.Citizen participation and environmental risk: A survey of institutional mechanisms Science, Technology, and Human Values 15 (1990) 226-243doi:10.1177/016224399001500204 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/016224399001500204
56. Fiorino D. J.Environmental policy as learning: A new view of an old landscape Public Administration Review 61 (2001) 322-334doi:10.1111/0033-3352.00033 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00033
57. Freyfogle E. T.Conservation and the culture war Conservation Biology 17 (2003) 354-355doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.01724.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.01724.x
58. Gbadegisin A. Ayileka O.Avoiding mistakes of the past: Towards a community-oriented management strategy for the proposed National Park in Abuja-Nigeria Land Use Policy 17 (2000) 89-100doi:10.1016/S0264-8377(00)00005-3 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0264-8377%2800%2900005-3
59. Gericke K. L. Sullivan J.Public participation and appeals of Forest Service plans: An empirical examination Society and Natural Resources 7 (1994) 125-135
60. Gowdy J. M.Terms and concepts in ecological economics Wildlife Society Bulletin 28 (2000) 26-33
61. Grant W. E. Peterson T. R. Peterson M. J.Quantitative modeling of coupled natural/human systems: Simulation of societal constraints on environmental action drawing on Luhmann’s social theory Ecological Modeling 158 (2002) 143-165doi:10.1016/S0304-3800(02)00219-3 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3800%2802%2900219-3
62. Gray, B.(2003). Framing of environmental disputes. In R.Lewicki, B.Gray, & M.Elliot (Eds.), Making sense of intractable environmental conflicts: Concepts and cases (pp. 11-34). Washington, DC: Island Press.
63. Gregory R. McDaniels T. Fields D.Decision aiding, not dispute resolution: Creating insights through structured environmental decisions Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 20 (2001) 415-432doi:10.1002/pam.1001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pam.1001
64. Gwartney P. A. Fessenden L. Landt G.Measuring the long-term impact of a community conflict resolution process: A case study using content analysis of public documents Negotiation Journal-On the Process of Dispute Settlement 18 (2002) 51-74
65. Habron G.Role of adaptive management for watershed councils Environmental Management 31 (2003) 29-41doi:10.1007/s00267-002-2763-y http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00267-002-2763-y
66. Hamilton J. D.Exploring technical and cultural appeals in strategic risk communication: The Fernald radium case Risk Analysis 23 (2003) 291-302doi:10.1111/1539-6924.00309 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1539-6924.00309
67. Hays, S. P.(1987). Beauty, health, and permanence: Environmental politics in the United States, 1955-1985. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511664106 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511664106
68. Heberlein T. A.Some observations on alternative mechanisms for public involvement: The hearing, public opinion poll, the workshop, and the quasi-experiment Natural Resources Journal 16 (1976) 197-212
69. Hellstrüm, E.(2001). Conflict cultures: Qualitative comparative analysis of environmental conflicts in forestry. Silva Fennica Monographs, 2. Finnish Society of Forest Science.
70. Hikins A.Through the rhetorical lookingglass: Consensus theory and fairy tales in the epistemology of communication Communication Studies 40 (1989) 161-171doi:10.1080/10510978909368267 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10510978909368267
71. Holling, C. S.(1978). Adaptive environmental assessment and management. London: Wiley.
72. Ivie R. L.Democratic deliberation in a rhetorical republic Quarterly Journal of Speech 84 (1998) 419-505
73. Ivie R. L.Rhetorical deliberation and democratic politics in the here and now Rhetoric and Public Affairs 5 (2002) 277-285doi:10.1353/rap.2002.0033 http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/rap.2002.0033
74. Ivie R. L.Prologue to democratic dissent in America Javnost, The Public: Journal of the European Institute for Communication and Culture 11 (2004) 19-35
75. Jacob M.Sustainable development and deep ecology: An analysis of competing traditions Environmental Management 18 (1994) 477-488doi:10.1007/BF02400853 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02400853
76. Kaminstein D. S.Persuasion in a toxic community: Rhetorical aspects of public meetings Human Organization 55 (1996) 458-464
77. Kasperson R. E.Six propositions on public participation and their relevance for risk communication Risk Analysis 6 (1986) 275-281doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1986.tb00219.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1986.tb00219.x
78. Killingsworth, J. M., & Palmer, J. S.(1992). Ecospeak: Rhetoric and environmental politics in America. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
79. Kollock P.Social dilemmas: The anatomy of cooperation Annual Review of Sociology 24 (1998) 183-214doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.183 http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.183
80. Kothari, R.(1990). Environment, technology and ethics. In J. R.Engels & J. G.Engels (Eds.), Ethics of the environment and development (pp. 27-35). Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
81. Laird F.Participatory analysis, democracy, and technological decision making Science, Technology, and Human Values 18 (1993) 341-361doi:10.1177/016224399301800305 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/016224399301800305
82. Lange J.Refusal to compromise: The case of Earth First! Western Journal of Speech Communication 54 (1990) 473-494doi:10.1080/10570319009374356 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10570319009374356
83. Lange J.The logic of competing information campaigns: Conflict over old growth and the spotted owl Communication Monographs 60 (1993) 239-257doi:10.1080/03637759309376311 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03637759309376311
84. Lee, K.(1993). Compass and gyroscope. Washington, DC: Island Press.
85. Lé;lé S. Norgaard R. B.Sustainability and the scientist’s burden Conservation Biology 10 (1996) 354-365
86. Leopold, A.(1949). A Sand County almanac and sketches here and there. London: Oxford University Press.
87. Lewicki, R., Gray, B., & Elliot, M. (Eds.). (2003). Making sense of intractable environmental conflicts: Concepts and cases. Washington, DC: Island Press.
88. Lin A. C.Participants’ experiences with habitat conservation plans and suggestions for streamlining the process Ecology Law Quarterly 23 (1996) 369-446
89. Lind E. A. Kray L. Thompson L.The social construction of injustice: Fairness judgments in response to own and others’ unfair treatment by authorities Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 75 (1998) 1-22doi:10.1006/obhd.1998.2785 http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1998.2785
90. Linnros H. D. Hallin P. O.The discursive nature of environmental conflicts: The case of the Oresund link Area 33 (2001) 391-403doi:10.1111/1475-4762.00045 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1475-4762.00045-->
91. Littlejohn, S. W., & Domenici, K.(2001). Engaging communication in conflict: Systemic practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781452225654 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452225654
92. Maguire L. A.Interplay of science and stakeholder values in Neuse River total maximum daily load process Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management-A 1299 (2003) 261-270
93. Margerum R. D.Getting past yes: From capital creation to action Journal of the American Planning Association 65 (1999) 181-192doi:10.1080/01944369908976046 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01944369908976046
94. Martin R.Piper J.-E.Native voices: An informal collection of papers presented at the AAA Meeting, November 2000 American Indian Quarterly 25 (1) (2001) 1-40doi:10.1353/aiq.2001.0007 http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/aiq.2001.0007
95. Mascarenhas M. Scarce R."The intention was good": Legitimacy, consensus-based decision making, and the case of forest planning in British Columbia, Canada Society & Natural Resources 17 (2004) 17-38
96. Mazmanian, D. A., & Craft, M. E.(1999). Toward sustainable communities: Transition and transformations in environmental policy. Cambridge: MIT Press.
97. McComas K. A.Public meetings about local waste management problems: Comparing participants to nonparticipants Environmental Management 27 (2001a) 135-147doi:10.1007/s002670010139 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s002670010139
98. McComas K. A.Theory and practice of public meetings Communication Theory 11 (2001b) 36-55doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2001.tb00232.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2001.tb00232.x
99. Mernitz, S.(1980). Mediation of environmental disputes: A sourcebook. New York: Praeger.
100. Metha J. N. Heinen J. T.Does community-based conservation shape favorable attitudes among locals? An empirical study from Nepal Environmental Management 28 (2001) 165-177
101. Moore M.Constructing irreconcilable conflict: The function of synecdoche in the spotted owl controversy Communication Monographs 60 (1993) 258-274doi:10.1080/03637759309376312 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03637759309376312
102. Moore, M.(2004). Colliding ironies and Clinton’s salvage rider rhetoric in the Northwest timber controversy. In T. R.Peterson (Ed.), Green talk in the White House: The rhetorical presidency encounters ecology (pp. 181-206). College Station: Texas A&M University Press.
103. Mouffe, C.(2000). The democratic paradox. New York: Verso.
104. Nabhan, G. P.(1995). Cultural parallax in viewing North American habitats. In M. E.Soule & G.Lease (Eds.), Reinventing nature: Responses to postmodern deconstruction (pp. 87-101). Washington, DC: Island Press.
105. National Environmental Policy Act, 42 U.S.C. t 4321 et seq. (1969).
106. Neuzil, M., & Kovarik, W.(1996). Mass media and environmental conflict: America’s green crusades. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
107. Nixon, R. M.(1970). Annual message to the Congress on the state of the union, January 22; Special message to the Congress on environmental quality, February 10; Special message to Congress about reorganization plans to establish the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, July 9. The American Presidency Project. Retrieved November 9, 2004, from http://www.presidency.uscb.edu/ws/.
108. Orr D. W.Walking north on a southbound train Conservation Biology 17 (2003) 348-351doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.01722.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.01722.x
109. Ostrom, E.(1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. New York: Cambridge University Press.
110. Ozawa C. P.Science in environmental conflicts Sociological Perspectives 39 (1996) 219-230
111. Payne R. A.The limits and promise of environmental conflict prevention: The case of the GEF Journal of Peace Research 35 (1998) 363-380doi:10.1177/0022343398035003006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022343398035003006
112. Pearce, W. B., & Littlejohn, S. W.(1997). Moral conflict: When social worlds collide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
113. Peters, J. D.(1999). Speaking into the air: A history of the idea of communication. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
114. Peterson M. N. Peterson M. J. Peterson T. R.Conservation and the myth of consensus Conservation Biology 19 (2005) 762-767doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00518.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00518.x
115. Peterson M. N. Peterson T. R. Peterson M. J. Lopez R. R. Silvy N. J.Cultural conflict and the endangered Florida Key deer Journal of Wildlife Management 66 (2002) 947-968doi:10.2307/3802928 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3802928
116. Peterson, T. R.(1997). Sharing the earth: The rhetoric of sustainable development. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
117. Peterson T. R.Social control frames: Opportunities or constraints Environmental Practice 5 (2003) 232-238
118. Peterson T. R. Horton C. C.Rooted in the soil: How understanding the perspectives of landowners can enhance the management of environmental disputes Quarterly Journal of Speech 81 (1995) 139-166doi:10.1080/00335639509384106 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00335639509384106
119. Peterson, T. R., Peterson, M. J., & Grant, W. E.(2004). Social practice and biophysical process. In S. L.Senecah (Ed.), Environmental communication yearbook, 1 (pp. 15-32). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. doi:10.1207/s15567362ecy0101_2 http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15567362ecy0101_2
120. Pinkley R.Dimensions of conflict frame: Disputant interpretations of conflict Journal of Applied Psychology 75 (1990) 117-126doi:10.1037/0021-9010.75.2.117 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.75.2.117
121. Pinkley R. Northcraft G.Conflict frames of reference: Implications for dispute processes and outcomes Academy of Management Journal 37 (1994) 193-205doi:10.2307/256777 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/256777
122. Poncelet E. C."A kiss here and a kiss there": Conflict and collaboration in environmental partnerships Environmental Management 27 (2001) 13-25doi:10.1007/s002670010130 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s002670010130
123. Prelli, L.(2004). Sustainable forestry in New Hampshire. In T. R.Peterson (Ed.), Green talk in the White House: The rhetorical presidency encounters ecology (pp. 233-257). College Station: Texas A&M University Press.
124. Putnam L. L. Burgess G. Royer R.We can’t go on like this: Frame changes in intractable conflicts Environmental Practice 5 (2003) 247-255
125. Putnam, L. L., & Holmer, M.(1992). Framing, reframing, and issue development. In L.Putnam & M.Roloff (Eds.), Communication & negotiation (pp. 128-155). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
126. Ratliff J. N.The politics of nuclear waste: An analysis of a public hearing on the proposed Yucca Mountain Nuclear Waste Repository Electronic Journal of Communication 8 (1998)Retrieved May 28, 2004, from http://www.cios.org/getfile/Ratliff_V8N198
127. Redford K. H. Richter B. D.Conservation of biodiversity in a world of use Conservation Biology 13 (1999) 1246-1256doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1999.97463.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1999.97463.x
128. Reilly T.Communities in conflict: Resolving difference through collaborative efforts in environmental planning and human service delivery Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare 25 (1998) 115-142
129. Riemer J. W.Chippewa spearfishing, lake property owners/anglers, and tourism: A case study of environmental social conflict Sociological Spectrum 24 (2004) 43-70doi:10.1080/02732170370229751 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02732170370229751
130. Rosener J. B.User-oriented evaluation: A new way to view citizen participation Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 17 (1981) 583-596doi:10.1177/002188638101700412 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002188638101700412
131. Rowe G. Frewer L. J.Public participation methods: A framework for evaluation Science, Technology, and Human Values 25 (2000) 3-29doi:10.1177/016224390002500101 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/016224390002500101
132. Russman, T. A.(1987). A prospectus for the triumph of realism. Macon, GA: Mercer University Press.
133. Salzman, J., & Thompson, B. H.(2003). Environmental law and policy. New York: Foundation Press.
134. Schoenbaum, T. J., & Rosenburg, R. H.(1996). Environmental policy law: Problems, cases, and readings. Westbury, NY: Foundation Press.
135. Selin S. Chaves D.Developing a collaborative model for environmental planning and management Environmental Management 19 (1995) 189-195doi:10.1007/BF02471990 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02471990
136. Senecah, S. L.(2004). The process trinity of access, standing, and influence: The role of practical theory in planning and evaluating the effectiveness of environmental participatory processes. In S. P.Depoe, J. W.Delicath, & M. A.Elsenbeer (Eds.), Communication and public participation in environmental decision making (pp. 13-33). Albany: State University of New York Press.
137. Senge, P. M.(1990). The fifth discipline. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
138. Singleton S.Collaborative environmental planning in the American West: The good, the bad and the ugly Environmental Politics 11 (2002) 54-75doi:10.1080/714000626 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/714000626
139. Spyke N. P.Public participation in environmental decisionmaking at the new millennium: Structuring new spheres of public influence Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review 26 (1999) 263-313
140. Stauber J. C.Going…going…green! PR Watch 1 (1994) 1-3
141. Steelman T. A. Ascher W.Public involvement methods in natural resource policy making: Advantages, disadvantages and tradeoffs Policy Sciences 30 (1997) 71-90doi:10.1023/A:1004246421974 http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1004246421974
142. Susskind, L., Levy, P. F., & Thomas-Larmer, J.(2000). Negotiating environmental agreements: How to avoid escalating confrontation, needless costs, and unnecessary litigation. Washington, DC: Island Press.
143. Susskind, L., McKearnan, S., & Thomas-Larmer, J.(1999). The consensus building handbook: A comprehensive guide to reaching agreement. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781452231389 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452231389
144. Tannen, D.(1993). Framing in discourse. New York: Oxford University Press.
145. Tannen, D.(1995). Framing and reframing. In R.Lewicki, D.Saunders, & J.Minton (Eds.), Negotiation: Readings, exercises, and cases (pp. 68-80). New York: McGraw-Hill.
146. Tauxe C. S.Marginalizing public participation in local planning: An ethnographic account Journal of the American Planning Association 61 (1995) 471-481doi:10.1080/01944369508975658 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01944369508975658
147. Toker, C. W.(2004). Public participation or stakeholder frustration: An analysis of consensusbased participation in the Georgia Port Authority’s stakeholder evaluation group. In S. P.Depoe, J. W.Delicath, & M. A.Elsenbeer (Eds.), Communication and public participation in environmental decision making (pp. 175-199). Albany: State University of New York Press.
148. Tukey D.Toward a spiritual critique of intersubjectivist rhetoric Journal of Communication and Religion 10 (1988) 1-8
149. Tuler S. Webler T.Voices from the forest: What participants expect of a public participation process Society & Natural Resources 12 (1999) 437-453
150. Turner, J. F., & Rylander, J. C.(1998). The private lands challenge: Integrating biodiversity conservation and private property. In J. F.Shogren (Ed.), Private property and the Endangered Species Act (pp. 92-137). Austin: University of Texas Press.
151. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. (2003). Conservation plans and agreements database. Retrieved July 15, 2003, from http://ecos.fws.gov/conserv_plans/public.jsp.
152. van den Belt, M. J.(2004). Mediated modeling: A system dynamics approach to environmental consensus building. Washington, DC: Island Press.
153. van den Belt M. J. Deutch L. Jansson Æ.A consensus-based simulation model for management in the Patagonia coastal zone Ecological Modeling 110 (1998) 79-103doi:10.1016/S0304-3800(98)00043-X http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3800%2898%2900043-X
154. Waddell, C.(1996). Saving the Great Lakes: Public participation in environmental policy. In C. G.Herndl & S. C.Brown (Eds.), Green culture: Environmental rhetoric in contemporary America (pp. 141-165). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
155. Walker, G. B., & Daniels, S. E.(2004). Dialogue and deliberation in environmental conflict: Enacting civic science. In S. L.Senecah (Ed.), Environmental communication yearbook, 1 (pp. 135-152). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. doi:10.1207/s15567362ecy0101_7 http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15567362ecy0101_7
156. Walters, C. J.(1986). Adaptive management of renewable resources. New York: Macmillan.
157. Walters C. J. Holling C. S.Large-scale management experiments and learning by doing Ecology 71 (1990) 2060-2068doi:10.2307/1938620 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1938620
158. Walters L. C. Aydelotte J. Miller J.Putting more public in policy analysis Public Administration Review 60 (2000) 349-359doi:10.1111/0033-3352.00097 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00097
159. Webler T. Tuler S. Krueger R.What is a good public participation process? Five perspectives from the public Environmental Management 27 (2001) 435-450
160. Wells, M. P.(1994). A profile and interim assessment of the Annapurna Conservation Area Project, Nepal. In D.Western & R. M.Wright (Eds.), Natural connections: Perspectives in community-based conservation (pp. 261-281). Washington, DC: Island Press.
161. Western, D., & Wright, R. M.(1994). Natural connections: Perspectives in community-based conservation. Washington, DC: Island Press.
162. Willers B.Sustainable development: A new world deception Conservation Biology 8 (1994) 1146-1148doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1994.08041146.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1994.08041146.x
163. Wondolleck, J. M.(1988). Public lands conflict and resolution. New York: Plenum.
164. Wondolleck J. M. Manring N. J. Crowfoot J. E.Teetering at the top of the ladder: The experience of citizen group participants in alternative dispute resolution processes Sociological Perspectives 39 (1996) 249-262
165. Wondolleck, J. M., & Yaffee, S. L.(2000). Making collaboration work: Lessons from innovation in natural resource management. Washington, DC: Island Press.
166. Woollard, R. G., & Ostry, A. S.(2000). Fatal consumption: Rethinking sustainable development. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
167. World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our common future. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
168. Yearley S. Cinderby S. Forrester J. Bailey P. Rosen P.Participatory modeling and the local governance of the politics of UK air pollution: A three-city case study Environmental Values 12 (2003) 247-262doi:10.3197/096327103129341315 http://dx.doi.org/10.3197/096327103129341315
169. Yosie, T. F., & Herbst, T. D.(1998). Using stakeholder processes in environmental decisionmaking: An evaluation of lessons learned, key issues, and future challenges. Washington, DC: Rudder Finn Washington and ICF Incorporated.