Hormesis within a mechanistic context

Homeopathy

Volumn 104, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 90-96

  Calabrese, Edward J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

Author keywords

Adaptive response; Biphasic; Dose response; Hormesis; U shaped

Indexed keywords

CELL RECEPTOR;

ARTICLE; CELL SIGNALING ASSAY; CHEMICAL STRESS; COMPENSATION; DOSE RESPONSE; FUSARIUM; HOMEOPATHY; HORMESIS; MYCELIUM; NONHUMAN; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; DRUG EFFECTS; HUMAN; PROCEDURES;

DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; HOMEOPATHY; HORMESIS; HUMANS;

EID: 84951852906     PISSN: 14754916     EISSN: 14764245     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.homp.2015.01.002     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Southam C.M., Ehrlich J. Effects of extracts of western red cedar heartwood on certain wood-decaying fungi in culture. Phytopathology 1943, 33:517-524.
2. Calabrese E.J. Historical blunders: how toxicology got the dose-response relationship half right. Cell Mol Biol 2005, 51:643-654.
3. Calabrese E.J. Hormesis: why it is important to toxicology and toxicologists. Environ Toxicol Chem 2008, 27:1451-1474.
4. Calabrese E.J. Toxicology rewrites its history and rethinks its future: giving equal focus to both harmful and beneficial effects. Environ Toxicol Chem 2011, 30:2658-2673.
5. Schulz H. Zur Lehre von der Arzneiwirkung. Virchows Arch Pathol Anat Physiol Klin Med 1887, 108:423-445.
6. Schulz H. Uber Hefegifte. Pflugers Arch Physiol Menschen Tiere 1888, 42:517-541.
7. Calabrese E.J. Paradigm lost, paradigm found: the re-emergence of hormesis as a fundamental dose response model in the toxicological sciences. Environ Poll 2005, 138:378-411.
8. Calabrese E.J. Getting the dose-response wrong: why hormesis became marginalized and the threshold model accepted. Arch Toxicol 2009, 83:227-247.
9. Calabrese E.J. The road to linearity: why linearity at low doses became the basis for carcinogen risk assessment. Arch Toxicol 2009, 83:203-225.
10. Calabrese E.J. Historical foundations of hormesis. Homeopathy 2015, 104.
11. Calabrese E.J., Baldwin L.A. Defining hormesis. Hum Exper Toxicol 2002, 21:91-97.
12. Calabrese E.J. Converging concepts: adaptive response, preconditioning, and the Yerkes-Dodson Law are manifestations of hormesis. Age Res Rev 2008, 7:8-20.
13. Jutte R., Riley D. A review of the use and role of low potencies in homeopathy. Complement Ther Med 2005, 13:291-296.
14. Li Sy., Deng Y.B., Feng J.Q., Ye W.B. Oxidative preconditioning promotes bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells migration and prevents apoptosis. Cell Biol Intern 2009, 33:411-412.
15. Calabrese E.J., Blain R. The occurrence of hormetic dose response in the toxicological literature, the hormesis database: an overview. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2005, 202:289-301.
16. Calabrese E.J., Blain R. Hormesis and plant biology. Environ Poll 2009, 157:42-48.
17. Calabrese E.J., Blain R. The hormesis database: the occurrence of hormetic dose responses in the toxicological literature. Reg Toxicol Pharmacol 2011, 61:73-81.
18. Townsend C.O. The correlation of growth under the influence of injuries. Ann Bot 1897, 11:509-532.
19. Branham S.E. The effects of certain chemical compounds upon the course of gas production by Baker's yeast. J Baceriol 1929, 18:247-284.
20. Chavarria A.P., Clark J.H. The reaction of pathogenic fungi to ultra-violet light and the role played by pigment in this reaction. Amer J Hyg 1924, 4:639-649.
21. Smith E.C. Effects of ultra-violet radiation and temperature on Fusarium. II. Stimulation. Bull Tor Bot Club 1935, 62:151-164.
22. Smith E.C. The effects of radiation on fungi. Biological effects of radiation 1936, Vol II:889-918. McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc, New York.
23. Sperti G.S., Loofbourow J.R., Dwyer C.M. Proliferation-promoting factors from ultraviolet injured cells. Ins Divi Thomae 1937, 1:163-191.
24. Sperti G.S., Loofbourow J.R., Lane M.M. Effects on tissue cultures of intercellular hormones from injured cells. Science 1937, 86:611.
25. Kostyuk S.V., Tabakov V.J., Chestkov V.V., Konkova M.S., Glebova K.V., Baydakova G.V., et al. Oxidized DNA induces an adaptive response in human fibroblasts. Mut Res 2013, 747-748:6-18.
26. Gordon M.B. The stimulative effect of roentgen rays upon the glands of internal secretion. Endocrinology 1930, 14:411-437.
27. Warren S. The histopathology of radiation lesions. Physiol Rev 1945, 25:225-238.
28. Hektowen L. Further observations on the effects of roentgenization and splenectomy on antibody production. J Infect Dis 1920, 27:23-30.
29. Pohle E.A. Effect of roentgen rays on the reticuloendothelial system. Am J Roentgen 1929, 22:439-447.
30. Koga Y. Uber die Wechselbeziehungen zwischen den Veranderungen des Farbstoffspeicherungsvermogens des Retikuloendothelial-Systems, der Hamobakterizidie und des Mineralstoffgehaltes der Gewebe bei bestrahlten Kaninchen. Strahlentherapie 1933, 47:201-232.
31. Tenneff S., Stoppani F. L'influenza delle irradiazioni sulle linfoghiandole e sulla circolazione linfatica. Radiol Med 1935, 22:768-787.
32. Schurer F. Wien. Klin. Wchnschr. 41:1581 (as cited in Dunlap). - Dunlap CE. (1942). Effects of radiation on the blood and the hemopoetic tissues, including the spleen, the thymus and the lymph nodes. Arch Pathol 1928; 34:562-608.
33. Calabrese E.J. Overcompensation stimulation: a mechanism for hormetic effects. Crit Rev Toxicol 2001, 31:425-470.
34. Stebbing A.R.D. Hormesis - stimulation of colony growth in Campanularia flexuosa (Hydrozoa) by copper, cadmium and other toxicants. Aquat Toxicol 1981, 1:227-238.
35. Stebbing A.R.D. Hormesis - the stimulation of growth by low levels of inhibitors. Sci Total Environ 1982, 22:213-234.
36. Stebbing A.R.D. A theory for growth hormesis. Mut Res 1998, 403:249-258.
37. Stebbing A.R.D. Hormesis: Interpreting the beta-curve using control theory. J Appl Toxicol 2000, 20:93-101.
38. Stebbing A.R.D. Interpreting 'dose-response' curves using homeodynamic data: with an improved explanation for hormesis. Dose-Response 2009, 7:221-233.
39. Stebbing A.R.D., Pomroy A.J. A sublethal technique for assessing the effects of contaminants using Hydra littoralis. Wat Res 1978, 12:631-635.
40. Stebbing A.R.D. The kinetics of growth control in a colonial hydroid. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 1981, 61:35-63.
41. Stebbing A.R.D., Norton J.P., Brinsley M.D. Dynamics of growth control in a marine yeast subject to perturbation. J Gen Microbiol 1984, 130:1799-1808.
42. Stebbing A.R.D. A mechanism for hormesis - A problem in the wrong discipline. Crit Rev Toxicol 2003, 33:463-467.
43. Szabaldi E. Model of 2 functionally antagonistic receptor populations activated by same agonist. J Theor Biol 1977, 69:101-112.
44. 2+ mobilization in SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells. Eur J Pharmacol 1995, 291:43-50.
45. Jarv J. A model of nonexclusive binding of agonist and antagonist on G-protein coupled receptors. J Theor Biol 1995, 175:577-582.
46. Rovati G.E., Nicosia S. An alternative model for bell-shaped concentration response curves - Reply. Trends Pharmacol Sci 1994, 15:321-322.
47. Pliska V. Models to explain dose-response relationships that exhibit a downturn phase. Trends Pharmacol Sci 1994, 15:178-181.
48. Calabrese E.J. Hormetic mechanisms. Crit Rev Toxicol 2013, 43:580-606.
49. Zhang X.-T., Ding L., Kang L.-G., Wang Z.-Y. Involvement of Er-alpha36, Src, EGFR and STAT5 in the biphasic estrogen signaling of ER-negative breast cancer cells. Oncol Rep 2012, 27:2057-2065.
50. Calabrese E.J., Baldwin L.A. Hormesis: U-shaped dose responses and their centrality in toxicology. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2001, 22:285-291.
51. Yokoyama K., Hayashi M., Mogi C., Sasakawa Y., Watanabe G., Taya K., et al. Dose-dependent effects of a glucocorticoid on protein production. Endocrine 2008, 55:405-414.
52. Motegi K., Harada K., Ohe G., Jones S.J., Ellis I.R., Crouch D.H., et al. Differential involvement of TGF-B1 in mediating the motogenic effects of TSP-1 on endothelial cells, fibroblasts and oral tumour cells. Exp Cell Res 2008, 314:2323-2333.
53. 1- and β-adrenoceptors. Endocrinology 1992, 132:133-140.
54. Mondillo C., Patrignani Z., Reche C., Rivera E., Pignataro O. Dual role of histamine in modulation of Leydig cell steroidogenesis via HRH1 and HRH2 receptor subtypes. Biol Reprod 2005, 73:899-907.