Erratum: Signing at the beginning makes ethics salient and decreases dishonest self-reports in comparison to signing at the end (Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. (2012) 109 (15197–15200) DOI:10.1073/pnas.1209746109);Signing at the beginning makes ethics salient and decreases dishonest self-reports in comparison to signing at the end

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 109, Issue 38, 2012, Pages 15197-15200

  Shu, Lisa L ^a   Mazar, Nina ^b   Gino, Francesca ^c   Ariely, Dan ^d   Bazerman, Max H ^c  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^c HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL   (United States)

^d DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Fraud; Morality; Nudge; Policy making

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FRAUD; HONESTY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL RECORD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SELF REPORT;

EID: 84866554163     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2115397118     Document Type: Erratum

References (16)

1. US Department of Treasury (2009). Update on Reducing the Federal Tax Gap and Improving Voluntary Compliance. Available at http://www.irs.gov/pub/ newsroom/tax-gap-report--final-version.pdf. Accessed August 2, 2012.
2. Coalition Against Insurance Fraud (2006) Coalition Against Insurance Fraud Annual Report (CAIF, Washington, DC).
3. Mazar N, Amir O, Ariely D (2008) The dishonesty of honest people: A theory of self-concept maintenance. J Mark Res 45:633-644.
4. Shu LL, Gino F, Bazerman MH (2011) Dishonest deed, clear conscience: When cheating leads tomoral disengagement andmotivated forgetting. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 37:330-349.
5. Haley KJ, Fessler DMT (2005) Nobody's watching? Subtle cues affect generosity in an anonymous economic game. Evol Hum Behav 26:245-256. (Pubitemid 40587391)
6. Rigdon M, Ishii K, Watabe M, Kitayama S (2009) Minimal social cues in the dictator game. J Econ Psychol 30:358-367.
7. Bateson M, Nettle D, Roberts G (2006) Cues of being watched enhance cooperation in a real-world setting. Biol Lett 2:412-414. (Pubitemid 44387375)
8. Kettle KL, Häubl G (2011) The signature effect: Signing influences consumption-related behavior by priming self-identity. J Consum Res 38:474-489.
9. Duval TS, Wicklund RA(1972) A Theory of Objective Self Awareness (Academic,NewYork).
10. Festinger L, Carlsmith JM (1959) Cognitive consequences of forced compliance. J Abnorm Psychol 58:203-210.
11. Bandura A, Barbaranelli C, Caprara G, Pastorelli C (1996) Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. J Pers Soc Psychol 71:364-374.
12. Bassili JN, Smith MC (1986) On the spontaneity of trait attribution: Converging evidence for the role of cognitive strategy. J Pers Soc Psychol 50:239-245.
13. Tulving E, Schacter DL, Stark HA (1982) Priming effects in word-fragment completion are independent of recognition memory. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 8: 336-342.
14. Preacher KJ, Hayes AF (2004) SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 36:717-731. (Pubitemid 40251423)
15. US Department of Transportation (2009). Office of Highway Policy Information, Federal Highway Administration. Available at http://tinyurl.com/ UShighwaystats. Accessed August 2, 2012.
16. Thaler RH, Sunstein CR (1998) Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth and Happiness (Yale Univ Press, New Haven, CT).