Analysis of key factors for waste management in humanitarian response: An interpretive structural modelling approach

International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction

Volumn 14, Issue , 2015, Pages 527-535

  Trivedi, Ashish ^a   Singh, Amol ^a   Chauhan, Ankur ^a  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT ROHTAK   (India)

Author keywords

Disaster recovery; Humanitarian logistics; Interpretive Structural Modelling; Waste management

Indexed keywords

EID: 84951320789     PISSN: 22124209     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.10.006     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. IFRC. What is a disaster? (accessed 17.06.15). http://www.ifrc.org/en/what-we-do/disaster-%20management/about-disasters/what-is-a-disaster/.
2. Nikbakhsh E., Farahani R.Z. Humanitarian logistics planning in disaster relief operations. Logist. Oper. Manag.: Concepts Model 2011, (291 pp).
3. Guha-Sapir D., Hoyois P., Below R. Annual Disaster Statistical Review 2013: The Numbers and Trends 2014, CRED, Brussels.
4. Brown C., Milke M., Seville E. Disaster waste management following the 2009 Victorian bushfires. Aust. J. Emerg. Manag. 2011, 26(2).
5. UNOCHA. United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs: Disaster waste management guidelines. (accessed 15.06.15). https://www.msb.se/RibData/Filer/pdf/26599.pdf.
6. USEPA. Planning for Disaster Debris. In: Wastes Department (ed.) (1995).
7. USEPA. Planning for Natural Disaster Debris In: Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response & Office of Solid Waste (Eds.). 2008 (accessed 17.06.15). http://www.epa.gov/osw/conserve/imr/cdm/pubs/pndd.pdf.
8. JEU. Joint Environmental Unit Disaster Waste Management Guidelines, 2010.
9. Milke M. Disaster waste management research needs. Waste Manag. 2010, 31(1):1.
10. Farris D.R., Sage A.P. On the use of interpretive structural modeling for worth assessment. Comput. Electr. Eng. 1975, 2(2):149-174.
11. Sage A.P. Interpret. Struct. Model: Methodol. Large-scale Syst. 1977, 91-164.
12. Warfield.J.N. Toward interpretation of complex structural models. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 1974, 5:405-417.
13. Warfield J.N. Developing interconnection matrices in structural modeling. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 1974, 1:81-87.
14. Christopher M., Tatham P. Introduction. Humanitarian logistics. Meeting the Challenge of Preparing for and Responding to Disasters 2011, 1-14. Kogan Page, London. M. Christopher, P. Tatham (Eds.).
15. Pettit S., Beresford A., Whiting M., Banomyong R. The 2004 Thailand tsunami reviewed: lesson learned. Humanitarian Logistics. Meeting the Challenge of Preparing for and Responding to Disasters 2011, 103-119. Kogan Page, London. M. Christopher, P. Tatham (Eds.).
16. Kovács G., Spens K.M. Humanitarian logistics in disaster relief operations. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 2007, 37(2):99-114.
17. Thomas A., Kopczak L. From Logistics to Supply Chain Management: The Path Forward in the Humanitarian Sector, White Paper 2005, Fritz Institute, San Francisco,CA.
18. Van Wassenhove L.N. Humanitarian aid logistics: supply chain management in high gear. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 2006, 57(5):475 489.
19. Long D. Logistics for disaster relief: engineering on the run. IIE Solut. 1997, 29(6):26-29.
20. Nisha de Silva F. Providing special decision support for evacuation planning: a challenge in integrating technologies. Disaster Prev. Manag.. 11ff 2001, 10(1).
21. Tomasini R.M., Van Wassenhove L.N. From preparedness to partnerships: case study research on humanitarian logistics. Int. Trans. Oper. Res. 2001, 16(5):549-559.
22. Lee H.W., Zbinden M. Marrying logistics and technology for effectiverelief. Forced Migr. Rev. 2003, 18(3):34-35.
23. Cottrill K. Preparing for the worst. Traffic World 2002, 266(40):15.
24. Cozzolino A. Humanitarian Logistics: Cross-sector Cooperation in Disaster Relief Management 2012, Springer Science & Business Media.
25. European Council. Council Regulation (EEC) No 259/93 of 1 February 1993 on the supervision and control of shipments of waste within, into and out of the European Community, 1993.
26. Saxena S., Srivastava R.K., Samaddar A.B. Sustainable waste management issues in India. IUP J. Soil Water Sci. 2010, 3(1):72-90.
27. Zhu D., Asnani P.U., Zurbrugg C., Anapolsky S., Mani S. Improving Solid Waste Management in India. A Sourcebook for Policy Makers and Practitioners 2008, World Bank Institute, WBI 741 Development Studies.
28. M. R. Gidde, V. V. Todakar, K. K. Kokate, Municipal solid waste management in emerging mega cities: a case study of Pune City, in: Proceedings of the Indo Italian Conference on Green and Clean Environment, 2008, pp. 441-450.
29. Rathi S. Alternative approaches for better municipal solid waste management in Mumbai, India. Waste Manag. 2006, 26(10):1192-1200.
30. Ekici S., McEntire D.A., Afedzie R. Transforming debris management: considering new essentials. Disaster Prev. Manag.: Int. J. 2009, 18(5):511-522.
31. L. Luther. Disaster Debris Removal After Hurricane Katrina: Status and Associated Issues, Order Code RL33477, Congressional Research Service, 2008.
32. Solis G.Y., Hightower H.C., Sussex J., Kawaguchi J. Disaster Debris Management 1996, Disaster Preparedness Resources Centre, University of British Columbia.
33. M. Petersen. Restoring waste management following disasters, in: Proceedings of the International conference on Post Disaster Reconstruction, 2004, pp. 22-23.
34. Xiao J., Xie H., Zhang C. Investigation on building waste and reclaim in Wenchuan earthquake disaster area. Resources Conserv. Recycl. 2012, 61:109-117.
35. Kung H.Y., Chen C.H., Ku H.H. Designing intelligent disaster prediction models and systems for debris-flow disasters in Taiwan. Expert Syst. Appl. 2012, 39(5):5838-5856.
36. Fetter G., Rakes T. Incorporating recycling into post-disaster debris disposal. Socio Econ. Plan. Sci. 2012, 46(1):14-22.
37. Hu Z.H., Sheu J.B. Post-disaster debris reverse logistics management under psychological cost minimization. Transp. Res. B: Methodol. 2013, 55:118-141.
38. Pramudita A., Taniguchi E., Qureshi A.G. Location and routing problems of debris collection operation after disasters with realistic case study. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2014, 125:445-458.
39. Özdamar L., Aksu D.T., Ergüneş.B. Coordinating debris cleanup operations in post disaster road networks. Socio Econ. Plan. Sci. 2014, 48(4):249-262.
40. Lorca Á., Çelik M., Ergun Ö., Keskinocak P. A decision-support tool for post-disaster debris operations. Procedia Eng. 2015, 107:154-167.
41. Vagnon F., Segalini A., Ferrero A.M. Studies of flexible barriers under debris flow impact: an application to an alpine basin. Procedia Earth Planet. Sci. 2015, 15:165-172.
42. Asari M., Sakai S.I., Yoshioka T., Tojo Y., Tasaki T., Takigami H., Watanabe K. Strategy for separation and treatment of disaster waste: a manual for earthquake and tsunami disaster waste management in Japan. J. Mater. Cycles Waste Manag. 2013, 15(3):290-299.
43. FEMA. Debris Management Guide. Public Assistance 2007 (accessed 15.06.15). http://www.fema.gov/pdf/government/grant/pa/paguide07.pdf.
44. WRCDEMG. Group Debris Disposal Guidelines, in: Wellington Region Civil Defence Emergency Management Group (Ed.). Wellington, 2008.
45. Johnston D., Dolan L., Glavovic B., Schalkwyk R.V., Killeen C., Cousins J., Saunders W., Becker J., McIntyre I., Brown C. Disposal of debris following urban earthquakes: guiding the development of comprehensive pre-event plans Wellington 2009, Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences Limited.
46. K. Gordon, M. Dion, Protection of 'Critical Infrastructure' and the role of investment policies relating to national security. Investment Division, Directorate for Financial and Enterprise Affairs 75116, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris, pp. 6.
47. F. Baycan, M. Petersen, Disaster waste management-C&D waste, in: Proceedings of the Annual conference of the international solid waste association, 2002, pp. 8-12.
48. Y. Kobayashi. Disasters and the problems of wastes-institutions in Japan and issues raised by the Great Hanshin-Awaji earthquake. In Earthquake Waste Symposium,1995, pp. 12-13.
49. D.R. Reinhart, P.T. McCreanor, Disaster debris management-planning tools. Submitted to the US Environmental Protection Agency Region IV, 1999.
50. Jackson N.M. Cleaning up after Mother Nature. Waste Age 2008, 3.
51. Basnayake B.F.A., Chiemchaisri C., Visvanathan C. Wastelands: clearing up after the tsunami in Sri Lanka and Thailand. Waste Manag. World 2006, 7:31-38.
52. Pilapitiya S., Vidanaarachchi C., Yuen S. Effects of the tsunami on waste management in Sri Lanka. Waste Manag. 2006, 26(2):107-109.
53. UNDP. Tsunami Recovery Waste Management Programme. Multi Donor Fund for Aceh and Nias. UNDP, 2006.
54. Petersen M. Wasting away--the post-tsunami menace-a year on from the Asian tsunami. Mater. World 2006, 14(1):20-22.
55. Lauritzen E.K. Emergency construction waste management. Saf. Sci. 1998, 30(1):45-53.
56. Cook T. Cleaning up New Orleans: the impact of a missing population on disaster debris removal. J. Emerg. Manag. 2009, 7(3).
57. USEPA. Decision-Makers' Guide to Solid Waste Management, Volume II. In: Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response (ed.), 1995.
58. Solid Waste Authority. 2003-2004 Annual Report: Mountains of Debris. Palm Beach County, Florida: Solid Waste Authority, 2004.
59. DANIDA. Building Waste Management, Kosovo. DANIDA (2004).
60. Bjerregaard M. UNWRA Nahr al-Bared: Rubble Recovery Programme 2007, Swedish Rescue Services Agency, Raddnings Verket.
61. M. Channell, M. R. Graves, V. F. Medina, A. B. Morrow, D. Brandon, C. C. Nestler. Enhanced Tools and Techniques to Support Debris Management in Disaster Response Missions. In: US Army Corps of Engineers (ed.) Final Report ed., Vicksburg, MS: Environmental Laboratory US Army Engineer Research and Development Center, 2009.
62. Huyck C.K., Adams B.J. Emergency response in the wake of the World Trade Center attack: The remote sensing perspective 2002, MCEER, Buffalo, New York.
63. Denhart H. Deconstructing disaster: psycho-social impact of building deconstruction in post-Katrina New Orleans. Cities 2009, 26:195-201.
64. Brown C., Milke M., Seville E. Disaster waste management: a review article. Waste Manag. 2011, 31(6):1085-1098.
65. Stephenson J.B. Hurricane Katrina: Continuing Debris Removal and Disposal Issues 2008, General Accounting Office, Washington, DC.
66. Jackson N.M. Cleaning up after mother nature. Waste Age 2008, 3.
67. GAO Hurricane Katrina: Continuing Debris Removal and Disposal issues. Hurricane Katrina Debris. Washington, DC 20548 2008, United States Government Accountability Office. J.B. Stephenson (Ed.).
68. Mandal A., Deshmukh S.G. Vendor selection using interpretive structural modelling (ISM). Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 1994, 14(6):52-59.
69. Jharkharia S., Shankar R. IT-enablement of supply chains: understanding the barriers. J. Enterp. Inf. Manag. 2005, 18(1):11-127.
70. Muduli K., Govindan K., Barve A., Kannan D., Geng Y. Role of behavioural factors in green supply chain management implementation in Indian mining industries. Resources Conserv. Recycl. 2013, 76:50-60.
71. Talib F., Rahman Z., Qureshi M.N. Analysis of interaction among the barriers to total quality management implementation using interpretive structural modeling approach. Benchmarking: Int. J. 2011, 18(4):563-587.
72. Sharma H.D., Gupta.A.D. The objectives of waste management in India: a futures inquiry. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 1995, 48(3):285-309.