Physical properties of bacterial cellulose composites for wound dressings

Food Hydrocolloids

Volumn 53, Issue , 2016, Pages 75-83

  Chang, Wen Shuo ^a   Chen, Hui Huang ^a  

^a NATIONAL ILAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Bacterial cellulose; Chitosan; Composite; Physical property; Wound dressing

Indexed keywords

ACETIC ACID; BYPRODUCTS; CELLULOSE; FABRICATION; FLAVONOIDS; OXIDATION; PHYSICAL PROPERTIES;

'DRY' [; BACTERIAL CELLULOSE; BIO-FILMS; CARBOXYL GROUP CONTENTS; CELLULOSE COMPOSITES; DEGREE OF OXIDATIONS; HIGH ELONGATION; PERIODIC ACID; SWELLING RATIO; WOUND DRESSINGS;

CHITOSAN;

EID: 84950276967     PISSN: 0268005X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2014.12.009     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Ashammakhi, N., Ndreu, A., Yang, Y., Ylikauppila, H., & Nikkola, L. (2007). Nanofiber based scaffolds for tissue engineering. European Journal of Plastic Surgery, 35, 135-149.
2. ASTM. (2002). Standard test methods for tensile properties thin plastic sheeting (pp. 882-902). American Society for Testing and Materials D.
3. Bodhibukkana, C., Srichana, T., Kaewnopparat, S., Tangthong, N., Bouking, P., Martin, G.P., et al. (2006). Composite membrane of bacterially-derived cellulose and molecularly imprinted polymer for use as a transdermal enantioselective controlled-release system of racemic propranolol. Journal of Controlled Release, 113, 43-56.
4. Bowman, M.C., & Cooke, I.D. (1994). The efficacy of synthetic adhesion barriers in infertility surgery. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 101, 3-6.
5. Chang, S.T., Chen, L.C., Lin, S.B., & Chen, H.H. (2012). Nano-biomaterials application: morphology and physical properties of bacterial cellulose/gelatin composites via crosslinking. Food Hydrocolloids, 27, 137-144.
6. Chawla, P.R., Bajaj, I.B., Survase, S.A., & Singhal, R.S. (2009). Microbial cellulose: fermentative production and applications. Food Technology and Biotechnology, 47, 107-124.
7. Chiaoprakobkij, N., Sanchavanakit, N., Subbalekha, K., & Pavasant, P. (2011). Characterization and biocompatibility of bacterial cellulose/alginate composite sponges with human keratinocytes and gingival fibroblasts. Carbohydrate Polymers, 85, 548-553.
8. CNS9638-N5200. (1982). Method of test for calcium and phosphorus in food stuff. In Chinese National Standard. Taipei: Bureau of Standards, Metrology & Inspection, M.O.E.A., Taiwan.
9. Costa, P., & Sousa Lobo, J.M. (2001). Modeling and comparison of dissolution profiles. European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 13, 123-133.
10. Czaja, W., Krystynowicz, A., Bielecki, S., & Brown, R.M. (2006). Microbial cellulosethe natural power to heal wounds. Biomaterials, 27, 145-151.
11. Da Silva, M.A., Bierhalz, A.C. K., & Kieckbusc, T.G. (2012). Modelling natamycin release from alginate/chitosan active films. International Journal of Food Science and Technology, 47, 740-746.
12. Fernandes, S.C. M., Freire, C.S. R., Silvestre, A.J. D., Neto, C.P., Gandini, A., Berglund, L.A., et al. (2010). Transparent chitosan films reinforced with a high content of 317 nanofibrillated cellulose. Carbohydrate Polymers, 81, 394-401.
13. Fontana, J.D., Franco, V.C., Souza, S.J., Lyra, I.N., & Souza, A.M. (1991). Nature of plant stimulators in the production of Acetobacter xylinum ("Tea Fungus") biofilm used in skin therapy. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 28-29, 341-351.
14. Fontana, J.D., Souza, A.M., Fontana, C.K., Toriani, I.L., & Moreschi, J.C. (1990). Acetobacter cellulose pellicle as a temporary skin substitute. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 24-25, 253-264.
15. Gerlier, D., & Thomasset, N. (1986). Use of MTT colorimetric assay to measure cell activation. Journal of Immunological Methods, 94, 57-63.
16. Gurny, R., Doelker, E., & Peppas, N.A. (1982). Modeling of drug sustained release of water soluble drugs from porous, hydrophobic polymers. Biomaterials, 3, 27-32.
17. Ho, Y.C., Mi, F.L., Sung, H.W., & Kuo, P.L. (2009). Heparin-functionalized chitosanalginate scaffolds for controlled release of growth factor. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 376, 69-75.
18. Huang, H.C., Chen, L.C., Lin, S.B., Hsu, C.P., & Chen, H.H. (2010). In situ modification of bacterial cellulose network structure by adding interfering substances during fermentation. Bioresource Technology, 101, 6084-6091.
19. Hungund, B.S., Prabhu, S., Shetty, C., Acharya, S., Prabhu, V., & Gupta, S.G. (2013). Production of bacterial cellulose from Gluconacetobacter persimmonis GH-2 using dual and cheaper carbon sources. Microbial & Biochemical Technology, 5, 31-33.
20. Kawecki, M., Krystynowicz, A., Wysota, K., Czaja, W., & Sakiel, S. (2006). Microbial cellulosedthe natural power to heal wounds. Biomaterials, 27, 145-151.
21. Keshk, S.M. A. S. (2014). Bacterial cellulose production and its industrial applications. Journal of Bioprocessing & Biotechniques, 4, 150.
22. Kim, U.J., Kuga, S., Wada, M., Okano, T., & Kondo, T. (2000). Periodate oxidation of crystalline cellulose. Biomacromolecules, 1, 488-492.
23. Kumar, V., & Yang, T. (1999). Analysis of carboxyl content in oxidized celluloses by solid-state 13C CP: MAS NMR spectroscopy. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 184, 219-226.
24. Li, X., Li, B., Ma, J., Wang, X., & Zhang, S. (2014). Development of a silk fibroin/HTCC/ PVA sponge for chronic wound dressing. Journal of Bioactive and Compatible Polymers, 29, 398-411.
25. Li, J., Wan, Y., Li, Y., Liang, H., & Wang, J. (2009). Preparation and characterization of 2,3-dialdehyde bacterial cellulose for potential biodegradable tissue engineering scaffolds. Materials Science and Engineering C, 29, 1635-1642.
26. Maeno, S., Niki, Y., Matsumoto, H., Morika, H., Yatabe, T., & Funayama, A. (2005). The effect of calcium ion concentration on osteoblast viability, proliferation and differentiation in monolayer and 3D culture. Biomaterials, 26, 4847-4855.
27. Menachen, C., & Aharon, E. (1969). Oxidaton of cellulose by hydrogen peroxide. Cellulose Chemistry and Technology, 3, 9-20.
28. Meng, X., Tian, F., Yang, J., He, C.N., Xing, N., & Li, F. (2010). Chitosan and alginate polyelectrolyte complex membranes and their properties for wound dressing application. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, 21, 1751-1759.
29. Moreira, S., Silva, N.B., Almeida-Lima, J., Rocha, H.A., Medeiros, S.R., Alves, C., Jr., et al. (2009). BC nanofibers: In vitro study of genotoxicity and cell proliferation. Toxicology Letters, 189, 235-241.
30. Morris, E.R., & Ross-Murphy, S.B. (1981). Chain flexibility of polysaccharides and glycoproteins from viscosity measurement. In D. H. Northcote (Ed.), Techniques in carbohydrate metabolism (pp. 1-46). Amsterdam: Elsevier/North-Holland.
31. Nakayama, A., Kakugo, A., Gong, J.P., Osada, Y., Takai, M., Erata, T., et al. (2004). High mechanical strength double-network hydrogel with bacterial cellulose. Advanced Functional Materials, 14, 1124-1128.
32. Okiyama, A., Shirae, H., Kano, H., & Yamanaka, S. (1992). Bacterial cellulose. I. Twostage fermentation process for cellulose production by Acetobacter aceti. Food Hydrocolloids, 6, 471-477.
33. Ougiya, H., Watanabe, K., Morinaga, Y., & Yoshinaga, F. (1997). Emulsion effect of bacterial cellulose. Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry, 61, 1541-1545.
34. Paul, W., & Sharma, C.P. (2004). Chitosan and alginate wound dressings: a short review. Trends in Biomaterials & Artificial Organs, 18, 18-23.
35. Phisalaphong, M., & Jatupaiboon, N. (2008). Biosynthesis and characterization of bacterial cellulose-chitosan film. Carbohydrate Polymers, 74, 482-488.
36. Ritger, P.L., & Peppas, N.A. (1987). A simple equation for description of solute release. I. Fickian and non-Fickian release from non-swellable devices in the form of slabs, spheres, cylinders or discs. Journal of Controlled Release, 5, 23-36.
37. Shuangyun, L., Wenjuan, G., & Gu, H.Y. (2008). Construction, application and biosafety of silver nanocrystalline chitosan wound dressing. Burns, 34, 623-628.
38. Sudheesh Kumar, P.T., Abhilash, S., Manzoor, K., Nair, S.V., Tamura, H., & Jayakumar, R. (2010). Preparation and characterization of novel b-chitin/nanosilver composite scaffolds for wound dressing applications. Carbohydrate Polymers, 80, 761-767.
39. Venkatesan, J., Bhatnagar, I., & Kim, S.K. (2014). Chitosan-alginate biocomposite containing fucoidan for bone tissue engineering. Marine Drugs, 12, 300-316.
40. Wiegand, C., Elsner, P., Hipler, U., & Klemm, D. (2006). Protease and ROS activities influenced by a composite of bacterial cellulose and collagen typelin vitro. Cellulose, 13, 689-696.
41. Wu, J., Zheng, Y., Wen, X., Lin, Q., Chen, X., & Wu, Z. (2014). Silver nanoparticle/ bacterial cellulose gel membranes for antibacterial wound dressing: investigation in vitro and in vivo. Biomedical Materials, 9 (on line).
42. Yamanaka, S., Watanabe, K., Kitamura, N., Iguchi, M., Mitsuhashi, S., Nishi, Y., et al. (1989). The structure and mechanical properties of sheets prepared from bacterial cellulose. Journal of Materials Science, 24, 3141-3145.
43. Yang, S.J. (2011). Development of fabricated composites film with bacterial cellulose and the investigation of its physical properties. Master thesis of Department of Food Science. I-Lan, Taiwan: National Ilan University.
44. Yang, J.M., Yang, S.J., Lin, H.T., Wu, T.H., & Chen, H.J. (2008). Chitosan containing PU/Poly (NIPAAm) thermosensitive membrane for wound dressing. Materials Science and Engineering C, 28, 150-156.