Coordinating debris cleanup operations in post disaster road networks

Socio-Economic Planning Sciences

Volumn 48, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 249-262

  Özdamar, Linet ^a   Tüzün Aksu, Dilek ^a   Ergüneş, Biket ^a  

^a YEDITEPE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Heuristics; Makespan; Post disaster roadside debris cleanup; Road recovery; Roadway network accessibility

Indexed keywords

CLEANUP; DISASTER MANAGEMENT; HEURISTICS; NUMERICAL MODEL; ROAD; STOCHASTICITY; TRAVEL TIME;

EID: 84922325310     PISSN: 00380121     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.seps.2014.08.001     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Chang S.E., Nojima N. Measuring post-disaster transportation system performance: the 1995 Kobe earthquake in comparative perspective. Transp Res Part A: Policy Pract 2001, 35(6):475-494.
2. Chen Y.W., Tzeng G.H. Afuzzy multi-objective model for reconstructing the post-quake road-network by genetic algorithm. Int J Fuzzy Syst 1999, 1(2):85-95.
3. Chen Y., Tzeng G. Determining the optimal reconstruction priority of a post-quake road network. Computing in civil and building engineering 2000, 686-693.
4. Chen A., Yang C., Kongsomsaksakul S., Lee M. Network based accessibility measures for vulnerability analysis of degradable transportation networks. Networks Spatial Econ 2007, 7:241-256.
5. Cho S., Gordon P., Moore J.E., Richardson H.W., Shinozuka M. Analyzing transportation network reconstruction strategies: a full cost approach. Rev Urban Reg Dev Stud 2000, 12(3):212-227.
6. Cho S., Gordon P., Moore J.E., Richardson H.W., Shinozuka M. Integrating transportation network and regional economic models to estimate the costs of a large urban earthquake. JRegional Sci 2001, 41:39-65.
7. Çinicioğlu SF, Bozbey I., Keleşoğlu S., Öztoprak S, Öztorun NK. Deprem bölgeleri için kentsel yönetim sistemlerinin ayrilmaz bileşeni: deprem risk analizleri. I˙stanbul Üniversitesi, I˙nşaat Mühendisliği Bölümü, Avcilar, 34320, I˙stanbul [accessed 18.04.14]. http://www.e-kutuphane.imo.org.tr/pdf/10024.pdf.
8. Erath A., Birdsail J., Axhausen K.W., Hajdin R. Vulnerability assessment methodology for Swiss road network. Transp Res Rec 2010, 2137:118-126.
9. FEMA Public assistance: debris management guide 2007, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC.
10. Feng C.M., Wang T.C. Highway emergency rehabilitation scheduling in post-earthquake 72 hours. JEast Asia Soc Transp Stud 2003, 5:3276-3285.
11. Furuta H., Ishibashi K., Nakatsu K., Hotta S. Optimal restoration scheduling of damaged networks under uncertain environment by using improved genetic algorithm. Tsinghua Sci Technol 2008, 13:400-405.
12. Garey M., Johnson D. Computers and intractability: a guide to the theory of NP-Completeness 1997, W.H. Freeman, New York.
13. Günneç D., Salma F.S. Assessing the reliability and the expected performance of a network under disaster risk. OR Spectr 2011, 33:499-523.
14. Giovinazzi S., Nicholson A. Transport network reliability in Seismic risk analysis and management 2010, Civil and Natural Resources Engineering Dept., Canterbury University, New Zealand.
15. Ham H., Kim T.J., Boyce D.E. Assessment of economic impacts from unexpected events with an interregional commodity flow and multimodal transportation network model. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 2005, 39:849-860.
16. Jenelius E., Mattsson L.-G. Network vulnerability analysis of area covering disruptions: a grid based approach with case study. Transp Res Part A: Policy Pract 2012, 46:746-760.
17. Johnson D.S., McGeoch L.A. The traveling salesman problem: a case study in local optimization. Local search in combinatorial optimization 1997, 215-310. John-Wiley and Sons, Ltd. E.H.L. Aarts, J.K. Lenstra (Eds.).
18. Kim T.J., Ham H., Boyce D.E. Economic impacts of transportation network changes: implementation of combined transportation network and input-output model. Pap Regional Sci 2002, 81:223-246.
19. Lee J.S., Kim T.J. Implementation of a spatiotemporal model for infrastructure reconstruction strategy under large scale disaster. Trans Res Rec 2007, 2022:39-46.
20. Liberatore F., Ortuño M.T., Tirado G., Vitoriano B., Scaparra M.P. Ahierarchical compromise model for the joint optimization of recovery operations and distribution of emergency goods in Humanitarian Logistics. Comput Operations Res 2012, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2012.03.019.
21. Matisziw T.C., Murray A.T. Modeling s-t path availability to support disaster vulnerability assessment of network infrastructure. Comput Operations Res 2009, 36(1):16-26.
22. Matisziw T.C., Murray A.T., Grubesic T.H. Strategic network restoration. Networks Spatial Econ 2010, 10:345-361.
23. Duque P. Maya, Sörensen K. AGRASP metaheuristic to improve accessibility after a disaster. OR Spectr 2011, 33(3):525-542.
24. Murray A.T., Matisziw T.C., Grubesic T.H. Critical network infrastructure analysis: interdiction and system flow. JGeogr Syst 2007, 9(2):103-117.
25. Nolz P.C., Semet F., Doerner K.F. Risk approaches for delivering disaster relief supplies. OR Spectr 2011, 33(3):543-569.
26. Pinedo M.L. Scheduling theory, algorithms, and systems 2008, Springer. 3rd ed.
27. Sohn J. Evaluating the significance of highway network linksunder flood damage: an accessibility approach. Transp Res Part A 2006, 40:491-506.
28. Tüzün Aksu D., Ozdamar L. Amathematical model for post-disaster road restoration: enabling accessibility and evacuation. Transp Res Part E 2014, 61C:56-67.
29. Yan S., Shih Y.L. Optimal scheduling of emergency roadway repair and subsequent relief distribution. Comput Operations Res 2009, 36(6):2049-2065.