Empirical evaluation of drivers' route choice behavioral responses to social navigation

Transportation Research Record

Volumn 2423, Issue , 2014, Pages 52-60

  Djavadian, Shadi ^a   Hoogendoorn, Raymond G ^b   Van Arem, Bart ^b   Chow, Joseph Y J ^a  

^a RYERSON UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADVANCED TRAVELER INFORMATION SYSTEMS; BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; NAVIGATION SYSTEMS; TRAFFIC CONTROL; TRANSPORTATION ROUTES;

ADVANCED TRAVELLER INFORMATION SYSTEMS; BEHAVIORAL RESPONSE; DRIVER ACCEPTANCE; DRIVER ROUTE CHOICE; EMPIRICAL EVALUATIONS; INCENTIVE STRATEGIES; INFORMATION STRATEGY; ROUTE CHOICE BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL NAVIGATION; TRAVEL-TIME;

TRAVEL TIME;

EID: 84950986429     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: 21694052     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/2423-07     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Helbing, D., I. Farkas, and T. Vicsek. Simulation Dynamical Features of Escape Panic. Nature, Vol. 407, No. 6803, 2000, pp. 487-490.
2. Zuurbier, F. Intelligent Route Guidance. PhD thesis. TRAIL thesis series T2010/8. Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands, 2010.
3. Mahmassani, H. S., and S. Peeta. Network Performance Under System Optimal and User Equilibrium Dynamic Assignments: Implications for Advanced Traveler Information Systems. In Transportation Research Record 1408, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1993, pp. 83-93.
4. van den Bosch, A., B. van Arem, M. Mahmod, and J. Misener. Reducing Time Delays on Congested Road Networks Using Social Navigation. IEEE Forum on Integrated and Sustainable Transportation Systems, Vienna, Austria, 2011, pp. 26-31.
5. Michon, J. A. A Critical View of Driver Behavior Models: What Do We Know, What Should We Do? In Human Behaviour and Traffic Safety (L. Evans and R. C. Schwing, eds.), Plenum Press, New York, 1985, pp. 485-520.
6. Xu, H. Decentralized Traffic Information System Design Based on Inter-Vehicle Communication. PhD dissertation. University of California, Riverside, 2006.
7. Schakel, W. J., B. van Arem, and B. Netten. Effects of Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control on Traffic Flow Stability. Proc., 13th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Funchal, Madeira Island, Portugal, 2010, pp. 759-764.
8. Fiorani, M., M. Mariani, F. Tango, and A. Saroldi. SASPENCE-Safe Speed and Safe Distance: Project Overview and Customer Benefit Analysis of a Novel Driver's Collision Avoidance Support System. Siena University, Tuscany, Italy, 2005.
9. Mobileye. http://www.Mobileye.com. Accessed April 2011.
10. Netten, B., I. Wilmink, J. Hogma, A. Hegyi, W. Wang, J. Baan, and I. Passchier. Dynamax InCar: System, Concepts, Research Questions, Hypothesis, Simulation and Evaluation. TNO report. Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research, 2011.
11. Wardrop, J. G. Some Theoretical Aspects of Road Traffic Research. Proc., Institute of Civil Engineers, Part II, 1952, pp. 325-378.
12. Wie, W., R. L. Tobin, D. Bernstein, and T. L. Friesz. A Comparison of System Optimum and User Equilibrium Dynamic Traffic Assignments with Schedule Delays. Transportation Research Part C, Vol. 3, No. 6, 1995, pp. 389-411.
13. Roughgarden, T., and E. Tardos. How Bad Is Selfish Routing? Journal of the ACM, Vol. 49, No. 2, 2002, pp. 236-259.
14. Boyce, D., and Q. Xiong. User-Optimal and System-Optimal Route Choices for a Large Road Network. Review of Network Economics, Vol. 3, No. 4, 2004.
15. Peeta, S., and H. S. Mahmassani. System Optimal and User Equilibrium Time-Dependent Traffic Assignment in Congested Networks. Annals of Operations Research, Vol. 60, No. 1, 1995, pp. 81-113.
16. Srinivasan, K. K., and H. S. Mahmassani. Modeling Inertia and Compliance Mechanisms in Route Choice Behavior Under Real-Time Information. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1725, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000, pp. 45-53.
17. Kahneman, D., and A. Tversky. Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk. Econometrica, Vol. 47, No. 2, 1979, pp. 263-292.
18. Chow, J. Y. J., G. Lee, and I. Yang. Genetic Algorithm to Estimate Cumulative Prospect Theory Parameters for Selection of High-Occupancy-Vehicle Lane. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2157, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010, pp. 71-77.
19. Ramos, G. M., E. Frejinger, W. Daamen, and S. P. Hoogendoorn. A Revealed Preference Study on Route Choices in a Congested Network with Real-Time Information. Proc., 13th International Conference on Travel Behaviour Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 2012.
20. Ben-Elia, E., and Y. Shiftan. Which Road Do I Take? A Learning-Based Model of Route-Choice Behaviour with Real-Time Information. Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 44, No. 4, 2010, pp. 249-264.
21. Verhoef, E. T., M. C. J. Bliemer, L. Steg, and G. P. Van Wee. Pricing in Road Transport: A Multidisciplinary Perspective. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, England, 2008.
22. Schuitema, G., L. Steg, and C. Vlek. Are Pricing Policies Effective and Acceptable for Changes in Car Usage? IATSS Research, Vol. 31, No. 1, 2007, pp. 92-111.
23. Knockaert, J., M. Bliemer, D. Ettema, D. Joksimovic, A. Mulder, J. Rouwendal, and D. van Amelsfort. Experimental Design and Modelling Spitsmijden, Bureau Spitsmijden, The Hague, Netherlands, 2007.
24. Bie, J., B. van Arem, and M. Igamberdiev. Economic Incentives to Influence Drivers' Route Choices for Safety Enhancement: A Win-Win Situation. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2187, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010, pp. 76-84.
25. Ajzen, I. The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 50, No. 2, 1991, pp. 179-211.
26. Mujcic, R., and P. Frijters. Altruism in Society: Evidence from a Natural Experiment Involving Commuters. IZA Discussion Paper 5648. 2011, http://ssrn.com/abstract=1820939.
27. Talaat, H. Decision Field Theoretical Analysis and Modelling of Dynamic Route Choice Deliberation Process. PhD thesis. University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 2008.
28. Koutsopoulos, H., T. Lotan, and Q. Yang. A Driving Simulator and Its Application for Modelling Route Choice in the Presence of Information. Transportation Research Part C, Vol. 2, No. 2, 1994, pp. 91-107.
29. Adler, J. L., W. W. Recker, and M. G. McNally. A Conflict Model and Interactive Simulator (FASTCARS) for Predicting Enroute Driver Behavior in Response to Real-Time Traffic Condition. Transportation, Vol. 20, No. 2, 1993, pp. 83-106.
30. Bonsall, P., P. Firmin, M. Anderson, I. Palmer, and P. Balmforth. Validating the Results of a Route Choice Simulator. Transportation Research Part C, Vol. 5, No. 6, 1997, pp. 371-387.
31. Mahmassani, H. S., and Y. H. Liu. Dynamics of Commuting Decision Behavior Under Advanced Traveller Information Systems. Transportation Research Part C, Vol. 7, No. 2-3, 1999, pp. 91-107.
32. Bogers, E. A. I., F. Viti, and S. P. Hoogendoorn. Joint Modeling of Advanced Travel Information Service, Habit, and Learning Impacts on Route Choice by Laboratory Simulator Experiments. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1926, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 189-197.
33. Chorus, C. G., J. E. E. Molin, T. A. Arentze, S. P. Hoogendoorn, H. J. P. Timmermans, and B. van Wee. Validation of a Multimodal Travel Simulator with Travel Information Provision. Transportation Research Part C, Vol. 15, No. 3, 2007, pp. 191-207.
34. Razo, M., and S. Gao. Strategic Thinking and Risk Attitudes in Route Choice: Stated Preference Approach. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2156, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010, pp. 28-35.
35. Razo, M., and S. Gao. A Rank-Dependent Expected Utility Model for Strategic Route Choice Model with Stated Preference Data. Transportation Research Part C, Vol. 27, 2013, pp. 117-130.
36. Di Pace, R., J. Dell'Orco, F. Galante, and M. Marinelli. Application of Data Fusion for Route Choice Modelling by Route Choice Driving Simulator Data. 17th WSC17 Online Conference on Soft Computing in Industrial Applicants Anywhere on Earth, 2012.
37. Schakel, W. J., V. L. Knoop, and B. van Arem. Integrated Lane Change Model with Relaxation and Synchronization. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2316, Trans portation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2012, pp. 47-57.
38. Ziliaskopoulos, A. K., and J. Zhang. A Zero Public Infrastructure Vehicle Based Traffic Information System. Presented at 82nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2003.
39. Krajzewicz, D., T. Boyom, and P. Wagner. Evaluation of the Performance of City-Wide, Autonomous Route Choice Based on Vehicleto-Vehicle Communication. Presented at 87th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2008.
40. Minciardi, R., and F. Gaetani. A Decentralized Optimal Control Scheme for Route Guidance in Urban Road Networks. Proc., IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2001, pp. 1195-1199.
41. Hawas, Y. E., and H. S. Mahmassani. Comparative Analysis of Robustness of Centralized and Distributed Network Route Control Systems in Incident Situations. In Transportation Research Record 1537, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1996, pp. 83-90.
42. Yang, X., and W. W. Recker. Modeling Dynamic Vehicle Navigation in a Self-Organizing, Peer-to-Peer, Distributed Traffic Information System. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems, Vol. 10, No. 4, 2006, pp. 185-204.
43. Kim, H. K. Development and Evaluation of Advanced Traveler Information System (ATIS) Using Vehicle-to-Vehicle Communication System. PhD dissertation. Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, 2010.
44. Chu, L., J. S. Oh, and W. W. Recker. Adaptive Kalman Filter Based Freeway Travel Time Estimation. Presented at 84th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2005.
45. Han, Q., H. J. P. Timmermans, B. G. C. Dellaert, and F. van Raaij. Route Choice Under Uncertainty: Effects of Recommendations. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2082, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2008, pp. 72-80.
46. Heyman, J., and D. Ariely. Effort for Payment: A Tale of Two Markets. Psychological Science, Vol. 15, No. 11, 2004, pp. 787-793.
47. Mahmassani, H., and G. L. Chang. On Boundedly-Rational User Equilibrium in Transportation Systems. Transportation Science, Vol. 21, No. 2, 1987, pp. 89-99.
48. Yang, H., and X. Wang. Managing Network Mobility with Tradable Credits. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 45, No. 3, 2001, pp. 580-594.
49. Jahn, O., R. H. Möhring, S. Schulz, and N. E. Stier-Moses. System-Optimal Routing of Traffic Flows with User Constraints in Networks with Congestion. Operations Research, Vol. 53, No. 4, 2005, pp. 600-616.
50. Yang, I., and R. Jayakrishnan. Modeling Framework to Analyze Effect of Multiple Traffic Information Service Providers on Traffic Network Performance. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2333, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2013, pp. 55-65.