Addressing Empathic Failures

Current Directions in Psychological Science

Volumn 24, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 471-476

  Zaki, Jamil ^a   Cikara, Mina ^b  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

empathy; intergroup conflict; interventions; perspective taking; prosocial behavior

Indexed keywords

EID: 84950267092     PISSN: 09637214     EISSN: 14678721     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0963721415599978     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. E.G.BruneauR.Saxe (2012). (See References). A compelling demonstration of a case in which mentalizing failed but perspective giving temporarily succeeded in improving low-power groups’ attitudes toward high-power groups.
2. A.NadlerI.Liviatan (2006). (See References). Two studies that found that expressions of empathy (supposedly) from a key Palestinian political leader increased Israeli Jewish participants’ willingness to reconcile, but only among participants who already reported high trust in Palestinians.
3. T.SaguyN.TauschJ.F.DovidioF.Pratto (2009). (See References). Two studies that explored the ironic effects of positive intergroup contact on disadvantaged groups: greater expectations of equitable treatment from high-power groups, and decreased support for change to make conditions between groups more equitable.
4. J.Zaki (2014). (See References). A review that provides a comprehensive account of empathy as a motivated phenomenon and describes several motives that drive people to approach or avoid empathy.
5. R.B.AdamsN.O.RuleR.G.FranklinJr.E.WangM.T.StevensonS.YoshikawaN.. Ambady (2010). Cross-cultural reading the mind in the eyes: An fMRI investigation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 97–108.
6. G.W.Allport (1954). The nature of prejudice. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.
7. A.AtaB.BastianD.Lusher (2009). Intergroup contact in context: The mediating role of social norms and group-based perceptions on the contact–prejudice link. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 33, 498–506.
8. D.BallietP.A.Van Lange (2013). Trust, conflict, and cooperation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 1090–1112.
9. D.Bar-TalE.Halperin (2011). Socio-psychological barriers to conflict resolution. In D.Bar-Tal (Ed.), Intergroup conflicts and their resolution: A social psychological perspective (pp. 217–240). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
10. C.D.BatsonN.AhmadE.L.Stocks (2004). Benefits and liabilities of empathy-induced altruism. In A.G.Miller (Ed.), The social psychology of good and evil (pp. 359–385). New York, NY: Guilford.
11. C.D.BatsonJ.FultzP.A.Schoenrade (1987). Distress and empathy: Two qualitatively distinct vicarious emotions with different motivational consequences. Journal of Personality, 55, 19–39.
12. C.D.BatsonM.P.PolycarpouE.Harmon-JonesH.J.ImhoffE.C.MitchenerL.L.BednarL.. Highberger (1997). Empathy and attitudes: Can feeling for a member of a stigmatized group improve feelings toward the group?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 105–118.
13. R.J.Blair (2005). Responding to the emotions of others: Dissociating forms of empathy through the study of typical and psychiatric populations. Consciousness and Cognition, 14, 698–718.
14. E.G.BruneauM.CikaraR.Saxe (2015). Causes and consequences of parochial empathy. Manuscript submitted for publication.
15. E.G.BruneauR.Saxe (2012). The power of being heard: The benefits of “perspective-giving” in the context of intergroup conflict. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 855–866.
16. M.Cikara (2015). Intergroup schadenfreude: Motivating participation in collective violence. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 3, 12–17.
17. M.CikaraE.G.BruneauR.Saxe (2011). Us and them: Intergroup failures of empathy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 149–153.
18. M.CikaraE.BruneauJ.Van BavelR.Saxe (2014). Their pain gives us pleasure: How intergroup dynamics shape empathic failures and counter-empathic responses. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 55, 110–125.
19. C.S.CrandallA.EshlemanL.O’Brien (2002). Social norms and the expression and suppression of prejudice: The struggle for internalization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 359–378.
20. A.J.CuddyM.S.RockM.I.Norton (2007). Aid in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina: Inferences of secondary emotions and intergroup helping. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 10, 107–118.
21. M.Davis (1994). Empathy: A social psychological approach. New York, NY: Westview Press.
22. J.Decety (2011). Dissecting the neural mechanisms mediating empathy. Emotion Review, 3, 92–108.
23. J.DecetyK.J.Yoder (2015). Empathy and motivation for justice: Cognitive empathy and concern, but not emotional empathy, predict sensitivity to injustice for others. Social Neuroscience. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/17470919.2015.1029593
24. J.DixonL.R.TroppK.DurrheimC.Tredoux (2010). “Let them eat harmony”: Prejudice-reduction strategies and attitudes of historically disadvantaged groups. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19, 76–80.
25. C.S.DweckE.L.Leggett (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256–273.
26. T.EyalN.Epley (2010). How to seem telepathic: Enabling mind reading by matching construal. Psychological Science, 21, 700–705.
27. G.GiniP.AlbieroB.BenelliG.Altoè (2007). Does empathy predict adolescents’ bullying and defending behavior?Aggressive Behavior, 33, 467–476.
28. N.J.GoldsteinI.S.VezichJ.R.Shapiro (2014). Perceived perspective taking: When others walk in our shoes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106, 941–960.
29. E.HalperinR.PoratM.TamirJ.J.Gross (2013). Can emotion regulation change political attitudes in intractable conflicts? From the laboratory to the field. Psychological Science, 24, 106–111.
30. O.S.HaqueA.Waytz (2012). Dehumanization in medicine causes, solutions, and functions. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 176–186.
31. G.HeinG.SilaniK.PreuschoffC.D.BatsonT.Singer (2010). Neural responses to in-group and out-group members’ suffering predict individual differences in costly helping. Neuron, 68, 149–160.
32. A.NadlerI.Liviatan (2006). Intergroup reconciliation: Effects of adversary’s expressions of empathy, responsibility, and recipients’ trust. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 459–470.
33. E.NookD.OngS.MorelliJ.MitchellJ.Zaki (2015). Prosocial conformity: Prosocial norms generalize across behavior and empathy. Manuscript submitted for publication.
34. E.L.Paluck (2011). Peer pressure against prejudice: A high school field experiment examining social network change. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 350–358.
35. J.R.PierceG.J.KilduffA.D.GalinskyN.Sivanathan (2013). From glue to gasoline: How competition turns perspective takers unethical. Psychological Science, 24, 1986–1994.
36. M.Prior (2013). Media and political polarization. Annual Review of Political Science, 16, 101–127.
37. T.SaguyN.TauschJ.F.DovidioF.Pratto (2009). The irony of harmony intergroup contact can produce false expectations for equality. Psychological Science, 20, 114–121.
38. L.RaymondS.L.WeldonD.KellyX.B.ArriagaA.M.Clark (2013). Making change: Norm-based strategies for institutional change to address intractable problems. Political Research Quarterly, 67, 197–211.
39. J.M.RichardsJ.J.Gross (2000). Emotion regulation and memory: The cognitive costs of keeping one’s cool. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 410–424.
40. H.RiessJ.M.KelleyR.W.BaileyE.J.DunnM.Phillips (2012). Empathy training for resident physicians: A randomized controlled trial of a neuroscience-informed curriculum. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 27, 1280–1286.
41. M.Şahin (2012). An investigation into the efficiency of empathy training program on preventing bullying in primary schools. Children and Youth Services Review, 34, 1325–1330.
42. C.SalmivalliM.Voeten (2004). Connections between attitudes, group norms, and behaviour in bullying situations. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 28, 246–258.
43. M.SandstromH.MakoverM.Bartini (2013). Social context of bullying: Do misperceptions of group norms influence children’s responses to witnessed episodes?Social Influence, 8, 196–215.
44. K.SchumannJ.ZakiC.S.Dweck (2014). Addressing the empathy deficit: Beliefs about the malleability of empathy predict effortful responses when empathy is challenging. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 475–493.
45. N.ShnabelA.Nadler (2008). A needs-based model of reconciliation: Satisfying the differential emotional needs of victim and perpetrator as a key to promoting reconciliation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 116–132.
46. L.L.ShuN.MazarF.GinoD.ArielyM.H.Bazerman (2012). Signing at the beginning makes ethics salient and decreases dishonest self-reports in comparison to signing at the end. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 109, 15197–15200.
47. T.SingerO.Klimecki (2014). Empathy and compassion. Current Biology, 24, R875–R878.
48. C.StangorG.B.SechristJ.T.Jost (2001). Changing racial beliefs by providing consensus information. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 486–496.
49. M.TarrantS.DazeleyT.Cottom (2009). Social categorization and empathy for out-group members. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 427–446.
50. A.R.ToddA.D.Galinsky (2014). Perspective-taking as a strategy for improving intergroup relations: Evidence, mechanisms, and qualifications. Social & Personality Psychology Compass, 8, 374–387.
51. A.R.ToddK.HankoA.D.GalinskyT.Mussweiler (2011). When focusing on differences leads to similar perspectives. Psychological Science, 22, 134–141.
52. J.Zaki (2014). Empathy: A motivated account. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 1608–1647.
53. J.ZakiK.Ochsner (2012). The neuroscience of empathy: Progress, pitfalls, and promise. Nature Neuroscience, 15, 675–680.
54. J.ZakiK.Ochsner (in press). Empathy. In L.F.BarrettM.LewisJ.Haviland-Jones (Eds.), The handbook of emotions (4th ed.). New York, NY: Guilford.