Why conservation needs dissent

Conservation Biology

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 576-578

  Peterson, M Nils ^a   Peterson, Markus J ^b   Peterson, Tarla Rai ^c  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONFLICT; CONSENSUS; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; METHODOLOGY; NOTE; POLICY; POLITICS;

CONSENSUS; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; DISSENT AND DISPUTES; POLITICS; PUBLIC POLICY;

EID: 33645110140     PISSN: 08888892     EISSN: 15231739     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00409.x     Document Type: Note

References (18)

1. Berlin J. A. C. B. Begg and T. A. Louis 1989 An assessment of publication bias using a sample of published clinical trials Journal of the American Statistical Association 84 381 392
2. Castree N. and B. Braun 1998 The construction of nature and the nature of construction Pages 3 45 in Castree N. and Braun B. editors Remaking reality: nature at the millennium Rutledge London
3. Chamberlin T. C. 1890 The method of multiple working hypotheses Science 15 92 96
4. Conley T. M. 1994 Rhetoric in the European tradition University of Chicago Press Chicago
5. Crotty M. 1998 The foundations of social research: meaning and perspective in the research process Sage Publications Thousand Oaks California
6. Daniels S. E. and G. B. Walker 2001 Working through environmental conflict: the collaborative learning approach Praeger Publishers Westport Connecticut
7. Gieryn T. F. 1995 Boundaries of science Pages 393 443 in Jasinoff S. Markle G. E. Petersen J. C. and Pinch T. editors Handbook of science and technology studies Sage Publications Thousand Oaks California
8. Fuller S. 1993 Philosophy, rhetoric, and the end of knowledge University of Wisconsin Press Madison
9. Hacking I. 1999 The social construction of what¿ Harvard University Press Cambridge Massachusetts
10. Leach W. D. 2006 Theories about consensus-based conservation Conservation Biology 20 Doi 10.1111/j.15231739.2006.00408.x
11. McCool S. F. K. Guthrie and J. K. Smith 2000 Building consensus: legitimate hope or seductive paradox¿ Research paper RMRS-RP-25 U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station Fort Collins Colorado
12. Møller A. P. and M. D. Jennions 2001 Testing and adjusting for publication bias Trends in Ecology & Evolution 16 580 586
13. Peterson M. N. S. A. Allison M. J. Peterson T. R. Peterson and R. R. Lopez 2004 A tale of two species: habitat conservation plans as bounded conflict Journal of Wildlife Management 68 743 761
14. Peterson M. N. M. J. Peterson and T. R. Peterson 2005 Conservation and the myth of consensus Conservation Biology 19 762 767
15. Peterson T. R. M. N. Peterson M. J. Peterson S. A. Allison and D. Gore 2006 To play the fool: can environmental conservation and democracy survive social capital Communications and Critical/Cultural Studies 3 in press
16. Popper K. R. 1959 The logic of scientific discovery Hutchinson London
17. Popper K. R. 1962 Conjectures and refutations: the growth of scientific knowledge Basic Books New York
18. Sterling T. D. W. L. Rosenbaum and J. J. Weinkam 1995 Publication decisions revisited - the effect of the outcome of statistical tests on the decision to publish and vice-versa American Statistician 49 108 112